0% found this document useful (0 votes)
72 views

Laboratory Evaluation of Asphalt Mixtures Containing Various Percentages of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement

AJSC2012(1.2-16)

Uploaded by

prmrao
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
72 views

Laboratory Evaluation of Asphalt Mixtures Containing Various Percentages of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement

AJSC2012(1.2-16)

Uploaded by

prmrao
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

ISSN: 2186-8476, ISSN: 2186-8468 Print

Vol. 1. No. 2. June 2012

LABORATORY EVALUATION OF ASPHALT MIXTURES CONTAINING


VARIOUS PERCENTAGES OF RECLAIMED ASPHALT PAVEMENT
Arshad Hussain1, Qiu Yanjun2
School of Civil Engineering,
Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu-610031,
CHINA.
1
[email protected] , 2 [email protected]

ABSTRACT

The use of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP) has been enormously increased from the
last two decades. In fact using RAP in pavement construction has now become most
common practice in many countries. Using RAP not only economical and environmental
friendly but also preserve the natural resources and similar or even better in
performance than virgin asphalt mixtures. This paper presents an experimental study to
evaluate the effect of various types and percentages of RAP on the properties of asphalt
mixtures. Four mixtures, which were the combination of two different virgin aggregates
and two different RAP sources, were studied in this research. RAP material was blended
with virgin aggregate such that all specimens tested had approximately the same
gradation. Mixtures containing RAP showed significant variability and the variability
increased with the increase in RAP content.

Keywords: Reclaimed asphalt, Mixture design, Marshall stability, Ductility, Penetration

INTRODUCTION
The use of reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) in the construction of new hot-mix asphalt (HMA)
pavements has increased in recent years. RAP is old asphalt pavement that is milled up or ripped
off the roadway [1]. This material can be reused in new asphalt mixtures because the components
of the mix (the asphalt binder and aggregate) still have value. Using RAP in new mixtures can
reduce the amount of new material that has to be added, saving money and natural resources. In
addition, several studies have shown that the RAP mixtures have performed equal or better than
the virgin mixtures [2, 3, 4]. Due to these advantages of using RAP, many state highway
agencies are moving toward rising the percentages of RAP in their hot-mix asphalt pavements
[5]
. RAP has been used in hot mix asphalt pavements in various percentages that reached in some
cases up to 80% [5]. Most studies have been used a range form 20-50% [1, 6, 7]. When RAP is
reused in a new mixture, it is necessary to properly account for the old material in the new
design. The aggregate from the RAP has to be included with the new aggregate, and that blend of
aggregate has to meet certain properties. Past experience with RAP in Marshall and Superpave
mixtures has shown that properly designed and constructed RAP mixes can perform as well as,
or even better than mixtures made with all new materials. In the current study only the Marshall
method was used for the evaluation of asphalt mixtures containing various RAP ratios. RAP
contents of 0, 10, 20, 30, 45, 60 and 100 % were evaluated in this study to see the effect of
various RAP contents and sources on the mixture properties.

() www. leena-luna.co.jp
. P a g e |156
ISSN: 2186-8476, ISSN: 2186-8468 Print
Vol. 1. No. 2. June 2012 ASIAN JOURNAL OF NATURAL & APPLIED SCIENCES

MATERIALS CONSIDERATION
Virgin Aggregates
In Pakistan, various aggregate sources are available for road constructions. For this research,
virgin aggregates have been collected from two dominant aggregate sources Margalla and Dina,
which are considered to be the largest live aggregate quarries in the country. The type of
aggregate from Margalla and Dina is crushed limestone and quartzite respectively. The limestone
from Margalla is one of the best mechanically fractured aggregate in the country free from
rounded particles or river bed gravel. On the other hand Dina quarry aggregates contain riverbed
and rounded gravels. The pavement construction and maintenance consume large amount of
aggregates from these two quarries which diminishes the natural resources.
Virgin Binder
Asphalt binder 60/70 penetration grade which is being in use in most highways in the country
has been acquired from Attock Refinery Limited (ARL) at Rawalpindi. ARL is using heavy
crude oil blend ~ 7 to 10 crude containing 3-5% asphaltenes for the production of 60/70 and
80/100 grade asphalt. Most of local heavy crude are produced from northern part of the country.
The asphalt binder price is increasing day by day due to increase in the cost of the crude oil.
RAP Material
RAP is the old asphalt pavement produced by milling existing asphalt pavement or crushing old
removal from asphalt pavements. For this study the RAP material has been obtained in form of
chunks from two sites (Mandra&Nowshera) along national highway N-5, Pakistan. The RAP
materials were subjected to severe aging and weathering on the site. The RAP chunks were
crushed and screened into different sizes to meet the specified grading requirements. The two
RAPs, two virgin aggregates and virgin binder ARL60/70 were used in this research to
investigate the effects of RAP on the resulting mixture properties. RAP contents of 0, 10, 20, 30,
45, 60 and 100 % were evaluated in this study to see the effect of various RAP content and
sources on the mixture properties.

