Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatographic Method For Simultaneous Quantification of Plerixafor and Related Substances in An Injection Formulation
Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatographic Method For Simultaneous Quantification of Plerixafor and Related Substances in An Injection Formulation
1. Introduction
Patients with non-Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL) and multiple myeloma (MM) require mobilization of
hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) as a strategic treatment following high doses of chemotherapy
2017 The Author(s). This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution
(CC-BY) 4.0 license.
Page 1 of 15
Venkata Narasimha Rao et al., Cogent Chemistry (2017), 3: 1275955
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23312009.2016.1275955
(Montgomery & Cottler-Fox, 2007). Currently, mobilization is initiated using granulocyte colony stim-
ulating factor (G-CSF), which promotes the proliferation and differentiation of HSCs (Klocke,
Kuhlmann, Scobioala, Schabitz, & Nikol, 2008).
Several days of treatment are required with placebo+G-CSF for adequate mobilization (Devine
et al., 2008). Studies have shown that patients with NHL and MM exhibited a rapid increase (a 2.5-
fold increase compared with only G-CSF) in peripheral blood CD34+ cells after subcutaneous admin-
istration of Plerixafor (PLX, direct antagonist of CXCR4/SDF-1) at a dose of 240gkg1 (Hess et al.,
2007). PLX is an on-demand, well-tolerated HSC mobilizer with mild adverse effects (Calandra et al.,
2008; DiPersio, Micallef, et al., 2007; DiPersio, Stadtmauer, et al., 2007; Flomenberg et al., 2005).
PLX is a symmetrical bicyclam derivative with molecular formula C28H54N8 and molecular weight
502.78gmol1. The structural formula of PLX and its impurities are depicted in Figure 1. PLX is a
white to off-white, hygroscopic, crystalline solid. The PLX injection formulation is a sterile, preserva-
tive-free, clear, and colorless to pale yellow isotonic solution for subcutaneous injection. Each single-
use vial is filled to deliver 1.2mL of the sterile solution containing 24mg of PLX and 5.9mg of sodium
chloride in water. Mozobil is the brand name of the innovator (CHMP Assessment Report, 2009; Drug
Bank, 2010; Drugs at FDA, 2008; Mozobil, 2016; Mozobil, Genzyme Corporation, 2015).
PLX and its injection formulation are not official monographs in any of the pharmacopeia (USP, EP,
BP, JP, and IP). It has an orphan drug status, approved by the FDA in the USA and in the EU. Hence,
no official methods have been reported for the estimation of PLX and related substances. A litera-
ture survey revealed several publications regarding the pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and
therapeutic efficacy studies on PLX (DiPersio, Stadtmauer, et al., 2007; Gerlach, Skerlj, Bridger,
Schwartz, 2001; Hatse, Princen, Bridger, De Clercq, & Schols, 2002; Hendrix et al., 2000; Hbel et al.,
2004; Lack et al., 2005; MacFarland, Ewesuedo, Badel, & Calandra, 2007; Rosenkilde et al., 2004).
An HPLC method for the determination of PLX was reported by Mathrusri Annapurna, Sai Pavan
Kumar, Goutam, and Venkatesh (2012). The method uses an isocratic elution mode using tetra butyl
ammonium hydrogen sulfate (pH=3.37) and acetonitrile mixed in the ratio 58:42 (v/v). The runtime
was 10min for PLX, and no impurities were addressed in the method.
An HPLC determination method was reported by Reddy et al., for PLX and its impurities in drug
substance (Hanimi Reddy, Ravi Kumar, & Satyanarayana Murthy, 2015). In this method, three impu-
rities and PLX were determined in 24min using a gradient elution mode. The mobile phase was a
complex mixture with a binary composition. The mobile phase A contained perchloric acid
(1.0mL)+heptane sulfonic acid (5mM) (pH=2.0) (buffer) and acetonitrile in the ratio 80:20 (v/v)
and mobile phase B contained a mixture of buffer and acetonitrile in the ratio 20:80 (v/v). The formu-
lation was separated on a phenomenex Luna phenylhexyl (L11) 100mm4.6mm, 3m column.
