Three Modes of Steering Report
Three Modes of Steering Report
LIST OF SYMBOL
D = Roll axis damping, Nm/rad
K = Roll axis stiffness, Nm/rad
= Vehicle roll angle, rad
Cf = Front cornering stiffness, N/rad
CHAPTER 1:
INTRODUCTION TO
STEERING SYSTEM
1.1PROJECT OVERVIEW:
1.1.2 DISADVANTAGES:
It is very expensive.
It is complex in design.
It will be easily put out of adjustment.
1.1.4 ADVANTAGES:
Easy maintenance.
Mode change is easy.
Implementation is easy.
1.2WORKING PRINCIPLE:
A vehicle with higher turning radius face difficulty in parking and low speed
cornering due to its higher wheelbase and track width, but the passenger prefer the vehicle
to be higher wheelbase and track width as it gives good comfort while travelling.
In this scenario four wheel, steering will be effective, as the turning radius will be
decreased for the same vehicle of higher wheelbase. In this project, a benchmark vehicle is
considered and four wheel steering is implemented without change in dimension of the
vehicle and reduction in turning radius is achieved. For achieving reduction, a mechanism
is built which turns the rear wheels opposite to the front wheels.
CHAPTER 2:
LITERATURE
REVIEW
LITERATURE REVIEW
Lohith [I] shows that the Four-wheel steering is a serious effort on the part of automotive
design engineers to provide near-neutral steering. In certain cases like low speed cornering,
vehicle parking and driving in city conditions with heavy traffic in tight spaces, driving
would be very difficult due to vehicle's larger wheelbase and track width. Hence the
requirement of a mechanism which results in less turning radius arises and it will be
achieved by implementing four wheel steering mechanism instead of regular two wheel
steering. The rear wheels were drawn out of phase to the front wheels. In order to achieve
this, a mechanism, which consists of two bevel gears, and intermediate shaft, which
transmit 100% torque as well, turns rear wheels in out of phase was developed.
Choudhari [2] explains that a Four Wheel steering (4WS) System is also known as "Quadra
Steering System". So both front as well as rear wheels can be steered according to speed of
the vehicle and space available for turning. Quadra steer system will give full size vehicles
greater ease while driving at low speed, and improves stability, handling and control at higher
speed. Quadra steering system works in following three phases Negative phase, Neutral phase,
Positive phase. It enables the car to be steered into tighter parking spaces and makes the car
more stable at speed (less body roll). It makes the car more efficient and stable on cornering,
easier and safer lanes change when on motorways. The steering system allows the driver to
guide the moving vehicle on the road and turn it right or left as required.
Jeong [3] describes the vehicle modeling and dynamic analysis of four wheel steering system.
The rear steering mechanism for the four-wheel steering system vehicle was modeled and
rear suspension was changed to McPherson-type forming a four-wheel independent
suspension system. Three different four-wheel steering systems were analyzed. The first
system serves a mechanical linkage between the front and rear steering mechanisms. The
second and third systems used simple control logic based on the speed and yaw rate of the
vehicle performance.
Sathyabalan[4] shows that the fabricated the four wheel steering can operate three mode
operation. The project is to steer the vehicle according to the requirement. The four wheel
steering is more required in critical roads and in desert roads. In this, implementing three
steering modes in a single vehicle and the modes can be changed as needed.
Gao[6] shows the kinematic models of planetary gear set and steering gear are established, based
on the analysis of the transmission mechanism of angle superposition with Active Front
Steering system (AFS). A controller of variable steering ratio for Active Front Steering system
is designed, and virtual road tests are made in Car Maker driver vehicle- road simulation
environment. The results of simulation tests validate the controller performance and the
advantage of variable steering ratio function, also show that the driving comfort is improved
at low speed especially, due to the Active Front Steering system alters the steering ratio
according to the driving situation.
