5/7/2017

M.R.D TENDER EVALUATION

M.R.D Designer Tender Evaluation |

Alex Stephens 18847554
 1 Executive Summary
This evaluation is of the tender submissions for the companys: DABS, GBR and Ingenious
Co. This evaluation is aimed at proposing which company best meets the criteria of
constructing and manufacturing M.R.D Incs design package, efficiently and promptly for the
clientele EMPACT.

In this evaluation each companys Tender applications have been reviewed and marked
according to the re modelled M.R.D Incs Tender Criteria (TEC), see Appendix B. The
successful company has complied with all requirements will me recommended for the
construction of the M.R.D Inc Rover Design.

The following table shows the total marks attained by each company. The winning tender is
the company with the highest score. Therefore according to the table below DABS is the
successful company.

COMPANY MARK
DABS 15/18 = 83.33%

GPR 11/18 = 61.11%

INGENIOUS CO. 9/18 = 50.00%

DABS is the first preference as the Tender submission was well structured and a lot of effort
and time went into their submission. Not only this, but they are the best suited for the
construction of the M.R.D Inc Design as they met nearly all the criteria. DABS not only
achieved this by time and effort but because they supplied sufficient evidence to support their
case. Their time line was precise down to the dates of each stage which showed excellent time
management and work ethic. Not only this but each contractor is skilled in many areas which
are fundamental to the construction to the Mars Rover Design supplied by M.R.D Inc. The
contractors of DABS also have a clear understanding of the Design package and the
fundamentals of each component. DABS could have achieved 100% but some of their
responses were lacking sufficient evidence to support them. This only includes the
Experience with the Hazardous materials.

GPR came in a close second but over all their tender submission was done well. The only
element that let GPR fall was their overall experience and communication with M.R.D. The
communication reply time frame wasnt specified which implies an unreliable partnership.
But over all a lot of thought and time was supplied into their Tender submission.

Ingenious Co. was the last preference as of several reasons. These include; their lack of
understanding of the design package, the limited response of suggestions to improve the
design and the failure to supply a timeline for completion of the construction. If Ingenious Co.
had supplied some of these aspects their score would have increased significantly.

DABS over all has shown that they are the correct choice to the production of the Mars Rover
but however if they not available then GPR would be sufficient.

1
Contents
1 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................... 1
2 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 4
3 Design Package Review ........................................................................................................................ 4
3.1 DABS ................................................................................................................................................... 4
3.1.1 Reflection ................................................................................................................................ 4
3.1.2 Suggestion1: Axle Details ................................................................................................. 6
3.1.3 Suggestion2: Glue ................................................................................................................ 6
3.1.4 Suggestion3: Specification Change ............................................................................... 6
3.2 Ingenious Co. ................................................................................................................................... 7
3.2.1 Reflection ................................................................................................................................ 7
3.2.2 Suggestion1: Re-Shape ...................................................................................................... 8
3.2.3 Suggestion2: Specification Modification .................................................................... 8
3.3 GPR ...................................................................................................................................................... 8
3.3.1 Reflection ................................................................................................................................ 8
3.3.2 Suggestion1: Brackets........................................................................................................ 8
3.3.3 Suggestion2: Hazard Materials ...................................................................................... 9
4 Tender Review Summary .................................................................................................................... 9
5 DABS Tender Review...........................................................................................................................10
5.1 Experience ......................................................................................................................................10
5.1.1 Overall Experience ............................................................................................................10
5.1.2 Experience with Hazardous Materials ......................................................................11
5.2 Capability ........................................................................................................................................12
5.2.1 Safety Procedure ................................................................................................................12
5.2.2 Efficiency ...............................................................................................................................13
5.3 Materials and Equipment .........................................................................................................14
5.4 Communication with M.R.D ....................................................................................................15
6 Ingenious Co. Tender Review ..........................................................................................................16
6.1 Experience ......................................................................................................................................16
6.1.1 Overall Experience ............................................................................................................16
6.1.2 Experience with Hazardous Materials ......................................................................17
6.2 Capability ........................................................................................................................................17
6.2.1 Safety Procedure ................................................................................................................17
6.2.2 Efficiency ...............................................................................................................................18
2
 6.1 Materials and Equipment .........................................................................................................19
6.2 Communication with M.R.D ....................................................................................................19
7 GPR Tender Review .............................................................................................................................20
7.1 Experience ......................................................................................................................................20
7.1.1 Overall Experience ............................................................................................................20
7.1.2 Experience with Hazardous Materials ......................................................................21
7.2 Capability ........................................................................................................................................22
7.2.1 Safety Procedure ................................................................................................................22
7.2.2 Efficiency ...............................................................................................................................23
7.3 Materials and Equipment .........................................................................................................23
7.4 Communication with M.R.D ....................................................................................................24
8 Summary...................................................................................................................................................25
9 Appendices ..............................................................................................................................................25
9.1 Appendix A: M.R.D Inc Design Package Axle specs........................................................25
9.2 Appendix B: Tender Evaluation Criteria ............................................................................26
9.3 Appendix C: Wheel Width ........................................................................................................29
9.4 Appendix D: GPR Tender Submission .................................................................................30
9.5 Appendix E: Ingenious Tender Submission......................................................................47
9.6 Appendix F: DABS Tender Submission...............................................................................47

3
2 Introduction
This evaluation reviews the three contractors; GPR, Ingenious Co. and DABS with their
comprehensive understanding of M.R.D Incs designs package and construction process of
the Mars Rover. The contractors from each group and their understandings of the clienteles
(EMPACT) criteria is also reviewed in this evaluation. Each one of the Tender Submissions
submitted to the Tender Criteria, set by the M.R.D Inc, Mars Rover Design Package Report is
also included. This evaluation has given a score for each contracting group, which in turn
helped decide which contracting group would be best suited for the construction and
manufacturing of M.R.D Incs design package. Each submission has been marked and can be
located at Tender Review Summary, as well as the Tender submissions from GPR (Appendix
D), Ingenious Co. (Appendix E) and DABS (Appendix F).

3 Design Package Review

Design Package Review highlights and reviews the Design Package for each contracting
Company. Suggestions and their understanding of the following: design, construction and
Client Compliance have all been reviewed in detail.

- Black is the discussion and grey is taken from Tender Submission.

3.1 DABS

3.1.1 Reflection
2.1 Understanding of Design
The overall design of the M.R.D. Mars Rover bears some resemblance to a buggy with an
aerodynamic shape. Given the information of the M.R.D design obtained at the group meeting
on the between the Rover Designers and the DABS Construction Team on the 7/04/2017, the
design is intended to obtain a significant horizontal component to its overall downwards
velocity, generated during its descent down the ramp, in order to spread the force generated
when it impacts the ground over a larger period of time, akin to rolling when landing from a
fall as some martial arts and sports teach. This means the rover and its components are
subjected to lesser pressures, and are thus less likely break or suffer any material failures. I
am somewhat sceptical of the effect of this aerodynamic shaping on overall horizontal
velocity, given the low speeds involved. It will not be counterproductive to the intended
workings of the design, however. The axles are places at the extreme ends of the rover,
placing them far apart, giving a relatively high wheelbase and therefore, good directional
stability, helping to ensure that the rover continues in a straight-line.

DABS has a clear understanding of the design intentions. They make clear reference to the
aerodynamic shape and the horizontal component of the intended movement of the rover.
Also has a suggestion of the extreme wheel base of the rover and suggests that it is a good
satiability feature.

The body of the rover consists of a wooden base measuring 410mm long, 30mm high and
150mm wide. Axle holes of radius 5mm are placed 10mm from either end and half way up
the base, running parallel to the lateral axis. Rising from the front of this base, at an angle of
30 degrees, is a wind shield, measuring a total overall length of 250mm, intended to provide
an aerodynamic form. 35mm in from the side and 114mm from the lower starting edge of the
wind shield is a hole of radius 20mm, in which the head and neck of the bottle will be placed
when undergoing testing. From the top of the wind shield is a roof piece, measuring
180mm long and 30mm tall. This continues the 30 degree slope from the wind shield, and
ends with a 25 degree slope, pointing downwards towards the end of the base. The roof

4
piece ends with the connection to 2 rear braces, which serve to secure the roof piece and by
extension, the front wind shield as well as to stop the bottle from moving left to right
relative to the longitudinal axis of the rover. The roof piece sits flush with both angles of the
wind shield and the rear braces. These braces measure 155mm overall length, a width of
30mm and an unspecified height. The braces attach at the rear of the base at an angle of 25
degrees, and at opposite ends of the lateral axis of the rover.
The wheels are likewise made of pine, measuring an unspecified width, with radius of 50mm
and axle holes of radius 5mm. The axles consists of a 5mm radius rod, length unspecified and
material unspecified, threaded at each end with a nut securing the wheels in place.

Here they have evidently demonstrated that they understand the specifications of the Design
Drawings. DABS contractors have stated that the wheel have an unspecified width (see
Appendix C) for evidence that was provided. The contractors have raised a significant point
of that the axle material and costing hasnt been provided, therefore will be supplied in
(Appendix A) and the Design Package will be edited before the construction process.

2.2 Compliance with Client Brief

The design brief states a several design conditions that the rover must comply with. These are
listed below.
The rover must be self-guided and have no manual control.
The bottle must be easily visible and require no complex assembly or procedure to secure.
The design cost must be less than or equal to $30.
No more than 25% of the final cost can be related to 3D printing.
The rover can be no longer than 420mm, no wider than 297mm and no higher than 210mm.
The rover must have 2 axles.
Additionally, there are testing standards that must be met. The rover cannot be held against
these until testing is undertaken, however outcomes of the testing can be discussed and
predicted based on known physics and understanding of the design.
The rover must roll down a 2m long slope of an angle between 30 and 45 degrees before
being subjected to a 1m free-fall without the load (the bottle) or the rover receiving major
damage that impairs their ability to function as intended, or the bottle detaching from the
rover.
The rover must land on its wheels.
The rover must freely move down the slope.
The design of M.R.D.s rover meets all of the Design Criteria except one. The maximum
allowed length of the rover is 420mm, while the length of the rover of their design is 490mm
long. We suspect that the designers forgot to include the length that the wheels add to the
designs overall length. As of writing (3:50 PM 17/04/2017), I have not yet contacted the
designers about this, although I intend to after finishing the Compliance with Client Brief
section.

DABS shows that they fully understand the client criteria and in which complies. They have
raised a valid point in terms of the Rover length and these can be changed to required length
which is discussed in Suggestion 3.

For the Test Criteria, we have 3 minor concerns:

Firstly, that the material of the axles is not specified, and the only thing vaguely axle like in
the bill of materials is timber. Coupled with the tight tolerances of the body axle holes, could
lead to the friction of the axles against the body being sufficient to stop the rover from free
rolling. This was, however, discussed in the group meeting between the DABS Contracting
Team and the M.R.D Design Team on the 7/04/2017 and it was agreed that the body axle
holes should be oversized to accommodate for this, although the current Design Package does
not reflect this.

5
Secondly, that the design is somewhat top heavy. Most of the mass of the rover is
concentrated above the axles, and thus the design is less stable in free fall, and more likely to
tumble, potentially causing the rover to land upside down. This is not likely to be too much of
a concern, firstly due to the small distance of freefall (1m) and secondly due to the high
relative horizontal velocity that this design is intended to create, which should, with air
resistance, slightly stabilise the rover, as it will face the direction it is travelling, as that
provides the most aerodynamic form.
Thirdly, the bottle is not fully secured in the rover. There is nothing to stop the bottle from
sliding out backwards from the rover, which would be of considerable concern during the
landing of the rover. This was discussed in in the group meeting between the DABS
Contracting Team and the M.R.D Design Team on the 7/04/2017. Brackets were supposed to
be mounted to the base, which would secure the bottle in place, however they are not included
in this revision of the Design Package, except in the Bill of Materials.

The contractors here raise several concerns that need to be addressed. These will be discussed
in 2.1.4 Suggestion 3. These will be rectified and be brought up in the next M.R.D Inc
meeting. DABS suggestions here will be dually noted and they also portrayed that they
understand the components and suggestions to what would work more efficiently.

3.1.2 Suggestion1: Axle Details

2.3 Concerns, Solutions and Suggestions for Improvements of Design

The first is that axle details, such as material and length are not specified.

These will be supplied in this report; see Appendix A, The M.R.D Inc Design Package will
have the necessary changes, which will be taken from this report.

3.1.3 Suggestion2: Glue

2.3 Concerns, Solutions and Suggestions for Improvements of Design

The second is that the joints are only held together by glue, which can be brittle.

DABS here have not read the Design package properly as it clearly states that it isnt glue but
liquid nails, See Appendix A, but in turn is a valid point which can be rectified with the
movement of the axle position being moved back towards the centre of the Rover, which is
discussed further in the next section.

3.1.4 Suggestion3: Specification Change

2.3 Concerns, Solutions and Suggestions for Improvements of Design

The joints can be reinforced by using nails in addition to the glue, however that will require
the wheels to be moved inwards about 10-20mm each,

2.2 Compliance with Client Brief

The design of M.R.D.s rover meets all of the Design Criteria except one. The maximum
allowed length of the rover is 420mm, while the length of the rover of their design is 490mm
long. We suspect that the designers forgot to include the length that the wheels add to the
designs overall length.

Thirdly, the bottle is not fully secured in the rover. There is nothing to stop the bottle from
sliding out backwards from the rover, which would be of considerable concern during the
landing of the rover. This was discussed in in the group meeting between the DABS
Contracting Team and the M.R.D Design Team on the 7/04/2017. Brackets were supposed to

6
be mounted to the base, which would secure the bottle in place; however they are not included
in this revision of the Design Package, except in the Bill of Materials.
The bottle can also be secured against rearward motion with the addition of a nail on each
side, placed about 175mm from the rear of the base and protruding around 20mm. When the
bottle is placed in the rover, an elastic band would be placed across the bottle. If looped so
that the top of the horizontal bottle and the base of the bottle are held by the band, the bottle
should be secure and not easily move.

2.3 Concerns, Solutions and Suggestions for Improvements of Design

To fix these issues, the axle details should be clearly indicated in the Design Package and
communicated to the designers. The joints can be reinforced by using nails in addition to the
glue, however that will require the wheels to be moved inwards about 10-20mm each, but that
also solves another problem, by shortening the length of the rover. The length can also be
shortened by reducing the radius of the wheels. These do not come entirely without
downsides. Reducing the wheel base will decrease the stability of the rovers movement down
the slope, and will allow it to more easily veer off. The exact solution should be decided by
the design team, but it is paramount that this issue is addressed.

These suggestions are extremely valid and the Design Package will be modified to re-enforce
the joints in the Rover. This suggestion is common sense and communicated clearly, and will
be rectified swiftly. Also in terms of the brackets to secure the bottle in place, is also was a
design issue that wasnt carried throughout every design drawing but only appears in a few of
the drawings, the Bill of Materials will also be edited to add in an extra bracket, See
Appendix (A). The Rover specs will also have to be changed as the valid point of it not
meeting the client criteria, this is easily modified in terms of shorting the wheel base of the
rover as DABS has clearly stated, in terms of imbalances, but in turn to strengthen the joints it
is a necessary modification that has to be made.

The mention of the bottle falling out is also an issue that has to be rectified. DABS
suggestion of the nail protruding 20mm is a solution which can be added to the Design
Package.

3.2 Ingenious Co.

3.2.1 Reflection
2.1 Understanding of Design

The Mars Rover is designed in such a way that it holds the bottle horizontally inside the body.
This is to prevent or minimise the damage done to the bottle as it lands. The wheels have a
width dimension of 30mm. This ensures that the Mars Rover model is able to travel in a
straight line when it goes down the slope.

Ingenious Co. have limited understanding of the design and each component and how they
react. The contractors have supplied limited understanding and information of the
components and structure of the M.R.D Design Package.

2.2 Client Brief Compliance

The Client Brief calls for a Mars Rover model design which costs less than $30. The cost of
materials used to build their Mars Rover model is below $30. A table to show the materials
costs is shown below.

7
As shown in Appendix A, Ingenious Co. have stated that M.R.D Inc has complied with the
client criteria with our material costing. However they have supplied limited insight to the
client brief.

3.2.2 Suggestion1: Re-Shape

One of the concerns raised was how the front of the body of the Mars Rover was shaped. I
was concerned that when it vertically drops, it will overturn and land that way. I suggested
that the body of the Mars Rover be reshaped to a cylinder or cuboid shape.

The suggestion of the re modelling of the Design is invalid as the basic design is already
ready to be constructed. Ingenious Co could have suggested improving the design which
would have been greatly appreciated.

3.2.3 Suggestion2: Specification Modification

Another concern of mine was the Mars Rover would be too heavy if we used their
measurements. If it is too heavy it will drop and hit the ground with a much stronger force. I
suggested reducing the length of the model. For example, reduce the length from 410mm to
around 350mm. Also move the front wheels back by around 20 to 30mm as it was almost
aligned with the front of the body of the Mars Rover.

The suggestion for the wheels being moved back is a valid suggestion which would therefore
reduce the total length. Ingenious Co has shown limited ideas to improve the design over all
but the use of measurements is an excellent addition.

