Multiple Carriers in Wireless Communications - : Curse or Blessing?
Multiple Carriers in Wireless Communications - : Curse or Blessing?
(NERG), 1
Vol. 70, No. 4, pp. 112-123, Dec. 2005
Abstract— The use of multi-carrier techniques is a natural on the system performance is generally low, when the largest
choice when regarding wireless systems with high bandwidths channel delay is small compared to the symbol time of the
and for which the application environment exhibits severe multi- system. Or when, similarly, the system bandwidth is small
path propagation. These techniques provide a way to cope with
and benefit from the time-dispersive channel. This, however, compared to the coherence bandwidth. For those cases the
comes at the cost of a higher sensitivity to imperfections in influence of the channel can generally be easily removed using
the analogue radio frequency front-end. This paper illustrates an equalizer with a few taps or a rake receiver with several
the sensitivity of the most frequently used multi-carrier tech- fingers.
nique, i.e. orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM),
to three of the main impairments: phase noise, IQ imbalance
and nonlinearities. Furthermore, it is shown that the use of
digital signal processing can largely compensate the effects of
these non-idealities, overcoming the disadvantages of the use of
multi-carrier techniques.
Index Terms— Wideband communication, multipath propaga-
tion, physical layer, orthogonal frequency division multiplexing
(OFDM), radio front-end impairments, digital compensation.
I. I NTRODUCTION
(a) User scenario (b) Multipath Channel
The application of digital modulation is well established to
convey data between the transmitter (TX) and receiver (RX) Fig. 1. Wireless communication in a multipath environment.
of a wireless communication system. It enables the use of
advanced signal processing and coding techniques to improve As the bandwidth, however, increases and systems move
the transmission quality. Where the application area of these towards more time-dispersive environments (e.g. offices), these
kinds of systems was traditionally in point-to-point links (e.g. solutions become highly complex. Hereto, the use of multiple
in satellite communications and microwave radio links), it carriers was proposed. In these techniques the whole system
has moved over the last decades towards terrestrial wireless, bandwidth is subdivided into several parallel narrow subbands.
mobile and indoor networks. In parallel, the ever increasing When this is implemented in the analogue domain it requires
demand for higher speeds in these kinds of networks, has multiple carriers for frequency conversion and steep bandpass
caused a move from narrowband towards wideband systems. filters to separate the non-overlapping subchannels. Therefore,
Wireless networks are currently deployed in urban areas and efficient implementations in the digital domain were proposed.
in indoor environments, like offices and homes. An example The most applied version of these techniques is based on
for the former are GPRS and UMTS and for the latter wireless the discrete Fourier transform (DFT) and named orthogonal
LAN (Wi-Fi) and Bluetooth. In these environments the trans- frequency division multiplexing (OFDM), the basics of which
mitted signal experiences multipath propagation before reach- will be treated in Section II.
ing the RX. This means that multiple copies of the transmitted Although OFDM exhibits a high spectral efficiency and
signal arrive with different delays and attenuations at the RX, the ability to use the multipath channel to its advantage,
see Fig. 1. The effect is that the response of the wireless it has several disadvantages when compared with traditional
channel is frequency selective and that delayed versions of the single carrier systems. These disadvantages lie mainly in
transmitted symbols leak into neighbouring symbols, causing the constraints it puts on the quality of the analogue radio
inter-symbol interference (ISI). The influence of the multipath frequency (RF) front-end of both TX and RX. The influence of
the most important imperfections on the system performance
Tim Schenk is with the Radiocommunication Group, Department of Elec-
trical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 are treated in Section III-A, Section IV-A and Section V-A.
MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands (e-mail: [email protected]). Since stringent specifications for the front-end of the re-
Peter Smulders is with the Radiocommunication Group, Department of garded wireless system are required, the analogue part is the
Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513,
5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands (e-mail: [email protected]). most expensive part of the system. Furthermore, Moore’s law
Erik Fledderus is with TNO Informatie- en Communicatietechnologie, will influence the digital part in terms of size and price, but has
P.O. Box 5050, 2600 GB Delft and with the Radiocommunication Group, little impact on the analogue part, i.e. the RF front-end; there-
Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technol-
ogy, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands and (e-mail: fore, this part will dominate over time the performance and
[email protected]). price of the radio system. Therefore, this paper also addresses
2
digital signal processing based algorithms in the baseband part interval (GI), which basically prefixes a copy of the last Ng
of the system, which are designed to suppress the influence samples to the start of the OFDM symbol. If Ng is chosen
of the analogue impairments. Examples hereof are presented sufficiently large compared to the channel length, the ISI is
in Section III-B, Section IV-B and Section V-B. A design contained in the GI of the symbol. Since it is redundant
incorporating these digital compensation techniques allows for information it can be disregarded at the RX, removing the
higher impairment levels, and thus opens the door for cheaper influence of ISI.
and more optimized implementation of the RF front-end, e.g.,
the use of RF CMOS or homodyne transmitters/receivers. This
of course at the cost of higher complexity in the digital part.