LABORATORY EVALUATION
In order to access the percentage of the asphalt present in the RAP material, asphalt extraction
was done using AASTHO T 160, Quantitative Extraction of Bitumen from Paving Mixtures
and AASTHO T 170, Recovery of Asphalt from Solution by Abson Method. The gradations of
virgin and RAP materials after extraction are shown in Table 1. The asphalt content of RAP was
found to be 5.05% and 5.57% for the Mandra and Nowshera RAP respectively. The laboratory
testing for this research was limited to 25mm nominal maximum aggregate size (NMAS)
mixture. Four different mixtures combinations of two virgin and two RAP sources were designed
and tested as shown below.
Margalla Base + Nowshera Rap denoted in this paper by (MB+N RAP)
Margalla Base + Mandra Rap denoted by (MB+M RAP)
Dina Base + Nowshera RAP (DB+N RAP)
Dina Base + Mandra Rap (DB+M RAP)

www.ajsc.leena-luna.co.jp Leena and Luna International,Oyama, Japan.


157|P a g e Copyright 2012
ISSN: 2186-8476, ISSN: 2186-8468 Print
Vol. 1. No. 2. June 2012

Table 1:Virgin and RAP gradation (after extraction)

Source
Virgin Mandra RAP Nowshera RAP
Sieve Size (in)

Percent Passing
37.5 100 100 100
25 93 92 95
19 80 77 83
12.5 65 60 68
4.75 40 42 39
2.36 25 26 30
.18 18 20 19
0.6 14 15 13
0.3 11 12 10
0.075 4 8 5

Prior to use RAP in recycling asphalt, it is essential to evaluate the extracted binder properties
and their blends with virgin binder. The recovered binder and its blends with virgin binder were
tested for penetration and ductility and the results are presented in Table 2. Literature search
reveals that normally low RAP content up to 20 % can be designed without changing the binder
grade. From table 2 it can be seen that even with 40% RAP, the penetration and ductility show
that the aged binders still have enough life. Since the virgin binder ARL 60/70 selected is soft
binder (Graded as PG58-16 according to Superpave system) so this will serve as rejuvenating
agent in the mixture.
Table 2: Penetration and Ductility for all the blends

RAP Source RAP/Virgin Ratio Penetration Ductility (cm)


0/100 66 >100
40/60 35 54
70/30 31 40
Mandra
80/20 14 29
90/10 12 20
100/0 7 16
0/100 66 >100
40/60 49 90
70/30 32 70
Nowshera
80/20 29 35
90/10 22 18
100/0 15 13

() www. leena-luna.co.jp
. P a g e |158
ISSN: 2186-8476, ISSN: 2186-8468 Print
Vol. 1. No. 2. June 2012 ASIAN JOURNAL OF NATURAL & APPLIED SCIENCES

As NMAS for base course mix is 1 inch therefore 6-inch diameter specimens were prepared for
Marshall testing following ASTM D 5581. Mixtures have been designed for heavy traffic only
using the Modified Marshall criteria shown in Table 3. It was assumed that the total asphalt
content in the mixture is equal to the 100% virgin base course control mixtures. The optimum
asphalt content for the control mixes were 3.69% and 4.75 % for Margalla and Dina aggregates
respectively based on 4% air voids.
Table 3: Modified Marshall Mix Design Criteria [8]
Heavy Traffic (>106 million
ESALs)
Mix Criteria
Minimum Maximum

Compaction(No. of blows on each side of the


112
specimen
Stability (Minimum) 18014 N
Flow (0.25mm) 12 21
Percent Air Voids 3 5
Percent voids in mineral aggregate for 4% air voids
and 25mm NMSG 12 -