3.3 GPR

3.3.1 Reflection
2.1 Understanding of The Design

The design is based upon the cutting as well as re-joining of wood cut out into specific
measurements. After which are re-joined at angles to make the rover, with the wheels being
made from wood as well. The adhesives would be the nails, screws. The design package
shows specific measurements which are clearly the intended process of making it. The
instructions, steps and guideline given by M.R.D INC in their design package includes the
safety precautions needed when handling certain substances which may be harmful.

GPR understand the materials being used but havent mentioned the adhesive Liquid Nails.
They also recognise that there are safety procedures but fail to mention what substance they
have to have precaution for.

3.3.2 Suggestion1: Brackets

2.2 Concerns

GPR has 2 concerns relating to the design of the Mars Rover. The first relates to the use of the
metal brackets which are not clear in the step by step procedures in the design package.

As previously mentioned by the other contracting groups, the brackets are not clear and are
rectified in Appendix A. The design drawings will be rectified before construction phase.

8
3.3.3 Suggestion2: Hazard Materials
2.2 Concerns

As well as for the use of Liquid nails, as it is a hazardous substance. We would to ensure
M.R.D. INC that we do have sufficient safety masks and equipment to handle this task
regardless. However, per M.R.Ds criteria in experience for using hazardous chemicals, super
glue has been specified which may cause confusion.

GPR is correct here with Liquid Nails as being a hazardous material. This inconsistence
with the M.R.D Design package in terms of the Criteria of Experience will be corrected in
Appendix C.

4 Tender Review Summary

The criteria supplied in the M.R.D Inc Design Package is vague, so therefore a new criteria
has been made to accommodate the marking process in this evaluation. See Appendix C for
full insight into the marking criteria. M.R.D Inc. is at fault for this inconvenience and
therefore marking will somewhat be lenient.

CRITERIA SUB CRITERIA SCORE GPR DABS INGENIOUS

CRITERIA DETAILS OUT CO.
OF
EXPERIENCE OVERALL Has various 4 2 3 1
EXPERIENCE knowledge of
manufacturing
procedures and
tools (powered
and manual)
Sufficient
evidence provided
HAZARDOUS Has a previous 2 1 1 1
CHEMICALS experience with
hazardous
chemicals and
supplied evidence.
CAPABILITY SAFETY Must be able to 3 1 3 2
PROCEDURE provide evidence
that PPE is being
used and be able
to uphold safety
procedures.
EFFICIENCY Provides 3 2 3 0
appropriate
timelines of
construction stage
with realistic
expectations.
MATERIALS Being able to 3 2 3 2
AND obtain all
EQUIPMENT materials and
9
 equipment
needed to
construct the
rover.
COMMUNICA COMMUNIC Demonstrates 3 1 2 3
TION ATION WITH instances in which
MRD INC they have been
able to solve
problems/issues
using clear
communication.
TOTAL SCORE 18 11 15 9

5 DABS Tender Review

This section evaluates DABS Tender application (Appendix F) against M.R.D Inc Tender
Criteria in Appendix B.

Note: Black is M.R.D Inc response, grey is DABS response and grey italics in our Tender
Criteria.

5.1 Experience
5.1.1 Overall Experience
As this project requires knowledge of various manufacturing procedures and tools, the
members of the successful tender group must provide evidence of prior experience that
expresses competency with general construction ability as well as proof of proficiency with
the various powered and manual tools being used for this project. A group that can prove
proficiency would be able to complete the project in the most efficient timeframe to a high
standard. A successful tender can provide evidence of said ability for all members of the
construction team.

3.1 Experience

In the TEC, M.R.D. stated that experience with power tools and hazardous chemicals would
both be required. DABS meets all of these criteria.

3.1.1 Experience with Power Tools

Experience with Power Tools

Precise specifications in design require very accurate measurements for a successful rover to
be constructed. Successful tender will have staff with experience in using a band saw, sanding
belt and drill press; capable of following direct instructions precisely.

The members of our team have extensive experience in Woodworking, working with an array
of tools including band saws, sanding belts and drill presses to produce a variety of finished
products.

This can be seen in Appendix A.1, our Group Resume, which lists our individual skills and
experience. Unfortunately, we do not have any examples of past DABS work to present to
you, as you are our first Tender Application, however we have included past individual work
as part of our supporting evidence.

10
DABS has provided evidence as seen in their Tender application, see Appendix F. These
consist of resumes with past experience working with these types of tools. Each member has
included their own abilities and past experience but failed to provide picture evidence.
However they have shown that they do in fact have general construction ability and therefore
meet the criteria as shown in the table below.

Criteria Fulfillment Marks Awarded DABS Evidence

Construction team can 4-3 3 - Supplied a list of
explicitly provide appropriate past experience
evidence of each member relating to
having previous experience in requirements.
material workshops or general 4 marks obtained if picture
project construction. evidence of past work was
presented.
Construction team can provide 2
appropriate evidence of most
members having experience in
workshops or general project
construction.
Construction team can provide 1
evidence to suggest that at only
one member has previous
experience in material
workshops or general project
construction.
No member of the construction 0
group can provide sufficient
evidence of previous projects or
workshop experience.

5.1.2 Experience with Hazardous Materials

The assembly stage of this construction project involves the use of adhesive compounds
containing chemicals that pose an elevated risk to all persons within the construction area.
Therefore, tenders must provide evidence of competency when said chemicals are being
interacted with. A successful tender can provide evidence of previous experience with
hazardous chemicals and/or display competency when planning to use them.

We have less experience handling hazardous chemicals than we have with power tools,
although we are by no means unskilled in this department. Some team members have
previous experience with plastic model kits, which involved oil based paints and Poly
Cement, both hazardous substances. The application of the cement often required extreme
care to avoid getting it out of the contact area of the pieces, as the cement would dissolve the
plastic and subsequently damage the model. A situation requiring the precise application of
adhesive is present in your design, while we possess those who are already experienced in a
nearly identical process.

DABS recognise the hazards associated with the use of these chemical compounds. Also they
have mentioned the use of the plastic model kits and the use of a hazardous material. They
fulfil the tender criteria as it requires experience but they didnt receive full marks as no
evidence was provided. This is shown in the table below.

11
Criteria Fulfilment Marks Awarded DABS Evidence
Members of the construction 2
group can provide evidence of
competency when dealing
with hazardous chemicals.

Members of the construction 1 1 - Have used hazardous

group can provide materials before
satisfactory evidence of
competency regarding the use 2 marks awarded if picture
of hazardous chemicals. evidence was provided.

Tender is unable to provide 0

sufficient evidence of being
able to handle hazardous
chemicals.

5.2 Capability
5.2.1 Safety Procedure
During the construction phase, the contractors are in the proximity of many potential
hazards, ranging from the power tools to fine dust particles. Therefore, to ensure the safety of
all those present throughout the construction phase, the construction team must be able to
prove that they are able to uphold fundamental safety procedures, such as the use of Personal
Protective Equipment (PPE) and means of hazard mitigation.

At DABS, our construction staff are skilled with the safe operation of power tools and
machinery, having taken, at the very least, units involving their use in high school, which
teach the safe practice and use of them. They subsequently know how to operate a Drill Press,
Band Saw and Sanding Belt, amongst other tools, the hazards they pose, and how to minimise
the risk associated with their operation. This includes the wearing of Personal Protective
Equipment (PPE) such as gloves, boots, safety glasses and earmuffs by those working on the
rover in the workshop and ensuring nothing of length hangs off them, such as clothes, hair, or
necklaces, which can get caught in machinery. Masks are to be worn in the presence of saw
dust, which most often occurs when sanding timber. Additional hazards are posed with the
use of glues. To reduce the risk, gloves are to be worn when handling glues, or recently glued
components. If possible, a quantity of a suitable skin friendly solvent, as identified by the
glues Material Safety Data Sheet, is to be kept nearby to quickly wash off any glue that does
inadvertently come into contact with skin.

DABS have identified the correct PPE for each piece of machinery and hazardous materials.
The mention of all the correct PEE shows that DABS have a highly awareness for personal
and group safety. This complies fully with OHS and our Tender Criteria which implies that
they have experience in workshop environments with the correct type of PPE for each tool.
There is mention is section 5.3 Materials and Equipment that DABS have access to all the
PPE mentioned in the Tender Submission. Overall has shown they understand the importance
of PPE and safety. The marks are shown in the table below.

Criteria Fulfilment Marks Awarded DABS Evidence

12
Construction team can 3-2 3 -Mention of all
provide sufficient the required PPE
evidence that safety is for all required
being constantly machinery.
addressed in an -Thorough
appropriate manner. understanding
of the
requirement for
OHS
Basic evidence is 1
provided that makes a
weak case for the degree
to which safety is being
addressed.
No evidence given. 0

5.2.2 Efficiency
The construction stage is to consist of several stages that are dependent on the completion of
the previous stages. Therefore, tenders must provide evidence of efficiency throughout the
construction phase in the form of timelines proposing the completion of all construction
stages to realistic expectations.

After Assignment 3b, there is a period of 11 days starting on Monday the 8th of May and
ending Friday the 19th of May (Corresponding to Study Weeks 9 & 10) that the Rover can be
constructed and delivered. Due to the delivery occurring throughout week 10, we aim to have
the Rover completed by the end of week 9. This both ensures that we can deliver to it
throughout the designated delivery time and means that we have a few extra days of non-
critical time if there are unexpected delays that push back the delivery of the completed rover.
To this end, we have devised a schedule that coordinates and plans the construction of the
Rover and makes us aware of any delays, if they occur.

The section of Efficiency in DABS Tender Submission was thorough and precise. The table
they include in their submission has exact dates and what is to be done between those dates,
see Appendix F for the DABS tender submission to view the table on page 6. It is well
structured and easy to read. Its also realistic with the content to complete and shows that can
be reached and completed in time.

Criteria Fulfilment Marks Awarded DABS Evidence

Timeline proposed 3 3 The table is well structured
provides a realistic goal with reachable dates for each
with additional construction phase.
proposals of stage
completion dates, and
has accounted for
delays.
Timeline proposed is 2
suitable for general
construction, but is not
able to account for
delays.
Timeline proposed does 1

13
not provide a realistic
goal and does not
account for delays.
No timeline provided. 0

5.3 Materials and Equipment

An important stage of this project is the obtaining of the listed materials and equipment. A
team that can efficiently obtain all required parts is able to complete construction with a
decreased chance of delays. As such, a successful tender can provide evidence of being able
to provide all listed requirements.

At DABS, we have access to a large variety of tools and equipment. As shown in Appendix
A.1, we have access to a Drill Press and Sanding Belt. Unfortunately, we do not have access
to a bandsaw, although we do have access to a drop saw, which should be able to achieve the
similar or better results with the materials we are working with. We have full access to all the
required Personal Protective Equipment that is required for the safe construction of the Mars
Rover. As for materials, we are unable to source any 150x30mm pine. We are however able
to access 140x19mm pine at a good price and can make the base, windshield, roof and wheels
from this instead. We have no problem obtaining 30x30mm pine for the rear braces. As for
the axles, the material is not specified in your Design Package. However, we have a large
supply of M10 threaded rod and M10 nuts at hand, which we would be able to supply at no
cost. Links to the pine supplier are below:

DABS have supplied materials that are part of the Material listing free of charge which is a
major contributing factor to the marks provided. They also suggest modifying the
specification of the wood to something that they can obtain easily and that will still be
sufficient. If this is to be changed then several other attributes will also have to be modified
which is possible and therefore drive costing down. They also supplied an alternate
machinery in terms of a drop saw instead of a bandsaw. This shows they understand what
machinery is sufficient for the construction phase and are willing to compromise on
equipment. DABS have shown fully competent for this section due to their suggestions and
understanding of materials and equipment needed.

Criteria Fulfilment Marks Awarded DABS Evidence

Tender can provide 3-2 3 - Able to acquire
appropriate evidence all materials and
that materials are able if unable then
to be obtained with ease will substitute
and within a with an alternate
respectable time. material.
- Also have all
required
machinery or
alternate equally
sufficient
machinery.
Tender can provide 1
minimal assurances that
obtaining materials and
equipment is somewhat
achievable, but with
moderate delay.

14
Sufficient evidence not 0
provided.

5.4 Communication with M.R.D

The successful tender will have demonstrated sound communication skills in the past and an
ability to communicate promptly when necessary. The successful tender will be able to
demonstrate instances in which they have been able solves problems/ issues using clear and
precise communication. Clear communication between both parties is essential for a
successful construction stage.

While we have no documented examples of past communication, we believed that we

successfully demonstrated adequate communication skills during the meeting of our two
companies on the 7th of May 2017. After the initial analysis of your Design Package, we
were left with several questions and uncertainties about your design. After a quick meeting
with your representatives, our questions had been answered and we fully understood your
design. This would not have been possible without the usage of clear communication between
our two groups.

DABS have failed to supply evidence except a date, but in turn understand the importance of
communication and are required to be flexible. They have shown that they have the
communication skills to work alongside with M.R.D Inc. To reach 3 marks they would have
to mention a 24 hour reply period which complies with industry standards.

Criteria Fulfillment Marks Awarded DABS Evidence

Construction team can 3
provide appropriate
evidence that expresses
their capabilities
regarding communication
and adherence to
professional conduct.
Construction team can 2 2 - Supplied a
provide moderate correct date
evidence to suggest - Understand
efficiency with importance of
communication that communication.
indicates an effort to
adhere to professional
conduct.
Minimal evidence of 1
prompt communication
given, with insufficient
evidence provided.
No evidence given. 0

15
6 Ingenious Co. Tender Review
In this section Ingenious Co.s Tender review in Appendix E will be compared to the Tender
Criteria in Appendix B.

6.1 Experience
6.1.1 Overall Experience
As this project requires knowledge of various manufacturing procedures and tools, the
members of the successful tender group must provide evidence of prior experience that
expresses competency with general construction ability as well as proof of proficiency with
the various powered and manual tools being used for this project. A group that can prove
proficiency would be able to complete the project in the most efficient timeframe to a high
standard. A successful tender can provide evidence of said ability for all members of the
construction team.

Our members in Ingenious Co. have no experience with using band saws and sanding belts.
However, we do have experience in using normal saw and drill press. We are good with
following instructions. We will be able to learn how to use band saws and sanding belts in a
short amount of time.

Ingenious Co. have stated they have no experience with power tools but instead have
experience with regular manual tools. This is sufficient but they failed to supply evidence of
having experience. They portray that they are prepared to learn to use such machinery but
dont mention if they are able to acquire such machinery. To acquire full marks Ingenious Co
would have had to provide evidence of the members being able to use a drill press and a
manual saw.

Criteria Fulfilment Marks INGENIOUS Co. Evidence

Awarded
Construction team can 4-3
explicitly provide appropriate
evidence of each member
having previous experience in
material workshops or
general project construction.
Construction team can 2
provide appropriate evidence
of most members having
experience in workshops or
general project construction.
Construction team can 1 1 - Limited evidence
provide evidence to suggest supplied.
that at only one member has - Are willing to
previous experience in learn on the
material workshops or mentioned
general project construction. machinery.
No member of the 0
construction group can
provide sufficient evidence of
previous projects or
workshop experience.

16
6.1.2 Experience with Hazardous Materials
The assembly stage of this construction project involves the use of adhesive compounds
containing chemicals that pose an elevated risk to all persons within the construction area.
Therefore, tenders must provide evidence of competency when said chemicals are being
interacted with. A successful tender can provide evidence of previous experience with
hazardous chemicals and/or display competency when planning to use them.

In the past, I had experiences with using super glue. I used super glue to fix the mini figurines
that broke in my house. Refer to Appendix A1.

Ingenious here have some experience with an hazardous material and have supplied limited
evidence, see Appendix E for Ingenious Cos Tender Submission.

Criteria Fulfilment Marks INGENIOUS Co Evidence

Awarded
Members of the construction 2
group can provide evidence
of competency when dealing
with hazardous chemicals.

Members of the construction 1 1 .- Picture Evidence of

group can provide glued figurine.
satisfactory evidence of
competency regarding the
use of hazardous chemicals.

Tender is unable to provide 0

sufficient evidence of being
able to handle hazardous
chemicals.

6.2 Capability

6.2.1 Safety Procedure

During the construction phase, the contractors are in the proximity of many potential
hazards, ranging from the power tools to fine dust particles. Therefore, to ensure the safety of
all those present throughout the construction phase, the construction team must be able to
prove that they are able to uphold fundamental safety procedures, such as the use of Personal
Protective Equipment (PPE) and means of hazard mitigation.

The members in Ingenious Co. managed to build a Mars Rovers model for testing purposes
during Stage 1. During the constructing phase, the members involved made it a habit to wear
protective masks as they handled and assembled the parts together. For example, protective
masks were worn when they cut the wood to prevent dust from entering their noses. We are
fully aware of using protective gloves when using super glue to prevent any glue making
contact with our skin. Refer to Appendice B1.

17
Ingenious Co. have an understanding of the importance of PPE during the construction state
when using materials. They supplied pictures of their protective equipment which is
consistent with the Tender Criteria. To achieve 3 marks Ingenious Co would have had to
mention other types of PPE such as safety glasses and steel cap boots for example.

Criteria Fulfilment Marks Awarded INGENIOUS Co Evidence

Construction team can 3-2 2 - Provided picture
provide sufficient of PPE
evidence that safety is - Aware of skin
being constantly contact with
addressed in an hazardous
appropriate manner. material.
- Aware of PPE
required.

