Modeling of Power Networks by ATP-Draw For Harmonics Propagation Study
Modeling of Power Networks by ATP-Draw For Harmonics Propagation Study
Received September 26, 2012; Revised September 10, 2013; Accepted September 13, 2013
This paper illustrates the possibilities of using the program ATP-Draw (Alternative Transient Program) for the
modeling of power networks to study power quality problems with highly detailed analyses. The Program ATP-Draw
is one of the most widespread and oldest programs. A unique characteristic of this program is its public domain and
the existence of forums and study committees where new application cases and modification are presented and
shared publicly. In this paper, to study the propagation of harmonics through a power network, a part of an industrial
power network was modeled. The network contains different types of electric components, such as transformers,
transmission lines, cables and loads, and there is a source of harmonics that injects 3rd, 5th, 7th, 9th and 11th harmonic
currents into the network, causing a distortion of the wave form of the currents and voltages through the power
network.
Keywords:Harmonic propagation, Modeling of elements, Harmonic current, Harmonic voltage and THD
1. INTRODUCTION used in industrial applications in the steel, paper, and textile in-
dustries. Other applications include multipurpose motor speed
Ideally, an electricity supply should invariably shows a per- control, electrical transportation systems, and electric appli-
fectly sinusoidal voltage signal at every customer location. ances [13].
However, for a number of reasons, utilities often find it hard to The focus of this study was to model a power network using
preserve such desirable conditions. The deviation of the voltage ATP and its graphical processor ATP-Draw [3], in order to study
and current waveforms from sinusoidal is described in terms of the propagation of harmonics through the power network. This
the waveform distortion, which is often expressed as harmonic software offers many possibilities based on models [10], where
distortion. electrical components such as transmission lines, cables, and
Harmonic distortion constitutes one of the main concerns for transformers can be easily modeled. The results obtained by
engineers in the several stages of energy utilization in the power ATP such as currents and voltages can be easily drawn by PlotXY
industry. In the first electric power systems, harmonic distortion software [12], which also can calculate the Fourier transforma-
was mainly caused by the saturation of transformers, industrial tion.
arc furnaces, and other arc devices like large electric welders. The power network represents an industrial plant, which
The increasing use of nonlinear loads in industry is continuing contains different types of electric components and a har-
to increase harmonic distortion in distribution networks. Non- monic source (3rd, 5th, 7th, 9th and 11th harmonic currents). The
linear loads include static power converters, which are widely simulation of the harmonics propagation will be done to find
out the distorted curves of the currents and voltages in dif-
ferent branches of the electrical system, and will be made to
Author to whom all correspondence should be addressed: control the THD (Total Harmonic Distortion). The standards
E-mail: [email protected] established in the 1992 revision of IEEE-519-1992 must be ad-
hered to. THD for voltages and currents are calculated as fol-
Copyright 2013 KIEEME. All rights reserved.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial lows [6]:
License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use,
distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
h=2
Vh2
THD
= 100 (1)
V V1
2
h=2 h
I
THD
= 100 (2)
I I1
Angle SMOVTP
Volt Freq Poles
Phase A in (deg.) No machines in parallel=1
8980.4 50 0 4 1
SMOVTQ RMVA RkV RA
AGLINE
No machines in parallel=1 3-phase volt-ampere rating line-to-line voltage Armature resistance (pu)
1 100 11 100 0
Xd (pu) Xq (pu)
XL (pu) Xd' (pu) Xq' (pu)
D-axis synchronous Q-axis synchronous
Armature leakage reactance D-axis transient reactance Q-axis transient reactance
reactance reactance
0.13 1.79 1.71 0.169 0.228
Xd'' (pu) Xq'' (pu) Tdo' (s) Tqo' (s) Tdo'' (s)
D-axis subtransient Q-axis subtransient D-axis transient time Q-axis transient time D-axis subtransient time
reactance reactance constant constant constant
0.135 0.2 4.3 0.85 0.032
Tqo'' (s) RN (pu) XN (pu) XCAN (pu)
Xo (pu)
Q-axis subtransient time Real part of neutral Imaginary part of neutral Canay's characteristic
Zero-sequence reactance
constant grounding impedance grounding impedance reactance. unknown=XL
0.05 0.13 0 0 0.13
MECHUN
HICO DSR DSD FM
0: English units. 1: Metric
2.5 0 50 3 1
- The transmission line 33 kV is made of 2AlFe6, 95 mm2, armature voltage on the d-axis. Indirect specification of mutual
length 5 km and was modeled as the same as the previous inductance.
with PI-Model. (ground resistivity)=20 m, Freq. init=50 Hz. HICO: Moment of inertia of mass. In (million pound.feet2) if
The parameters are in Table 6 and the placement of the con- MECHUN=0. In (million kg.m2) if MECHUN=1.
ductors as shown in Fig. 3. DSR: Speed-deviation self-damping coefficient for mass.