The eluted components were detected at 210nm. The method used long-chain alkyl sulfonates in
the mobile phase, which required a longer equilibration time before analysis than do methods that
do not use long-chain alkyl sulfonates (Fanali, Haddad, Poole, Schoenmakers, & Lloyd, 2013;
Verpoorte & Baerheim, 1984).
Thus far, studies have been reported either on PLX determination or its impurities in active phar-
maceutical ingredients. Studies on the estimation of PLX and its impurities in presence of excipients
in an injection formulation were not available.
Thus, an attempt was made for developing an accurate reproducible method that uses a nonalkyl
branched, nonquaternary ion pair reagent as a buffer for improving the peak shape for PLX and its
impurities, in the presence of excipients.
Page 2 of 15
Venkata Narasimha Rao et al., Cogent Chemistry (2017), 3: 1275955
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23312009.2016.1275955
Page 3 of 15
Venkata Narasimha Rao et al., Cogent Chemistry (2017), 3: 1275955
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23312009.2016.1275955
2.3.1.1. Preparation of standard and sample solution for assay determination (0.1mgmL1). The
standard solution for assay of PLX was prepared by diluting the standard stock solution 10 times
(550mL) to obtain a concentration of 0.1mgmL1. The vials of PLX injection were pooled and 2mL
of the sample was diluted to 100mL and further diluted 520mL to obtain the 0.1mgmL1 concen-
tration, similar to that of the standard.
Before initiating the development activity, information on impurities and their acceptable limits
was collected to define sample concentration and the range of the method. The maximum daily
dose of PLX is 40mg/day. Based on the daily dose, the qualification threshold did not exceed 0.5%,
and the identification threshold was 0.2%. Table 1 lists the chemical names and ICH limits for the
specified impurities. Method development was targeted to cover a range of 50150% of qualification
Page 4 of 15
Venkata Narasimha Rao et al., Cogent Chemistry (2017), 3: 1275955
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23312009.2016.1275955
threshold for impurities and PLX for assay. A systematic approach was adopted for the method
development.
UV spectra of the drug and its impurities were recorded by scanning between 200 and 400nm.
The spectra of drug and its impurities were overlaid and the wavelength 210nm was selected
where the active analyte as well as impurities have sufficient response for detection and quantifica-
tion. The ultraviolet scans of PLX and the four potential impurities are depicted in Figure 2.
Based on the physicochemical properties of the drug substance and the solubility (freely soluble in
alcohols), the reverse phase chromatographic technique was selected for initial separation of the
drug from its impurities.
The first development trial was initiated with sodium perchlorate buffer (pH 2.5), Waters Acquity
HSS T3 (1002.1mm, 1.7m), column with linear gradient program using 100% Acetonitrile as the
second component. The pump was maintained at a constant flow rate of 0.35mL/min. The column
was maintained at 35C. Two microliter of spiked sample was injected into the chromatograph and
the peak responses were monitored. All impurities were resolved from main peak; however, separa-
tion among impurities was not achieved. Figure 3 illustrates the chromatogram obtained from trial 1.
Page 5 of 15
Venkata Narasimha Rao et al., Cogent Chemistry (2017), 3: 1275955
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23312009.2016.1275955
Figure 3. Chromatogram
obtained from trial 1.
Another attempt was made by changing the gradient program and keeping other parameters
unchanged. The patterns obtained from both trials did not differ significantly. The pattern obtained
for trial 2 is depicted in Figure 4.
The next trial was made by changing the column to Waters CSH C18, 502.1mm, 1.7m. The
remaining chromatographic parameters were unchanged. All impurities were appropriately sepa-
rated from each other. The resolution between impurity 1 and the PLX is further improved by modify-
ing the gradient program. The optimized chromatographic conditions are listed in section 2.1. A
specimen chromatogram obtained from the final method parameters is illustrated in Figure 5.