Basic evidence is 1
provided that makes a
weak case for the
degree to which safety
is being addressed.
No evidence given. 0

6.2.2 Efficiency
The construction stage is to consist of several stages that are dependent on the completion of
the previous stages. Therefore, tenders must provide evidence of efficiency throughout the
construction phase in the form of timelines proposing the completion of all construction
stages to realistic expectations.

There is no mention of a timeline or any indication of structure of when parts of the

construction phase should be completed by, therefore awarded 0 for this section.

Criteria Fulfilment Marks Awarded INGENIOUS Co Evidence

Timeline proposed 3
provides a realistic goal
with additional proposals
of stage completion dates,
and has accounted for
delays.
Timeline proposed is 2
suitable for general
construction, but is not
able to account for delays.
Timeline proposed does 1
not provide a realistic
goal and does not account
for delays.
No timeline provided. 0 0 None

18
6.1 Materials and Equipment
An important stage of this project is the obtaining of the listed materials and equipment. A
team that can efficiently obtain all required parts is able to complete construction with a
decreased chance of delays. As such, a successful tender can provide evidence of being able
to provide all listed requirements.

One of our contractors in Ingenious Co. lives near Bunnings, so whatever materials and
equipments that we lack, we can immediately get them. As far as I am concerned, we do not
have a band saw and sanding belt, but we do have a saw and cordless drill press. Refer to
Appendice B2.

Ingenious Co have stated that one of their contractors are located near a hardware store
entitles swift obtainment of the required materials. They have also supplied pictures as
evidence of their obtainable equipment which complies with the Tender Criteria. To obtain 3
marks Ingenious Co should have mentioned having sandpaper to compensate for the lack of a
sanding belt or suggesting that other members of the team were willing to obtain materials
needed. See Appendix E for Ingenious Co tender submission for evidence viewing.

Criteria Fulfilment Marks Awarded IGENIOUS Co. Evidence

Tender can provide 3-2 2 - Located near a
appropriate evidence hardware store
that materials are able in turn swiftly
to be obtained with obtaining
ease and within a required
respectable time. materials.
- Evidence provide
for equipment.
Tender can provide 1
minimal assurances
that obtaining
materials and
equipment is
somewhat achievable,
but with moderate
delay.
Sufficient evidence not 0
provided.

6.2 Communication with M.R.D

The successful tender will have demonstrated sound communication skills in the past and an
ability to communicate promptly when necessary. The successful tender will be able to
demonstrate instances in which they have been able solves problems/ issues using clear and
precise communication. Clear communication between both parties is essential for a
successful construction stage.

I represented Ingenious Co. to contact M.R.D Inc. I made sure to contact them as soon as my
company fully understood Stage 2 and assigned us to contractors and designers. I also replied
their emails within a day to ensure communication was more consistent.

19
Ingenious Co. have fully complied with the communication tender criteria. With the mention
of 24 hour return complies with industry standards, which portrays professional conduct.
Therefore obtain full marks for the Communication section.

Criteria Fulfilment Marks INGENIOUS Co Evidence

Awarded
Construction team can 3 3 - Understand
provide appropriate importance of
evidence that expresses communication
their capabilities - Mentions
regarding Professional
communication and conduct of 24 hour
adherence to reply
professional conduct.
Construction team can 2 - .
provide moderate
evidence to suggest
efficiency with
communication that
indicates an effort to
adhere to professional
conduct.
Minimal evidence of 1
prompt communication
given, with insufficient
evidence provided.
No evidence given. 0

7 GPR Tender Review

This section evaluates GPRs Tender application (Appendix D) against M.R.D Inc Tender
Criteria in Appendix B.

7.1 Experience

7.1.1 Overall Experience

As this project requires knowledge of various manufacturing procedures and tools, the
members of the successful tender group must provide evidence of prior experience that
expresses competency with general construction ability as well as proof of proficiency with
the various powered and manual tools being used for this project. A group that can prove
proficiency would be able to complete the project in the most efficient timeframe to a high
standard. A successful tender can provide evidence of said ability for all members of the
construction team.

GPR is a company that has done a lot of woodwork previously. We had just made a Mars
Rover per our designers specifications to be sure of its durability. As well as most of our
contractors are certified in using power tools. Certifications as well as wood work done are
shown in appendices. (Appendix A as well B)

20
GPR have supplied evidence of previous work and therefore proving their competency with
woodwork. Also they have supplied certification of competency for one member. See
Appendix D for GPR Tender submission to view evidence. To achieve 4-3 marks would to be
having more than one member qualified to construct the design package.

Criteria Fulfilment Marks Awarded GPR Evidence

Construction team can 4-3
explicitly provide appropriate
evidence of each member
having previous experience in
material workshops or general
project construction.
Construction team can provide 2 2 - Supplied pictures of
appropriate evidence of most previously completed
members having experience in projects.
workshops or general project - Supplied Evidence of
construction. certification of
competency.
Construction team can provide 1
evidence to suggest that at only
one member has previous
experience in material
workshops or general project
construction.
No member of the construction 0
group can provide sufficient
evidence of previous projects or
workshop experience.

7.1.2 Experience with Hazardous Materials

The assembly stage of this construction project involves the use of adhesive compounds
containing chemicals that pose an elevated risk to all persons within the construction area.
Therefore, tenders must provide evidence of competency when said chemicals are being
interacted with. A successful tender can provide evidence of previous experience with
hazardous chemicals and/or display competency when planning to use them.

As all our contractors at GPR have experience in using super glue efficiently. Pictures shown
in appendices would appeal to M.R.D regarding our experience. (Appendix A, B,)

GPR has supplied little evidence but still complies with the Tender criteria, but overall show
limited understanding of the hazardous implications of the material. To achieve full marks
more detail about the hazardous nature of the material and the need to proceed with caution.
Overall GPR needed more of an explanation in terms of the nature of the material to achieve
full marks. See Appendix D for evidence viewing.

Criteria Fulfilment Marks GPR Evidence

Awarded
Members of the construction 2
group can provide evidence
21
of competency when dealing
with hazardous chemicals.

Members of the construction 1 1 - Picture evidence of GPR

group can provide members gluing wood.
satisfactory evidence of
competency regarding the
use of hazardous chemicals.

Tender is unable to provide 0

sufficient evidence of being
able to handle hazardous
chemicals.

7.2 Capability

7.2.1 Safety Procedure

During the construction phase, the contractors are in the proximity of many potential
hazards, ranging from the power tools to fine dust particles. Therefore, to ensure the safety of
all those present throughout the construction phase, the construction team must be able to
prove that they are able to uphold fundamental safety procedures, such as the use of Personal
Protective Equipment (PPE) and means of hazard mitigation.

All our contractors are equipped with personal protective equipment while working on
projects, as well as using caution when using super glue. (Appendix C)

The company GPR have supplied photographic evidence of their safety produce. In the
photograph in fact there is no PPE being used. For example they are holding a glued piece but
in turn dont have any PPE on which gloves would be appropriate. If GPR has supplied a
photograph with PPE being used or even PPE that they are able to acquire then they would
have acquired 3-2 marks.

Criteria Fulfilment Marks Awarded GPR Evidence

Construction team can 3-2
provide sufficient
evidence that safety is
being constantly
addressed in an
appropriate manner.
Basic evidence is 1 1 - Supplies evidence that
provided that makes a doesnt portray any PPE
weak case for the being used. E.g - gloves.
degree to which safety
is being addressed.
No evidence given. 0

22
7.2.2 Efficiency
The construction stage is to consist of several stages that are dependent on the completion of
the previous stages. Therefore, tenders must provide evidence of efficiency throughout the
construction phase in the form of timelines proposing the completion of all construction
stages to realistic expectations.

The whole project is budgeted at a time of 2 weeks for the Mars Rover to be completed to
satisfaction. Table was provided, see Appendix

Criteria Fulfilment Marks Awarded GPR Evidence

Timeline proposed 3
provides a realistic goal
with additional
proposals of stage
completion dates, and
has accounted for
delays.
Timeline proposed is 2 2
suitable for general
construction, but is not
able to account for
delays.
Timeline proposed does 1
not provide a realistic
goal and does not
account for delays.
No timeline provided. 0

7.3 Materials and Equipment

An important stage of this project is the obtaining of the listed materials and equipment. A
team that can efficiently obtain all required parts is able to complete construction with a
decreased chance of delays. As such, a successful tender can provide evidence of being able
to provide all listed requirements.

GPR has access to the tools and materials needed. Attached are work done with the
equipment in appendices. (Appendix B,D)

GPR has supplied some equipment that is required for construction as mentioned in the
Tender Criteria. However it is limited and there is no mention being able to obtain the
required materials within a respectable time frame. GPR do have a ban saw which is
mentioned in the Tender criteria as a requirement. They supplied pictures of their
equipment but overall their response was limited and needed to be elaborated on.

Criteria Fulfilment Marks GPR Evidence

Awarded
Tender can provide 3-2 2 - Photographs of Equipment
appropriate evidence
that materials are able

23
to be obtained with
ease and within a
respectable time.
Tender can provide 1
minimal assurances
that obtaining
materials and
equipment is
somewhat achievable,
but with moderate
delay.
Sufficient evidence not 0
provided.

7.4 Communication with M.R.D

The successful tender will have demonstrated sound communication skills in the past and an
ability to communicate promptly when necessary. The successful tender will be able to
demonstrate instances in which they have been able solves problems/ issues using clear and
precise communication. Clear communication between both parties is essential for a
successful construction stage.

GPR is always readily available to M.R.D for contact, as all contractors have given relevant
contact details which would help with the communication with M.R.D for fast and effective
responses.

The communication between the two companies is absolutely critical. GPR have mentioned
fast replies which imply that communication will be quick and responsive between the two
companies. GPR have also supplied contact details for communication. However there is no
mention of a time frame for replies, where industry standards are 24 hour reply period.

Criteria Fulfilment Marks Awarded GPR Evidence

Construction team can 3
provide appropriate
evidence that expresses
their capabilities
regarding communication
and adherence to
professional conduct.
Construction team can 2
provide moderate
evidence to suggest
efficiency with
communication that
indicates an effort to
adhere to professional
conduct.
Minimal evidence of 1 1 - States fast
prompt communication responses
given, with insufficient - Supplies contact
evidence provided. details
24
 No evidence given. 0

8 Summary
The final marks are scored to show the successful company which shows DABS with a score
of 15/18 = 83.33%. Their tender wasnt perfect but overall was well laid out with useful
suggestions and sufficient evidence to compel their case. However if DABS is unavailable
then GPR is second preference and still acceptable for the construction of the M.R.D Design
package. Overall Ingenious Co and GPR wasnt in the same calibre of quality as DABS but
were still acceptable.

9 Appendices

9.1 Appendix A: M.R.D Inc Design Package Axle specs

ITEM MATERIAL ITEM DIMENSION QUANTITY PRICE TOTAL
NO. PER PRICE
UNIT
1. WOOD BASE OF 410mm*150mm*30mm 1 $1.85 $
ROVER 110mm*150mm*30mm 1 $0.50 $
155mm*30mm*30mm 2 $0.14 $
140mm*150mm*30mm 1 $0.63 $0.63
WHEELS 100mm diameter 4 $0.15 $0.60
*30mm thick
2. METAL AXLE 10mm Diameter* 160mm 2 ~$5.00 ~$10.00
in Length *
3. METAL WASHER Internal Diameter = 11 - 8 $0.05 $0.40
12 mm
4. METAL NUT TO TO FIT TAPPED END 4 $0.08 $0.32
FIT AXLE ON THE AXLE
5. METAL SELF LENGTH- 50MM 10 $0.43 $4.30
TAPPING WIDTH 5/10MM
SCREWS
LENGTH 20MM 10 $0.14 $1.40
WIDTH 5/10MM

6. METAL BRACKET 40mm*40mm*2mm 3 $1.00 $3.00

S
7. CHEMICAL LIQUID 200g $0.10 $2.00
COMPOUND NAILS
TOTAL $25.35

*wasnt able to find it on the website but they will cut to length free of charge
and will cost less.

25
9.2 Appendix B: Tender Evaluation Criteria
Tender Evaluation Criteria
The contents of this document contain a summary of criteria that will be met by the
successful tender of the Mars Land Rover. As well as a criteria summary, this document
contains a detailed description of the criteria that has been listed in the criteria
summary that must be met by the successful tender.

3.1 Experience

3.1.1 Overall Experience

As this project requires knowledge of various manufacturing procedures and tools, the
members of the successful tender group must provide evidence of prior experience that
expresses competency with general construction ability as well as proof of proficiency
with the various powered and manual tools being used for this project. A group that can
prove proficiency would be able to complete the project in the most efficient timeframe
to a high standard. A successful tender can provide evidence of said ability for all
members of the construction team.

Criteria Fulfilment Marks Awarded

Construction team can explicitly provide 4-3
appropriate evidence of each member
having previous experience in material
workshops or general project construction.
Construction team can provide 2
appropriate evidence of most members
having experience in workshops or general
project construction.
Construction team can provide evidence to 1
suggest that at only one member has
previous experience in material
workshops or general project construction.
No member of the construction group can 0
provide sufficient evidence of previous
projects or workshop experience.

26
3.1.2 Experience with hazardous chemicals
The assembly stage of this construction project involves the use of adhesive compounds
containing chemicals that pose an elevated risk to all persons within the construction
area. Therefore, tenders must provide evidence of competency when said chemicals are
being interacted with. A successful tender can provide evidence of previous experience
with hazardous chemicals and/or display competency when planning to use them.

Criteria Fulfilment Marks Awarded

Members of the construction group can 2
provide evidence of competency when
dealing with hazardous chemicals.
Members of the construction group can 1
provide satisfactory evidence of
competency regarding the use of
hazardous chemicals.
Tender is unable to provide sufficient 0
evidence of being able to handle hazardous
chemicals.
3.2.1 Capability

3.2.1 Safety Procedures:

During the construction phase, the contractors are in the proximity of many potential
hazards, ranging from the power tools to fine dust particles. Therefore, to ensure the
safety of all those present throughout the construction phase, the construction team
must be able to prove that they are able to uphold fundamental safety procedures, such
as the use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and means of hazard mitigation.

Criteria Fulfilment Marks Awarded

Construction team can provide sufficient 3-2
evidence that safety is being constantly
addressed in an appropriate manner.
Basic evidence is provided that makes a 1
weak case for the degree to which safety is
being addressed.
No evidence given. 0

27
3.2.2 Efficiency:
The construction stage is to consist of several stages that are dependent on the
completion of the previous stages. Therefore, tenders must provide evidence of
efficiency throughout the construction phase in the form of timelines proposing the
completion of all construction stages to realistic expectations.

Criteria Fulfilment Marks Awarded

Timeline proposed provides a realistic goal 3
with additional proposals of stage
completion dates, and has accounted for
delays.
Timeline proposed is suitable for general 2
construction, but is not able to account for
delays.
Timeline proposed does not provide a 1
realistic goal and does not account for
delays.
No timeline provided. 0
3.2.3 Materials and Equipment
An important stage of this project is the obtaining of the listed materials and equipment.
A team that can efficiently obtain all required parts is able to complete construction with
a decreased chance of delays. As such, a successful tender can provide evidence of being
able to provide all listed requirements.

Criteria Fulfilment Marks Awarded

Tender can provide appropriate evidence 3-2
that materials are able to be obtained with
ease and within a respectable time.
Tender can provide minimal assurances 1
that obtaining materials and equipment is
somewhat achievable, but with moderate
delay.
Sufficient evidence not provided. 0

28
3.3 Communication

3.3.1 Communication with M.R.D.

The successful tender will have demonstrated sound communication skills in the past
and an ability to communicate promptly when necessary. The successful tender will be
able to demonstrate instances in which they have been able solves problems/ issues
using clear and precise communication. Clear communication between both parties is
essential for a successful construction stage.

Criteria Fulfilment Marks Awarded

Construction team can provide appropriate 3
evidence that expresses their capabilities
regarding communication and adherence
to professional conduct.
Construction team can provide moderate 2
evidence to suggest efficiency with
communication that indicates an effort to
adhere to professional conduct.
Minimal evidence of prompt 1
communication given, with insufficient
evidence provided.
No evidence given. 0

9.3 Appendix C: Wheel Width

29
9.4 Appendix D: GPR Tender Submission

Tender Submission
TENDER EVALUATION: M.R.D. INC. (Mars Rover
Designs)
CLIENT: EMPACT
PROJECT: MARS ROVER
CONTRACTORS:
Carl Joshua Briagas 18333215
Mi Al-kendi 18750199
S.Ruben 19225669
30
 Executive summary
This tender has been written by GALACTIC PHOBOS ROVER
(GPR) in response to the requirements of the designing
company Mars Rover Designs (M.R.D. INC.), which is acting
on the behalf of the client EMPACT. The purpose of this tender
is to demonstrate to M.R.D. INC that GPR has complete
understanding of the design and construction method. Thereby
making it the most suitable company to construct the Mars
Rover project for them.

Among the main reasons why this tender should be considered

favourably is that the tender evaluation criteria set out by
M.R.D. INC have been accurately addressed. GPR also has the
ability to acquire all required materials, working equipment as
well as personal protective equipment required to be used during
construction of the Mars Rover. The designers require that the
contracting company will have staff with experience in using a
band saw, sanding belt, drill press, super glue efficiently. GPR
staff are familiar with correct safety procedures needed to use
the equipment needed in the process.