Fig. 4. OFDM system block diagram, showing a generic model for the
Fig. 2. Spectra of three subcarrier forming an OFDM signal.
transmitter and receiver.
The same OFDM signal is depicted in the time-domain in The received signal is, subsequently, downconverted to base-
Fig. 3. From this figure it can be concluded that the symbol band by the RF RX front-end. The output of the analogue-to-
length contains {1, 2, 3} periods of the signal on the different digital converter is then passed to the RX baseband processing.
carriers, respectively. Here the number of periods depends on This processing removes the GI, which annuls the influence of
the position of the subcarrier within the OFDM spectrum. the ISI. The DFT processing then separates the signals on the
To increase the robustness of the OFDM system against ISI, different carriers. The multiplexed (MUX) data stream is then
caused by multipath propagation, the addition of a cyclic processed in the RX processing, here depicted as block GRX ,
extension of the symbols was proposed in [4]. Hereto the where, e.g., channel equalization, decoding and deinterleaving
symbol length is prolonged for Ng samples with a guard are performed.
3
B. Turning multipath into an advantage all subchannels carry symbols from the same modulation
As mentioned above, the influence of the ISI caused by size. Here the subchannels with the lowest SNR determine
multipath propagation is removed at the receiver, when the GI the probability of error and thus the modulation format. In
is chosen long enough. The other effect of the multipath, the contrast, a system based on adaptive modulation can maximize
frequency selective fading, remains. Now, however, since the the total throughput for a certain probability of error.
bandwidth is subdivided into parallel carriers, the subcarrier
bandwidth is smaller than the channel coherence bandwidth.
That is why the channel can be regarded as frequency flat for
a certain carrier. This enables to use of a single tap equalizer
per subcarrier to compensate for the channel influence.
If we assume the noise experienced in the system is white,
the subcarriers having a lower channel transfer experience a
lower signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). The detection of the trans-
mitted symbols on such subcarriers yields a higher probability
of error. This is schematically depicted in Fig. 5. Here the
white carriers have a low probability of correct detection of
the transmitted symbols.
of the frequency of the oscillator output. These frequency This influence of PN on the received signal in an OFDM
deviations are often modelled as a random excess phase, and system applying QPSK modulation is illustrated in Fig. 10.
therefore referred to as phase noise. Phase noise (PN) will These results are for a system transmitting several packets
more and more appear to be a factor limiting the performance and not experiencing a channel, i.e., Hm (k) = 1 for all k
of OFDM systems, when low-cost implementations or systems and m. In Fig. 10(a) a typical result is shown for a system
with high carrier frequencies are regarded [12], since it is in having an oscillator characterised by a corner frequency ∆f3dB
those cases more challenging to produce an oscillator with which is low compared to the spacing of the subcarriers.
sufficient stability. It can be concluded that the dominant effect of PN is the
The RF oscillator process used for down-conversion of the rotation. When ∆f3dB is increased, whereas the total noise
received signal can be modelled as power remains unchanged, for the situation in Fig. 10(b), the
rotational behaviour is less pronounced, but a higher additive
a(t) = e−j{2πfRF t−θ(t)} , (1) behaviour is visible.
where j denotes the imaginary unit, t is the time variable and 1.5 1.5
θ(t) denotes the PN process. When (1) models a free-running 1 1
oscillator it can be shown that the corresponding PSD is given
0.5 0.5
by the Lorentzian function [11], as depicted schematically in
Fig. 9. The PN process is then fully determined by the 3 dB
Q
0
Q
0
−1 −1
−1.5 −1.5
10 log10 ( 2π∆f1 ) −1.5 −1 −0.5 0
I
0.5 1 1.5 −1.5 −1 −0.5 0
I
0.5 1 1.5
3dB
(a) Low ∆f3dB (b) High ∆f3dB
a certain carrier is dominated by the neighbouring carriers. These carriers have the same separation from DC. The signal is
Some gain in performance is achieved here, but the overall up converted to RF and transmitted to the frequency selective
effect is limited at low SNRs and in fading channels. channel, where the received RF signal is depicted in Fig. 12(b).