Schwab[7] explains that the Delft design, called VeloX (Human Power Team (2013)), is a
fully-faired monocoque front-driven recumbent bicycle, with minimized air drag and
maximized space for a big and strong athlete. The, front driven bicycles have the disadvantage
that the front driving induces unwanted steering and that the frontal area of the bicycle cannot
be reduced any further. A solution would be rear-wheel steering. A common thought is that a
rear-wheel steered bicycle cannot be laterally self-stable, and therefore hard to control. One can
design a rear-wheel steered bicycle which shows a stable forward speed range. Computer
simulations demonstrate that the bicycle can be stabilized by adding a human controller model
to the bicycle model. For a set of expected lateral perturbations (side wind perturbations) it is
shown that rider steer torque stays within human bounds, both in magnitude and in frequency.
Pushkin
Deepak [9] carried out design and analysis of a three wheeled vehicle that has steering on both
sides which is powered by hub motors. The vehicle is fabricated by using 1090m ild steel
for chassis, swing-arm and Wishbones (A-arms). It is determined that the turning radius of
the wheel is obtained by using all wheels steering mechanism and it is relatively smaller than
actual turning radius. The equivalent stress values were also determined for safe design.
Bhishikar[10] showed that standard 2 Wheel Steering System, the rear set of wheels
are always directed forward and do not play an active role in controlling the steering,
While in 4 Wheel Steering System, the rear wheels do play an active role for steering,
which can be guided at high as well as low speeds. Production cars are designed to
under steer and rarely do them over steer. If a car could automatically compensate for an
under steer/over steer problem, the driver would enjoy nearly neutral steering under
varying operating conditions. In situations like low speed cornering, vehicle parking
and driving in city conditions with heavy traffic in tight spaces, driving would be
very difficult due to a sedan's larger wheelbase and track width. Hence there is a
requirement of a mechanism which result in less turning radius.
The requirement of a mechanism which results in less turning radius arises and it
will be achieved by implementing four wheel steering mechanism instead of regular
two wheel steering. The four wheel steering is more required in critical roads and in
desert roads. In this implementing three steering modes in a single vehicle and the
modes can be changed as needed. Four wheel steering system vehicles proved dynamic
results through double lane change test in a perfect way.
MAZDA 4WS SYSTEM [12]The rear wheels in this system are steered by a hydraulically
operated power unit, which is electronically controlled in accordance with the steering
wheel angle and vehicle speed. The Mazda 4WS layout is more complicated than the Honda
arrangement and hence incorporates suitable fail-safe for trouble free operation. The fail-
safe device includes a centering lock spring and special safety solenoid. If hydraulic or
electronic failure takes place, these devices set the rear wheels to the straight-ahead
position.
It is determined that the turning radius of the wheel is obtained by using all wheels steering
mechanism and it is relatively smaller than actual turning radius. The equivalent stress values were
also determined for safe design.
. A fixed annulus is meshed with a large planet gear, which is driven by an eccentric on
the input shaft. A short shaft in integral with the planet and is offset from the centre of the
CHAPTER 3:
BACKGROUND
THEORY
BACKGROUND THEORY
The most effective type of steering, this type has all the four wheels of the vehicle used for
steering purpose. In a typical front wheel steering system the rear wheels do not turn in the
direction of the curve and thus curb on the efficiency of the steering. Normally this system
is not been the preferred choice due to complexity of conventional mechanical four-wheel
steering systems. However, a few cars like the Honda Prelude, Nissan Skyline GT-R have
been available with four-wheel steering systems, where the rear wheels turn by an angle to
aid the front wheels in steering.
However, these systems had the rear wheels steered by only 2 or 3 degrees, as their main
aim was to assist the front wheels rather than steer by themselves. With advances in
technology, modern four-wheel steering systems boast of fully electronic steer-by-wire
systems, equal steer angles for front and rear wheels, and sensors to monitor the vehicle
dynamics and adjust the steer angles in real time. Although such a complex four wheel
steering model has not been created for
production purposes, a number of experimental concepts with some of these technologies
have been built and tested successfully.
Compared with a conventional two wheel steering system, the advantages offered by
a four-wheel steering system include:
1. Superior cornering stability.
2. Improved steering responsiveness and precision.
3. High speed straight-line stability.
4. Notable improvement in rapid lane changing maneuvers.
5. Smaller turning radius and tight space maneuverability at low speed.
6. Relative wheel angles and their control.
Usually in vehicles during turning, the tires are subject to the forces of grip,
momentum, and steering input when making a movement other than straight-ahead driving.
