Page |1 358815494.

doc

ACC09 VIDEO REPORT

GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR GROUP REPORTS AND ORAL PRESENTATIONS

1 For oral presentation, save your presentation materials in a removable disk, preferably a compact disc to avoid
file corruption.
2 Come in business attire/school uniform/customized attire.
Make use of an eye-friendly presentation.
Avoid animations which may consume precious presentation time.
Tables are appreciated.
If diagrams will not fit presentation material, just ask the panellists to turn to the specific page where it is
more clearly illustrated.
If presenting a list of concepts, limit the number to about 6 lines only per slide.
3 Wear name tags, indicating your first name.
4 When your group is called, before starting the presentation proper:
Make sure that the group leader states the order of reporting as to topic and person in charge.
Announce to the panel whether your group prefers to entertain questions at the end of the entire report or
during the presentation.
Provide any addendum and/or erratum faculty.
Have all presentation paraphernalia in order.
5 Time allotment per group is 15-20 minutes. Manage and organize your presentation so as to consume only 15
minutes of the group time. The last five minutes is devoted to the giving of the 10-item quiz to classmates.
6 Announce that the report is nearing end.
7 Submit the complete report to your class officers both in hard and soft copy after presentation.
8 Class officers must submit the compilation of all group reports at the end of the semester in hardbound copies.
Color of cover is to be agreed upon by class and faculty in charge.
9 For video presentations, additional reminders are as follows:
a. The 15-20 minute report should be able to cover all topics assigned.
b. A 5-10 minute final activity (worth 10 points) with the live audience will follow the report. Scores
received from the activity shall form part of post-discussion activities of the term.
c. Video presentations are intended to teach the audience in a manner that will make them relate to the
lesson in the most interesting and creative way.
d. Handouts for classmates should include the illustrative problems presented in class. This must be
useful for the review for final examinations.
e. Written report is not necessary to be submitted to faculty in charge since the primary source is the
prescribed textbook.
f. Video presentations of all groups must be submitted at the same time, regardless of schedule.
10 All groups must prepare and submit at the time of reporting a separate short bond paper with the following
details (see next page):

ACC09 CASE STUDY MARATHON

MECHANICS
1. The class will be divided into 3-6 groups.
2. Each group will draw lots to determine the case they will present. A case will be presented by two groups for
comparison of analysis presentation.
3. Guide questions will be used for write-up and oral presentation of output.
1. Briefly summarize the data of the case; emphasizing important points that will be used as support for
argumentation
2. Determine the major problem or issue in the case; discuss minor problems, if any
3. Present solution to Specific questions or requirements indicated at the end of the case, if any
4. Present 2-3 solutions to the major problem or issue you presented. (Status quo options are not allowed)
Page |2 358815494.doc

5. Give the advantages and disadvantages of each solution. Use hypothetical assumptions if necessary to
prove points of discussion
6. Evaluate no. 5 data and choose the best course of action from the 3 solutions presented. Apply concepts
learned in class to justify assessment.
7. Identify the specific steps to implement the best course of action
2. The presentation must be 10 minutes or less.
3. The two groups must be able to listen to the answers of each in numbers 2 to 6.
1. In 6 minutes, group (A) must give:
1. At least 2 points of contradiction to the presentation of the other group
2. At least 2 questions for clarification
3. At least 2 points of agreement
2. In 6 minutes, the group (B) will answer.
3. In 6 minutes, group (B) must give:
1. At least 2 points of contradiction to the presentation of the other group
2. At least 2 questions for clarification
3. At least 2 points of agreement
4. In 6 minutes, group (A) will answer.

RUBRICS
All reporters are graded accordingly:
1. Written Presentation (not applicable to video reports)
1. Content
i. 1-0-4.9 (Beginning) : Incomplete treatment of the topic assigned; No evidence at all of a well-
researched and up to date information
ii. 5.0-5.9 (Emerging) : At least 50% of the content has been thoroughly discussed; Demonstrates
fair or moderate evidence of a well-researched and up to date information
iii. 6-7.4 (Accomplished) : At least 65% of the content has been discussed; Demonstrates adequate
evidence of a well-researched and up to date information
iv. 7.5-8.9 ( Proficient): At least 80% of the content has been discussed; Demonstrates substantial
evidence of a well-researched and up to date information
v. 9.0-10 (Exemplary): In-depth and thorough discussion of assigned topic; Shows very strong
evidence of well-researched and up to date information.

