0% found this document useful (0 votes)
88 views

Metrics

The document outlines various metrics used to measure quality, defects, productivity, and schedule performance across traditional and agile development approaches. Metrics include defect containment percentage, defect density, code review effectiveness, review efficiency, residual defect density, productivity, effort variance, schedule variance, rework efforts, defect leakage, capacity utilization, sprint stability index, mean time to acknowledge, resolve, and escalate issues, SLA compliance, delivery quality, and abend efficacy.

Uploaded by

Abhishek Sutar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
88 views

Metrics

The document outlines various metrics used to measure quality, defects, productivity, and schedule performance across traditional and agile development approaches. Metrics include defect containment percentage, defect density, code review effectiveness, review efficiency, residual defect density, productivity, effort variance, schedule variance, rework efforts, defect leakage, capacity utilization, sprint stability index, mean time to acknowledge, resolve, and escalate issues, SLA compliance, delivery quality, and abend efficacy.

Uploaded by

Abhishek Sutar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Development / Enhancement STD

To measure No. of internal defects detected in req.


delivery quality review, design review, test plan review, code
- based on review and in UT,IT,ST testing
Defect Containment % reviews & ----------------------------------------------------- * 100 > 95%
testing Total internal defects detected in review and
(internal/client) testing + Customer defects detected in UAT
and post production defects
To measure No of weighted internal defects detected in
internal quality review and testing
Defect Density wrt size
wrt size -------------------------------------------------------------
(KLOC/FP) Product Size (KLOC/FP)
To measure No of weighted internal defects detected in
internal quality review and testing
based on ---------------------------------------------------- * 100
Defect Density per 100 hrs 2
engineering Engineering efforts
efforts
expended
To measure Coding defects detected during code review
effectiveness ---------------------------------------------------- * 100
Code Review Effectiveness % of code review total code defects detected at all phases
process
(internal)
To measure No. of weighted defects detected in all review
effectiveness ---------------------------------------------------- * 100
Review Efficiency % of internal total no. of defects detected before delivery
reviews
performed
To measure No. of client reported defects
client reported -------------------------------------
defects based product size (KLOC/FP)
Residual defect density wrt size
on size
delivered
(KLOC/FP)
To measure No. of client reported defects
client reported ------------------------------------- * 100
defects based Engineering Efforts
Residual defect density per 100 hrs
on engineering
efforts
expended
To measure the Actual Size
work in terms ----------------------- * 160
of size (use Actual Eng. Efforts
Productivity (per person month)
case points, (8hr/day, 40hrs/wk, 4wk/mo*40hr/day = 160
LOC, FP) Vs hrs/mo
Efforts
Actual Efforts in hrs - Estimated Efforts in hrs
-------------------------------------------------------------
Effort Variance % +/- 5%
--- * 100
Estimated Efforts
Actual days taken to complete - Estimated
days
Schedule Variance %
---------------------------------------------------- * 100
Estimated days
Schedule Slippage Days Actual End Date - Estimated End Date
Rework hrs
Rework Efforts % ---------------- * 100
Actual total hrs
Total no. of customer reported defects
-----------------------------------------------------* 100
Defect Leakage %
Total no. of defects + customer reported
defects

Agile
% efforts
Capacity Utilization utilized for
planned sprint
Ratio of User
stories
delivered to
Sprint Stability Index
total User
stories worked
in a sprint
To measure the
Sprint in terms
of Size Vs
Efforts (Size in
Productivity (per Sprint)
Velocity - Story
Points
completed in
Sprint)
DC %
RDD wrt size and efforts

Production Support
% of severity
based tickets
Mean time to acknowledge acknowledged
within
stipulated time
% of severity
based tickets
Mean time to resolve
resolved within
stipulated time
% of severity
based tickets
Mean time to escalate escalated
within
stipulated time
total no. of task delivered
SLA Compliance ------------------------------------- * 100
total no. of task planned
No. of defective component
Delivery Quality % 1 - ------------------------------------------------ * 100
total no. of components moved to prod
Abend solved within time window
Abend Efficacy % --------------------------------------------------- * 100
total abends

You might also like