These forces compete with each other during steering manoeuvres. With a front-steered
vehicle, the rear end is always trying to catch up to the directional changes of the front
wheels. This causes the vehicle to sway. When turning, the driver is putting into motion a
complex series of forces. Each of these must be balanced against the others. The tires are
subjected to road grip and slip angle. Grip holds the cars wheels to the road, and
momentum moves the car straight ahead. Steering input causes the front wheels to turn.
The car momentarily resists the turning motion, causing a tire slip angle to form. Once the
vehicle begins to respond to the steering input, cornering forces are generated.
CHAPTER 4:
APPLICATION OF
THREE MODE
STEERING
The vehicle with arrows is the model under study. As can be seen from the figure
the vehicle can turn with hardly any space requirement with a single steering action and
also resume without any corrective inputs. Thus, it also acts as a driver aid helping
relatively inexperienced drivers make quick lane changes even at high speeds.
The company Honda Prelude manufactured the first four-wheel steering car and
it defines four wheel steering, as the effect of the 4WS mechanism acting in this way was
non-linear steering. That is, the effective steering ratio varied from a low ratio at small
steering angles, to high ratio at large angles.
This means more steering angle input is required to perform a gradual turn, making
the car less twitchy and more relaxed to drive at high speed, without requiring constant
corrections; while less steering angle is required to perform a tight-radius turn, giving the
car a go-kart like feel during tight manoeuvres.
The observed effect while driving might be best imagined as a variable effective
wheelbase, from a long wheelbase at small steering angles, to very short wheelbase at large
Normally the rear wheel steer angles are a fraction of that at the point (typically
limited to about 5 degrees of steer) and may only be applied at low speeds. At 50 percent
rear steer angle, a one-third reduction in turn radius is achieved. At 100 percent rear steer
angle, a 50 percent reduction in turn radius occurs. The primary advantage of 4WS is
derived from the better control of transient behavior in cornering. In general, 4WS systems
yield a quicker response with better damping of the yaw oscillation that occurs with
initiation of a turn.
CHAPTER 5:
COMPONENTS
COMPONENTS
The four wheels steering with three mode operation consists of the following
components to full fill the requirements of complete operation of the machine.
Rack and pinion
Bevel gear
Spur gear
Steering
Wheel
Hinge joint
The material selected must possess the necessary properties for the proposed
application. The various requirements to be satisfied can be weight, surface finish, rigidity,
ability to withstand environmental attack from chemicals, service life, reliability etc.
4.1 GEAR:
Gear or cogwheel is a rotating machine part having cut teeth, or cogs,
which mesh with another toothed part to transmit torque, in most cases with teeth on the
one gear being of identical shape, and often also with that shape on the other gear. Two or
more gears working in a sequence (train) are called a gear train or, in many cases, a
transmission; such gear arrangements can produce a mechanical advantage through a gear
ratio and thus may be considered a simple machine Geared devices can change the speed,
torque, and direction of a power source. The most common situation is for a gear to mesh
with another gear; however, a gear can also mesh with a non-rotating toothed part, called a
rack, thereby producing translation instead of rotation.
The gears in a transmission are analogous to the wheels in a crossed
belt pulley system. An advantage of gears is that the teeth of a gear prevent slippage. When
two gears mesh, and one gear is bigger than the other is (even though the size of the teeth
must match), a mechanical advantage is produced, with the rotational speeds and the
torques of the two gears differing in an inverse relationship.
In transmissions with multiple gear ratios such as bicycles, motorcycles, and cars,
the term gear, as in first gear, refers to a gear ratio rather than an actual physical gear. The
term describes similar devices, even when the gear ratio is continuous rather than discrete,
or when the device does not actually contain gears, as in continuously.
4.3 TYPES
An external gear is one with the teeth formed on the outer surface of a cylinder or
cone. Conversely, an internal gear is one with the teeth formed on the inner surface of a
cylinder or cone. For bevel gears, an internal gear is one with the pitch angle exceeding 90
degrees. Internal gears do not cause output shaft direction reversal.