The designers can rest assured that GPR have the relevant
capabilities as required by them in the tender evaluation criteria.
Therefore, GPR not only maintain a core staff of highly skilled
and experienced staff, GPR have made a Mars Rover before
with our designers as well. We have the necessary skills set to
make the Mars rover intended.

31
GPR are proud of their staff, capabilities and reputation and
would like to assure M.R.D. INC that a reactor of the highest
standard will be delivered within the promised time-frame.

32
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................................... 34
2.0 Design Package Review .................................................................................................................................................... 34
2.1 Understanding Of The Design .................................................................................................................................. 34
2.2 Concerns And Solutions .................................................................................................................................................. 1
2.3 Client Brief Compliance ................................................................................................................................................. 2
3.0 Criteria ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 3
3.1 Experience........................................................................................................................................................................... 3
3.2 Capability ............................................................................................................................................................................. 4
3.3 Communication ................................................................................................................................................................. 5
4.0 Appendix A ................................................................................................................................................................................ 6
5.0 Appendix B ......................................................................................................................................................................... 7,8,9
6.0 Appendix C .............................................................................................................................................................................. 10
7.0 Appendix D........................................................................................................................................................................ 11,12

33
1.0 Introduction

This document contains GALACTIC PHOBOS ROVERs (GPR) tender

submission for the construction of the Mars Rover. This document has
been written in response to the criteria as defined by Mars Rover
Designs(M.R.D INC) document M.R.D. Stage 1 Design Package.pdf ,
developed on behalf of EMPACT.

2.0 Design Package Review

GPRs designers have performed a design review and have briefed and
the contractors on it. Therefore, GPR has a full and complete
understanding of the project.

2.1 Understanding of The Design

The design is based upon the cutting as well as re-joining of wood cut out
into specific measurements. After which are re-joined at angles to make
the rover, with the wheels being made from wood as well. The adhesives
would be the nails, screws. The design package shows specific
measurements which are clearly the intended process of making it. The
instructions, steps and guideline given by M.R.D INC in their design
package includes the safety precautions needed when handling certain
substances which may be harmful.

2.2 Concerns
GPR has 2 concerns relating to the design of the Mars Rover. The first
relates to the use of the metal brackets which are not clear in the step by
step procedures in the design package. As well as for the use of Liquid
nails, as it is a hazardous substance. We would to ensure M.R.D. INC that
we do have sufficient safety masks and equipment to handle this task
regardless. However, per M.R.Ds criteria in experience for using
34
hazardous chemicals, super glue has been specified which may cause
confusion.

2.3 Client Brief Compliance

The Client brief calls for a design that mainly composed of wood in
dimensions and quantity of:

Table 1: Rover capsule Dimensions

MATERIAL ITEM DIMENSIONS QUANTITY

WOOD BASE OF ROVER 410mm*150mm*30mm 1

110mm*150mm*30mm 1

155mm*30mm*30mm 2

140mm*150mm*30mm 1

WHEELS 100mm diameter *30mm thick 4

DOW ROD 140mm*10mm 1

Use of adhesives such as liquid nails, screws or glue to combine the

frame of the Mars Rover, in the step by step guide provided in the design
package.

35
3.0 Criteria
Please note that in answering this tender, the criteria have been listed in
italics and followed by GPRs response in normal text.

3.1 Experience
Experience in using Power Tools

Precise specifications in design require very accurate measurements for a successful rover
to be constructed. Successful tender will have staff with experience in using a band saw,
sanding belt and drill press; capable of following direct instructions precisely.

GPR is a company that has done a lot of woodwork previously. We had

just made a Mars Rover per our designers specifications to be sure of its
durability. As well as most of our contractors are certified in using power
tools. Certifications as well as wood work done are shown in appendices.
(Appendix A as well B)

Experience using Hazardous Chemicals

To successfully construct our rover, staff will need experience in using super glue efficiently
such that able to not waste any resulting in additional cost and also to not interfere with
rest of design

As all our contractors at GPR have experience in using super glue

efficiently. Pictures shown in appendices would appeal to M.R.D
regarding our experience. (Appendix A, B,

3.2 Capability
Safety Procedures

Staff must be familiar with correct safety procedure, such as wearing correct personal
protective equipment (PPE) while using band saw or sanding belt and also when handling
hazardous chemicals such as super glue.

36
All our contractors are equipped with personal protective equipment
while working on projects, as well as using caution when using super
glue. (Appendix C)
3

Efficiency

Staff must be able to work efficiently with a reliable work structure and schedule to
successfully complete the construction of the Mars Land Rover. Successful tender will
provide a realistic structure and schedule that they will be able to follow, prior to being
give the all clear to go ahead with the construction of the Mars Land Rover.

Timetable intended for Project: Mars Rover

Buy Materials intended for use in the 2-3 days

process of making the Mars Rover

Marking out measurements on materials as 4-5 days

well as making of base plates, wheels and
rod needed

Assembly and testing of product 2-3 days

Improvements needed 2-3 days

The whole project is budgeted at a time of 2 weeks for the Mars Rover to
be completed to satisfaction.

Materials and Equipment

Successful tender will have the ability to easily access all required materials and
equipment. This includes all materials equipment required to complete the construction of
the Mars Land Rover; it also includes all personal protective equipment required to be used
during construction of the Mars Land Rover.

GPR has access to the tools and materials needed. Attached are work
done with the equipment in appendices. (Appendix B,D)

37
3.3 Communication
Communication with M.R.D

The successful tender will have demonstrated sound communication skills in the past and
an ability to communicate promptly when necessary. The successful tender will have be
able to demonstrate past instances in which they have been able solves problems/ issues
through the use of clear and precise communication. Clear communication between both
parties is essential for a successful construction of the Mars Land Rover.

GPR is always readily available to M.R.D for contact, as all contractors

have given relevant contact details which would help with the
communication with M.R.D for fast and effective responses.

Contractors Contact Details:

Carl Joshua Briagas 18333215 (+61 412 054 075)

Mi Al-kendi 18750199 (+61 424 591 537)

S.Ruben 19225669 (+61 422 437 737)

38
Appendices

39
4.0 Appendix A Certificate For Using Power Tools

40
5.0 Appendix B.1 - Wood Work

41
5.0 Appendix B.2 - Wood Work

5.0 Appendix B.3 - Wood Work

42
5.0 Appendix B.4 - Wood Work

5.0 Appendix B.5 - Wood Work

43
6.0 Appendix C.1 and C.2 Glue work

C.1 C.2

44
7.0 Appendix D.1 Equipment

45
7.0 Appendix D.2 Equipment

46
9.5 Appendix E: Ingenious Tender Submission

9.6 Appendix F: DABS Tender Submission

47
 DABS

Tender Submission

Tender Evaluator: M.R.D.

Client: EMPACT
Project: Mars Rover
Date: 19/04/2017
Revision: C

Abel Titus Andrew Rowe Bradyn Ianello

Burim Emini Declan Swain Sanganak Kasare
 Executive Summary

This document is the DABS Tender Application for the construction of the M.R.D. designed
Mars Rover, for the client EMPACT. This document is intended to show our understanding
and comprehension of the Mars Rover design, including the fabrication and assembly of its
parts, the needs and requirements of the client, EMPACT, for whom M.R.D. are acting on
behalf of, and to show our suitability for the awarding of the construction contract to build
the Rover.

We strongly feel that our Tender Application should be strongly considered and assessed
against other applications in order to find the best possible deal for the client. We believe
that we will best provide this service due to our full understanding of the design, our
practical experience and finally, our high standards and adherence to design.

Among the concerns raised during the inspection of compliance to client brief is that the
rover design, as it currently stands, exceeds the maximum length allowed by the client.
Several solutions to this problem are further discussed. These include smaller wheels and a
shortened wheel base. Additional concerns are raised about the strength of the bonds
between the wooden pieces and it is suggested that the connections are augmented with
nails.

We fully meet almost all of the requirements of the Tender as laid out in the Tender
Evaluation Criteria, and where we do not be these requirements, we offer viable
alternatives. We do not have access to a band saw, but we can accomplish all tasks with a
drop saw, which we have available, instead. Additionally, we were unable to source a
supply of 150x30mm timber, but we have found a supply of 140x19mm pine, which can be
used instead. All other claims are supported with evidence included in our attached group
resume, contained in the appendix at the end of the document. We have experience with
the safe usage of all power tools required to fabricate the rover, while we have several
members skilled with the handling and use of hazardous chemicals such as glues.

We eagerly await your response and look forward to hopefully working with you. We
unequivocally guarantee that we can supply the rover on time, according to the design in
compliance to the Client Brief and to the high standards that we not only expect, but
demand of ourselves.
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 2
2.0 Design Package Review ..................................................................................................................... 2
2.1 Understanding of Design .............................................................................................................. 2
2.2 Compliance with Client Brief......................................................................................................... 3
2.3 Concerns, Solutions and Suggestions for Improvements of Design ............................................. 4
3.0 Tender Evaluation Criteria Response ................................................................................................ 4
3.1 Experience ..................................................................................................................................... 4
3.1.1 Experience with Power Tools ................................................................................................. 4
3.1.2 Experience with Hazardous Chemicals .................................................................................. 5
3.2 Capability ...................................................................................................................................... 5
3.2.1 Safety Procedures .................................................................................................................. 5
3.2.2 Efficiency ................................................................................................................................ 5
3.2.3 Materials and Equipment....................................................................................................... 6
3.3 Communication ............................................................................................................................. 7
4.0 Appendix A.1: DABS Resume ............................................................................................................ 8
5.0 Appendix B.1: M.R.D. Design Package .............................................................................................. 9

Page 1 of 9
1.0 Introduction
This document is the Tender Application of DABS for the construction of the Mars Rover designed by
M.R.D. for the client, EMPACT. This Tender Application has been written to show our suitability for
the construction of the previously mentioned design, showing our skill, experience and
craftsmanship with similar projects in the past, and by demonstrating compliance with the specified
Tender Evaluation Criteria (TEC) laid out in M.R.D.s Design Package.

2.0 Design Package Review

A comprehensive review of the design package has been undertaken to fully understand the
Designers Mars Rover design to an intricate detail. This is essential to deliver a final product of the
highest standards, an expectation which we place great importance on and will endeavour to
achieve.

2.1 Understanding of Design

The overall design of the M.R.D. Mars Rover bears some resemblance to a buggy with an
aerodynamic shape. Given the information of the M.R.D design obtained at the group meeting on
the between the Rover Designers and the DABS Construction Team on the 7/04/2017, the design is
intended to obtain a significant horizontal component to its overall downwards velocity, generated
during its descent down the ramp, in order to spread the force generated when it impacts the
ground over a larger period of time, akin to rolling when landing from a fall as some martial arts and
sports teach. This means the rover and its components are subjected to lesser pressures, and are
thus less likely break or suffer any material failures. I am somewhat sceptical of the effect of this
aerodynamic shaping on overall horizontal velocity, given the low speeds involved. It will not be
counterproductive to the intended workings of the design, however. The axles are places at the
extreme ends of the rover, placing them far apart, giving a relatively high wheelbase and therefore
good directional stability, helping to ensure that the rover continues in a straight-line.

The body of the rover consists of a wooden base measuring 410mm long, 30mm high and 150mm
wide. Axle holes of radius 5mm are placed 10mm from either end and half way up the base, running
parallel to the lateral axis. Rising from the front of this base, at an angle of 30 degrees, is a wind
shield, measuring a total overall length of 250mm, intended to provide an aerodynamic form.
35mm in from the side and 114mm from the lower starting edge of the wind shield is a hole of
radius 20mm, in which the head and neck of the bottle will be placed when undergoing testing.
From the top of the wind shield is a roof piece, measuring 180mm long and 30mm tall. This
continues the 30 degree slope from the wind shield, and ends with a 25 degree slope, pointing
downwards towards the end of the base. The roof piece ends with the connection to 2 rear braces,
which serve to secure the roof piece and by extension, the front wind shield as well as to stop the
bottle from moving left to right relative to the longitudinal axis of the rover. The roof piece sits flush
with both angles of the wind shield and the rear braces. These braces measure 155mm overall
length, a width of 30mm and an unspecified height. The braces attach at the rear of the base at an
angle of 25 degrees, and at opposite ends of the lateral axis of the rover.

The wheels are likewise made of pine, measuring an unspecified width, with radius of 50mm and
axle holes of radius 5mm.

Page 2 of 9
The axles consists of a 5mm radius rod, length unspecified and material unspecified, threaded at
each end with a nut securing the wheels in place.

2.2 Compliance with Client Brief

The design brief states a several design conditions that the rover must comply with. These are listed
below.

The rover must be self-guided and have no manual control.

The bottle must be easily visible and require no complex assembly or procedure to secure.
The design cost must be less than or equal to $30.
No more than 25% of the final cost can be related to 3D printing.
The rover can be no longer than 420mm, no wider than 297mm and no higher than 210mm.
The rover must have 2 axles.

Additionally, there are testing standards that must be met. The rover cannot be held against these
until testing is undertaken, however outcomes of the testing can be discussed and predicted based
on known physics and understanding of the design.

The rover must roll down a 2m long slope of an angle between 30 and 45 degrees before
being subjected to a 1m freefall without the load (the bottle) or the rover receiving major
damage that impairs their ability to function as intended, or the bottle detaching from the
rover.
The rover must land on its wheels.
The rover must freely move down the slope.

The design of M.R.D.s rover meets all of the Design Criteria except one. The maximum allowed
length of the rover is 420mm, while the length of the rover of their design is 490mm long. We
suspect that the designers forgot to include the length that the wheels add to the designs overall
length. As of writing (3:50 PM 17/04/2017), I have not yet contacted the designers about this,
although I intend to after finishing the Compliance with Client Brief section.

For the Test Criteria, we have 3 minor concerns:

Firstly, that the material of the axles is not specified, and the only thing vaguely axle like in the bill of
materials is timber. Coupled with the tight tolerances of the body axle holes, could lead to the
friction of the axles against the body being sufficient to stop the rover from free rolling. This was,
however, discussed in the group meeting between the DABS Contracting Team and the M.R.D Design
Team on the 7/04/2017 and it was agreed that the body axle holes should be oversized to
accommodate for this, although the current Design Package does not reflect this.

Secondly, that the design is somewhat top heavy. Most of the mass of the rover is concentrated
above the axles, and thus the design is less stable in free fall, and more likely to tumble, potentially
causing the rover to land upside down. This is not likely to be too much of a concern, firstly due to
the small distance of freefall (1m) and secondly due to the high relative horizontal velocity that this
design is intended to create, which should, with air resistance, slightly stabilise the rover, as it will
face the direction it is travelling, as that provides the most aerodynamic form.

Thirdly, the bottle is not fully secured in the rover. There is nothing to stop the bottle from sliding
out backwards from the rover, which would be of considerable concern during the landing of the
rover. This was discussed in in the group meeting between the DABS Contracting Team and the

Page 3 of 9
M.R.D Design Team on the 7/04/2017. Brackets were supposed to be mounted to the base, which
would secure the bottle in place, however they are not included in this revision of the Design
Package, except in the Bill of Materials.

2.3 Concerns, Solutions and Suggestions for Improvements of Design

At DABS, we have several concerns about your rover. In addition to the 3 previously mentioned
Testing Criteria, as well as the non-compliant length, we have identified 2 other concerns we have
with M.R.D.s design. The first is that axle details, such as material and length are not specified. The
second is that the joints are only held together by glue, which can be brittle.

To fix these issues, the axle details should be clearly indicated in the Design Package and
communicated to the designers. The joints can be reinforced by using nails in addition to the glue,
however that will require the wheels to be moved inwards about 10-20mm each, but that also solves
another problem, by shortening the length of the rover. The length can also be shortened by
reducing the radius of the wheels. These do not come entirely without downsides. Reducing the
wheel base will decrease the stability of the rovers movement down the slope, and will allow it to
more easily veer off. The exact solution should be decided by the design team, but it is paramount
that this issue is addressed.

The bottle can also be secured against rearward motion with the addition of a nail on each side,
placed about 175mm from the rear of the base and protruding around 20mm. When the bottle is
placed in the rover, an elastic band would be placed across the bottle. If looped so that the top of
the horizontal bottle and the base of the bottle are held by the band, the bottle should be secure
and not easily move.

3.0 Tender Evaluation Criteria Response

In order to complete the rover to the standards expected by the client, EMPACT, and by ourselves,
we must first have the necessary experience, capability and skills to do this. The Designers at M.R.D.
have defined the necessary prerequisites in their Tender Evaluation Criteria. DABS meets all skill and
experience requirements, but not all requirements for materials and equipment. We have however
found suitable alternatives.

Experience and Capability are all detailed within the attached appendix at the end of this document.

The questions asked or requirements stated in the TEC are duplicated here and indicated in Italics.
Responses are in normal form.

3.1 Experience
In the TEC, M.R.D. stated that experience with power tools and hazardous chemicals would both be
required. DABS meets all of these criteria.

3.1.1 Experience with Power Tools

Experience with Power Tools

Precise specifications in design require very accurate measurements for a successful rover to be
constructed. Successful tender will have staff with experience in using a band saw, sanding belt and
drill press; capable of following direct instructions precisely.

