International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 6, Issue 2, February 2016 435

ISSN 2250-3153

The importance of Supervisor Support for Employees

Affective Commitment: An analysis of Job Satisfaction
Sadiya Ahmed Mohamed* and Maimunah Ali

Department of Technology Management, Faculty of Technology Management, Business and Entrepreneurship

University Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, 86400 Parit Raja, Batu Pahat, Johor Malaysia

Abstract- Supervisor support (SVS) has greater influence on employees affective commitment. The purpose of the present study is to
address the impacts of SVS on affective commitment of the employees of Malaysian private Telecommunication companies.
Variables such as SVS and job satisfaction were proposed to enhance employees affective commitment of their organizations. SVS,
Job satisfaction and affective commitment were proposed as the independent, intervening and outcome variables respectively. The
data of this study have been collected from a group of employees in the telecommunication Malaysian industry through questionnaire
survey. The data were analyzed using SPSS. The findings revealed that SVS has significant relationship with job satisfaction and
affective commitment. Likewise; this study suggested that SVS can improve the employees affective commitment by presenting a
significant relationship between SVS and affective commitment through mediation of job satisfaction.

Index Terms- Supervisor support, affective commitment and job satisfaction.

I. INTRODUCTION

T he notion of commitment has been defined as a force that binds an individual to a course of action of relevance to one or more
targets (Meyer and Herscovitch, 2001). There are three-component model of organizational commitment such as affective,
normative and continuous commitment as proposed by Meyer and Allen (1991). This study however, exclusively focuses on affective
commitment because it is the most widely studied, the most generalizable across targets, and the most predictive of employee
behaviour (Morin et al., 2011, p. 718). Affective commitment to a given target can be broadly defined as an attachment to,
identification with and involvement in that particular target (Meyer and Allen, 1997; Meyer and Herscovitch, 2001).
It is now well recognized that commitment is a multifaceted construct, which can be directed towards different constituencies
located within and outside the organisation (Reichers, 1985; Becker et al., 1996). For instance, research has demonstrated that besides
the global organisation (Meyer et al., 2002), employees can also develop affective commitment to the top management (Becker,
1992), supervisor (Becker et al., 1996; Clugston et al., 2000), work group (Vandenberghe et al., 2004; Snape et al., 2006) and
customers (Siders et al., 2001). Among the various foci of commitment, the supervisor support is particularly important because
supervisors are formally responsible for monitoring the performance of employees, are involved in decisions regarding pay and
promotions that affect their employees and are increasingly made accountable for reducing turnover in their teams (Panaccio and
Vandenberghe, 2011). Thus, affective commitment to the supervisor, which depicts a high quality relationship between employees and
their supervisors (Cheng et al., 2003), is likely to have a significant bearing on employees work related attitudes and behaviours. For
example, research has shown that supervisory commitment is positively associated with job satisfaction (Chen, 2001), task
performance (Siders et al., 2001; Becker and Kernan, 2003; Cheng et al., 2003) and organisational citizenship behaviours (Wasti and
Can, 2008) and is negatively related to turnover (Vandenberghe and Bentein, 2009). However, despite the growing importance of
supervisory commitment, relatively few studies have empirically investigated the consequences of this construct.
The present study seeks to address this gap by exploring the link between supervisor support and affective commitment
through job satisfaction.

II. LITERATURE REVIEW

This part describes the theoretical background of the variables of the study such as supervisor support, job satisfaction and affective
commitment.

www.ijsrp.org
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 6, Issue 2, February 2016 436
ISSN 2250-3153