Spur gears or straight-cut gears are the simplest type of gear. They consist of a
cylinder or disk with the teeth projecting radially, and although they are not straight-sided
in form (they are usually of special form to achieve constant drive ratio, mainly involute),
the edge of each tooth is straight and aligned parallel to the axis of rotation. These gears
can be meshed together correctly only if they are fitted to parallel shafts.
Helical or "dry fixed" gears offer a refinement over spur gears. The leading edges
of the teeth are not parallel to the axis of rotation, but are set at an angle. Since the gear is
curved, this angling causes the tooth shape to be a segment of a helix. Helical gears can be
meshed in parallel or crossed orientations. The former refers to when the shafts are parallel
to each other; this is the most common orientation. In the latter, the shafts are non-parallel,
and in this configuration the gears are sometimes known as "skew gears".
The angled teeth engage more gradually than do spur gear teeth, causing them to run
more smoothly and quietly. With parallel helical gears, each pair of teeth first make contact
A disadvantage of helical gears is a resultant thrust along the axis of the gear, which
needs to be accommodated by appropriate thrust bearings, and a greater degree of sliding
friction between the meshing teeth, often addressed with additives in the lubricant.
Where is the helix angle for the gear. The crossed configuration is less mechanically
sound because there is only a point contact between the gears, whereas in the parallel
configuration there is a line contact. Quite commonly, helical gears are used with the helix
angle of one having the negative of the helix angle of the other; such a pair might also be
referred to as having a right-handed helix and a left-handed helix of equal angles.
Double helical gears, or herringbone gears, overcome the problem of axial thrust
presented by "single" helical gears, by having two sets of teeth that are set in a V shape. A
double helical gear can be thought of as two mirrored helical gears joined together. This
arrangement cancels out the net axial thrust, since each half of the gear thrusts in the
opposite direction resulting in a net axial force of zero. This arrangement can remove the
need for thrust bearings. However, double helical gears are more difficult to manufacture
due to their more complicated shape.
For both possible rotational directions, there exist two possible arrangements for
the oppositely-oriented helical gears or gear faces. One arrangement is stable, and the other
is unstable. In a stable orientation, the helical gear faces are oriented so that each axial force
is directed toward the center of the gear. In an unstable orientation, both axial forces are
directed away from the center of the gear.
In both arrangements, the total (or net) axial force on each gear is zero when the
gears are aligned correctly. If the gears become misaligned in the axial direction, the
unstable arrangement generates a net force that may lead to disassembly of the gear train,
while the stable arrangement generates a net corrective force.
A bevel gear is shaped like a right circular cone with most of its tip cut off. When two
bevel gears mesh, their imaginary vertices must occupy the same point. Their shaft axes
also intersect at this point, forming an arbitrary non-straight angle between the shafts. The
angle between the shafts can be anything except zero or 180 degrees. Bevel gears with
equal numbers of teeth and shaft axes at 90 degrees are called miter gears.
Spiral bevel gears can be manufactured as Gleason types (circular arc with non-
constant tooth depth), Oerlikon and Curvex types (circular arc with constant tooth depth),
KlingelnbergCyclo-Palloid(Epicycloide with constant tooth depth) or KlingelnbergPalloid.
Spiral bevel gears have the same advantages and disadvantages relative to their
straight-cut cousins as helical gears do to spur gears. Straight bevel gears are generally used
only at speeds below 5 m/s (1000 Ft. /min), or, for small gears, 1000 r.p.m.
Hypoid gears resemble spiral bevel gears except the shaft axes do not intersect. The
pitch surfaces appear conical but, to compensate for the offset shaft, are in fact
hyperboloids of revolution. Hypoid gears are usually designed to operate with shafts at 90
degrees.