Figure 4. Chromatogram
obtained from trial 2.
Figure 5. Specimen
chromatogram from final
method for spiked sample.
Page 6 of 15
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23312009.2016.1275955
time resolution tailing theoretical (r2) %RSD %RSD %w/w 50% 100% 150% (%w/w) (%w/w)
(mins) (RT (Rs) (T) plates USP (%RSD) %w/w %w/w %w/w
ratio) tangent (%RSD) (%RSD) (%RSD)
method (N)
1 Impurity 1 0.837 (0.72) 1.14 8,074 0.998 1.67 1.50 87.5 (0.8) 91.1 (0.8) 93.6 (2.3) 87.7 (0.4) 0.0075 0.02421
2 Plerixafor 1.161 (1.00) 2.2 1.34 6,665 0.999 0.3 0.2 100.5 (1.5) 101.5 (0.8) 100.1 (0.9) 101.6 (0.7) 0.02 0.1
3 Impurity 2 3.000 (2.58) 10.8 1.20 5,655 0.997 1.22 1.15 88.3 (1.1) 106.4 (0.4) 99.4 (1.3) 100.0 (1.0) 0.0135 0.03216
4 Impurity 3 3.886 (3.35) 5.5 1.11 9,223 0.999 0.71 0.69 98.0 (0.9) 108.5 (0.5) 108.0 (0.8) 104.2 (0.2) 0.0150 0.02381
5 Impurity 4 4.459 (3.84) 3.2 1.40 7,717 0.997 0.57 0.50 101.6 (1.1) 89.2 (0.3) 86.8 (0.9) 87.9 (1.1) 0.0207 0.04600
#
Method precision (M.P), intermediate precision (I.P).
$
LOD, LOQ values are established by S/N ratio.
Page 7 of 15
Venkata Narasimha Rao et al., Cogent Chemistry (2017), 3: 1275955
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23312009.2016.1275955
Page 8 of 15
Venkata Narasimha Rao et al., Cogent Chemistry (2017), 3: 1275955
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23312009.2016.1275955
preparations and the relative standard deviation (% RSD) was evaluated. In addition to the % RSD,
USP Resolution, USP tailing, and USP plate count were also evaluated and found to be satisfactory,
as per current USP requirements for a chromatographic peak (USP General Chapter<621>). The sys-
tem suitability results obtained are presented in Table 2.
4.1.2. Linearity
The linearity of the analytical method was tested to check its ability to elicit test results that are directly
proportional to the concentration of analyte in samples within a given range. Hence, different concen-
trations of individual impurities and standard working solution of PLX were prepared and injected into
the UPLC, and the chromatograms were recorded. The linearity of detector response was determined
by plotting a graph of peak areas versus concentrations. Plots of linearity experiments are illustrated in
Figure 6. The correlation coefficients, >0.997 for impurities and 0.999 for PLX, indicate that the method
satisfies a linear relationship between the concentration and peak response. The linearity range is be-
tween the limit of quantification (LOQ) and 150% of the sample concentration for all impurities and
between 50 and 150% of target sample concentration for assay determination. The linearity data for
all four impurities and PLX are listed in Table 2. The signal-to-noise ratio for each impurity standard
meets the criteria as per the ICH requirement and the data are presented in Table 3.
4.1.3. Precision
Precision of the test method was evaluated by injecting six individual samples (assay concentration)
and six individual samples spiked with all four impurities into the chromatograph. The % RSD values
from the six individual test preparations were found to be 0.3 for assay determination and below 2%
for all four impurities. The ruggedness (intermediate precision) of the method was determined using
another system and column for the analysis in a different day. The precision data are listed in Table
2. The data indicate that a low % RSD, concluding that the method is precise for assay and impurities
determination.