Percent voids filled with asphalt (VFA) 65 75


The percentage of new binder was calculated by using the following equation for the 10 to 60%
RAP mixtures. The 100% RAP mixtures were compacted without adding any virgin binder since
the RAP binder present is higher than the optimum binder.
Pnb= [(1002-rPsb)Pb/100(100-Psb)}-{(100-r)Psb/(100-Psb)] [9]
Where
Pnb = Percent of new asphalt binder in recycled mix expressed as whole number
r = New aggregate expressed as a percent of the total aggregate in the recycled mix
expressed as a whole number
Pb = Percent, estimated asphalt content of recycled mix assumed to be the same as that of
100 percent virgin HMA mix
Psb = Percent, asphalt content of RAP

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS


The results of Marshall Mix design of all the four mixtures with various RAP content are
summarized in Table 4. With increasing RAP content the mixture stability increases for the first
three mixtures group but for the last one there is no significant change in the stability values. The
entire mixtures satisfy the minimum stability of 18 kN but for Dina source with high RAP
content the mixture exceeds the maximum flow limit of 5.25mm for modified Marshall. Marshall
high flow values indicate excess binder content. Generally the variability in the volumetric
parameters increases with increase RAP content. The RAP source effect on the first two mixtures
which consist of crushed limestone is shown in Fig.1 below. The stability increases linearly with
increase in RAP. As the first mixture consist of crushed limestone and also the Nowshera RAP
www.ajsc.leena-luna.co.jp Leena and Luna International,Oyama, Japan.
159|P a g e Copyright 2012
ISSN: 2186-8476, ISSN: 2186-8468 Print
Vol. 1. No. 2. June 2012

aggregate is also crushed so result in good combination and give high stability. Also the N RAP
binder is less aged than the M RAP binder as indicated by the penetration and ductility values.
Similarly for the third mixture the stability increases with increase RAP content with good
linearity (R2=0.939) but for the fourth mixture the increase is not significant (R 2= 0.795).
Table 4: Marshall Mix Design for all Mixtures
RAP Air Voids VFA VMA Stability Flow Unit Weight
(%) (%) (%) (%) (kN) (mm) (Kg/m3)
Control Margalla Base

0 4 68.40 12.66 31.2 3.55 2393


MB+N RAP
10 3.75 71.46 13.14 30.53 3.45 2383
20 3.70 71.45 12.96 34.86 4.18 2388
30 4.70 63.73 12.96 36.63 3.49 2388
45 3.20 74.58 12.59 42.52 3.96 2398
60 3.82 71.70 13.50 47.91 4.71 2373
100 3.52 75.40 14.31 71.34 5.03 2453
MB+M RAP
10 4.60 72.23 16.57 28.86 3.91 2293
20 4.30 74.00 16.54 30.33 3.50 2298
30 4.18 73.57 15.82 38.24 5.06 2318
45 4.69 68.54 14.91 37.05 3.97 2343
60 5.07 68.31 16.00 44.32 3.57 2313
100 4.18 73.41 15.72 60.63 4.68 2363
Control Dina Base

0 4 73.80 15.25 22.5 4.27 2416


DB+N RAP
10 3.93 73.85 15.03 21.87 4.46 2338
20 3.75 72.63 13.70 29.83 4.62 2403
30 3.88 68.38 12.27 38.78 4.69 2443
45 3.25 72.64 11.88 38.29 4.63 2463
60 3.24 73.53 12.24 48.26 5.50 2453
DB+M RAP
10 4.55 67.22 13.88 32.69 4.59 2398
20 5.66 62.14 14.95 33.13 4.40 2368
30 4.78 66.00 14.06 31.99 4.68 2393
45 4.36 69.76 14.42 31.56 5.71 2383
60 4.39 70.66 14.96 29.48 5.41 2368
The fourth mixture is combination of rounded riverbed aggregate and also the M RAP is also
rounded so no prominent change in stability with increase in RAP. Similarly the effect of the
virgin aggregate source on the Stability of the N RAP contained mixtures is shown in Fig.2
below. The Marshall stability increases for Margalla and Dina aggregates with increase in RAP
with good linearity having R2 value of 0.917 and 0.929 respectively.
() www. leena-luna.co.jp
. P a g e |160
ISSN: 2186-8476, ISSN: 2186-8468 Print
Vol. 1. No. 2. June 2012 ASIAN JOURNAL OF NATURAL & APPLIED SCIENCES