Depending on which side the shaft is offset to, relative to the angling of the teeth,
contact between hypoid gear teeth may be even smoother and more gradual than with spiral
bevel gear teeth, but also have a sliding action along the meshing teeth as it rotates and
therefore usually require some of the most viscous types of gear oil to avoid it being
extruded from the mating tooth faces, the oil is normally designated HP (for hypoid)
followed by a number denoting the viscosity. Also, the pinion can be designed with fewer
teeth than a spiral bevel pinion.with the result that gear ratios of 60:1 and higher are feasible
using a single set of hypoid gears. This style of gear is most common in motor vehicle drive
trains, in concert with a differential.
Crown gears or contrite gears are a particular form of bevel gear whose teeth project
at right angles to the plane of the wheel; in their orientation the teeth resemble the points
on a crown. A crown gear can only mesh accurately with another bevel gear, although
crown gears are sometimes seen meshing with spur gears. A crown gear is also sometimes
meshed with an escapement such as found in mechanical clocks.
Worms resemble screws. A worm is meshed with a worm wheel, which looks
similar to a spur gear.Worm-and-gear sets are a simple and compact way to achieve a high
torque, low speed gear ratio. For example, helical gears are normally limited to gear ratios
of less than 10:1 while worm-and-gear sets vary from 10:1 to 500:1. A disadvantage is the
potential for considerable sliding action, leading to low efficiency.
A worm gear is a species of helical gear, but its helix angle is usually somewhat
large (close to 90 degrees) and its body is usually fairly long in the axial direction. These
attributes give it screw like qualities. The distinction between a worm and a helical gear is
Worm-and-gear sets that do lock are called self-locking, which can be used to
advantage, as for instance when it is desired to set the position of a mechanism by turning
the worm and then have the mechanism hold that position. An example is the machine
head found on some types of stringed instruments.
If the gear in a worm-and-gear set is an ordinary helical gear only a single point of
contact is achieved. If medium to high power transmission is desired, the tooth shape of the
gear is modified to achieve more intimate contact by making both gears partially envelop
each other. This is done by making both concave and joining them at a saddle point; this is
called acone-drive. Or "Double enveloping".Worm gears can be right or left-handed,
following the long-established practice for screw threads.
CHAPTER 6:
STEERING
PRINCIPLES AND
COMPONENTS
6.2.8 Caster:
In addition to being tilted inward toward the centre of the vehicle, the king pin axis may
also be tilted forward or backward from the vertical line. This tilt is known as caster. Thus
the angle between the vertical line and the king pin centre line in the plane of the wheel
(when viewed from the side) is called caster angle.
Positive caster: If the king-pin centre line meets the ground at point ahead of the vertical
centre line.
Negative caster: If the king-pin centre line meets the ground at point behind the vertical
centre line.
The caster angle in modern vehicle range from 2-8.About 3 of caster gives the good
result. The purpose of the caster is to give a trailing effect to the front wheels. When the
wheel trails the line of weight that moves in the same direction as the vehicle it is easy to
steer a straight course. Positive caster in wheels results in a natural tendency in wheels to
toe-in. The negative caster would have the opposite effect. The positive caster increases the
effort required to steer and tries to keep the wheels straight ahead. Negative caster is
provided in heavy duty trucks for making steering easier.
When the caster at the two wheels are not equal , the tendency to toe-in at the wheel
with the larger caster will be more which will cause the vehicle to pull constantly towards
the side of the wheel with lesser caster.
6.2.10 Toe-in:
The front wheels are usually turned in slightly in front so that the distance between the front
ends is slightly less than the distance between the back ends, when viewed from the top.
The difference between these distances is called toe in.
The actual amount of toe-in is usually ranges from 3 - 5 mm.
1) It ensures parallel running of the front wheels
2) It stabilizes steering
3) It prevents side slipping and excessive wear of the tyres
4) It also serves to offset the small deflections in the wheel support system which comes
out then the vehicle is moving forward.
Figure 24:TOE-IN
Figure 25:TOE-OUT
Vehicle dynamics have very importance for a balanced drive of vehicle. It can be
say in three terms of steering, which are under-steer, over-steer, and neutral or counter
steering.
6.3.1 Under-steer:
Under steer is so called because when the slip angle of front wheels is
greater than slip angle of rear wheels. The diagram for the under steer is given below, from
the diagram the explanation is made out clear very well.
