Quantitative Methods in Renography
Quantitative Methods in Renography
Quantitative Methods in
Renography
Richard Lawson
Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre
[email protected]
Overview
Problems of quantifying the renogram
Complex shape of the curve
Unwanted background
Background subtraction
Recognising correct subtraction
Tissue and vascular background components
Compare two solutions
Rutland plot
Deconvolution
Quantitative parameters
Relative function
Absolute function
Elimination
ISCORN Consensus Report: Sem.Nucl.Med. 1999, 29:146-159
Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre
Renography
Renography is a dynamic study of kidney function
Time is the important dimension
It is the renogram curves that show transit of tracer
through the kidneys
So curves are more important than the images
Upslope of curves demonstrate kidney uptake
Relative function
one kidney compared with the other
Absolute function
each kidney compared with normal
Downslope of curves demonstrate elimination
Concentration
Extravascular
Tissue
Time
Concentration
Blood
Time
Concentration Concentration
Kidney
Tubules + pelvis
Time
Bladder
Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre
Renogram Model
Concentration
Extravascular
Tissue
Time
Concentration
Blood
Time
This is the
Concentration Concentration
curve that Kidney
we want Tubules + pelvis
Time
Bladder
Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre
Regions of Interest
Each kidney ROI includes
Blood background
}
Renal blood vessels
Renal tubules Renogram
Renal pelvis
Overlying tissues Tissue background
Tissue
Time Time
Background ROI curve
cps If background
subtraction is correct,
+ Blood renogram curve should
rise smoothly from zero
Tissue
Time
Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre
Mixing
During the first few seconds after injection
Tracer has not had enough time to mix uniformly
throughout all of the blood
Therefore blood activity in the background region may
differ from blood activity in the kidney region
So background subtraction may be wrong
Therefore ignore first few seconds of the curve
Until mixing is complete
Varies between patients
Often about 30 seconds
Possibly up to 1 minute
Curve is not
smooth during
first minute
Extrapolate to
overcome
mixing phase
0 1 2 3 4 5 min
Question 1: Is this renogram curve correctly subtracted ?
1 = Correct subtraction, 2 = Under-subtracted, 3 = Over-subtracted
Answer: Under-subtracted
Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre
Recognising Correct Subtraction
0 1 2 3 4 5 min
Question 2: Is this renogram curve correctly subtracted ?
1 = Correct subtraction, 2 = Under-subtracted, 3 = Over-subtracted
Answer: Over-subtracted
Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre
Recognising Correct Subtraction
0 1 2 3 4 5 min
Question 3: Is this renogram curve correctly subtracted ?
1 = Correct subtraction, 2 = Under-subtracted, 3 = Over-subtracted
Answer: Correct subtraction after extrapolation
Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre
Recognising Correct Subtraction
Under-subtracted
If curve has a
kink during first
Correctly subtracted
minute then
extrapolate to
overcome Over-subtracted
mixing phase
0 1 2 3 4 5 min
0 1 min
Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre
Background Subtraction
Examples
Example 1
Left Kidney
Relative function
Left kidney: 52% Right Kidney
Right kidney: 48%
L R
Right Kidney
Relative function
Left kidney: 52% Left Kidney
Right kidney: 48%
Question 6: Are these curves correctly subtracted ?
1 = Correct subtraction, 2 = Under-subtracted, 3 = Over-subtracted
Answer: Correct subtraction
Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre
Teaching Point
L R
Right Kidney
Relative function Left Kidney
Left kidney: 56%
Right kidney: 44%
Question 7: Are these curves correctly subtracted ?
1 = Correct subtraction, 2 = Under-subtracted, 3 = Over-subtracted
Answer: Significantly under-subtracted after extrapolation
Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre
Example 2 Peri-renal background
L R
Right Kidney
Relative function
Left Kidney
Left kidney: 90%
Right kidney: 10%
Question 8: Are these curves correctly subtracted ?
1 = Correct subtraction, 2 = Under-subtracted, 3 = Over-subtracted
Answer: Over-subtracted
Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre
Example 2 Rutland method
L R
Right Kidney
Relative function
Left kidney: 66% Left Kidney
Right kidney: 34%
Question 9: Are these curves correctly subtracted ?
1 = Correct subtraction, 2 = Under-subtracted, 3 = Over-subtracted
Answer: Correct subtraction after extrapolation
Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre
Teaching Point
If using MAG3 and function is poor
Then different background regions can have a
big effect
If using DTPA this happens even with good
function
Because of lower extraction efficiency
If function is asymmetric
Then incorrect background subtraction can
affect relative function measurement
L R
Right Kidney
L R
Right Kidney
Relative function
Left Kidney
Left kidney: 85%
Right kidney: 15%
L R
Right Kidney
Relative function
Left Kidney
Left kidney: 81%
Right kidney: 19%
Concentration
Extravascular
Tissue
Time
Concentration
Blood
Time
Concentration Concentration
Kidney
Time
Bladder
Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre
Rutland Theory
Define:
-
Tissue ROI counts
Blood activity B = Vascular ROI counts (scaled for ROI size)
K
= UC
+ a
Bdt
Rutland Plot
B B
(Patlak plot)
This is the equation of a straight line with slope UC and intercept a
Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre
Rutland Practice
Draw regions of interest L R
Kidneys
Vascular background
heart or spleen
Tissue background
below kidney
Bladder
Generate activity-time curves Post
*
*
Late points will be below the line
*
**
(kidney is emptying)
Relative function
Left kidney: 81%
Right kidney: 19%
ke
t a Slope is a
U p measure of the
kidney function
Intercept tells us
Blood background how much blood
background to
subtract
Rutland Time
Rutland Plot
Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre
Deconvolution
Simple Kidney Model
Renal Renal Blood Activity
Artery Vein
Bolus Input
Glomerulus
Renal
Tubules time
Kidney Activity
Transit
Impulse
Elim
Uptake
Renal
Retention
ina
Pelvis
tion
Function
Ureter time
Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre
Mean Transit Time
Impulse Retention Function
MTT Mean transit time is
the average time for
a molecule to pass
through the system
Initial Height
Area
H(t) MTT = Initial height
time
Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre
Idealised Renogram
Blood Activity Perfect bolus Input
But not practicable
Perfect injection
Direct into renal artery
No recirculation
time
Kidney Activity
Impulse Response Transit
Elim
Uptake, transit and
Uptake
ina
elimination are separated
tion
time
Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre
But what about the real renogram ?