4.1.4. Accuracy
Accuracy of the analytical procedure expresses the degree of closeness of the obtained results with
true values. Samples for accuracy were prepared in triplicate by spiking PLX and impurities at differ-
ent levels in the placebo. The covered levels for assay were 50, 100, and 150% of target assay con-
centration (0.100mgmL1). The covered levels for impurities were LOQ, 50% (1mgmL1), 100%
(2mgmL1), and 150% (3mgmL1) of the sample concentration (2mgmL1). From the response of
the analyte peaks, the amounts recovered (in %) and % RSD were reported. Accuracy results are
summarized in Table 2.
The data indicate that the assay recovery results are between 100.1 and 101.5 with an RSD rang-
ing from 0.8 to 1.5% for all three samples. The % recovery of impurities lies in the range of 85110
with an RSD of between 0.3 and 2.3%. This indicates that the method is accurate and precise.
4.1.5. Specificity
The specificity of the method was determined by analyzing the diluent, standard solutions of PLX,
placebo, and the impurities spiked sample. The chromatograms of the diluent and placebos solu-
tions were evaluated for the interference of any peaks at the retention times of the analyte peaks.
No interference was found. The samples of PLX injection were subjected to stress conditions, chemi-
cal conditions such as, acid hydrolysis, base hydrolysis, and 3% of oxidant treatment, as well as
physical conditions, such as treatment with heat and light. A detailed forced degradation study has
been detailed.
4.1.5.1. Forced degradation study. Forced degradation studies were conducted on samples and on
the plain placebo to prove the specificity and stability-indicating power of the method. Specificity
was determined by exposing test solution to oxidation by hydrogen peroxide, acid hydrolysis, base
hydrolysis, heat and photolytic stress. A detailed procedure has been reported.
Page 9 of 15
Venkata Narasimha Rao et al., Cogent Chemistry (2017), 3: 1275955
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23312009.2016.1275955
Oxidation stress studies were provided by adding 1mL of 3% H2O2 to 2mL of the sample and stor-
ing for 48h on bench top. Acid hydrolysis was performed by adding 1mL of 0.5N HCl to 2mL of the
sample and storing for 24h on the bench top. Base hydrolysis was performed by adding 1mL of
0.5N NaOH and storing for 24h on the bench top. Heat stress was provided by exposing the sample
to 70C for 48h. Photolytic studies were carried as per the current ICH requirements i.e. by exposing
the sample to UV light (200 Watt h/m2), day light (1.2 million lux h) (Fanali et al., 2013). The stressed
samples were then further diluted to 20mL with the diluent and chromatographed as per the pro-
posed method. The percentage assay and peak purity of PLX peaks were evaluated using the PDA
Page 10 of 15
Venkata Narasimha Rao et al., Cogent Chemistry (2017), 3: 1275955
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23312009.2016.1275955
Figure 7. (Continued)
(e) UV degradation
detector. The forced degradation chromatograms are illustrated in Figure 7. Table 4 presents the
results obtained from the stress studies.
The data in Table 4 indicate that the maximum degradation was observed in case of oxidation
(5%), followed by base hydrolysis (0.8%). The molecule appears to be extremely stable under light
Page 11 of 15
Venkata Narasimha Rao et al., Cogent Chemistry (2017), 3: 1275955
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23312009.2016.1275955
stress conditions. According to Waters Empower software, the peak is homogenous if the purity
angle is less than the purity threshold. The peak purity data indicated that all known impurities and
PLX peaks were homogenous and free from interference, and their estimation was unaffected in
presence of other degradant peaks. This confirms the stability-indicating power of the developed
method.
From Table 5, the similarity factor between the standard at zero hours and standard at 24h is
1.00. This indicates that the standard solution is stable up to 24h at room temperature.
Page 12 of 15
Venkata Narasimha Rao et al., Cogent Chemistry (2017), 3: 1275955
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23312009.2016.1275955
The difference of % concentrations of impurities obtained between sample at zero hours and that
obtained at 24h indicates that the sample solution is stable up to 72h.