Page 4 of 9
The members of our team have extensive experience in Woodworking, working with an array of
tools including band saws, sanding belts and drill presses to produce a variety of finished products.
This can be seen in Appendix A.1, our Group Resume, which lists our individual skills and experience.
Unfortunately, we do not have any examples of past DABS work to present to you, as you are our
first Tender Application, however we have included past individual work as part of our supporting
evidence.

3.1.2 Experience with Hazardous Chemicals

Experience with Hazardous Chemicals

To successfully construct our rover, staff will need experience in using super glue efficiently such that
able to not waste any resulting in additional cost and also to not interfere with rest of design.

We have less experience handling hazardous chemicals than we have with power tools, although we
are by no means unskilled in this department. Some team members have previous experience with
plastic model kits, which involved oil based paints and Poly Cement, both hazardous substances.
The application of the cement often required extreme care to avoid getting it out of the contact area
of the pieces, as the cement would dissolve the plastic and subsequently damage the model. A
situation requiring the precise application of adhesive is present in your design, while we possess
those who are already experienced in a nearly identical process.

3.2 Capability
3.2.1 Safety Procedures
Safety Procedures

Staff must be familiar with correct safety procedure, such as wearing correct personal protective
equipment (PPE) while using band saw or sanding belt and also when handling hazardous chemicals
such as super glue.

The hazards identified in the Risk Management Plan of your Design Package are the use of power
tools/machinery and working with glue.

At DABS, our construction staff are skilled with the safe operation of power tools and machinery,
having taken, at the very least, units involving their use in high school, which teach the safe practice
and use of them. They subsequently know how to operate a Drill Press, Band Saw and Sanding Belt,
amongst other tools, the hazards they pose, and how to minimise the risk associated with their
operation. This includes the wearing of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) such as gloves, boots,
safety glasses and earmuffs by those working on the rover in the workshop and ensuring nothing of
length hangs off them, such as clothes, hair, or necklaces, which can get caught in machinery. Masks
are to be worn in the presence of saw dust, which most often occurs when sanding timber.

Additional hazards are posed with the use of glues. To reduce the risk, gloves are to be worn when
handling glues, or recently glued components. If possible, a quantity of a suitable skin friendly
solvent, as identified by the glues Material Safety Data Sheet, is to be kept nearby to quickly wash
off any glue that does inadvertently come into contact with skin.

3.2.2 Efficiency
Efficiency

Page 5 of 9
Staff must be able to work efficiently with a reliable work structure and schedule to successfully
complete the construction of the Mars Land Rover. Successful tender will provide a realistic structure
and schedule that they will be able to follow, prior to being give the all clear to go ahead with the
construction of the Mars Land Rover.

After Assignment 3b, there is a period of 11 days starting on Monday the 8th of May and ending
Friday the 19th of May (Corresponding to Study Weeks 9 & 10) that the Rover can be constructed and
delivered. Due to the delivery occurring throughout week 10, we aim to have the Rover completed
by the end of week 9. This both ensures that we can deliver to it throughout the designated delivery
time and means that we have a few extra days of non-critical time if there are unexpected delays
that push back the delivery of the completed rover. To this end, we have devised a schedule that
coordinates and plans the construction of the Rover and makes us aware of any delays, if they occur.

Date
Monday, Design is reviewed for any revisions or changes in dimension or specification.
08/05/17 Clarification or confirmation of changes made may be requested by email.
Tuesday, Rover materials purchased. Designers & client notified of commencement of
09/05/17 construction.
Wednesday, Base and wheels of rover body are fabricated.
10/05/17
Thursday, The windshield and rear braces are fabricated, the completed parts are checked
11/05/17 for compliance to the specifications and the body is assembled if specifications are
met. Designers & client notified of progress, with visual evidence.
Friday, The axles and wheels are fabricated.
12/05/17
Saturday, The fabricated parts are once again checked for compliance to the specification,
13/05/17 and if compliant, final assembly of Rover occurs; wheels are attached to the body
and checked to see if they freely spin.
Sunday, Final adjustments or minor changes. Rover is compared to the Specifications and
14/05/17 adjusted if necessary. Client & designers are notified of completion.

3.2.3 Materials and Equipment

Materials and Equipment

Successful tender will have the ability to easily access all required materials and equipment. This
includes all materials equipment required to complete the construction of the Mars Land Rover; it
also includes all personal protective equipment required to be used during construction of the Mars
Land Rover.

At DABS, we have access to a large variety of tools and equipment. As shown in Appendix A.1, we
have access to a Drill Press and Sanding Belt. Unfortunately, we do not have access to a bandsaw,
although we do have access to a drop saw, which should be able to achieve the similar or better
results with the materials we are working with. We have full access to all the required Personal
Protective Equipment that is required for the safe construction of the Mars Rover.

As for materials, we are unable to source any 150x30mm pine. We are however able to access
140x19mm pine at a good price and can make the base, windshield, roof and wheels from this
instead. We have no problem obtaining 30x30mm pine for the rear braces. As for the axles, the
material is not specified in your Design Package. However, we have a large supply of M10 threaded

Page 6 of 9
rod and M10 nuts at hand, which we would be able to supply at no cost. Links to the pine supplier
are below:

140x19mm Pine: https://www.bunnings.com.au/140-x-19mm-x-2-4m-premium-grade-dressed-

pine_p8401467

30x30mm Pine: https://www.bunnings.com.au/30-x-30mm-2-4m-standard-and-better-dressed-all-

round-pine_p0021173

3.3 Communication
Communication with M.R.D.

The successful tender will have demonstrated sound communication skills in the past and an ability
to communicate promptly when necessary. The successful tender will have been able to demonstrate
past instances in which they have been able solves problems/ issues through the use of clear and
precise communication. Clear communication between both parties is essential for a successful
construction of the Mars Land Rover.

While we have no documented examples of past communication, we believed that we successfully

demonstrated adequate communication skills during the meeting of our two companies on the 7th of
May 2017. After the initial analysis of your Design Package, we were left with several questions and
uncertainties about your design. After a quick meeting with your representatives, our questions had
been answered and we fully understood your design. This would not have been possible without the
usage of clear communication between our two groups.

Page 7 of 9
4.0 Appendix A.1: DABS Resume

Page 8 of 9
 DABS
SKILLS
Abel Titus

1. Intermediate Woodworking (year 8 and 10)

2. Metal working (Year 8)

Andrew Rowe

1. Metalwork (year 8)
2. Woodwork (years 8 to 10)
3. Experience with most power tools and machines
Completed Engineering studies (years 11 & 12)

Bradyn Iannello

1. Metalworking (years 7 to 10)

2. Woodworking (years 7 to 9)
3. Technical Graphics Drawing reading (years 8 to 10)
4. Teamworking.
5. Management and Customer Service.

Burim Emini

1. Taught Martial Arts (1 year)

2. Leadership and people skills.
3. Woodwork (year 8)
4. Metalwork (year 8)
5. Mechanical Workshop (years 9 and 10)
6. Technical Drawing (years 8 to 10)

Declan Swain

1. Woodworking (years 8 to 10)

2. Metalworking (years 9 & 10)

Sanganak Kasare

1. Metalwork (year 10)

2. Balsa wood Modelling (year 9)

[email protected]
WORK EXPERIENCE/ EMPLOYMENT HISTORY
Burim Emini

Target Australia (1 Year)

Autobarn As Salesman (2.5 Years)

Sanganak Kasare

Kmart Australia (3 Years)

Virgin Australia Aircraft Maintenance Work Experience (5 Days)

TOOLS
1. Electric Saw
2. Grinder
3. Bench Sander
4. Drill Press
5. Drop Saw
6. Lathe
7. Sheet Metal Guillotine
8. Sheet Metal Bender
9. Power drill with various drill bit sizes
10. Hammers
11. Spanners
12. Screwdrivers

Safety Gear:
1. Welding goggles
2. Work boots
3. Work Gloves

Photographic Evidence, Certificates etc available on request.

[email protected]
5.0 Appendix B.1: M.R.D. Design Package

Page 9 of 9
 Mars Rover Designs

Product Specification & Design Package

Client: EMPACT

Product: Mars Land Rover

 Mars Rover Designs

Dear EMPACT,

Re: Design & Construction of Mars Land Rover

We are very pleased to present to you our full design documentation package
for the Mars Land Rover. Our package includes the following documents listed
below.

Document Contents
Materials Cost
Design Specifications
Safety Procedure for
Construction
Tender Evaluation

Within our documents provided is all information that is required to

successfully complete the task listed in your client brief, Client Brief.pdf.
We vouch that all information provided within any and all documents listed in
our Design Package are of our own work and is not sourced from an external
IP. For any queries or concerns do not hesitate to contact a member of our
team.

Regards,

Alex Stephens (Construction Engineer)

Nathan Rowe (Construction Engineer)
Jordan Beamsley (Construction Contractor/Engineer)
Kheeshon Selvraja (Construction Contractor)
Yash Mittha (Construction Contractor

Mars Rover Designs 2 Email: [email protected]

 Mars Rover Designs

Materials Cost
Client: EMPACT
Project: Mars Rover Design

Mars Rover Designs 3 Email: [email protected]

MATERIAL COSTING

ITEM MATERIAL ITEM DIMENSION QUANTITY PRICE TOTAL

NO. PER PRICE
UNIT
1. WOOD BASE OF 410mm*150mm*30mm 1 $1.85 $1.85
ROVER
110mm*150mm*30mm 1 $0.50 $0.50

155mm*30mm*30mm 2 $0.14 $0.28

140mm*150mm*30mm 1 $0.63 $0.63

WHEELS 100mm diameter 4 $0.15 $0.60

*30mm thick

DOW 140mm*10mm 1 $0.07

ROD $0.07

2. NUT TO 4 $0.08 $0.32

FIX AXLE
3. WASHER 8 $0.05 $0.40
4. SELF LENGTH- 50MM 10 $4.30
TAPPING WIDTH 5/10MM $0.43
SCREWS
LENGTH 20MM 10 $0.14 $1.40
WIDTH 5/10MM
5. LIQUID 200g $0.10 $2.00
NAILS
6. METAL 40mm*40mm*2mm 2 $1.00 $2.00
BRACKETS
TOTAL $14.35

Mars Rover Designs 4 Email: [email protected]

 Mars Rover Designs

Design Specification
Client: EMPACT
Project: Mars Rover Design

Mars Rover Designs 5 Email: [email protected]

 80

30

25
43
176

40

25
30
110 200
30

410

5
Rover Side View

30

20
30
20

30

10

110
150
110
10

10 30

Rover Back View

150

Rover Front View

 Manufacturing Process Figure 1

10

10

15

15
Manufacturing Process Figure 2

10 10
 Manufacturing Process Figure 3 Manufacturing Process Figure 4

150

75

64

114
50

250
20
64

75
 Hole for lid

155

65

32
32
25

25
65

Manufacturing Process Figure 6

Manufacturing Process Figure 5

123

32
32
43
43

Manufacturing Process Figure 7

 80

150

43
25
0 32

65
Manufacturing Process Figure 9

180
32
Manufacturing Process Figure 8

10
100

R50

Manufacturing Process Figure 10

Manufacturing Process Figure 11
 Mars Rover Designs

Manufacturing Process
Client: EMPACT
Project: Mars Rover Design

Mars Rover Designs 6 Email: [email protected]

Introduction
Listed below is the step by step instructions for the construction of the Mars Land Rover.
The following steps must be executed in the order they are presented to successfully
construct the Mars Land Rover. Any queries or issues that you may have with the
completion of a step, should be expressed to one of M.R.D. staff members.

Assembly/Manufacturing Process
1. Take the BASE piece [Drawing #01 Rover Side View & Rover Front View] and mark
out with a pencil centre points for axle holes from each end along the side. Also
mark 7.5mm up along the same side therefore marking a line along the centre of
that side.

2. After the sides are marked, the drill holes through the marked centre holes [Drawing
#01 Rover Side View].
Note: To drill completely through the BASE, it will have to be drilled half way
through on one side, then flipped and drilled again from the other 30mm side
to be drilled through completely.

3. Take the FRONT piece [Drawing #03 Manufacturing Process Figure 3 & 4]. Mark out
the dashed lines with a pencil. Drill a hole at the intersection as shown.

4. On the side of the FRONT piece [Drawing #04 Manufacturing Process Figure 5],
mark with the pencils vertically at the dimensions shown. Draw a line from the
corner of the wood to that line in a diagonal direction. Cut along the diagonals
resulting in a parallelogram shape.
Note: the angles should be correct, but if not done correctly on the right side,
it will result in having to repeat steps 3 5 on other piece of wood.

5. Take the BACK piece [Drawing #04 Manufacturing Process Figure 6 & Drawing #01
Rover Back View] (if couldnt be obtained then cut out required measurements) and
mark out dashed lines with pencil at dimensions shown. Then mark a straight
diagonal line from the line marked to the corner of the wood. Cut along the
diagonals resulting in a parallelogram shape.
Note: the angles should be correct, but if not done correctly on the right side,
it will result in having to repeat steps 6 7 on other piece of wood.

6. Repeat step 5 again, duplicating another piece.

7. Take the Roof piece [Drawing #01 Rover Front view & Drawing #05
Manufacturing Process Figure 8]. Mark, with pencil, the dashed lines at the
dimensions shown

Mars Rover Designs 7 Email: [email protected]

 8. Once marked mark out a diagonal line from the corner of the wood to the top of the
marking on each side. [Drawing #05 Manufacturing Process Figure 9]
Note: the angles should be correct, but if not done correctly on the right side,
it will result in having to repeat steps 9 10 on other piece of wood.

9. Next take the Wheels [Drawing #01 Rover Back View & Drawing #05
Manufacturing Process Figure 10 & Manufacturing Process Figure 11] and mark out
centre point at dimensions shown.
Note: if this piece cant be obtained then it will have to be cut out a piece of
wood large enough to cut 4 Wheels

10. Once marked drill a hole through the wheel marked centre point with dimensions as
shown.

11. Repeat steps 11-12 four times.

12. Place an axle into the two holes in the base. Attach wheels by tightening nuts on
either side. Repeat with the other axle of the rover.

13. Using liquid nails, create the rover through combining all components onto the base.
[Drawing #01 All Views].

Mars Rover Designs 8 Email: [email protected]

 Mars Rover Designs

Risk Management Plan

Client: EMPACT
Project: Mars Rover Design

Mars Rover Designs 9 Email: [email protected]

Material Safety Data Sheet

Hazardous Substance, Dangerous Goods

1. MATERIAL AND SUPPLY COMPANY IDENTIFICATION

Product name: Liquid Nails Heavy Duty

Synonyms: Product Code Bar Code
Liquid Nails Heavy Duty, 350g 930069712461601 9300697124616
Liquid Nails Heavy Duty, 350g Export 100188 9300697124616
Liquid Nails Heavy Duty, 350g Triple Pk 100173 9300697124852
Liquid Nails Heavy Duty, 375mL NZ 941430211117201 9414302111172

Recommended use: Multipurpose construction adhesive.

Supplier: Selleys, a division of

DuluxGroup (Australia) Pty Ltd
ABN: 67 000 049 427
Street Address: 1956 Dandenong Road
Clayton VIC 3168
Australia
1300 555 205

Emergency telephone number: Australia 1800 033 111 New Zealand 0800 734 607

2. HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION

This material is hazardous according to health criteria of Safe Work Australia.

Hazard Category:
Xi Irritant

Risk Phrase(s):
R11: Highly Flammable.
R36: Irritating to eyes.
R66: Repeated exposure may cause skin dryness or cracking.
R67: Vapours may cause drowsiness and dizziness.
R51/53: Toxic to aquatic organisms. May cause long term adverse effects in the aquatic
environment.

Safety Phrase(s):
S1/2: Keep locked up and out of the reach of children.
S16: Keep away from sources of ignition.
S24/25: Avoid contact with skin and eyes.
S29: Do not empty into drains.
S36/37/39: Wear suitable protective clothing, gloves and eye/face protection.
S45: In case of accident or if you feel unwell, seek medical advice immediately (show the
label whenever possible).

Poisons Schedule (Aust): Not applicable

Product name: Liquid Nails Heavy Duty SDS No: SELAUSEN000148

Issued: 19 September 2014 Version: 2.0 Page: 1 of 8
Material Safety Data Sheet

DANGEROUS GOODS CLASSIFICATION

Classified as Dangerous Goods by the criteria of the Australian Code for the Transport of Dangerous
Goods by Road & Rail and the New Zealand NZS5433: Transport of Dangerous Goods on Land.

Class: 3 Flammable Liquid

3. COMPOSITION INFORMATION

CHEMICAL ENTITY CAS NO. PROPORTION

Methyl acetate 79-20-9 10 - 30%

Acetone 67-64-1 1 - 10%
Naphtha (petroleum), hydrotreated light 64742-49-0 1 - 10%
Heptane 142-82-5 1 - 10%
Ingredients determined to be non-hazardous - Balance
________
100%

4. FIRST AID MEASURES

If poisoning occurs, contact a doctor or Poisons Information Centre (Phone Australia 131 126, New Zealand
0800 764 766).