2. Organization
i. 1-0-4.9 (Beginning) : No logical sequence of ideas; Ideas and evidences presented do not support
the topic (problem, objective of the study)
ii. 5.0-5.9 (Emerging) : Some ideas are logically presented; Some ideas and evidences presented
support the topic (problem, objective of the study)
iii. 6-7.4 (Accomplished) : Most ideas are logically presented; Most ideas and evidences presented
support the topic (problem, objective of the study)
iv. 7.5-8.9 ( Proficient): All ideas are logically presented; Almost all ideas and evidences presented
support the topic (problem, objective of the study)
v. 9.0-10 (Exemplary): All ideas are logically presented; Almost all ideas and evidences presented
strongly support the topic (problem, objective of the study)

3. Documentation
i. 1-0-4.9 (Beginning) : Only 1 or no recommendation is presented with adequate supporting charts,
diagrams, exhibits, and complete write-ups for descriptions; with major flaws.
ii. 5.0-5.9 (Emerging) : Many recommendations are not supported with charts, diagrams, exhibits,
and complete write-ups for descriptions; with some major flaws.
iii. 6-7.4 (Accomplished): Some 1 or 2 recommendations, designs are not supported with charts,
Page |3 358815494.doc

diagrams, exhibits, and complete write-ups for descriptions; with some minimal flaws.
iv. 7.5-8.9 (Proficient): Some 1 or 2 designs are not supported with charts, diagrams, exhibits, and
complete write-ups for descriptions; no errors.
v. 9.0-10 (Exemplary): All the designs are supported with charts, diagrams, exhibits, and complete
write-ups for descriptions; no errors.

4. Format/Style
i. 1-0-2.4 (Beginning) : Follows the agreed style/ format to a limited extent
ii. 2.5-2.9 (Emerging) : Follows the agreed style/ format but with some errors
iii. 3.0-3.7 (Accomplished) : Follows the agreed style/ format but with minimal errors
iv. 3.8-4.4 ( Proficient): Follows the agreed style/ format but with 1 or 2 errors
v. 4.5-5.0 (Exemplary): Follows the agreed style/ format but with no errors

5. Grammar
i. 1-0-2.4 (Beginning) : Almost sentences have errors in grammar and mechanics
ii. 2.5-2.9 (Emerging) : There are many errors in grammar and mechanics
iii. 3.0-3.7 (Accomplished) : There are some 3 to 5 errors in grammar and mechanics.
iv. 3.8-4.4 ( Proficient):There are about 1 to 2 errors in grammar and mechanics.
v. 4.5-5.0 (Exemplary): There are no errors in grammar and mechanics.

2. Oral (or Video) Presentation

1. Organization
i. 1-0-4.9 (Beginning) : No evidence of a well-planned and organized presentation of topic
ii. 5.0-5.9 (Emerging) : Shows below average evidence of a well-planned and organized
presentation of topic; needs improvement
iii. 6-7.4 (Accomplished) :Shows below average evidence of a well-planned and organized
presentation of topic; Most parts of the topic are logically presented
iv. 7.5-8.9 ( Proficient): Shows strong evidence of a well-planned and well-organized and logical
presentation of topic ; appeals to audience
v. 9.0-10 (Exemplary): Shows a very strong evidence of a well-planned and well-organized and
logical presentation of topic; captures the interest of the audience

2. Delivery or Preparedness
i. 1-0-4.9 (Beginning) : Voice projection does not fluctuate at all; Mispronounces most of the
words; Commits many grammatical errors; Inappropriate choice of words; Reads the notes and
fails to establish eye contact with the listeners.
ii. 5.0-5.9 (Emerging) : Voice projection is varied to a limited extent (i.e. volume and inflection);
Mispronounces some of the words; Commits some grammatical errors; Inappropriate choice of
some words; Reads the notes and occasionally establishes eye contact with the listeners.
iii. 6-7.4 (Accomplished) : Voice projection is moderately varied in volume and inflection;
Mispronounces few words; Commits few grammatical errors; Appropriate choice of some words;
Glances at ones notes but does not read; occasionally establishes eye contact with the listeners.
iv. 7.5-8.9 ( Proficient): Voice projection is satisfactorily varied in volume and inflection;
Mispronounces 3-5 words; Commits 3-5 grammatical errors; Appropriate choice of words, most
of the time; Occasionally glances at ones notes during the presentation; Establishes eye contact
with the listeners, most of the time.
v. 9.0-10 (Exemplary): Voice fluctuates in volume and inflection; Mispronounces 1-2 words;
Commits 1-2 grammatical errors; Appropriate choice of words; Does not glance at ones notes
during the presentation; Establishes eye contact with the listeners, all the time.
Page |4 358815494.doc

