Procedural Due Process Reviewer
Procedural Due Process Reviewer
PHRASE ISSUE
VALID
Banco Espaol Failure to send 1. There must be a court or Irregularity in the The actual notice to the defendant
Filipino v. a mail for tribunal cloathed with judicial foreclosure is NOT absolutely necessary.
Palanca foreclosure power to hear or determine proceeding Property is always assumed to be in
proceedings the matter before it. the possession of its owner and it
2. Jurisdiction must be may be assumed that he has
lawfully acquired over the knowledge of any proceedings that
person of the defendant or are instituted for its condemnation
over the property which is the or sale.
subject of the proceeding.
3. The defendant must be The failure to make a notice is not
given an opportunity to be of such an irregularity that amounts
heard. to denial of due process of law.
4. Judgment must be
rendered upon lawful hearing.
Gravides v. Election for Filing of In this case, Borjal was misled by
COMELEC punong preliminary briefs the Notice of Preliminary
barangay in Conference issued by the MeTC,
Brgy. UP which erroneously applied the
Campus. provision on pre-trial under the
Rules of Civil Procedure.
According to Philippine
Immigrations Act of 1940, the
charge against an alien must specify
the act or omissions complained of
which must be state in an ordinary
and concise language to enable a
person with a common
understanding to know the ground
in which he is intended to be
deported.
INVALID
Govt of Extradition case Right to bail may Extradition is when the jurisdiction
Hongkong v. be extended to a of the case was transferred from
Olasi Jr. prospective the Philippine to foreign country as
extradite requested.
It is repugnant to the
Constitution if:
1. violates the right to due
process for failure to accord
persons fair notice of the
conduct to avoid
2. Gives the law enforcers an
unbridled discretion in
carrying its provision.
Estrada v. Plunder Law A statute is vague when it Vague and A statute is not void just because it
Sandiganbayan lacks comprehensible overbroad uses general terms or it does not
standards that men of provisions define the meaning of the terms.
common intelligence must The inability to define the terms will
necessarily guess its meaning not necessarily result to vagueness
and differs to its application. or ambiguity of the law as long as it
has clear legislative intent or it can
It is repugnant to the be inferred from the whole body of
Constitution if: the law.
1. violates the right to due
process for failure to accord Void-for-vagueness doctrine states
persons fair notice of the that a statute establishing a
conduct to avoid criminal offense must define the
2. Gives the law enforcers an offense with sufficient definiteness
unbridled discretion in that persons of ordinary
carrying its provision. intelligence can understand what
conduct is prohibited by statute.
-It cannot be invoked if it can still
be clarified by a saving clause or by
construction.
-The doctrine does not apply to
statutes which have imprecise
language but nonetheless specify
the standard though not properly
worded, or those which are
couched with ambiguous terms yet
fairly applicable.
-It applies to cases where the
fundamental rights are violated.
CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS
VALID
Estrada v. Plunder case Request for the There is no law or rule which
Ombudsman against Estrada copies of all the requires the Ombudsman to furnish
filings by the other a respondent with the copies of the
parties together counter-affidavits of his co-
with the counter- respondents.
affidavits of his co- -Neither the Rule of Court or the
respondents Rules of Procedure of the Office of
the Ombudsman support Estradas
claim.
-The counter-affidavits of co-
respondents are NOT part of the
supporting affidavits of
complainants.