Inhalation: Remove victim from exposure - avoid becoming a casualty. Remove contaminated clothing
and loosen remaining clothing. Allow patient to assume most comfortable position and keep warm. Keep at
rest until fully recovered. If breathing laboured and patient cyanotic (blue), ensure airways are clear and
have a qualified person give oxygen through a facemask. If breathing has stopped apply artificial respiration
at once. In the event of cardiac arrest, apply external cardiac massage. Seek immediate medical advice.

Skin contact: For gross contamination, immediately drench with water and remove clothing. Continue to
flush skin and hair with plenty of water (and soap if material is insoluble). For skin burns, cover with a clean,
dry dressing until medical help is available. If blistering occurs, do NOT break blisters. If swelling, redness,
blistering, or irritation occurs seek medical assistance.

Eye contact: If in eyes, hold eyelids apart and flush the eyes continuously with running water. Continue
flushing until advised to stop by the Poisons Information Centre or a Doctor; or for at least 15 minutes and
transport to Doctor or Hospital.

Ingestion: Rinse mouth with water. If swallowed, do NOT induce vomiting. Give a glass of water to drink.
Never give anything by the mouth to an unconscious patient. If vomiting occurs give further water. Seek
medical advice.

Notes to physician: Treat symptomatically.

5. FIRE-FIGHTING MEASURES

Specific hazards: Flammable liquid. May form flammable vapour mixtures with air. Flameproof equipment
necessary in area where this chemical is being used. Nearby equipment must be earthed. Electrical
requirements for work area should be assessed according to AS3000. Vapour may travel a considerable
distance to source of ignition and flash back. Avoid all ignition sources. All potential sources of ignition
Product name: Liquid Nails Heavy Duty SDS No: SELAUSEN000148
Issued: 19 September 2014 Version: 2.0 Page: 2 of 8
Material Safety Data Sheet

(open flames, pilot lights, furnaces, spark producing switches and electrical equipment etc) must be
eliminated both in and near the work area. Do NOT smoke.

Fire fighting further advice: If safe to do so, remove containers from path of fire. Keep containers cool
with water spray. On burning may emit toxic fumes. Fire fighters to wear self-contained breathing
apparatus and suitable protective clothing if risk of exposure to vapour or products of combustion.

Hazchem Code: 3Y

Suitable extinguishing media: Alcohol resistant foam is the preferred fire-fighting medium. If material is
involved in a fire use alcohol resistant foam, standard foam or dry agent (carbon dioxide, dry chemical
powder).

6. ACCIDENTAL RELEASE MEASURES

SMALL SPILLS
Wear protective equipment to prevent skin and eye contamination. W ipe up with absorbent (clean rag or
paper towels). Allow absorbent to dry before disposing with normal household garbage.

LARGE SPILLS
Shut off all possible sources of ignition. Clear area of all unprotected personnel. Prevent further leakage or
spillage if safe to do so. Slippery when spilt. Avoid accidents, clean up immediately. Wear protective
equipment to prevent skin and eye contamination and the inhalation of vapours. Work up wind or increase
ventilation. Contain - prevent run off into drains and waterways. Use absorbent (soil, sand or other inert
material). Collect and seal in properly labelled containers or drums for disposal. Use a spark-free shovel.
If contamination of sewers or waterways has occurred advise local emergency services.

Dangerous Goods Initial Emergency Response Guide No: 14

7. HANDLING AND STORAGE

Handling: Avoid skin and eye contact and inhalation of vapour.

Storage: Store in a cool, dry, well-ventilated place and out of direct sunlight. Store away from
incompatible materials described in Section 10. Store away from sources of heat or ignition. Store away
from foodstuffs. Keep containers closed when not in use - check regularly for leaks.

This material is classified as a Dangerous Good Class 3 Flammable Liquid as per the criteria of
the Australian Dangerous Goods Code and must be stored in accordance with the relevant
regulations.

Product name: Liquid Nails Heavy Duty SDS No: SELAUSEN000148

Material Safety Data Sheet

8. EXPOSURE CONTROLS / PERSONAL PROTECTION

National occupational exposure limits: No value assigned for this specific material by Safe Work
Australia or Department of Labour New Zealand.

However for:

TWA STEL CARCINOGEN NOTICES

ppm mg/m3 ppm mg/m3 CATEGORY

Methyl acetate 200 606 250 757 - -

Acetone 500 1,185 1,000 2,375 -
Heptane 400 1,640 -500 2,050 - -

As published by the Safe Work Australia or Department of Labour New Zealand.

TWA - The time-weighted average airborne concentration over an eight-hour working day, for a five-day
working week over an entire working life.

STEL (Short Term Exposure Limit) - the average airborne concentration over a 15 minute period which
should not be exceeded at any time during a normal eight-hour workday.

These Exposure Standards are guides to be used in the control of occupational health hazards. All
atmospheric contamination should be kept too as low a level as is workable. These exposure standards
should not be used as fine dividing lines between safe and dangerous concentrations of chemicals. They
are not a measure of relative toxicity.

If the directions for use on the product label are followed, exposure of individuals using the product should
not exceed the above standard. The standard was created for workers who are routinely, potentially
exposed during product manufacture.

Biological Limit Values: As per the National Model Regulations for the Control of Workplace Hazardous
Substances (Safe Work Australia) the ingredients in this material do not have a Biological Limit Allocated.

Engineering measures: Ensure ventilation is adequate to maintain air concentrations below Exposure
Standards. Use with local exhaust ventilation or while wearing appropriate respirator. Vapour heavier than
air - prevent concentration in hollows or sumps. DO NOT enter confined spaces where vapour may have
collected. Keep containers closed when not in use.

Personal protection equipment: YELLOW: OVERALLS, SAFETY SHOES, SAFETY GLASSES,

GLOVES, RESPIRATOR.

MANUFACTURING, PACKAGING AND TRANSPORT:

Wear overalls, safety glasses and impervious gloves. Use with adequate ventilation. If inhalation risk exists
wear organic vapour/particulate respirator meeting the requirements of AS/NZS 1715 and AS/NZS 1716.
Available information suggests that gloves made from nitrile rubber be suitable for intermittent contact.
However, due to variations in glove construction and local conditions, the user should make a final
assessment. Always wash hands before smoking, eating, drinking or using the toilet. W ash contaminated
clothing and other protective equipment before storing or re-using.

CONSUMER USE:
Wear gloves. Avoid inhaling vapour. W ash hands after use.

Product name: Liquid Nails Heavy Duty SDS No: SELAUSEN000148

Issued: 19 September 2014 Version: 2.0 Page: 4 of 8
Material Safety Data Sheet

Hygiene measures: Keep away from food, drink and animal feeding stuffs. When using do not eat, drink or
smoke. Wash hands prior to eating, drinking or smoking. Avoid skin and eye contact and inhalation of
vapour. Ensure that eyewash stations and safety showers are close to the workstation location.

9. PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES

Form / Colour / Odour: Brown paste with a solvent odour.

Solubility: Soluble in organic solvents. Insoluble in water.

Specific Gravity (20 C): 1.18 1.20
Relative Vapour Density (air=1): >1
Vapour Pressure (20 C): N Av
Flash Point (C): -9 (Solvent)
Flammability Limits (%): N Av
Autoignition Temperature (C): N Av
% Volatile by Volume: 32
Melting Point/Range (C): N Av
Boiling Point/Range (C): N Av
Decomposition Point (C): N Av
pH: N Av
Viscosity (Flow time): >100 seconds (6mm jet)
Total VOC (g/Litre): N Av

(Typical values only - consult specification sheet)

N Av = Not available N App = Not applicable

10. STABILITY AND REACTIVITY

Reactivity: No reactivity hazards are known for the material.

Chemical stability: This material is thermally stable when stored and used as directed.

Hazardous reactions: No known hazardous reactions.

Conditions to avoid: Elevated temperatures and sources of ignition.

Incompatible materials: Oxidising agents.

Hazardous decomposition products: Oxides of carbon and nitrogen, smoke and other toxic fumes.

11. TOXICOLOGICAL INFORMATION

No adverse health effects expected if the product is handled in accordance with this Safety Data Sheet and
the product label. Symptoms or effects that may arise if the product is mishandled and overexposure occurs
are:

Acute Effects

Inhalation: Inhalation of vapour can result in headaches, dizziness and possible nausea. Inhalation of high
concentrations can produce central nervous system depression, which can lead to loss of co-ordination,
impaired judgement and if exposure is prolonged, unconsciousness.
Product name: Liquid Nails Heavy Duty SDS No: SELAUSEN000148
Issued: 19 September 2014 Version: 2.0 Page: 5 of 8
Material Safety Data Sheet

Skin contact: Contact with skin may result in irritation. W ill have a degreasing action on the skin.
Repeated or prolonged skin contact may lead to irritant contact dermatitis.

Ingestion: Swallowing can result in nausea, vomiting and central nervous system depression. If the victim
is uncoordinated there is greater likelihood of vomit entering the lungs and causing subsequent
complications. Aspiration pneumonia (inflammation of the lung) may result.

Eye contact: An eye irritant.

Long Term Effects: No information available for product.

Acute toxicity / Chronic toxicity:

No LD50 data available for the product.

12. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION

Avoid contaminating waterways.

Ecotoxicity: No information available.

Persistence and degradability: No information available.

Mobility: No information available.

13. DISPOSAL CONSIDERATIONS

Persons conducting disposal, recycling or reclamation activities should ensure that appropriate personal
protection equipment is used, see Section 8. Exposure Controls and Personal Protection of this SDS.

If possible material and its container should be recycled. If material or container cannot be recycled,
dispose in accordance with local, regional, national and international Regulations.

14. TRANSPORT INFORMATION

ROAD AND RAIL TRANSPORT

Classified as Dangerous Goods by the criteria of the Australian Code for the Transport of Dangerous
Goods by Road & Rail and the New Zealand NZS5433: Transport of Dangerous Goods on Land.

UN No: 1133
Dangerous Goods Class: 3 Flammable Liquid
Packing Group: III
Hazchem Code: 3Y
Emergency Response Guide No: 14

Proper Shipping Name: ADHESIVES

Segregation Dangerous Goods: Not to be loaded with explosives (Class 1), flammable gases (Class 2.1),
if both are in bulk, toxic gases (Class 2.3), spontaneously combustible substances (Class 4.2), oxidising
agents (Class 5.1), organic peroxides (Class 5.2) or radioactive substances (Class 7), however exemptions
may apply.
Product name: Liquid Nails Heavy Duty SDS No: SELAUSEN000148
Issued: 19 September 2014 Version: 2.0 Page: 6 of 8
Material Safety Data Sheet

MARINE TRANSPORT
Classified as Dangerous Goods by the criteria of the International Maritime Dangerous Goods Code (IMDG
Code) for transport by sea.

UN No: 1133
Dangerous Goods Class: 3 Flammable Liquid
Packing Group: III
Hazchem Code: 3Y

Proper Shipping Name: ADHESIVES

AIR TRANSPORT
Classified as Dangerous Goods by the criteria of the International Air Transport Association (IATA)
Dangerous Goods Regulations for transport by air.

UN No: 1133
Dangerous Goods Class: 3 Flammable Liquid
Packing Group: III
Hazchem Code: 3Y

Proper Shipping Name: ADHESIVES

15. REGULATORY INFORMATION

This material is not subject to the following international agreements:

Montreal Protocol (Ozone depleting substances)

The Stockholm Convention (Persistent Organic Pollutants)
The Rotterdam Convention (Prior Informed Consent)

This material is subject to the following international agreements:

Basel Convention (Hazardous Waste)

Wastes from production, formulation and use of inks, dyes, pigments, paints, lacquers, varnish

International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL)

Annex III - Harmful Substances carried in Packaged Form

This material/constituent(s) is covered by the following requirements:

All the constituents of this material are listed on the Australian Inventory of Chemical Substances
(AICS).

Product name: Liquid Nails Heavy Duty SDS No: SELAUSEN000148

Issued: 19 September 2014 Version: 2.0 Page: 7 of 8
Material Safety Data Sheet

16. OTHER INFORMATION

Literary reference

This Material Safety Data Sheet has been prepared by Chemical Data Services Pty Ltd (chemdata.com.au)
on behalf of its client.

Reason(s) For Issue: 5 Yearly Revision

Change to Transport Information
Format change
Minor Text Changes.

Material Safety Data Sheets are updated frequently. Please ensure that you have a current copy.

This MSDS summarises at the date of issue our best knowledge of the health and safety hazard information
of the product, and in particular how to safely handle and use the product in the workplace. Since
DuluxGroup (Australia) Pty Ltd and DuluxGroup (New Zealand) Pty Ltd cannot anticipate or control the
conditions under which the product may be used, each user must, prior to usage, review this MSDS in the
context of how the user intends to handle and use the product in the workplace.

If clarification or further information is needed to ensure that an appropriate assessment can be made, the
user should contact this company.

Our responsibility for product as sold is subject to our standard terms and conditions, a copy of which is sent
to our customers and is also available upon request.

Product name: Liquid Nails Heavy Duty SDS No: SELAUSEN000148

Issued: 19 September 2014 Version: 2.0 Page: 8 of 8
RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN

1.0 Introduction

This document contains a risk management plan, including possible hazards and
complications that may come during the design, construction and testing of the Mars Land
Rover. Any complications or issues that come up that cannot be resolved and/ or affect the
construction of the Mars Land Rover should be reported to a staff member of M.R.D
immediately.
2.0 Design Stage:

2.1 Group Unfamiliarity

2.1.1 Miscommunication within the group due to inexperience working with each other
can lead to time wastage and redundancies.

2.1.2 Mitigations include concise, non-ambiguous communication and always trying to

keep in contact. This will allow the rest of the group to always know exactly what is
currently occurring and what is required.

2.2 Eye strain

2.2.1 Long, uninterrupted computer work can lead to eyestrain and headaches.

1.2.2 Mitigations include hourly breaks (or as needed) for short periods.

3.0 Construction Stage:

3.1 Use of Machinery

3.1.1 Machinery, including power tools, is a major hazard in construction. Persons with
little to no experience operating machinery such as band saws and sanding belts
can lead to very serious injury.

3.1.2 To lower the effects of this risk, Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) must be
worn by everyone in the workshop. PPE includes but is not limited to safety
boots, safety glasses, not wearing loose clothing, tying up long hair and using
ear plugs.

3.1.3 To mitigate the likelihood of this risk, machinery should only be operated by
persons of experience.

3.2 Use of Hazardous Chemicals

3.2.1 Potentially hazardous chemicals, including super glue, can pose risks of
poisoning, bodily harm and skin irritation.

Mars Rover Designs 10 Email: [email protected]

3.2.2 These risks can be mitigated by use of appropriate PPE, taking care when
using and reference to the products MSDS.

3.2.3 Dust from wood sanding and sawing may become airborne creating a risk of
inhaling or eye irritation.
3.2.4 PPE including dust masks and safety glasses should be worn to mitigate this risk.

4.0 Testing Stage:

4.1 Rover falling off drop

4.1.1 During the falling stage, the rover because it is effectively a freefalling weight of
around 1kg, posing the risk of bodily harm.

4.1.2 To ensure no one is struck by this freefalling weight, a safe radius distance
around the testing area should be abided by, with only one person conducting
the test.

4.2 Materials breaking upon impact

4.2.1 Impact with ground after falling stage poses the possibility for materials
breaking/ splintering off the main chassis of the rover. This has the potential of
causing bodily harm, with the possibility of small wood splinters becoming lodged
in skin.

4.2.2 This can be mitigated by following the procedure outlined in item 1.b [Rover
falling off drop].

Mars Rover Designs 11 Email: [email protected]

 Mars Rover Designs

Tender Evaluation Criteria

Client: EMPACT
Project: Mars Rover Design

Mars Rover Designs 12 Email: [email protected]

1.0 Introduction
The contents of this document contain a summary of criteria that will be met by the
successful tender of the Mars Land Rover. As well as a criteria summary, this document
contains a detailed description of the criteria that has been listed in the criteria summary,
that must be met by the successful tender.

1.0 Criteria Summary

Criteria Title Criteria Details Mark
Experience Experience in using power tools
Experience using hazardous /6
chemicals

Capability Safety procedures

Efficiency /9
Materials and Equipment

Communication Communication with M.R.D.

/3

3.0 Criteria Summary Specific Details

3.1 Experience

3.1.1 Experience in using Power Tools:

Precise specifications in design require very accurate measurements for a successful rover
to be constructed. Successful tender will have staff with experience in using a band saw,
sanding belt and drill press; capable of following direct instructions precisely.

Experience using Hazardous Chemicals:

To successfully construct our rover, staff will need experience in using super glue efficiently
such that able to not waste any resulting in additional cost and also to not interfere with
rest of design.

3.2.1 Capability

3.2.1 Safety Procedures:

Staff must be familiar with correct safety procedure, such as wearing correct personal
protective equipment (PPE) while using band saw or sanding belt and also when handling
hazardous chemicals such as super glue.

Mars Rover Designs 13 Email: [email protected]

3.2.2 Efficiency:

Staff must be able to work efficiently with a reliable work structure and schedule to
successfully complete the construction of the Mars Land Rover. Successful tender will
provide a realistic structure and schedule that they will be able to follow, prior to being give
the all clear to go ahead with the construction of the Mars Land Rover

3.2.3 Materials and Equipment

Successful tender will have the ability to easily access all required materials and equipment.
This includes all materials equipment required to complete the construction of the Mars
Land Rover; it also includes all personal protective equipment required to be used during
construction of the Mars Land Rover.