Figure 1: Effect of RAP source on Marshall Stability

Figure 2: Effect of virgin Aggregate source on Stability


The flow values for all the mixtures are presented in Fig.3 which indicated that most of the
values are within the specifications limits of 3 to 5.25mm. These analysis shows that RAP
blending is a viable option for base course construction in the country. The laboratory testing
confirmed that good quality mixtures can be design using RAP material. The quality of the virgin
aggregates and also the quality of RAP material greatly affect the mixture volumetric properties.
Even the 100% RAP mixtures of both the sources give good results in laboratory compaction.
Few mixtures exceed the maximum flow limits but most RAP blends fall within the specified
limits for the volumetric properties. The low RAP content up to 30% can be used for heavy
traffic and higher RAP content can be used for medium and low traffic.

Figure 3: Marshall Flow values for all the Mixtures


www.ajsc.leena-luna.co.jp Leena and Luna International,Oyama, Japan.
161|P a g e Copyright 2012
ISSN: 2186-8476, ISSN: 2186-8468 Print
Vol. 1. No. 2. June 2012

SUMMARY
Based on extensive laboratory evaluation of different Marshall Mixtures containing RAP
concludes that the blending of virgin and RAP material overall improve the mixture properties.
The main conclusions drawn from this research are the following:
In laboratory the RAP mixtures designed using Marshall method perform the same as
virgin mixtures.
Generally the Marshall stability increases with increase in RAP content with good
linearity. The stability of the 100% RAP mixtures is two times the stability of the virgin
mixtures.
The crushed limestone gives better performance with both the RAP sources as compared
to the quartzite. When mostly riverbed and rounded particles are used the stability does
not change significantly and the flow exceeds the maximum limit.
Using RAP in design even up to 30% will help in conserving the natural resources,
reducing the HMA price and improve the performance.
It is suggested to construct a trial section using virgin and RAP blends to verify the
suitability of RAP mixtures to the country climate condition and traffic loadings. It is
recommended for future study to use modified binder and different NMSG to see the
RAP mixture performance.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors acknowledge the Pakistan-United States Science and Technology Cooperative
Program for funding this research. Thanks are extended to National Institute of Transportation
(NIT) of NUST, Islamabad for the laboratory testing facilities.

REFERENCES
[1] Kim, S et al. (2007), Evaluation of Use of High Percentage of Reclaimed Asphalt
Pavement (RAP) for Superpave Mixtures Research Report FL/DOT/SMO/07-507,
Florida, USA.
[2] Al-Qadi I.L. et al. (2007), Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement- A Literature Review, Research
Report FHWA-ICT-07-001, Illinois Center for Transportation.
[3] Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center (TFHRC), Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement-
User Guideline- Asphalt Concrete, viewed Sep 2011
http://www.tfhrc.gov/hnr20/recycle/waste/rap132.htm
[4] Li, X. et al. (2008). Effect of reclaimed asphalt pavement (proposition and type) and
Binder Grade on asphalt Mixture. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No.
2051, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington D.C., pp
90-97
[5] Environmental Protection Agency and Federal Highway Administration (1993) ,
Recycling of Asphalt Pavements Using at Least 80 Percent Recycled Asphalt
Pavement .Engineering and Environmental Aspects of Recycled Materials for
Highway Construction, Report No. FHWA-RD-93-088.
[6] Solaimanian, M. And Tahmoressi, M. (1996). Variability Analysis of Hot-mixed
Asphalt Concrete Containing High Percent Reclaimed Asphalt Pavements, Presented

() www. leena-luna.co.jp
. P a g e |162
ISSN: 2186-8476, ISSN: 2186-8468 Print
Vol. 1. No. 2. June 2012 ASIAN JOURNAL OF NATURAL & APPLIED SCIENCES

at the 75th Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board, Transportation


Research Record, No.1543, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 89-96.
[7] Lynn, L. (1992), Three States OK More RAP in Recycling Specs: Asphalt
Recycling and Reclaiming, Roads and Bridges.
[8] Asphalt Institute (2007), "Mix Design Methods for Asphalt Concrete and Other Hot-Mix
Types, Manual Series No. 2 (MS-2), 6th Edition, AI, Lexington.
[9] Asphalt Institute (1986), Asphalt Hot-Mix Recycling, Manual Series No. 20 (MS-20)
Second Edition.

www.ajsc.leena-luna.co.jp Leena and Luna International,Oyama, Japan.


163|P a g e Copyright 2012

You might also like