T=DSR(W-Ws), where W is the speed of mass and Ws is the syn-
Cables can be simply modeled by RLC3 (3-phase R-L serial cir- chronous speed. In (pound.feet)/(rad/sec) if MECHUN=0. In
cuits), without parallel capacitance. Relatively short-length ca- (N.m)/(rad/sec) if MECHUN=1.
bles can be treated as pure resistances obtained from the length, DSD: Absolute-speed self-damping coefficient for mass.
area of the core, and resistivity (R=.l/S). The resistance and the T=DSD(W), where W is the speed of mass. In [(pound.feet)/(rad/
reactance are also available in different catalogues and tables. If sec)] if MECHUN=0. In [(N.m)/(rad/sec)] if MECHUN=1.
the parameters of the cable are known, such as the dimensions FM<=2: Time constants based on open circuit measurements.
and material constants, it is suitable to model the cable by the FM>2: Time constants based on short circuits measurements.
built-in procedure Lines/Cables (LCC). The parameters of two
kinds of models are shown in Tables 7 and 8. 3.5 Load
3.4 Synchronous generator In most cases, the load model does not give the real situation,
but in general, the well-known models consist of serial-parallel
SG of the generator is =100 MVA, operating on the 11 kV bus combinations of RLC ( or Y) [5,15]. The load at bus 4, which
and can be represented by the SM59 model. This model is of- includes a group of asynchronous motors, was modeled by RLC_
fered in ATP-Draw as a synchronous machine, with no TACS con- D3 (3-phase R, L and C are delta-coupled). The parameters are
trol (Transient Analysis of Control Systems), type59, balanced calculated as follows without C [14]:
steady-state, and no saturation. The parameters of the generator
are listed in Table 9. The voltage magnitude is calculated as in
U 11000
equation 1 and represents the steady-state voltage at the termi- Z
= 3 n = =55 (6)
n In 346
nals of the machine.
2
U
= 11 = 8.9804 kV (5) n =Z n cos =55 0.9 =49.5
R (7)
amp 3
Z n sin 55 0.436
Explanations for Table 9 [10]: = L
n = = 76.4 mH (8)
2 f 314
SMOVTP: proportionality factor used only to split the real
power among multiple machines in parallel during initialization.
No machines in parallel corresponds to SMOVTP =1. A load can be easily modeled by a standard component RLC_3
SMOVTQ: proportionality factor which is used only to split the (3-phase, same values in all phases) if R, L, and C are known. As-
reactive power among multiple machines in parallel during ini- suming that the load at bus 9 consists of a load of some streets
tialization. No machines in parallel corresponds to SMOVTQ=1. and was measured as 1 MW and 0.3 MVAr, for 400 V, the values
Machines in parallel: requires manually input file arranging. of the model will be R=U2/P=0.16 , L=(U2/Q)/2 f=1.6985 mH,
AGLINE: Value of field current in (A) which will produce rated and C=0.
Trans. Electr. Electron. Mater. 14(6) 283 (2013): S. A. Ali 287
Table 10. The values of the harmonic source. Table 11. The harmonic currents and voltages at T1.
The same explanations as before are applied. The results are in This bus is affected by the harmonic source, which is clearly
Figs. 11 and 12 and in the table below. seen from the wave forms in Figs. 13(a)-(c). The current which
Trans. Electr. Electron. Mater. 14(6) 283 (2013): S. A. Ali 289
(a)
(a)
Fig. 14. The currents and voltage at bus 7 (a) the current flows from
the generator and (b) the voltage at bus 7.
(b)
The current that flows from the generator (IG-Fig. 4) has a high
(c) distortion, and the voltage at this bus has a high distortion too
(Figs. 14(a) and (b)). The results are in Table 16.