3.3 Communication

3.3.1 Communication with M.R.D.

The successful tender will have demonstrated sound communication skills in the past and an
ability to communicate promptly when necessary. The successful tender will have be able to
demonstrate past instances in which they have been able solves problems/ issues through
the use of clear and precise communication. Clear communication between both parties is
essential for a successful construction of the Mars Land Rover.

Mars Rover Designs 14 Email: [email protected]

 Ingenious Co.

Tender Submission

Tender Evaluation: M.R.D Inc.

Client: EMPACT
Project: Mars Rover
Date: 19/04/17
Members: Wajeeh Ullah
Qais Malikzai
Brendan Teo Meng Zhen
Sharier Islam
Vishant Vishant
Yuhuai Liu
 Executive Summary

This tender has been written by Ingenious Co. in response to the requirements of the
designing company M.R.D Inc. The purpose of this tender is to show M.R.D Inc. that
Ingenious Co. has all the required experience and hands-on skills and we meet all their
requirements in their tender evaluation criteria in their design package.

Among the main reasons why this tender should be considered favourably is that the tender
evaluation criteria set out by M.R.D Inc. have been accurately addressed. The designers
require that the contracting company is experienced in using power tools such as band saw,
sanding belt and drill press. Our members in Ingenious Co. have no experience with using
band saws and sanding belts. However, we do have experience in using normal saw and drill
press. We are good with following instructions. We will be able to learn how to use band
saws and sanding belts in a short amount of time.

The designers also require that we have experiences and are skilled with using super glue. In
the past, I personally had experiences with using super glue. I used super glue to fix the mini
figurines that broke in my house.

Furthermore, they require that we are familiar with the correct safety procedures. For
example, knowing when to use protective masks and gloves. The members in Ingenious Co.
managed to build a Mars Rovers model for testing purposes during Stage 1. During the
constructing phase, the members involved made it a habit to wear protective masks as they
handled and assembled the parts together. For example, protective masks were worn when
they cut the wood to prevent dust from entering their noses. We are fully aware of using
protective gloves when using super glue to prevent any glue making contact with our skin.

Moreover, they require us to have access to all required materials and equipments. One of
our contractors in Ingenious Co. lives near Bunnings, so whatever materials and equipments
that we lack, we can immediately get them. As far as I am concerned, we do not have a
band saw and sanding belt, but we do have a saw and cordless drill press.

Lastly, they require that we have great communication skills with their designers. I
represented Ingenious Co. to contact M.R.D Inc. I made sure to contact them as soon as my
company fully understood Stage 2 and assigned us to contractors and designers. I also
replied their emails within a day to ensure communication was more consistent.

Ingenious Co. are proud to have great members and we can assure M.R.D Inc. that we will
be able to build the Mars Rover model well and within the deadline.
Table of Contents

1.0 Introduction.1
2.0 Design Package Review1
2.1 Understanding of Design1
2.2 Client Brief Compliance..1
2.3 Concerns and Solutions..3
3.0 Criteria3
3.1 Experience..3
3.2 Capability.4
3.3 Communication..4
4.0 Appendices.5
4.1 Appendice A1.6
4.2 Appendice B1.7
4.3 Appendice B2.8
4.4 Appendice C1.9

5.0 Latest Design Package10

1.0 Introduction
This document contains Ingenious Co.s tender submission for the construction of M.R.D
Inc.s Mars Rovers. This document has been written in response to the criteria as defined by
M.R.D Inc. in their tender evaluation criteria in their design package.

2.0 Design Package Review

A design review has been performed to ensure that Ingenious Co. has a full understanding
of the project.

2.1 Understanding of Design

The Mars Rover is designed in such a way that it holds the bottle horizontally inside the
body. This is to prevent or minimise the damage done to the bottle as it lands. The wheels
have a width dimension of 30mm. This ensures that the Mars Rover model is able to travel
in a straight line when it goes down the slope.

2.2 Client Brief Compliance

The Client Brief calls for a Mars Rover model design which costs less than $30. The cost of
materials used to build their Mars Rover model is below $30. A table to show the materials
costs is shown below.
2.3 Concerns and Solutions
One of the concerns raised was how the front of the body of the Mars Rover was shaped. I
was concerned that when it vertically drops, it will overturn and land that way. I suggested
that the body of the Mars Rover be reshaped to a cylinder or cuboid shape. Another
concern of mine was the Mars Rover would be too heavy if we used their measurements. If
it is too heavy it will drop and hit the ground with a much stronger force. I suggested to
reduce the length of the model. For example, reduce the length from 410mm to around
350mm. Also move the front wheels back by around 20 to 30mm as it was almost aligned
with the front of the body of the Mars Rover. Furthermore, they did not mention where did
they get their materials from. I solved this problem by asking them during the meeting. They
confirmed with me that all the materials were bought from Bunnings.

3.0 Criteria
Please note that in answering this tender, the criteria have been listed in italics and then
Ingenious Co.s response follows in normal text.

3.1 Experience
Experience in using power tools

Precise specifications in design require very accurate measurements for a successful rover to
be constructed. Successful tender will have staff with experience in using a band saw,
sanding belt and drill press; capable of following direct instructions precisely.

Our members in Ingenious Co. have no experience with using band saws and sanding belts.
However, we do have experience in using normal saw and drill press. We are good with
following instructions. We will be able to learn how to use band saws and sanding belts in a
short amount of time.

Experience in using Hazardous Chemicals

To successfully construct our rover, staff will need experience in using super glue efficiently
such that able to not waste any resulting in additional cost and also to not interfere with rest
of design.

In the past, I had experiences with using super glue. I used super glue to fix the mini
figurines that broke in my house. Refer to Appendice A1.
3.2 Capability
Safety Procedures

Staff must be familiar with correct safety procedure, such as wearing correct personal
protective equipment (PPE) while using band saw or sanding belt and also when handling
hazardous chemicals such as super glue.

The members in Ingenious Co. managed to build a Mars Rovers model for testing purposes
during Stage 1. During the constructing phase, the members involved made it a habit to
wear protective masks as they handled and assembled the parts together. For example,
protective masks were worn when they cut the wood to prevent dust from entering their
noses. We are fully aware of using protective gloves when using super glue to prevent any
glue making contact with our skin. Refer to Appendice B1.

Materials and Equipment

Successful tender will have the ability to easily access all required materials and equipment.
This includes all materials equipment required to complete the construction of the Mars Land
Rover; it also includes all personal protective equipment required to be used during
construction of the Mars Land Rover.

One of our contractors in Ingenious Co. lives near Bunnings, so whatever materials and
equipments that we lack, we can immediately get them. As far as I am concerned, we do not
have a band saw and sanding belt, but we do have a saw and cordless drill press. Refer to
Appendice B2.

3.3 Communication
Communication with M.R.D Inc.

The successful tender will have demonstrated sound communication skills in the past and an
ability to communicate promptly when necessary. The successful tender will have be able to
demonstrate past instances in which they have been able solves problems/ issues through
the use of clear and precise communication. Clear communication between both parties is
essential for a successful construction of the Mars Land Rover.

I represented Ingenious Co. to contact M.R.D Inc. I made sure to contact them as soon as my
company fully understood Stage 2 and assigned us to contractors and designers. I also
replied their emails within a day to ensure communication was more consistent.
Appendices
Appendice A1-1

Appendice A1-2
Appendice B1-1

Appendice B1-2

Appendice B1-3
Appendice B2-1

Appendice B2-2
Appendice C1
 Mars Rover Designs

Product Specification & Design Package

Client: EMPACT

Product: Mars Land Rover

 Mars Rover Designs

Dear EMPACT,

Re: Design & Construction of Mars Land Rover

We are very pleased to present to you our full design documentation package
for the Mars Land Rover. Our package includes the following documents listed
below.

Document Contents
Materials Cost
Design Specifications
Safety Procedure for
Construction
Tender Evaluation

Within our documents provided is all information that is required to

successfully complete the task listed in your client brief, Client Brief.pdf.
We vouch that all information provided within any and all documents listed in
our Design Package are of our own work and is not sourced from an external
IP. For any queries or concerns do not hesitate to contact a member of our
team.

Regards,

Alex Stephens (Construction Engineer)

Nathan Rowe (Construction Engineer)
Jordan Beamsley (Construction Contractor/Engineer)
Kheeshon Selvraja (Construction Contractor)
Yash Mittha (Construction Contractor

Mars Rover Designs 2 Email: [email protected]

 Mars Rover Designs

Materials Cost
Client: EMPACT
Project: Mars Rover Design

Mars Rover Designs 3 Email: [email protected]

MATERIAL COSTING

ITEM MATERIAL ITEM DIMENSION QUANTITY PRICE TOTAL

NO. PER PRICE
UNIT
1. WOOD BASE OF 410mm*150mm*30mm 1 $1.85 $1.85
ROVER
110mm*150mm*30mm 1 $0.50 $0.50

155mm*30mm*30mm 2 $0.14 $0.28

140mm*150mm*30mm 1 $0.63 $0.63

WHEELS 100mm diameter 4 $0.15 $0.60

*30mm thick

DOW 140mm*10mm 1 $0.07

ROD $0.07

2. NUT TO 4 $0.08 $0.32

FIX AXLE
3. WASHER 8 $0.05 $0.40
4. SELF LENGTH- 50MM 10 $4.30
TAPPING WIDTH 5/10MM $0.43
SCREWS
LENGTH 20MM 10 $0.14 $1.40
WIDTH 5/10MM
5. LIQUID 200g $0.10 $2.00
NAILS
6. METAL 40mm*40mm*2mm 2 $1.00 $2.00
BRACKETS
TOTAL $14.35

Mars Rover Designs 4 Email: [email protected]

 Mars Rover Designs

Design Specification
Client: EMPACT
Project: Mars Rover Design

Mars Rover Designs 5 Email: [email protected]

 80

30

25
43
176

40

25
30
110 200
30

410

5
Rover Side View

30

20
30
20

30

10

110
150
110
10

10 30

Rover Back View

150

Rover Front View

 Manufacturing Process Figure 1

10

10

15

15
Manufacturing Process Figure 2

10 10
 Manufacturing Process Figure 3 Manufacturing Process Figure 4

150

75

64

114
50

250
20
64

75
 Hole for lid

155

65

32
32
25

25
65

Manufacturing Process Figure 6

Manufacturing Process Figure 5

123

32
32
43
43

Manufacturing Process Figure 7

 80

150

43
25
0 32

65
Manufacturing Process Figure 9

180
32
Manufacturing Process Figure 8

10
100

R50

Manufacturing Process Figure 10

Manufacturing Process Figure 11
 Mars Rover Designs

Manufacturing Process
Client: EMPACT
Project: Mars Rover Design

Mars Rover Designs 6 Email: [email protected]

Introduction
Listed below is the step by step instructions for the construction of the Mars Land Rover.
The following steps must be executed in the order they are presented to successfully
construct the Mars Land Rover. Any queries or issues that you may have with the
completion of a step, should be expressed to one of M.R.D. staff members.

Assembly/Manufacturing Process
1. Take the BASE piece [Drawing #01 Rover Side View & Rover Front View] and mark
out with a pencil centre points for axle holes from each end along the side. Also
mark 7.5mm up along the same side therefore marking a line along the centre of
that side.

2. After the sides are marked, the drill holes through the marked centre holes [Drawing
#01 Rover Side View].
Note: To drill completely through the BASE, it will have to be drilled half way
through on one side, then flipped and drilled again from the other 30mm side
to be drilled through completely.

3. Take the FRONT piece [Drawing #03 Manufacturing Process Figure 3 & 4]. Mark out
the dashed lines with a pencil. Drill a hole at the intersection as shown.

4. On the side of the FRONT piece [Drawing #04 Manufacturing Process Figure 5],
mark with the pencils vertically at the dimensions shown. Draw a line from the
corner of the wood to that line in a diagonal direction. Cut along the diagonals
resulting in a parallelogram shape.
Note: the angles should be correct, but if not done correctly on the right side,
it will result in having to repeat steps 3 5 on other piece of wood.

5. Take the BACK piece [Drawing #04 Manufacturing Process Figure 6 & Drawing #01
Rover Back View] (if couldnt be obtained then cut out required measurements) and
mark out dashed lines with pencil at dimensions shown. Then mark a straight
diagonal line from the line marked to the corner of the wood. Cut along the
diagonals resulting in a parallelogram shape.
Note: the angles should be correct, but if not done correctly on the right side,
it will result in having to repeat steps 6 7 on other piece of wood.

6. Repeat step 5 again, duplicating another piece.

7. Take the Roof piece [Drawing #01 Rover Front view & Drawing #05
Manufacturing Process Figure 8]. Mark, with pencil, the dashed lines at the
dimensions shown

Mars Rover Designs 7 Email: [email protected]

 8. Once marked mark out a diagonal line from the corner of the wood to the top of the
marking on each side. [Drawing #05 Manufacturing Process Figure 9]
Note: the angles should be correct, but if not done correctly on the right side,
it will result in having to repeat steps 9 10 on other piece of wood.

9. Next take the Wheels [Drawing #01 Rover Back View & Drawing #05
Manufacturing Process Figure 10 & Manufacturing Process Figure 11] and mark out
centre point at dimensions shown.
Note: if this piece cant be obtained then it will have to be cut out a piece of
wood large enough to cut 4 Wheels

10. Once marked drill a hole through the wheel marked centre point with dimensions as
shown.

11. Repeat steps 11-12 four times.

12. Place an axle into the two holes in the base. Attach wheels by tightening nuts on
either side. Repeat with the other axle of the rover.

13. Using liquid nails, create the rover through combining all components onto the base.
[Drawing #01 All Views].

Mars Rover Designs 8 Email: [email protected]

 Mars Rover Designs

Risk Management Plan

Client: EMPACT
Project: Mars Rover Design

Mars Rover Designs 9 Email: [email protected]

Material Safety Data Sheet

Hazardous Substance, Dangerous Goods

1. MATERIAL AND SUPPLY COMPANY IDENTIFICATION

Product name: Liquid Nails Heavy Duty

Synonyms: Product Code Bar Code
Liquid Nails Heavy Duty, 350g 930069712461601 9300697124616
Liquid Nails Heavy Duty, 350g Export 100188 9300697124616
Liquid Nails Heavy Duty, 350g Triple Pk 100173 9300697124852
Liquid Nails Heavy Duty, 375mL NZ 941430211117201 9414302111172

Recommended use: Multipurpose construction adhesive.

Supplier: Selleys, a division of

DuluxGroup (Australia) Pty Ltd
ABN: 67 000 049 427
Street Address: 1956 Dandenong Road
Clayton VIC 3168
Australia
1300 555 205

Emergency telephone number: Australia 1800 033 111 New Zealand 0800 734 607

2. HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION

This material is hazardous according to health criteria of Safe Work Australia.

Hazard Category:
Xi Irritant

Risk Phrase(s):
R11: Highly Flammable.
R36: Irritating to eyes.
R66: Repeated exposure may cause skin dryness or cracking.
R67: Vapours may cause drowsiness and dizziness.
R51/53: Toxic to aquatic organisms. May cause long term adverse effects in the aquatic
environment.

Safety Phrase(s):
S1/2: Keep locked up and out of the reach of children.
S16: Keep away from sources of ignition.
S24/25: Avoid contact with skin and eyes.
S29: Do not empty into drains.
S36/37/39: Wear suitable protective clothing, gloves and eye/face protection.
S45: In case of accident or if you feel unwell, seek medical advice immediately (show the
label whenever possible).

Poisons Schedule (Aust): Not applicable

Product name: Liquid Nails Heavy Duty SDS No: SELAUSEN000148

Issued: 19 September 2014 Version: 2.0 Page: 1 of 8
Material Safety Data Sheet

DANGEROUS GOODS CLASSIFICATION

Classified as Dangerous Goods by the criteria of the Australian Code for the Transport of Dangerous
Goods by Road & Rail and the New Zealand NZS5433: Transport of Dangerous Goods on Land.

Class: 3 Flammable Liquid

3. COMPOSITION INFORMATION

CHEMICAL ENTITY CAS NO. PROPORTION

Methyl acetate 79-20-9 10 - 30%

Acetone 67-64-1 1 - 10%
Naphtha (petroleum), hydrotreated light 64742-49-0 1 - 10%
Heptane 142-82-5 1 - 10%
Ingredients determined to be non-hazardous - Balance
________
100%

4. FIRST AID MEASURES

If poisoning occurs, contact a doctor or Poisons Information Centre (Phone Australia 131 126, New Zealand
0800 764 766).

Inhalation: Remove victim from exposure - avoid becoming a casualty. Remove contaminated clothing
and loosen remaining clothing. Allow patient to assume most comfortable position and keep warm. Keep at
rest until fully recovered. If breathing laboured and patient cyanotic (blue), ensure airways are clear and
have a qualified person give oxygen through a facemask. If breathing has stopped apply artificial respiration
at once. In the event of cardiac arrest, apply external cardiac massage. Seek immediate medical advice.

Skin contact: For gross contamination, immediately drench with water and remove clothing. Continue to
flush skin and hair with plenty of water (and soap if material is insoluble). For skin burns, cover with a clean,
dry dressing until medical help is available. If blistering occurs, do NOT break blisters. If swelling, redness,
blistering, or irritation occurs seek medical assistance.

