Scribd
Upload
43 views1 page

Evaluacion Companeros de Equipo

This rubric assesses students on their ability to prepare and present information to the class. It evaluates them on five criteria: preparation and organization, relevance of information, eye contact, understandability, and voice. For each criterion there are three potential assessment levels ranging from less thorough preparation and execution to very well organized preparation and smooth performance. The assessor rates the student being evaluated on a scale of 1 to 3 points for each criterion.

Uploaded by

CELESTE INUNGARAY
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
43 views1 page

Evaluacion Companeros de Equipo

This rubric assesses students on their ability to prepare and present information to the class. It evaluates them on five criteria: preparation and organization, relevance of information, eye contact, understandability, and voice. For each criterion there are three potential assessment levels ranging from less thorough preparation and execution to very well organized preparation and smooth performance. The assessor rates the student being evaluated on a scale of 1 to 3 points for each criterion.

Uploaded by

CELESTE INUNGARAY
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

PEER ASSESSMENT RUBRIC FOR PRESENTATION OF INFORMATION TO CLASS

Name of student being assessed:


Name of student completing the assessment:

Criteria
= = =
1. Abilty to prepare and organise More thorough preparation was The preparation for the The preparation for the
for the information to be presented required for the presentation and presentation was generally presentation was very well
performance to run smoothly. organised and the performance organised and the performance
Points = 1 ran quite smoothly. ran smoothly.
Points = 2 Points = 3

2. Relevance of the information to Some of the information did not Most of the information was All the information was highly
the chosen questions relate directly to the key accurate and related directly to the accurate and relevant to the key
questions. key questions. questions
Points = 1 Points = 2
3. Oral presentation Speaker sometimes faces or Speaker faces or maintains eye Speaker faces and maintains eye
Eye contact maintains eye contact with the contact with the audience most of contact with the audience
audience. the time, but occasionally loses Points = 3
Points = 1 eye contact.
Points = 2
5. Oral presentation Student sometimes uses Student uses understandable Student uses words, terms, and
Understandability confusing words and terms and words and terms, but needs examples which the audience
needs to give examples to help examples to clarify major ideas. clearly understand.
explain the ideas. Points = 2 Points= 3
Points = 1
5. Oral presentation Student speaks in a voice which is Student speaks in a voice which is Speaker always speaks in an
Voice frequently difficult to understand generally understandable; understandable voice, using clear
due to poor tone, enunciation or sometimes tone, enunciation or tone, enunciation, and reasonable
pace even after listener requests pace interferes with message; pace; message is clearly received.
to repeat message. adjusts delivery when listener Points = 3
Points = 1 does not understand.
Points = 2

The best part of this presentation was:


The area for improvement is:

You might also like