Blood Activity IV injection
Slow recirculation
Blood activity persists
time
Kidney Activity
Real Renogram
What shape is the
kidney curve ? ?
time
Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre
Convolution
100 Must be linear 25
Must be stationary
70 50% 35
50%
50
50%
50
Input time
18
50 50 50
40 28 12
Input time 20
14
Response time
Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre
Convolution
Bolus R4
R3
I(t)
R(t)
R2
I1
I2 R1
I3
I4
H(t)
Input time
H1 H2 H3 H4
Response time
Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre
Deconvolution
Bolus R4
R3
I(t)
R(t)
R2
I1
I2 R1
I3
I4
H(t)
Input time
H1 H2 H3 H4
Response time
Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre
Teaching Point
Given the input to a system I(t) and the response
to that input R(t), you can use deconvolution to
calculate the expected response to an ideal
impulse input
This is the impulse retention function , H(t)
The impulse retention function is easy to interpret
because
The initial height represents uptake
The duration represents transit
The downslope represents elimination
Matrix method 1 Ri i 1
As previous illustration H i = I i j +1 H j
I1 t j =1
Fourier transform
FT of a convolution is
H (t ) = F -1F {R(t )}
product of FTs F {I (t )}
Constrained optimisation
Find smooth solution consistent with noise
Deconvolution
Kidney Activity
=
Blood Activity + Renogram
Not easy to
remove
Vascular Background background
Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre
Effect of Vascular Background
After Deconvolution
Kidney Activity
=
Blood Activity + Renogram
Easy to
remove
background
Vascular Background
Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre
Renogram Example - Raw Curves
Activity-time curves
After smoothing
After trimming
LEFT KIDNEY
RIGHT KIDNEY
Vascular
Background
Impulse
transit
Retention
Function
El
im
in
Uptake
at
io
Mean Transit Time
n
Time
Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre
Quantitative Parameters
Renogram Components
Uptake
Elimination
Elimination
Difference
Activity
starts
Transit = kidney
contents
Uptake
only Renogram peaks when
rate of uptake = rate of elimination
Downslope when
rate of elimination is
greater than rate of uptake
Renogram
Time
Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre
Quantifying Relative Function
During first 2 or 3 minutes there is no elimination
So we can calculate relative uptake from:
Relative counts in summed image
eg 1 to 3 min
Difficult to get correct background subtraction
Relative area under uptake phase of curves
eg from 1 to 3 min
Provided background subtraction is correct
Relative height of impulse retention function
After deconvolution
Provided plateau can be identified
Relative slope of Rutland plot
Using linear fit
Guarantees correct background subtraction
Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre
Quantifying Absolute Function
Absolute function is much harder than relative
function
Compare kidney activity with administered activity
Using known camera sensitivity
eg Manchester method
By imaging dose syringe first
eg Gates method
(Gates GF. Am.J.Roentgenol,1982, 138: 565-70)
Compare kidney activity with blood curve
Calibrate by taking one blood sample
(eg Piepsz A et.al. Eur.J.Nucl.Med. 1977, 2:173-77)
Proper measurement requires formal blood clearance
Multiple blood samples
(ISCORN Report. Blaufox et.al. J.Nucl.Med 1997, 37: 1883-1890)
Difference between
Uptake phase
Activity
Renogram
Blood (input)
Time
* Chaiwatanarat et. al. J.Nucl.Med. 1993, 34: 845-848
Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre
We have looked at two Methods
The problem
Variable input function
Complex curve shape & superimposed background
The solution
Standardise input function
Simpler curve shape with separable background
Delta function input Calculate using:
Perfect bolus injection
Impossible in practice Deconvolution
Bolus spreading and recirculation
Constant input
Rutland plot
Continuous infusion
Possible but complicated
Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre
Comparison of Methods
Renogram Rutland Plot
Deconvolution
Quantifies uptake Quantifies uptake
Quantifies MTT ?
Facilitates vascular Facilitates vascular
background removal background removal
Very sensitive to noise Insensitive to noise
Sensitive to timing Robust against timing
errors errors
Spoiled by furosemide Still OK with furosemide
Impulse
Background Retention
Decon- Bolus input Function
Integrate
volution MTT
Kidney
Rutland plot
Background
Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre
ISCORN Reports
Quantification of the renogram
Prigent A, Cosgriff PS, Gates GF, et al.
Consensus report on quality control of quantitative measurements of
renal function obtained from the renogram.
Semin.Nucl.Med. 1999 29:146-159.
Renal clearance
Blaufox MD, Aurell M, Bubeck B et al.
Report of the Radionuclides in Nephrourology Committee on renal
clearance.
J Nucl Med 1997; 37:1883-1890.
Richard Lawson Central Manchester Nuclear Medicine Centre