Design and Optimalization of Racing Car'S Steering Column: Number 4, Volume IX, December 2014
Design and Optimalization of Racing Car'S Steering Column: Number 4, Volume IX, December 2014
Summary: Article describes the design of racing cars steering column. First part describes
legislative issue of safety cages in light of operation of vehicles on roads and in
terms of technical regulations. In the next part are described design of variants,
calculation of stresses and deformations using finite element method, the materials
used in design of racing cars steering column and production technology of the
steering column selected variant for a racing car.
Key words: rollcage, technical requirements, welding, finite elements method
INTRODUCTION
The holder is part of a steering column of the vehicle, which serves to support the
steering wheel and its accessories. For civilian vehicles steering column bracket serves as a
holder of dashboard. The holder of the steering column is for civilian vehicles robust than for
racing cars. For civilian vehicles is necessary that the holder, including the steering column,
must meet the technical requirements for approval of vehicles. Racing car steering column
bracket is a separate unit, which carries only the steering wheel, or its accessories due to
weight reduction. Post holder must be sufficiently rigid and light. Vehicle weight and the
stiffness of individual units is very important for racing cars. Bracket steering column in
racing vehicles is homologated separately within the body, when the body is connected by
permanent joints. Or its homologated separately if it is mounted detachably.
1
Ing. Luk Horek, VB Technical University of Ostrava, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of
Transport, 17.listopadu 15, 708 33 Ostrava-Poruba, e-mail: [email protected]
Source: Author
Fig. 1 Holder + steering column of koda Octavia III. generation
Racing vehicles are special vehicle category and a changes
in vehicle structure according the rules are allowed. Modifications of the steering column
bracket can be realized under the supervision of NSC FIA. The structure must be able to
operate also in fault, after the impact. Driver safety is primarily ensured by the design of the
protective frame and by 6-point seat belts with anatomically shaped seat shell. The downward
deformation of steering column is not necessary, beside a civil vehicles. Due this reason the
safety aspects of a steering column for racing cars are insignificant. Design of steering
column is different for different manufacturers of racing cars, but meets the same
requirements. (1)
Source: Author
Dynamic analysis of the issue mainly deals with vibrations. From the perspective of a
person is suitable steering column frequency between 30 and 40 [Hz]. Vibration of the
steering column is a superposition of oscillations excited by different parts of the vehicle,
such as engine (30 [Hz]), chassis (15 to 17 [Hz]) etc. The dynamic load of the steering
column bracket will not be solved. Can be supposed, that the resulting will meet the demands
of safety as previously tested design. Also is assumed, than if the structural design will be
similar to the original, waveforms loading forces will be also similar. Eigenfrequencies and
inertia also will not be solved.
Regulations International Automobile Federation FIA set, what materials and what
structures can be holders steering columns. They may in particular be made of steel or
composite materials such as carbon materials. It is always given a prescription for rally cars
and for a given class or group of vehicle. They can also be securely welded to the frame MAG
or screwed to the frame. The regulation stipulates that the management mechanism and its
parts must be made of steel. Thus, steering rod, bearings, joints, steering gear, connecting
rods, levers and steering pins. (2)
In terms of ergonomics, an important role have in drivers position for all day sitting in a
racing car. The bodies of the crew absorb vertical vibrations caused by vehicles on uneven
surfaces (gravel) or a bumpy road and also move sideways (cornering or even controlled
shear). Persons absorb forces during acceleration or deceleration of the vehicle. Bad
ergonomics leads to backache, so-called Injury of repetitive motion (in the UK known as RDI
- Repetetive Driving Injury). Because of these reasons the proposed holder is designed as
adjustable, respecting the driver requirements. (3)(4)
The technical requirements for the design were following: minimal possible weight,
maximal possible rigidity, MAG welding and using the holder material eg alloy steel
25CrMo4, 15CdV6, T45, 4130, Docol.
New design came from the original design and the original attachment points to the
parts of the car have been kept. Attachment is realized to the same restraints and struts as in
the original version. This fact relates to the validated holder attached at these places to the
protective frame of the racing vehicle. Furthermore, the steering column is installed as shown
in Fig. 3, together with the steering. It consists of a steering wheel, wheel bearings, steering
rod and others. It is entry restriction for the holder design, this restriction must be included in
the design of the steering column bracket. Steering column bracket was designed for this
steering mechanism and it was not the aim to modify it.
