Scribd
Upload
503 views

6.2 Elements of Transport Protocols PDF

The document discusses elements of transport protocols. It explains that transport protocols perform error control and flow control like data link protocols but have significant differences in their environment. Transport protocols require explicit addressing of destination hosts and transport service access points (TSAPs) like ports to distinguish between processes. Connection establishment in transport involves addressing, handling delayed duplicates, and using three-way handshakes. Connection release requires symmetric procedures to avoid data loss or half-open connections. Transport protocols also support multiplexing of multiple connections over a single network address.

Uploaded by

Roshni Khurana
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
503 views

6.2 Elements of Transport Protocols PDF

The document discusses elements of transport protocols. It explains that transport protocols perform error control and flow control like data link protocols but have significant differences in their environment. Transport protocols require explicit addressing of destination hosts and transport service access points (TSAPs) like ports to distinguish between processes. Connection establishment in transport involves addressing, handling delayed duplicates, and using three-way handshakes. Connection release requires symmetric procedures to avoid data loss or half-open connections. Transport protocols also support multiplexing of multiple connections over a single network address.

Uploaded by

Roshni Khurana
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 12

CEN445 NetworkProtocolsandAlgorithms

Chapter6 TransportLayer
6.2ElementsofTransportProtocols

Dr. Mostafa Hassan Dahshan


Department of Computer Engineering
College of Computer and Information Sciences
King Saud University
[email protected]
http://faculty.ksu.edu.sa/mdahshan

ElementsofTransportProtocols
Transport protocol similar to data link protocols
Both do error control and flow control
However, significant differences exist

Environment of the data link layer Environment of the transport layer


2
ElementsofTransportProtocols
Data link layer Transport layer

Communication directly via physical channel over the entire network

Addressing no need to specify address. explicit addressing of


Just select outgoing line destination is required

Connection over a wire is simple more complicated


establishment

Delay frame either arrives or lost, fackets might be stored for


not stored and delayed seconds and delivered later

Buffering and simpler more complicated;


flow control large and dynamic number of
simultaneous connections

Addressing
Specify which host process to connect to
TSAP: Transport Service Access Point
In TCP, UDP, called ports
Analogy: NSAP. Example: IP address
Client or server app attaches to TSAP
Connections run through NSAP
TSAP to distinguish endpoints sharing NSAP

4
Addressing

Addressing
How host1 process knows TSAP # at host2?
Stable TSAP # listed in wellknown places

e.g. /etc/services in UNIX list permanent #s


mail server: 25, web server: 80
Alternatively, special process: portmapper
listen on wellknown TSAP
user conn to portmapper, specify service name
portmapper sends back TSAP address
similar to directory service ()
6
Addressing
Many server processes used only rarely
Waste if each process listen to TSAP all day
Instead, use initial connection protocol
Spec process server listens all known TSAP
Act as proxy for lightly used servers
e.g. inted, xinetd on UNIX

Addressing
User does CONNECT request Process server spawns request server

8
ConnectionEstablishment
Sounds easy; surprisingly tricky!
Just send REQUEST, wait for ACCEPTED?
Can lose, delay, corrupt, duplicate packets
Duplicate may transfer bank money again!
Protocols must work correct all cases
Implemented efficiently in common cases
Main problem is delayed duplicates
Cannot prevent; must deal with (reject)
9

ConnectionEstablishment
Solutions for delayed duplicates
Not reuse transport address (TSAP)

problem difficult to connect to process


Give each connection unique ID
seq # chosen by initiating party
update table listing obsolete connections
check new connections against table
problems requires maintain certain amount of history
if machine crashes, no longer identify old con
10
ConnectionEstablishment
To simplify problem, restrict packet lifetime
restricted network design: prevent looping
mostly used hop counter in each packet: 1 at each hop
timestamp in each packet: clock must be synced
Must also guarantee ACKs are dead
Assume a value T of max packet lifetime
T sec after packet sent, sure traces are gone
In the Internet, T is usually 120 seconds
11

ConnectionEstablishment
New method with packet lifetime bounded
Label segments with seq # not reused in T

T and packet rate determine size of seq #s

1 packet w given seq # may be outstanding

Duplicates may still occur, but discarded dst

Not possible to have delayed duplicate old

packet with same seq # accepted at dest

12
ConnectionEstablishment
How to deal with losing memory after crash?
Each host has timeofday clock

clocks at different host need not be synced


binary counter increments uniform intervals
no. of bits must be of seq #
clock must be running even if host goes down
Initial seq # (kbits) low kbits of clock
Seq space must be so large
by time # wrap, old pkts w same # are long gone
13

ConnectionEstablishment
Clock method work within connection
Host dont remember # across connections
Cant know if CONN REQUEST with initial
seq # is a duplicate of a recent connection
To solve this, use threeway handshake
Check with other peer that con req is current
Used in TCP, with 32bit seq #
Clock not used in TCP; attacker can predict
14
ConnectionEstablishment
CR = Connection Request
Normal Procedure
H1 choses initial s# x

H2 replies

ACKs x
announce own s# y
H1replies
ACKs y
with 1st data segment

15

ConnectionEstablishment
Abnormal situations
Delayed duplicate CR

H2 sends ACK to H1
X
H1 rejects
H2 knows it was tricked
Worst case
DD CR, old ACK floating
H2 gets delayed CR, replies
X
H1 rejects
X
H2 gets old DATA, discards
(z received instead of y) 16
ConnectionRelease
Easier than establish
However, some pitfalls

Asymmetric release
each con term separately
abrupt; may cause data loss
better protocol needed

17

ConnectionRelease
Symmetric release
Each direction is released independently

Can receive data after sending DISCONNECT

H1: I am done, are you done too?

H2: I am done too, goodbye

Twoarmy problem: unreliable channel

18
ConnectionRelease
Twoarmy problem
each blue army < white army, but together are larger
need to sync attack
however, only com channel is the valley (unreliable)
3way handshake? B1 cant know ACK arrived
making 4way handshake doesnt help either
Attack? Attack?

19

ConnectionRelease
Let each side independently decide its done
Easier to solve

Normal release sequence


H1 send DR, start timer

H2 responds with DR

when H1 recv DR, release

when H2 recv ACK, release

20
ConnectionRelease
Error cases, handled by timers, retransmissions

Final ACK lost: Lost DR: Extreme:


Host 2 times out H1 starts over Many lost DRs
both release after N
21

ConnectionRelease
Protocol usually suffices; can fail in theory
after N lost attempts; half open connection
Not allowing give up, can go on forever
To kill half open connections, automatically
disconnect if no received segments in X sec
Must have timer reset after each segment
Send dummy segments to keep con alive
TCP normally does symmetric close, with
each side independently close con w FIN 22
Multiplexing
Transport, network sharing can either be:
Multiplexing: connections share a network address
Inverse multiplexing: addresses share a connection

Multiplexing Inverse Multiplexing 23

You might also like