A. Supervisor Support
According to organizational support theory (Eisenberger et al., 1986), supervisor support (SVS) facilitates changes in employees
levels of affective commitment (Sadiya, 2015). Supervisor support is defined as employees views concerning the degree to which
their supervisors value their contributions and care about their well-being (Eisenberger et al., 1986; Kottke & Sharafinski, 1988). As
agents of the organization, supervisors are responsible for directing and evaluating employees job performance. Thus, employees
often view their supervisors feedback as indicative of the organizations orientation toward them (Eisenberger et al., 1986; Levinson,
1965). Moreover, because employees are aware that their supervisors evaluations of their job performance are often communicated to
executives, who are seen as the representatives of the organization, the association between affective commitment and supervisor
support is further strengthened (Eisenberger et al., 2002).
Supervisor support leads for employees to high commitment through job satisfaction and motivation. Shriesheim, and Stodgigill
(1975) came up with their tenet in the book of Personnel Psychology and they opined that Supervisor consideration refers to a leader
behaviors concerned with promoting the comfort and wellbeing of subordinates. It is hypothesized that employees who believe their
superiors are considerate leaders will perform high commitment than those who do not perceive that their managers as such (Johnston,
M.W., Parasuraman, A., Futrell, C.M. and Black, B.C, 1990). De Cotiis and Summers (1977), Morris and Sherman (1981) and
Zaccaro and Dobbins (1989) all found empirical evidence supporting the view of supervisory consideration. Supervisor consideration
again refers to the degree to which supervisors are supportive, friendly and considerate, consult subordinates and recognize their
contribution.
B. Job Satisfaction
Job satisfaction refers to an employees overall affect laden attitude toward their job (Witt, 1991). It is an internal state based on
assessing the job and job-related experiences with some degree of favor or disfavor (Locke, 1976). SVS should contribute to overall
job satisfaction by meeting socioemotional needs, increasing performance-reward expectancies and signalling the availability of aid
when needed. High level of job satisfaction reveals real enthusiasm, good feeling and truly value the job, which leads then to high
affective commitment. Findings suggest that employees with high level of job satisfaction physically and mentally are in a proper
state. Job satisfaction is resulted from employees perception that provided them with valuable content and context. The first step to
get a valuable, satisfactory and also successful job is to find job environment matching the individuals main interest. Job satisfaction
is divided into two categories; internal and external satisfaction. External satisfaction is related to the factors such as payment,
promotion, admiration and interaction with colleagues while employees satisfaction with values, social status, position and
professional responsibility indicate internal satisfaction. Individuals assessment of their job and expression of satisfaction or
dissatisfaction can be regarded as the general outcome of their job constituents (Robbins 1995).
C. Affective Commitment
The current employee work environment is one in which at least two specific organizational commitment issues come to the
forefront. One of those issues is that employees, including Telecom companies, work in a multiple-commitment world. The job itself,
the company, and the profession compete for employees loyalty. Employees may develop commitment to a boss or to professional
company membership (Morrow & McElroy, 1993; Randall & Cote, 1991; Tyree, 1996). Employees may also experience different
degrees of commitment to various companies aspects such as organizational philosophy (Meyer & Allen, 1997). The second issue is
that organizational commitment itself is viewed as a multidimensional construct and this researchers focus is to explain the
dimensions of organizational commitment.
John Meyer and Natalie Allen developed their Three Component Model of Commitment and published it in the 1991 "Human
Resource Management Review." The model explains that commitment to an organization is a psychological state, and that it has three
distinct components that affect how employees feel about the organization that they work for. The three components are; affective
commitment (Affection for your job), continuance commitment (Fear of loss) and normative commitment (Sense of obligation to
stay). However, due to brevity, only affective commitment is used at the present study rather than the other two components of
organizational commitment.
Affection for employees job occurs when they feel a strong emotional attachment to their organization, and to the work that they
do (Meyer, Allen, &Smith, 1993). They will most likely identify with the organization's goals and values, and they genuinely want to
be there. If employees are enjoying their work, they are likely to feel good, and be satisfied with their job. In turn, this increased job
satisfaction is likely to add to their feeling of affective commitment.

D. Research theoretical framework

A theoretical framework refers to the theory that a researchers choose to guide them in their research. Thus, a theoretical
framework is the application of a theory, or a set of concepts drawn from one and the same theory, to offer an explanation of an event,
or shed some light on a particular phenomenon or research problem. Figure 1 presents a research theoretical framework, which
explains the relationship between supervisor support, job satisfaction and affective commitment.

www.ijsrp.org
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 6, Issue 2, February 2016 437
ISSN 2250-3153

Job Satisfaction
H2
H1

Supervisor Support Affective

H3
Commitment

Figure 1: Research frame work

E. Hypothesis
The hypothetical model of the study is elaborated in the theoretical framework diagram which is shown in Figure 1 and these are
proposed hypotheses of the study:
H1: Supervisor support has a significant relationship with job satisfaction.
H2: Job satisfaction has a significant relationship with affective commitment.
H3: Supervisor support has a significant relationship with affective commitment.

III. METHODOLOGY
Data were collected through a questionnaire survey in Malaysian private telecommunications. Among the 274 employees who
received the questionnaire, 109 responded to the items capturing our variables of interest as part of a larger survey. The response rate
was 37 percent and is one of the average response rate for studies that utilized data collected from individuals. Average age was 40
years and 46.8 percent were male.
A. Measures
The questionnaire for supervisor support concerns about three main things in supervision of the employees such as respecting the
views and ideas of the employees, collaborative approach in supervision and safe feedbacks. This study uses the scale developed by
Palomo (2010) and the two items are My supervisor is respectful of my views and ideas, My supervisor has a collaborative
approach in supervision and My supervisor gives feedback in a way that feels safe. Job satisfaction is divided into two categories;
internal and external satisfaction. The job satisfaction scale aims to assess whether an individual is satisfied with his or her job. This
scale, developed by Wright and Cropanzano (1991), it is a two-item scale and it is targeting overall job satisfaction including internal
and external satisfaction. Sample items include All in all, I am satisfied with the work of my job (Internal JS; Position) and All in
all, I am satisfied with my pay (total wages and tips) (External JS; Payment). Affective commitment to the organization is measured
using an organizational scale developed by Meyer and Allen (1991). Two items are selected from the scale in order to assess the
affective commitment dimension, including I would be happy to work at my company until I retire and I feel like part of a family at
my company.