It is clear that carrier −k is more attenuated by the channel
IV. IQ IMBALANCE than carrier k. Subsequently, the RX signal is down converted
to baseband using the homodyne structure of Fig. 11. Since
In this section we discuss the influence of a mismatch
this structure exhibits IQ mismatch, the mirror is not fully
between the I and Q branch, known as IQ imbalance. This mis-
rejected, and mixes down into the regarded baseband channel.
match occurs due to limited accuracy in the implementation
This is illustrated in Fig. 12(c), which shows that carrier k
of the RF front-end and results into a limited image rejection.
experiences a contribution of the signal received on the mirror
Although IQ imbalance can occur in any quadrature receiver,
carrier −k and vice versa.
we here focus on a homodyne receiver [18], as illustrated
The effect on the received baseband signal can be expressed
in Fig. 11. The advantage of these direct conversion type of
as
RXs is that no costly surface acoustic wave (SAW) filter is
∗
necessary, only two low-pass filters (LPFs), which can more xm (k) = K1 Hm (k)sm (k) + K2 Hm (−k)s∗m (−k) , (3)
easily be integrated.
where ∗ denotes complex conjugation and K1 and K2 model
the imbalance. The effect of mirror leakage as shown in
Fig. 12(c) is also apparent from (3). In general K1 is larger
than K2 and in a system with ideal matching K1 = 1 and
K2 = 0.
To clearly show the effect of the IQ imbalance on the
reception of an OFDM signal, a noiseless system applying 16-
QAM modulation is regarded. The system does not experience
a wireless channel, but has a 10% amplitude and 5◦ phase
Fig. 11. Schematic representation of a direct conversion based RX. imbalance between the I and Q branches of the RX. The
received signal is depicted in Fig. 13, which shows that the
First we will regard the influence of IQ imbalance in transmitted 16-QAM points are distorted by an additive rotated
Section IV-A and then review several digital compensation 16-QAM constellation of lower amplitude. This is due to
approaches in Section IV-B. the leakage of the mirror carrier −k, where the rotation and
reduced amplitude are due to the imbalance parameter K2 .
A. Influence of IQ imbalance Furthermore, one may observe a minor rotation and decrease
in amplitude due to the multiplication of the desired signal
The IQ imbalance in the structure of Fig. 11 has several (on carrier k) with imbalance parameter K1 .
sources, but regarding the influence we can distinguish be-
tween two types of IQ imbalance: frequency independent and
1.5
frequency selective IQ imbalance. An example of the first
group is the mismatch which occurs when the phase shift
1
between the signal used for up/down-conversion of the I and
Q signal is not exactly 90 degrees. The frequency selective IQ
0.5
imbalance for instance occurs due to a mismatch between the
low-pass filters (LPFs) in the I and Q branches, see Fig. 11.
Q
0
In a practical RX the frequency independent behaviour will
be dominant. Hereto, we will focus on this behaviour here.
−0.5
−1
−1.5
−1.5 −1 −0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5
I
compensation techniques for this RF impairment is, however, the PAPR becomes higher. Figure 15 illustrates the PAPR
promising, since the IQ imbalance variation with time is dependence on Nc for a system applying 64-QAM modulation.
negligible and the influence of IQ imbalance has a very It, hereto, shows the inverse cumulative distribution function
specific structure, as was shown in Section IV-A. for the PAPR of the OFDM-symbols for different number of
Several compensation approaches have been proposed for subcarriers, which indicates the chance that the PAPR is larger
the compensation of IQ imbalance, mainly focussing on imbal- than the value on the x-axis.