Source: Author
Fig. 3 The installation of steering, 1 steering wheel, 2 mounting screw,
3 wheel housing, 4 steering column bracket, 5 steering rod,
6 Teflon bearing
Software CATIA for design variants of steering column bracket has been used. were 8
variants of bracket have been created, 5 basic variants and 3 variants have been optimized.
Source: Author
Fig. 4 The original version of the steering column bracket, 1 - left brace, 2 - upper
brace, 3 - left side of the steering house, 4 - bottom stiffener, 5 - right side of the steering
house, 6 - bottom strut 7 - house bearings, 8.9 - corner brace, 10 - right brace,
11 - corner brace
Source: Author
Fig. 5 Variant E3, 1 - left side of steering house, 2 - right side of steering
house, 3 - right brace, 4 - house bearing
5 - left bottom brace, 6 - left upper strut
Material of steering column should be chosen with regard to the material used for the
race car protective frame. This choice is important because of strength, stiffness, and prices,
and especially because of manufacturability and final assembly. Manufacturability of bent
parts is ensured by ductility of the material, ductility must be greater than 10 [%]. The reasons
mentioned above leads to following material choice, pipe material 25CrMo4 and 15CdV6 for
sheets.
3. STRESS ANALYSIS
Finite element mesh with element size 1 [mm] using created model has been generated.
Network density affects the calculation accuracy and calculation time. Mesh and shape of
mesh elements have been chosen as a software-controlled. Part divided into 500,000 finite
elements is shown in Fig. 6.
Source: Author
Fig. 6 The finite element mesh on the computational model
First boundary conditions are fixed supports, which serve to fix the product in the test
environment space. Fixed supports ("Support") on blue marked areas of solid rods have been
created (see Fig. 7.). A further boundary conditions are the component loads, thus, forces,
pressures, etc. allowable displacements. Forces were chosen according to the diagram in Fig.
3. Forces are shown in Fig. 7 as a red colored.
Source:Author
Fig. 7 Boundary conditions, red - load,
blue - support
Analysis results can be displayed in the form of a written report. For users, however, a
graphical outputs are friendly. In our case, for a results evaluation of reduced stress a HMH
hypothesis has been chosen. General Three-axis stress is reduced to that equivalent stress.
Other suitable presentation of components in the simulation load is presentation of
deformations, thus shifting the elements after loading.
In variant E3 the bigger deformation is on side of the steering column and also in areas
of welding. Maximal stress is about 350 [MPa] on the inner side of the bent metal plate of left
steering house (see Fig. 8 and Fig. 9.).
Source: Author
Fig. 8 Detail of strain option E3
Source: Author
Fig. 9 Detail of strain option E3
CONCLUSION
Variant E3 gives maximum weight savings. In comparison to the original variant, it is
an approximately of 62 [%] weight saving. The design of variant E3 is relatively simple,
increase time and price savings by simple holder completion and by reduction of the welders
working time. Deformation of the bracket under same load increased about 22 [%]. Maximum
stress of bracket is about 350 [MPa], which may constitute a significant increase of stress in
comparison with the original holder, but it is still enough under the yield strength of the
selected material, where Re = min. 600 [MPa]. Safety factor is about k = 1.7. This represents
a 70 [%] reserve in stress, which should provide enough space for dynamic stress or strain at
once. The bracket has been successfully optimized and specified requirements have been met.
REFERENCES
(1) EHK/OSN . 79, JEDNOTN USTANOVEN PRO SCHVALOVN TYPU
VOZIDEL Z HLEDISKA MECHANISMU ZEN. [online], last revision
10.4.2014 [cit. 10-4-2014]. Avaliable from WWW: <http://eurlex.europa.eu/
LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2008:137:0025:0051:EN:PDF>
(2) Ploha J mezinrodnho sportovnho du (peklad) FIA, Federace
Automobilovho sportu AR, 2014
(3) Ergonomie | autolexicon.net: [online], last revision 10.4.2014 [cit. 10-4-2014].
Avaliable from WWW: <http://cs.autolexicon.net/articles/ergonomie/>
(4) Ing. DRESLER, Pavel. Consultation with the vehicle crew.