Figure 26:UNDER-STEER
Figure 27:OVER-STEER
Figure 28:Neutral-Steer
CHAPTER 7:
STEERING GEAR
BOXES
There really are only two basic categories of steering system today; those that have
pitman arms with a steering 'box' and those that don't. Older cars and some current trucks
use pitman arms. Newer cars and unibody light-duty trucks typically all use some derivative
of rack and pinion steering.
Pitman arm mechanisms have a steering 'box' where the shaft from the steering
wheel comes in and a lever arm comes out - the pitman arm. This pitman arm is linked to
the track rod or centre link, which is supported by idler arms. The tie rods connect to the
track rod. There are a large number of variations of the actual mechanical linkage from
direct-link where the pitman arm is connected directly to the track rod, to compound
linkages where it is connected to one end of the steering system or the track rod via other
rods. The example below shows a compound link.
Most of the steering box mechanisms that drive the pitman arm have a 'dead spot' in the
centre of the steering where you can turn the steering wheel a slight amount before the front wheels
start to turn. This slack can normally be adjusted with a screw mechanism but it can't ever be
eliminated. The traditional advantage of these systems is that they give bigger mechanical
advantage and thus work well on heavier vehicles. With the advent of power steering, that has
become a moot point and the steering system design is now more to do with mechanical design,
price and weight. The following are the four basic types of steering box used in pitman arm systems.
This is by far the most common type of steering box for pitman arm systems. In a
recirculating ball steering box, the worm drive has many more turns on it with a finer pitch.
A box or nut is clamped over the worm drive that contains dozens of ball bearings. These
loop around the worm drive and then out into a recirculating channel within the nut where
they are fed back into the worm drive again. As the steering wheel is turned, the worm
drives turns and forces the ball bearings to press against the channel inside the nut. This
forces the nut to move along the worm drive. The nut itself has a couple of gear teeth cast
into the outside of it and these mesh with the teeth on a sector gear which is attached to the
cross shaft just like in the worm and sector mechanism. This system has much less free play
or slack in it than the other designs, hence why it's used the most. The example below shows
a recirculating ball mechanism with the nut shown in cutaway so you can see the ball
bearings and the recirculation channel.
In this type of steering box, the end of the shaft from the steering wheel has a worm
gear attached to it. It meshes directly with a sector gear (so called because it's a section of
a full gear wheel). When the steering wheel is turned, the shaft turns the worm gear, and
The worm and roller steering box is similar in design to the worm and sector box.
The difference here is that instead of having a sector gear that meshes with the worm gear,
there is a roller instead. The roller is mounted on a roller bearing shaft and is held captive
on the end of the cross shaft. As the worm gear turns, the roller is forced to move along it
but because it is held captive on the cross shaft, it twists the cross shaft
Cam and lever steering boxes are very similar to worm and sector steering boxes. As
the worm gear is turned, the studs slide along the cam channels which forces the cross shaft
to rotate, turning the pitman arm. One of the design features of this style is that it turns the
cross shaft 90 to the normal so it exits through the side of the steering box instead of the
bottom. This can result in a very compact design when necessary.
CHAPTER 8:
DESIGN
CALCULATION
DESIGN CALCULATION
We know that
R2 = a22 + R12.. (1)
Where
R = Turning radius of the vehicle.
a2 = Distance of CG from rear axle.
R1 = Distance between instantaneous center and the axis of the vehicle.
To find a2:
Wf = (W * a2) / L (2)
Where
Wf = Load on front axle.
W = Total weight of car.
L = Wheelbase.
Where
C1 = Distance of instantaneous centre from front axle axis.
C2 = Distance of instantaneous centre from rear axle axis.
wf = Front trackwidth.
Figure 35:Steering angles position of instantaneous centre for turning radius 4.4m
Now considering the same steering angles for front and rear tires, we reduce in the turning
radius of the vehicle but keeping the wheelbase and track width same as the benchmark
vehicle.