ances in the RX. Again data-aided and blind techniques can be
1
distinguished. An effective data-aided technique was proposed N = 64
c
by the authors of [19], which is applicable for systems 0.9 Nc = 128
applying a block of pilot carrier preceding the data carriers. 0.8
Nc = 512
It applies the fact that the estimate of the wireless channel N = 1024
c
will not be smooth, when IQ imbalance occurs in the down 0.7
P{PAPR> x}
conversion. A blind method was proposed by the authors of 0.6
[20], where the imbalance parameters are estimated by using
0.5
the statistical independence of the datasymbols transmitted on
carrier k and −k. Both methods can be applied to significantly 0.4
suppress the RX based IQ imbalance. 0.3
When the system, however, experiences both TX and RX
0.2
IQ imbalance, these techniques will not suffice. Therefore,
the authors recently proposed a data-aided approach for joint 0.1
estimation of TX and RX induced IQ imbalance [21]. This 0
method effectively compensates for the joint TX and RX IQ 2 4 6 8 10 12
imbalance in the digital baseband part of the RX. x [dB]
An example of results achieved with the blind compensation Fig. 15. PAPR of 64-QAM OFDM symbols for different number of
subcarriers Nc .
method for RX IQ imbalance [20] is shown in Fig. 14. Here a
scenario with severe RX imbalance and experiencing additive
RX noise is regarded. It is clear from Fig. 14(a) that detection It can be concluded from the figure that for 1024 subcarriers
of the receiver 16-QAM points before digital compensation 50% of the symbols possesses a PAPR which is higher than
would result in many errors. The results after the compensation 9 dB. This would not be a disadvantage in a fully linear
are shown in Fig. 14(b). It can be concluded that the rotation wireless system. Any practical system, however, has nonlinear
and attenuation of the signal (by K1 ) has been successfully parts like for instance the power amplifier (PA) in the TX and
removed. Furthermore, the scatter plot of the constellation low-noise amplifier (LNA) in the RX. The influence of these
points are much smaller after compensation, showing that also nonlinearities on the signal is discussed in Section V-A and
the mirror leakage is removed. The remaining impairment is suppression approaches are reviewed in Section V-B.
due to the additive RX noise.
1.5 1.5 A. Influence of Non-linearities
1 1 For illustration purposes Fig. 16 schematically depicts the
0.5 0.5 transfer of a nonlinear PA. It shows that the PA delivers linear
amplification for input powers up to a certain level. Beyond
Q
0 0
Q
require a considerable complexity in the baseband part of the [9] IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks Part 16:
wireless system to significantly reduce the performance degra- Air Interface for Fixed Broadband Wireless Access Systems, IEEE Std
802.16-2004, 2004.
dation due to non-linearities. However, when combinations of [10] M. Lax, “Classical noise. V. Noise in self-sustained oscillators,” Phys.
the different techniques are applied, the complexity can be Rev., vol. CAS-160, pp. 290-307, 1967.
minimized. [11] A. Demir, A. Mehrotra, and J. Roychowdhury, “Phase noise in oscil-
lators: a unifying theory and numerical methods for characterization,”
IEEE Trans. on Circuits and Systems, pp. 655–674, May 2000.
VI. C ONCLUSIONS [12] P.F.M. Smulders, “Exploiting the 60 GHz band for local wireless
multimedia access: prospects and future directions,” IEEE Commun.
The applications multiple carriers can effectively be used Magazine, vol. 40, 2002.
to overcome the impact of multipath propagation on the per- [13] T. Pollet, M. van Bladel, and M. Moeneclaey, “BER sensitivity of OFDM
systems to carrier frequency offset and wiener phase noise,” IEEE Trans.
formance of wireless systems applying high bandwidths. The on Commun., vol. 43, no. 2/3/4, pp. 191–193, Feb./Mar./Apr. 1995.
most applied multi-carrier technique is orthogonal frequency [14] A.G. Armada and M. Calvo, “Phase noise and subcarrier spacing
division multiplexing (OFDM). It is shown that OFDM effec- effects on the performance of an OFDM communication system,” IEEE
Commun. Letters, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 11–13, Jan. 1998.
tively divides the frequency selective channel into frequency [15] R. Hasholzner, C. Drewes, and J.S. Hammerschmidt, “The effects
flat parallel subchannels. The addition of a guard interval to of phase noise on 26 Mb/s OFDMA broadband radio in the local
the OFDM symbols removes the influence of inter-symbol- loop systems,” in Proc. International Zurich Seminar on Broadband
Communications 1998, Feb. 1998, pp. 105–112.
interference. Furthermore, the application of channel coding, [16] R.A. Casas, S.L. Biracree, and A.E. Youtz, “Time domain phase noise
OFDMA and adaptive modulation turn the time dispersive correction for OFDM signals,” IEEE Trans. on Broadcasting, vol. 48,
channel into an advantage, by exploiting the provided fre- no. 3, pp. 230–236, Sept. 2002.