Eye contact: If in eyes, hold eyelids apart and flush the eyes continuously with running water. Continue
flushing until advised to stop by the Poisons Information Centre or a Doctor; or for at least 15 minutes and
transport to Doctor or Hospital.

Ingestion: Rinse mouth with water. If swallowed, do NOT induce vomiting. Give a glass of water to drink.
Never give anything by the mouth to an unconscious patient. If vomiting occurs give further water. Seek
medical advice.

Notes to physician: Treat symptomatically.

5. FIRE-FIGHTING MEASURES

Specific hazards: Flammable liquid. May form flammable vapour mixtures with air. Flameproof equipment
necessary in area where this chemical is being used. Nearby equipment must be earthed. Electrical
requirements for work area should be assessed according to AS3000. Vapour may travel a considerable
distance to source of ignition and flash back. Avoid all ignition sources. All potential sources of ignition
Product name: Liquid Nails Heavy Duty SDS No: SELAUSEN000148
Issued: 19 September 2014 Version: 2.0 Page: 2 of 8
Material Safety Data Sheet

(open flames, pilot lights, furnaces, spark producing switches and electrical equipment etc) must be
eliminated both in and near the work area. Do NOT smoke.

Fire fighting further advice: If safe to do so, remove containers from path of fire. Keep containers cool
with water spray. On burning may emit toxic fumes. Fire fighters to wear self-contained breathing
apparatus and suitable protective clothing if risk of exposure to vapour or products of combustion.

Hazchem Code: 3Y

Suitable extinguishing media: Alcohol resistant foam is the preferred fire-fighting medium. If material is
involved in a fire use alcohol resistant foam, standard foam or dry agent (carbon dioxide, dry chemical
powder).

6. ACCIDENTAL RELEASE MEASURES

SMALL SPILLS
Wear protective equipment to prevent skin and eye contamination. W ipe up with absorbent (clean rag or
paper towels). Allow absorbent to dry before disposing with normal household garbage.

LARGE SPILLS
Shut off all possible sources of ignition. Clear area of all unprotected personnel. Prevent further leakage or
spillage if safe to do so. Slippery when spilt. Avoid accidents, clean up immediately. Wear protective
equipment to prevent skin and eye contamination and the inhalation of vapours. Work up wind or increase
ventilation. Contain - prevent run off into drains and waterways. Use absorbent (soil, sand or other inert
material). Collect and seal in properly labelled containers or drums for disposal. Use a spark-free shovel.
If contamination of sewers or waterways has occurred advise local emergency services.

Dangerous Goods Initial Emergency Response Guide No: 14

7. HANDLING AND STORAGE

Handling: Avoid skin and eye contact and inhalation of vapour.

Storage: Store in a cool, dry, well-ventilated place and out of direct sunlight. Store away from
incompatible materials described in Section 10. Store away from sources of heat or ignition. Store away
from foodstuffs. Keep containers closed when not in use - check regularly for leaks.

This material is classified as a Dangerous Good Class 3 Flammable Liquid as per the criteria of
the Australian Dangerous Goods Code and must be stored in accordance with the relevant
regulations.

Product name: Liquid Nails Heavy Duty SDS No: SELAUSEN000148

Material Safety Data Sheet

8. EXPOSURE CONTROLS / PERSONAL PROTECTION

National occupational exposure limits: No value assigned for this specific material by Safe Work
Australia or Department of Labour New Zealand.

However for:

TWA STEL CARCINOGEN NOTICES

ppm mg/m3 ppm mg/m3 CATEGORY

Methyl acetate 200 606 250 757 - -

Acetone 500 1,185 1,000 2,375 -
Heptane 400 1,640 -500 2,050 - -

As published by the Safe Work Australia or Department of Labour New Zealand.

TWA - The time-weighted average airborne concentration over an eight-hour working day, for a five-day
working week over an entire working life.

STEL (Short Term Exposure Limit) - the average airborne concentration over a 15 minute period which
should not be exceeded at any time during a normal eight-hour workday.

These Exposure Standards are guides to be used in the control of occupational health hazards. All
atmospheric contamination should be kept too as low a level as is workable. These exposure standards
should not be used as fine dividing lines between safe and dangerous concentrations of chemicals. They
are not a measure of relative toxicity.

If the directions for use on the product label are followed, exposure of individuals using the product should
not exceed the above standard. The standard was created for workers who are routinely, potentially
exposed during product manufacture.

Biological Limit Values: As per the National Model Regulations for the Control of Workplace Hazardous
Substances (Safe Work Australia) the ingredients in this material do not have a Biological Limit Allocated.

Engineering measures: Ensure ventilation is adequate to maintain air concentrations below Exposure
Standards. Use with local exhaust ventilation or while wearing appropriate respirator. Vapour heavier than
air - prevent concentration in hollows or sumps. DO NOT enter confined spaces where vapour may have
collected. Keep containers closed when not in use.

Personal protection equipment: YELLOW: OVERALLS, SAFETY SHOES, SAFETY GLASSES,

GLOVES, RESPIRATOR.

MANUFACTURING, PACKAGING AND TRANSPORT:

Wear overalls, safety glasses and impervious gloves. Use with adequate ventilation. If inhalation risk exists
wear organic vapour/particulate respirator meeting the requirements of AS/NZS 1715 and AS/NZS 1716.
Available information suggests that gloves made from nitrile rubber be suitable for intermittent contact.
However, due to variations in glove construction and local conditions, the user should make a final
assessment. Always wash hands before smoking, eating, drinking or using the toilet. W ash contaminated
clothing and other protective equipment before storing or re-using.

CONSUMER USE:
Wear gloves. Avoid inhaling vapour. W ash hands after use.

Product name: Liquid Nails Heavy Duty SDS No: SELAUSEN000148

Issued: 19 September 2014 Version: 2.0 Page: 4 of 8
Material Safety Data Sheet

Hygiene measures: Keep away from food, drink and animal feeding stuffs. When using do not eat, drink or
smoke. Wash hands prior to eating, drinking or smoking. Avoid skin and eye contact and inhalation of
vapour. Ensure that eyewash stations and safety showers are close to the workstation location.

9. PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES

Form / Colour / Odour: Brown paste with a solvent odour.

Solubility: Soluble in organic solvents. Insoluble in water.

Specific Gravity (20 C): 1.18 1.20
Relative Vapour Density (air=1): >1
Vapour Pressure (20 C): N Av
Flash Point (C): -9 (Solvent)
Flammability Limits (%): N Av
Autoignition Temperature (C): N Av
% Volatile by Volume: 32
Melting Point/Range (C): N Av
Boiling Point/Range (C): N Av
Decomposition Point (C): N Av
pH: N Av
Viscosity (Flow time): >100 seconds (6mm jet)
Total VOC (g/Litre): N Av

(Typical values only - consult specification sheet)

N Av = Not available N App = Not applicable

10. STABILITY AND REACTIVITY

Reactivity: No reactivity hazards are known for the material.

Chemical stability: This material is thermally stable when stored and used as directed.

Hazardous reactions: No known hazardous reactions.

Conditions to avoid: Elevated temperatures and sources of ignition.

Incompatible materials: Oxidising agents.

Hazardous decomposition products: Oxides of carbon and nitrogen, smoke and other toxic fumes.

11. TOXICOLOGICAL INFORMATION

No adverse health effects expected if the product is handled in accordance with this Safety Data Sheet and
the product label. Symptoms or effects that may arise if the product is mishandled and overexposure occurs
are:

Acute Effects

Inhalation: Inhalation of vapour can result in headaches, dizziness and possible nausea. Inhalation of high
concentrations can produce central nervous system depression, which can lead to loss of co-ordination,
impaired judgement and if exposure is prolonged, unconsciousness.
Product name: Liquid Nails Heavy Duty SDS No: SELAUSEN000148
Issued: 19 September 2014 Version: 2.0 Page: 5 of 8
Material Safety Data Sheet

Skin contact: Contact with skin may result in irritation. W ill have a degreasing action on the skin.
Repeated or prolonged skin contact may lead to irritant contact dermatitis.

Ingestion: Swallowing can result in nausea, vomiting and central nervous system depression. If the victim
is uncoordinated there is greater likelihood of vomit entering the lungs and causing subsequent
complications. Aspiration pneumonia (inflammation of the lung) may result.

Eye contact: An eye irritant.

Long Term Effects: No information available for product.

Acute toxicity / Chronic toxicity:

No LD50 data available for the product.

12. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION

Avoid contaminating waterways.

Ecotoxicity: No information available.

Persistence and degradability: No information available.

Mobility: No information available.

13. DISPOSAL CONSIDERATIONS

Persons conducting disposal, recycling or reclamation activities should ensure that appropriate personal
protection equipment is used, see Section 8. Exposure Controls and Personal Protection of this SDS.

If possible material and its container should be recycled. If material or container cannot be recycled,
dispose in accordance with local, regional, national and international Regulations.

14. TRANSPORT INFORMATION

ROAD AND RAIL TRANSPORT

Classified as Dangerous Goods by the criteria of the Australian Code for the Transport of Dangerous
Goods by Road & Rail and the New Zealand NZS5433: Transport of Dangerous Goods on Land.

UN No: 1133
Dangerous Goods Class: 3 Flammable Liquid
Packing Group: III
Hazchem Code: 3Y
Emergency Response Guide No: 14

Proper Shipping Name: ADHESIVES

Segregation Dangerous Goods: Not to be loaded with explosives (Class 1), flammable gases (Class 2.1),
if both are in bulk, toxic gases (Class 2.3), spontaneously combustible substances (Class 4.2), oxidising
agents (Class 5.1), organic peroxides (Class 5.2) or radioactive substances (Class 7), however exemptions
may apply.
Product name: Liquid Nails Heavy Duty SDS No: SELAUSEN000148
Issued: 19 September 2014 Version: 2.0 Page: 6 of 8
Material Safety Data Sheet

MARINE TRANSPORT
Classified as Dangerous Goods by the criteria of the International Maritime Dangerous Goods Code (IMDG
Code) for transport by sea.

UN No: 1133
Dangerous Goods Class: 3 Flammable Liquid
Packing Group: III
Hazchem Code: 3Y

Proper Shipping Name: ADHESIVES

AIR TRANSPORT
Classified as Dangerous Goods by the criteria of the International Air Transport Association (IATA)
Dangerous Goods Regulations for transport by air.

UN No: 1133
Dangerous Goods Class: 3 Flammable Liquid
Packing Group: III
Hazchem Code: 3Y

Proper Shipping Name: ADHESIVES

15. REGULATORY INFORMATION

This material is not subject to the following international agreements:

Montreal Protocol (Ozone depleting substances)

The Stockholm Convention (Persistent Organic Pollutants)
The Rotterdam Convention (Prior Informed Consent)

This material is subject to the following international agreements:

Basel Convention (Hazardous Waste)

Wastes from production, formulation and use of inks, dyes, pigments, paints, lacquers, varnish

International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL)

Annex III - Harmful Substances carried in Packaged Form

This material/constituent(s) is covered by the following requirements:

All the constituents of this material are listed on the Australian Inventory of Chemical Substances
(AICS).

Product name: Liquid Nails Heavy Duty SDS No: SELAUSEN000148

Issued: 19 September 2014 Version: 2.0 Page: 7 of 8
Material Safety Data Sheet

16. OTHER INFORMATION

Literary reference

This Material Safety Data Sheet has been prepared by Chemical Data Services Pty Ltd (chemdata.com.au)
on behalf of its client.

Reason(s) For Issue: 5 Yearly Revision

Change to Transport Information
Format change
Minor Text Changes.

Material Safety Data Sheets are updated frequently. Please ensure that you have a current copy.

This MSDS summarises at the date of issue our best knowledge of the health and safety hazard information
of the product, and in particular how to safely handle and use the product in the workplace. Since
DuluxGroup (Australia) Pty Ltd and DuluxGroup (New Zealand) Pty Ltd cannot anticipate or control the
conditions under which the product may be used, each user must, prior to usage, review this MSDS in the
context of how the user intends to handle and use the product in the workplace.

If clarification or further information is needed to ensure that an appropriate assessment can be made, the
user should contact this company.

Our responsibility for product as sold is subject to our standard terms and conditions, a copy of which is sent
to our customers and is also available upon request.

Product name: Liquid Nails Heavy Duty SDS No: SELAUSEN000148

Issued: 19 September 2014 Version: 2.0 Page: 8 of 8
RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN

1.0 Introduction

This document contains a risk management plan, including possible hazards and
complications that may come during the design, construction and testing of the Mars Land
Rover. Any complications or issues that come up that cannot be resolved and/ or affect the
construction of the Mars Land Rover should be reported to a staff member of M.R.D
immediately.
2.0 Design Stage:

2.1 Group Unfamiliarity

2.1.1 Miscommunication within the group due to inexperience working with each other
can lead to time wastage and redundancies.

2.1.2 Mitigations include concise, non-ambiguous communication and always trying to

keep in contact. This will allow the rest of the group to always know exactly what is
currently occurring and what is required.

2.2 Eye strain

2.2.1 Long, uninterrupted computer work can lead to eyestrain and headaches.

1.2.2 Mitigations include hourly breaks (or as needed) for short periods.

3.0 Construction Stage:

3.1 Use of Machinery

3.1.1 Machinery, including power tools, is a major hazard in construction. Persons with
little to no experience operating machinery such as band saws and sanding belts
can lead to very serious injury.

3.1.2 To lower the effects of this risk, Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) must be
worn by everyone in the workshop. PPE includes but is not limited to safety
boots, safety glasses, not wearing loose clothing, tying up long hair and using
ear plugs.

3.1.3 To mitigate the likelihood of this risk, machinery should only be operated by
persons of experience.

3.2 Use of Hazardous Chemicals

3.2.1 Potentially hazardous chemicals, including super glue, can pose risks of
poisoning, bodily harm and skin irritation.

Mars Rover Designs 10 Email: [email protected]

3.2.2 These risks can be mitigated by use of appropriate PPE, taking care when
using and reference to the products MSDS.

3.2.3 Dust from wood sanding and sawing may become airborne creating a risk of
inhaling or eye irritation.
3.2.4 PPE including dust masks and safety glasses should be worn to mitigate this risk.

4.0 Testing Stage:

4.1 Rover falling off drop

4.1.1 During the falling stage, the rover because it is effectively a freefalling weight of
around 1kg, posing the risk of bodily harm.

4.1.2 To ensure no one is struck by this freefalling weight, a safe radius distance
around the testing area should be abided by, with only one person conducting
the test.

4.2 Materials breaking upon impact

4.2.1 Impact with ground after falling stage poses the possibility for materials
breaking/ splintering off the main chassis of the rover. This has the potential of
causing bodily harm, with the possibility of small wood splinters becoming lodged
in skin.

4.2.2 This can be mitigated by following the procedure outlined in item 1.b [Rover
falling off drop].

Mars Rover Designs 11 Email: [email protected]

 Mars Rover Designs

Tender Evaluation Criteria

Client: EMPACT
Project: Mars Rover Design

Mars Rover Designs 12 Email: [email protected]

1.0 Introduction
The contents of this document contain a summary of criteria that will be met by the
successful tender of the Mars Land Rover. As well as a criteria summary, this document
contains a detailed description of the criteria that has been listed in the criteria summary,
that must be met by the successful tender.

1.0 Criteria Summary

Criteria Title Criteria Details Mark
Experience Experience in using power tools
Experience using hazardous /6
chemicals

Capability Safety procedures

Efficiency /9
Materials and Equipment

Communication Communication with M.R.D.

/3

3.0 Criteria Summary Specific Details

3.1 Experience

3.1.1 Experience in using Power Tools:

Precise specifications in design require very accurate measurements for a successful rover
to be constructed. Successful tender will have staff with experience in using a band saw,
sanding belt and drill press; capable of following direct instructions precisely.

Experience using Hazardous Chemicals:

To successfully construct our rover, staff will need experience in using super glue efficiently
such that able to not waste any resulting in additional cost and also to not interfere with
rest of design.

3.2.1 Capability

3.2.1 Safety Procedures:

Staff must be familiar with correct safety procedure, such as wearing correct personal
protective equipment (PPE) while using band saw or sanding belt and also when handling
hazardous chemicals such as super glue.

Mars Rover Designs 13 Email: [email protected]

3.2.2 Efficiency:

Staff must be able to work efficiently with a reliable work structure and schedule to
successfully complete the construction of the Mars Land Rover. Successful tender will
provide a realistic structure and schedule that they will be able to follow, prior to being give
the all clear to go ahead with the construction of the Mars Land Rover

3.2.3 Materials and Equipment

Successful tender will have the ability to easily access all required materials and equipment.
This includes all materials equipment required to complete the construction of the Mars
Land Rover; it also includes all personal protective equipment required to be used during
construction of the Mars Land Rover.

3.3 Communication

3.3.1 Communication with M.R.D.

The successful tender will have demonstrated sound communication skills in the past and an
ability to communicate promptly when necessary. The successful tender will have be able to
demonstrate past instances in which they have been able solves problems/ issues through
the use of clear and precise communication. Clear communication between both parties is
essential for a successful construction of the Mars Land Rover.

Mars Rover Designs 14 Email: [email protected]