Figure 36:Steering angles and position of instantaneous centre for turning radius 2.59 m
From Figure 28 and 29 we can see that there is a change in instantaneous center as
there is change in turning radius. The values of C1and C2 changes gradually, in
figure 3 the value of C1 is greater and the value of C2 is lesser but in Fig as the turning
radius changes the values of C1 becomes lesser and the value of C2 becomes
more.Calculation we conclude that for same wheel base and track width there
Is change in turning radius from 4.4m to 2.59m.
CHAPTER 8:
DESIGN OF MODEL
DESIGN OF MODEL
The model is designed considering the same wheelbase and track width. The model
is designed using the software CATIA V5.
The model shown in figure is designed in CATIA by using the options surfacing, the
model is designed considering four tires and four stub axles, here we are placing two
steering set one at front and the other at the rear so the stub axle considered at rear wheels
are exactly the same as front stub axles. There is a shaft connecting between the front
steering box and the rear steering box and double wishbone suspension type is considered
for suspension and only one degree of freedom is applied for the suspension motion, rest
all the degrees are constrained.
Here two bevel gears are considered, one bevel gear is attached to the steering column
of the front steering box and the other bevel gear is attached to the intermediate shaft. The
input is given at the steering wheel by the driver which rotates the steering column, as
steering column rotates the gear attached to it will rotate, the other bevel gear coupled with
the bevel gear of steering column rotates in opposite direction, so with respect to the second
bevel gear attached to the intermediate shaft.
The shaft rotates in the direction of the second bevel gear. The rear steering column is
attached with the intermediate shaft also rotates as per the shaft such that the rear wheels
attached to the rear steering column rotates as per the rear steering column, so the rear
wheels rotates in opposite direction to the driver input to the steering wheel.
The final model after creating all the joints with respect to all parts. The joint given
for front steering is replicated at the rear steering, there is bevel gear joint provided between
steering column and intermediate shaft.
This intermediate shaft provides the rotation moment to the rear steering through rear body,
the shaft gets the rotational moment from the bevel gear and this bevel gear gets the
rotational moment from steering column.
The two-wheel steering (2WS) vehicle is proven that it is still low compared to the four-
wheel steering (4WS) system car. So, this project is based on how to prove that the 4WS is
better than 2WS in terms of turning radius
After creating all the joints, the simulation is carried out for the model. The motion
is given to the steering wheel from that motion the vehicle turns with the help of the other
parts and joints
. We conclude that all the four wheels are turning at an angle, the front wheels turn as per
the steering wheel turns and the rear wheels turn opposite to the front wheels.As per the
calculation and theory, the concept of four wheel steering is proved from the simulation.
Figure 41:RACK
CHAPTER 9:
LIST OF MATERIALS
LIST OF MATERIALS
7.1.1 PROPERTIES:
The material selected must possess the necessary properties for the proposed
application. The various requirements to be satisfied can be weight, surface finish, rigidity,
ability to withstand environmental attack from chemicals, service life, reliability etc.
The following four types of principle properties of materials decisively affect their
selection
Physical
Mechanical
From manufacturing point of view Chemical. The various physical properties
concerned are melting point, thermal Conductivity, specific heat, coefficient of thermal
expansion, specific gravity, electrical conductivity, magnetic purposes etc.
The various Mechanical properties Concerned are strength in tensile, Compressive
shear, bending, torsion and buckling load, fatigue resistance, impact resistance, elastic
limit, endurance limit, and modulus of elasticity, hardness, wear resistance and sliding
properties. The various properties concerned from the manufacturing point of view are,
Cast ability
Weld ability
Surface properties
Shrinkage
7.1.6 COST:
As in any other problem, in selection of material the cost of material plays an
important part and should not be ignored.
Sometimes factors like scrap utilization, appearance, and non-maintenance of the
designed part are involved in the selection of proper materials.
CHAPTER 11:
DISCUSSION OF
RESULTS
11.1CALCULATIONS:
11.1.1.NORMAL MODE:
.
C =4366.061385 Nm.
W/2 = 6621.75 N.
P/2 = C/2x = 1685.737987 N.
R1=3238.857488 N.
R2=11.41653844 N.
R3= 6610.333462 N.
R4= 6610.333462 N.