3. Content and Ability to answer questions

i. 1-0-4.9 (Beginning) : Incomplete treatment of the topic assigned; No evidence at all of a well-
researched and up to date information; Demonstrates no verbal reasoning ability.
ii. 5.0-5.9 (Emerging) : At least 50% of the content has been thoroughly discussed; Demonstrates
fair or moderate evidence of a well-researched and up to date information; Demonstrates low
level verbal reasoning ability; cannot expound on the subject matter at hand.
iii. 6-7.4 (Accomplished) : At least 65% of the content has been discussed; Demonstrates adequate
evidence of a well-researched and up to date information; Demonstrates some verbal reasoning
ability; can expound on the subject matter at hand, but at a limited extent.
iv. 7.5-8.9 (Proficient): At least 80% of the content has been discussed; Demonstrates substantial
evidence of a well-researched and up to date information ; Demonstrates verbal reasoning ability;
can expound on the subject matter at hand.
v. 9.0-10 (Exemplary): In-depth and thorough discussion of assigned topic; Shows very strong
evidence of well-researched and up to date information; Demonstrates verbal reasoning ability;
can expound on the subject matter at hand, relates ideas with other areas of the study .

4. Quality of Questions Raised (applicable only to debates and case marathons)

i. 1-0-4.9 (Beginning) : No basis of raising question as there is no evidence of a well-researched
and updated argument; Demonstrates no verbal reasoning ability.
ii. 5.0-5.9 (Emerging) : At least 50% of the argument has been supported with references;
Demonstrates fair or moderate evidence of a well-researched and updated argument;
Demonstrates low level verbal reasoning ability; cannot expound on the subject matter being
discussed when asked.
iii. 6-7.4 (Accomplished) : At least 65% of the content has been supported with references;
Demonstrates adequate evidence of a well-researched and updated argument; Demonstrates some
verbal reasoning ability; can expound on the subject matter being discussed when asked, but at a
limited extent.
iv. 7.5-8.9 (Proficient): At least 80% of the content has been discussed; Demonstrates substantial
evidence of a well-researched and updated argument ; Demonstrates verbal reasoning ability; can
expound on the subject matter being discussed when asked.
v. 9.0-10 (Exemplary): In-depth and thorough discussion of assigned topic; Shows very strong
evidence of well-researched and updated argument; Demonstrates verbal reasoning ability; can
expound on the subject matter being discussed when asked, relates ideas with topics covered in
ACC09.
Page |5 358815494.doc

(intentionally left blank)

Page |6 358815494.doc
REPORT/ CASE RATING SHEET

COMPANY: ________________________________ SECTION.:______ DATE OF PRESENTATION ______________

NAME OF MEMBERS: ________________________ ____________________ ________________________ ________________________

________________________ ____________________ ________________________ ________________________
________________________ ____________________ ________________________ ________________________
SUMMARY
II. ORAL PRESENTATION & DEFENSE (40 pts.):
I. WRITTEN PRESENTATION (40 pts.- Group Grade):
1. Content and Ability to Answer questions (10-Ave) _____
1. Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis/ Content (10) ______
2. Organization and Creativity (10) _____
2. Organization and Substance of Arguments (10) ______
3. Delivery or Preparedness (10-Ave) _____
3. Documentation (10) ______
4. Quality of questions raised (10) _____
4. Format/Style (5) ______
5. Grammar (5) ______
OVERALL GROUP RATING [Sum of I and II above]: _______
Page |7 358815494.doc
ORDER NAME INDIVIDUAL RATING GROUP RATING TOTAL REMARKS
Content and Written Quality of
Organization and
Ability in Delivery (10) Report Questions
Creativity (10)
Q&A (10) (40) Raised (10)
Presenter 1
Presenter 2
Presenter 3
Presenter 4
Presenter 5
RECOMMENDATION: Accepted as is Revise, Re-submit with Major Revisions on/before __________
Revise; Minor Revisions, pass on the deadline: ________________
RECOMMENDING PANEL MEMBERS: Printed Name / Signature ___________________________Printed Name / Signature __________________________
Printed Name / Signature ___________________________Printed Name / Signature __________________________
Page |8 358815494.doc