[17] D. Petrovic, W. Rave, and G. Fettweis, “Intercarrier interference due to
quency diversity. This is the reason why the application of Phase Noise in OFDM - estimation and suppression,” in Proc. IEEE
OFDM is proposed for use in many wireless systems over the VTC Fall 2004, LA, Sept. 2004, pp. 1901–1905.
last few years. [18] A.A. Abidi, “Direct-conversion radio transceivers for digital commu-
nications,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 30, pp. 1399–1410, Dec.
It is also explained that OFDM is sensitive to imperfections 1995.
in the analogue front-end of the transmitter and receiver. It [19] J. Tubbax, B. Come, L. van der Perre, S. Donnay, M. Engels, and
is shown that phase noise, IQ imbalance and nonlinearities C. Desset, “Joint compensation of IQ imbalance and phase noise,” in
Proc. 57th IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference 2003-Spring, April
impose severe performance degradations to an OFDM system. 2003, vol. 3, pp. 1605–1609.
This paper, however, also highlights that the application of [20] M. Windisch and G. Fettweis., “Standard-independent I/Q imbalance
digital signal processing can largely overcome these disad- compensation in OFDM direct-conversion receivers,” in Proc. 9th
International OFDM Workshop, Sept. 2004.
vantages. A design incorporating these digital compensation [21] T.C.W. Schenk, P.F.M. Smulders, and E.R. Fledderus, “Estimation and
techniques allows for higher impairment levels, and thus opens compensation of TX and RX IQ imbalance in OFDM based MIMO
the door for cheaper and more optimized implementation of systems,” Accepted for IEEE Radio and Wireless Symposium (RWS
2006), Jan. 2006.
the RF front-end. [22] C. Rapp, “Effects of HPA-nonlinearities on a 4-DPSK/OFDM-signal for
Overall it can be concluded that multi-carrier techniques a digital sound broadcasting system,” in Proc. of the second European
conference on Satellite Communication, Liege, Belgium, Oct. 1991, pp.
are a natural choice for wideband systems to be applied in 179–184.
multipath environments, especially since its major drawbacks [23] R.D.J. van Nee, “OFDM codes for peak-to-average power reduction
can largely be solved by emerging digital compensation tech- and error correction,” in Proc. of the IEEE Global Telecommunications
Conference, 1996, Nov. 1996, vol. 1, pp. 740–744.
niques. [24] R.W. Bauml, R.F.H. Fischer, and J.B. Huber, “Reducing the peak-to-
average power ratio of multicarrier modulation by selected mapping,”
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Electronics Letters, vol. 32, pp. 2056–2057, Oct. 1996.
[25] S.H. Muller and J.B. Huber, “OFDM with reduced peak-to-average
This work was carried out within the B4 Broadband Ra- power ratio by optimum combination of partial transmit sequences,”
Electron. Lett., vol. 33, pp. 368–369, Feb. 1997.
dio@hand project, which is supported in part by the Dutch [26] S.C. Cripps, Advanced Techniques in RF Power Amplifier Design,
Ministry of Economic Affairs under grant BTS01063 and by Artech House, 2002.
Agere Systems.
R EFERENCES
[1] A.R.S. Bahai and B.R. Saltzberg, Multi-Carrier Digital Communications
- Theory and Applications of OFDM, Kluwer Academic/Plenum, 1999.
[2] R.D.J. van Nee and R. Prasad, OFDM for Wireless Multimedia
Communications, Artech House Publishers, 2000.
[3] J. Heiskala and J. Terry, OFDM Wireless LANs: a theoretical and
practical guide, Sams Publishing, Indianapolis, USA, 2002.
[4] S. Weinstein and P. Ebert, “Data transmission by frequency-division
multiplexing using the discrete Fourier transform,” IEEE Trans. on
Commun., vol. 19, pp. 628–634, Oct. 1971.
[5] IEEE 802.11a standard, ISO/IEC 802-11:1999/Amd 1:2000(E).
[6] IEEE 802.11g standard, Further Higher-Speed Physical Layer Extension
in the 2.4 GHz Band, 2003.
[7] Multiband OFDM Alliance, “MB-OFDM proposal specifications for
IEEE,” available from http://www.multibandofdm.org/, 2004.
[8] “Wireless USB Specification,” available from http://www.usb.
org/, 2005.