Scribd
Upload
21 views

Social Security System Strategic Performance Management System Individual Performance Commitment and Review (Ipcr) Form

This document is an Individual Performance Commitment and Review (IPCR) form for Maria Teresa Sanchez Juanich for the period of July 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015. It outlines her key performance commitments and indicators in areas like compliance, core functions, and service quality. Her actual accomplishments are then rated against the targets. She achieved a total score of 97 and an adjectival rating of "Very Satisfactory" for the period. The form requires signatures from her supervisor and next higher supervisor to approve the performance review.

Uploaded by

Sam Lago
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as ODT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
21 views

Social Security System Strategic Performance Management System Individual Performance Commitment and Review (Ipcr) Form

This document is an Individual Performance Commitment and Review (IPCR) form for Maria Teresa Sanchez Juanich for the period of July 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015. It outlines her key performance commitments and indicators in areas like compliance, core functions, and service quality. Her actual accomplishments are then rated against the targets. She achieved a total score of 97 and an adjectival rating of "Very Satisfactory" for the period. The form requires signatures from her supervisor and next higher supervisor to approve the performance review.

Uploaded by

Sam Lago
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as ODT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SSS SPMS FORM 1

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW (IPCR) FORM v.2016-08-02


For Supervisory and Non-Supervisory Positions
(Please read instructions at the back before filling out this form)
NAME (Last name, First name Middle name Suffix) POSITION TITLE / DESIGNATED POSITION (if applicable) EMPLOYEE ID NO.
JUANICH, MARIA TERESA SANCHEZ CORPORATE EXECUTIVE OFFICER II 851158
SECTION / TEAM (if applicable) BRANCH / DEPARTMENT / OFFICE / UNIT DIVISION / GROUP / SECTOR OFFICIAL TIME
MEMBER SERVICES SECTION GENERAL SANTOS BRACH SOUTHERN MINDANAO 2 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM
COMMITMENT CONTRACT
I commit to deliver and agree to be rated on the attainment of the Performance Commitment ( Part 1) in accordance with the indicated Success Indicators for the period 7/01/15 to 12/31/2015
07/01/2016
APPROVED BY: Signature of Ratee Date
JOVE L. COLASITO 07/01/2016 JOVE L. COLASITO 07/01/2016
Signature over Printed Name and Position Title of Immediate Supervisor Date Signature over Printed Name and Position Title of Next Higher Supervisor Date
PART I PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT PART II ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENT AND RATING
WEIGHT MAJOR FINAL OUTPUT SUCCESS INDICATOR (SI) % WEIGHTED REMARK
CATEGORY ALLOCATION ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENT ACCOMPLISHED (Use separate sheet, if necessary. Indicate excess from %
(whole number only)
(MFO) (Target + Measure) (cannot exceed 100) SCORE ACCOMPLISHED if more than 100%)

Strategic Functions
Compliance to ARTA REQUIREMENTS 10 Arta rating obtained 92% ARTA rating obtained 92.39% 100.00% 10.00
Core Functions
Increase the number of Ers registered in the web 5 Ers registered in the web increased 40% of Ers under the Branch Account registered in the 94.00% 94.00% 5.00
web
Increase in the number of Ers filing R3s 5 Ers filing R3s electronically 100% of paying Ers under the Branch Account filing 2785 of 3818 73.00% 3.70
electronically during the period electronically during the period
Increase in the number of Ers submitting ML2s 5 Ers submitting ML2s electronically 100% of Ers under the Branch Account with more than 410 of 635 65.00% 3.30
electronically increased 10EEs with existing salary loans (except HH Ers)
submitting ML2s electronically (moving target)
Compliance to SLA on processing time 65 Application reviewed Applications/s reviewed with the approved committed 100.00% 100.00% 65.00
processing time for 2015
Service Quality 10 Service Quality rating obtained 75% Service Quality obtained 78.37% 100.00% 100.00
Support Functions
100 0.00

Total Weight Allocation 100.00 Total Score 97.00


Numerical Rating 4
Adjectival Rating VS
COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DEVELOPMENT PURPOSES (Please see attached documents and/or additional sheets, if any.)

RATING APPROVAL
DISCUSSED WITH: RECOMMENDING APPROVAL: APPROVED BY: RATING SCALE
The assessment of my performance in Part II has been shown and discussed with Score Numerical Adjectival
me by my immediate supervisor (please shade the appropriate box). JOVE L. COLASITO 01/28/16 100.00 5 Outstanding (O)
I agree with the Performance Rating. Signature over Printed Name of Immediate Date 90-99.99 4 Very Satisfactory (VS)
I disagree with the Performance Rating. Attached on a separate document Supervisor 75-89.99 3 Satisfactory (S)
is/are the following reason/s. 60-74.99 2 Unsatisfactory (US)
01/28/16 JOVE L. COLASITO 01/28/16 JOVE L. COLASITO 01/28/16 59.99-below 1 Poor (P)
Signature of Ratee Date Signature over Printed Name of Date Signature over Printed Name of Date Rating Scale as approved by the SSS PCEO and SPMS
Next Higher Supervisor Branch/Dept./Office/Unit Head PMT on 02 February 2016.

You might also like