5. CONCLUSIONS
The modeling of power system elements can help engineers
to find solutions for problems related to harmonics, even with
complications about how to find an accurate model for some
elements of the power system. With this simple example, the
helpfulness of ATP has been demonstrated for harmonics propa-
gation analysis . It is important carefully enter data into the pro-
Fig. 13. The currents and voltage at bus 4 (a) current to load 1, (b) gram, because the desired results depend on this data.
current to network, and (c) voltage at bus 4. The different figures show the propagation of harmonics
through the whole electric system, starting from the source of
harmonics via different buses to the far end of the network.
Some transformers and buses are affected more, and some of
them less. The THD of the primary current of all transformers
290 Trans. Electr. Electron. Mater. 14(6) 283 (2013): S. A. Ali
did not exceed 2%, and the secondary current was 3%. The main pp. 43-46.
harmonic was the 3rd harmonic with an amplitude that reached [6] C. Francisco, and De La Rosa, Harmonics and Power Systems
1.19% on the primary side of T2 and 2.29% on the secondary (Taylor & Francis Group, Hazelwood, Missouri. U.S.A., 2006)
side. The THD of the voltages reached 4.246% on the primary pp. 1-8, 59-68, 149-167.
side of T5 and 5.313% on the secondary side of T2. The main [7] J. J. Grainger, and W. D. Stevenson, 1994: Power System Analysis
harmonic was the 5th harmonic with an amplitude that reached (McGraw Hill, New York, 1994) pp. 470-527.
2.38% on the primary side of T5 and 2.84% on the secondary side [8] Hans K. Hidalen, Bruce A. Mork, Laszlo Prikler, and James L.
of T2. Both buses 4 and 7 were affected. The voltage at bus 4 had Hall, Implementation of new features in ATPDraw version 3
5.313% THD, and bus 7 had 4.24% THD. The main harmonic was (Paper to the International Conference on Power Systems Tran-
the 5th harmonic with an amplitude of 2.99% at bus 4. sients - IPST 2003 in New Orleans, USA, 2003).
From the knowledge of harmonics propagation, it should be [9] James J. Burke, Power Distribution Engineering - Fundamen-
kept in mind that the electromagnetic radiation generated by the tals and applications, Vol. 7 (Marcel Dekker, Inc. New York,
sources has to be minimized, and it is advisable to strictly follow June1994) pp. 36-53, 270-303.
the manufacturers recommendations, or suitable filters should [10] Lszl Prikler, and Hans Kristian Hidalen, ATP-Draw version
be installed to reduce the harmonics. 3.5 for windows 9x/NT/2000/XP, User's Manual (October 2002).
[11] V. Mach (2006). ATP 2006, Manual, Retrieved 2012 from http://
homen.vsb.cz/~mah30/menu.html.
REFERENCES [12] Massimo Ceraolo, PlotXY program (University of Pisa, Italy, Oc-
tober 2005).
[1] Andrew James Senini, Simulating Power Quality Problems by [13] Michal Zvodn, and Martin Paar, ATP, Application manual.
ATP/EMTP (University of Queensland, Australia, 1998) pp. 25- (FEKT Vysokho uen technickho v Brn, Czech Republic,
29. 2006) pp. 14-20.
[2] J. Arrillaga, D. A. Bradley, and P. S. Bodger. 1985. Power System [14] Milan Mikulec and Vclav Havliek, Fundamentals of electro-
Harmonics. Vol. 5 (Chichester West Sussex and New York Wiley, magnetic circuits 1 (VUT, Prague-Czech Republic, 1999) pp.
1985) pp. 110-123. 159-161, 213-220.
[3] ATP-Draw. PC software for windows, version 5.7p2. [15] Norberto A. Lemozy, and Alejandro Jurado, ATP Modeling of
[4] Alfred Bodor, Harmonic analysis for distribution and industrial Distribution Networks for The Study of Harmonics Propaga-
networks (II-konference ERU 96. Brno, Czech Republic, 1996) tion (18th International Conference on Electricity Distribution,
pp. 44-51. Turin, 2-9 June 2005) Retrieved 2012 from http://www.cired.be/
[5] Alfred Bodor, Harmonic analysis for distribution and industrial CIRED05/papers/cired2005_0693.pdf.
networks, version 3.0. User's Manual (Czech Republic, 1999) [16] M. A. Pesonen, Electra, CIGRE. No. 77 (July 1981) pp. 43-54.