By 2.59 m 4.4 m
calculation
By 2.85 m 5.75 m
experiment
11.3 LIMITATIONS:
The 4ws, due to construction of many new components, the system becomes more
expensive.
The system includes as many components (especially electronically) there is
always a chance to get any the part inactive, thus the system become inoperative
Suspensions in rear wheels demands considerable changes for proper working of
the vehicle with varying load.
CHAPTER 12:
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSION
An innovative feature of this steering linkage design is its ability to drive all four
(or two) wheels using a single steering actuator. Its successful implementation will allow
for the development of a four-wheel, steered power base with maximum maneuverability,
uncompromised static stability, front- and rear-wheel tracking, and optimum obstacle
climbing capability.
Thus the four-wheel steering system has got cornering capability, steering
response, straight-line stability, lane changing and low-speed maneuverability. Even
though it is advantageous over the conventional two-wheel steering system, 4WS is
complex and expensive. Currently the cost of a vehicle with four wheel steering is more
than that for a vehicle with the conventional two wheel steering. Four wheel steering is
growing in popularity and it is likely to come in more and more new vehicles. As the
systems become more commonplace the cost of four wheel steering will drop.
The project carried out by us made an impressing task in the field of automobile
industries. It is very usefully for driver while driving the vehicle. This project has also
reduced the cost involved in the concern. Project has been designed to perform the entire
requirement task which has also been provided.
CHAPTER 13:
REFERENCES
REFERENCES
[1]. K.Lohith, Dr. S. R.Shankapal, M. H. Monish Gowda, development of four wheel steering
system for a car, sastech Journal, Volume 12, Issue 1, April 2013.
[2]. Dilip S Choudhari,four wheel steering system for future, ISSN 2278 0149, Vol. 3, No.
4, October 2014.
[3]. Woongsang Jeong, Jinhee Jang, Changsoo Han, modeling and dynamic analysis for four
wheel steering vehicle.
[4]. Dr.P.Sathyabalan, R.Sivaprakasam, A.Vijin Prabhu, G.sundaram, designing and
fabrication of multiple modes steering system, IJIRSET Vol. 2, Issue 12, December 2013.
[5]. Chih-Hsien Yu, Chyuan-Yow Tseng, Chih-Ming Chang, study on power train of two
axles four wheel drive electric vehicle, Energy Procedia 14 (2012) 1528 1535.
[6]. Zhenhai Gao, Jun Wang, Deping Wang, dynamic modeling and steering performance
analysis of active front steering system, procedia engineering 15 (2011) 1030 1035.
[7]. A.L.Schwab, J.D.G.Kooijman, balance and control of a rear-wheel steered speed-record
recumbent bicycle, International Sports Engineering Association, Procedia Engineering 72
(2014) 459 464.
[8]. Pushkin Gautam, Vipul Vibhanshu, selectable all wheel steering for an ATV,
International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT), SSN: 2278-0181,
IJERTV4IS080314, Vol. 4 Issue 08, August-2015.
[9]. P. Deepak, S. Vamshi Reddy, N. Ramya, M. Bharath Goud, K. Chandra Shekar, design
and analysis of three wheeled dual steering vehicle, International Journal of Engineering
Research & Technology (IJERT),ISSN: 2278-0181.
[10].Saket Bhishikar, Vatsal Gudhka, Neel Dalal, Paarth Mehta, Sunil Bhil, A.C. Mehta,
design and simulation of 4 wheel steering system, International Journal of Engineering
and Innovative Technology (IJEIT) Volume 3, Issue 12, June 2014.
[11] K. Lohith, Dr. S. R. Shankapal, & Mr. H. Monish Gowda Development of Four Wheel
Steering System for a Car, SAS Tech Journal, vol. 12, pg. 90-97, Issue 1, April 2013.
[12] Honda official website http://automobiles.honda.com/civic-sedan/specifications.aspx
[13] Dr. Kirpal Singh Automobile Engineering Standard Publishers Distributors, vol. 1,
12th Edition, 2011.
[15] PSG College of Technology Design Data Book Kalaikathir Achchagam, 2013.