4.1.7. Robustness
The robustness of an analytical method is a measure of its capacity to remain unaffected by small
but deliberate changes in the method parameters. The robustness of the method was determined
by deliberately varying pH, flow rate, and column temperature. The effect of mobile phase pH was
studied at 2.3 and 2.7, the effect of flow rate was studied at 0.29mL/min and 0.35mL/min, and the
effect of column oven temperature was studied at 30 and 40C. The impact of column temperature
on the assay of PLX was studied at 50 and 60C. System suitability parameters, such as USP resolu-
tion, tailing % RSD, and retention time, of PLX were noted. The data are listed in Table 7. The data
reveal that the method is sensitive to low pH and influences the resolution between impurity 1 and
PLX. Furthermore, the flow rate affects the retention behavior of PLX.
Page 13 of 15
Venkata Narasimha Rao et al., Cogent Chemistry (2017), 3: 1275955
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23312009.2016.1275955
5. Conclusions
The rapid gradient reverse phase UPLC method, developed for the quantitative analysis of PLX and
related substances in pharmaceutical dosage forms, is precise, accurate, linear, robust, and specific.
Satisfactory results were obtained from validation of the method. The retention time (1.1min) ena-
bles rapid estimation of the drug. This method exhibits an excellent performance in terms of sensi-
tivity and speed. The method is stability-indicating and can be used for routine analysis of production
samples, checking the stability of samples, and checking the stability of samples of PLX.
Page 14 of 15
Venkata Narasimha Rao et al., Cogent Chemistry (2017), 3: 1275955
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23312009.2016.1275955
Klocke, R., Kuhlmann, M. T., Scobioala, S., Schabitz, W. R., & Montgomery, M., & Cottler-Fox, M. (2007, February).
Nikol, S. (2008). Granulocytecolony-stimulating factor Mobilization and collectionof autologous hematopoietic
(G-CSF) for cardio- andcerebrovascular regenerative progenitor/stem cells. Clinical Advances in Hematology
applications. Current Medicinal Chemistry, 15, 968977. and Oncology, 5, 127136.
Lack, N. A., Green, B., Dale, D. C., Calandra, G. B., Lee, H., Mozobil. (2016). Retrieved from http://www.rxlist.com/mozobil-
MacFarland, R. T., ... Bridger, G. (2005, May). A drug.htm
pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model for the Mozobil, Genzyme Corporation. (2015). Retrieved from http://
mobilization of CD34 hematopoietic progenitor cells by www.mozobil.com
AMD3100. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 77, 427 Q2A (R1) validation of analytical procedures: Text and
436. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clpt.2004.12.268 methodology, international conference on harmonization.
MacFarland R., Ewesuedo R. B., Badel K., & Calandra G. (2007, 2005.
November 16). Pharmacokinetics of plerixafor (AMD3100) Rosenkilde, M. M., Gerlach, L. O., Jakobsen, J. S., Skerlj, R. T.,
in volunteers with renal impairment (Abstract No. 2878). Bridger, G. J., & Schwartz, T. W. (2004, January 23).
Blood, 110, 847a. Molecular mechanism of AMD3100 antagonism in the
Mathrusri Annapurna, M., Sai Pavan Kumar, B., Goutam, S. V. S., & CXCR4 receptor. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 279,
Venkatesh, B. (2012). Stability-indicating high performance 30333041. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M309546200
liquid chromatographic and derivative spectrophotometric Verpoorte, R., & Baerheim, S. (1984). Chromatography of
methods for Plerixafor. Drug Invention Today, 4, 465469. alkaloids. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
2017 The Author(s). This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
You are free to:
Share copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions
You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Cogent Chemistry (ISSN: 2331-2009) is published by Cogent OA, part of Taylor & Francis Group.
Publishing with Cogent OA ensures:
Immediate, universal access to your article on publication
High visibility and discoverability via the Cogent OA website as well as Taylor & Francis Online
Download and citation statistics for your article
Rapid online publication
Input from, and dialog with, expert editors and editorial boards
Retention of full copyright of your article
Guaranteed legacy preservation of your article
Discounts and waivers for authors in developing regions
Submit your manuscript to a Cogent OA journal at www.CogentOA.com
Page 15 of 15