IV. FINDINGS
The descriptive and inferential statistical methods were used to conduct the analysis. For hypotheses testing, the Pearson correlation
coefficients were used. The first part of the analysis focused on the descriptive analysis of the respondents. At the end of gathering
data, the reliability of the scales was analyzed. An analysis was performed in the study to ascertain the reliability of the measures by
using Cronbach alpha reliability coefficient; 0.60 being the acceptable reliability coefficient level in terms of research standards as
shown in Table I.

Table I: Reliability Statistics

Variable Cronbachs Alpha
supervisor support .857
job satisfaction .823
Affective commitment .956

www.ijsrp.org
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 6, Issue 2, February 2016 438
ISSN 2250-3153

As it can be seen in Table I, the measures of the study are reliable because all the variables have an acceptable reliability
coefficient which ranged from .823 to .956.
A. Descriptive analysis of the respondents:
Descriptive analysis of the respondents: The descriptive analysis focused on the variables such as gender, age, marital status and
job status. Male responders represented 46.8% while female responders were 53.2%. Most of the respondents (33%) were aged
between 25 and 29 years old, 18.3% of the respondents were between 21 and 24 years. Same percentages goes to those between 35
and 39 years old. 23.9% of the respondents were between 30 and 34 years old, 4.6% of the respondents were above 40 and 49 years
old and 1.8% of the respondents were above 50 years old. Majority of the respondents were having job permanent and were married in
a percentage of 86% and 83% respectively. While employees; who have contract jobs represented 16% and single staff were 17% of
the total respondents.

Table II: Demographic Information

Variables Percentage (%)
Gender
Male 46.8
Female 53.2
Age (in years)
21-24 18.3
25-29 33
30-34 23.9
35-39 18.3
40-49 4.6
Above 50 1.8
Marital status
Married 49.6
Single 47
Job Status
Permanent 67
Contract 33

B. Inferential analysis of the respondents:

The correlation data shows the relationship between the independent, intervening and dependent variables of study as shown in
Table III. The table displays correlation coefficients between these variables. The correlation coefficients are a measure of the
strength of the association between any two metric variables (Hair et al., 2003). The results of the Pearson correlation show that the
dimensions of the independent variable and dependent variables were positively correlated to each other.

Table III: Pearson correlations between Variables

Relationship Correlation Coefficient (r) Hypothesis Support
SVS JS .480* Yes
JS AF .624* Yes
SVS AF .345* Yes
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

The results of Table III demonstrated that there is significant positive relationship between supervisor support and job satisfaction
at (r=.480; p=0.01) and the correlation is significant if the p=.01. The correlation shows that there is significant relationship between
supervisor support and job satisfaction. Hence the alternative hypothesis is supported. Similarly, the results have shown that there is a
significant high correlation between supervisor support and affective commitment (r=.345; p=.01), so the proposed alternative
hypothesis is accepted. In addition, Table III shows that there is significant correlations between job satisfaction and affective
commitment (r=.624; p=.01), so the alternative hypothesis is accepted.

V. DISCUSSION
The aim of this study is to analyse the relationship between SVS and job satisfaction also affective commitment. The study also
analysed the relationship between job satisfaction and affective commitment. Therefore, three hypotheses were proposed in order to
achieve the aim of the study. The first hypothesis proposed that there was a positive relationship between SVS and JS. Hence, this
meant that an employee who is given good level of supervisor support in their jobs, the support will translate that high level of good
perception towards their organization into getting involved in activities that are outside their job requirements. This means that due to

www.ijsrp.org
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 6, Issue 2, February 2016 439
ISSN 2250-3153

that high level of perception, they will reciprocate from the supervisor support to good job satisfaction (Isaks, 2002). Likewise, the
proposed second hypothesis predicted that there was a positive relationship between job satisfaction and affective commitment. The
outcome results has supported the prediction of the hypothesis and there was a significant relationship between job satisfaction and
affective commitment. This shows that when the employees get high level of good job satisfaction, their perceptions towards their
company increase and this also increases their affective commitment. Likewise, the third hypothesis examined the relationship
between SVS and affective commitment. It followed that the employees having good support from their supervisors, view their
employers as being generally caring about their well-being, that type of attitude will influence their affective commitment in a positive
way. Therefore, there was a positive strong relationship between these two variables in that the independent variable SVS had a
positive influence on the dependent variable of affective commitment.
.

VI. CONCLUSION
The aim of the study was to analyse the relationship between supervisor support, job satisfaction and affective commitment. The
adopted measures of this study have shown remarkable level of reliability as shown in Table I. Three hypotheses were developed; all
of them were supported. Based on the findings of the study, the affective commitment and job satisfaction have a significant
relationship with supervisor support. But the proposed hypothesis of organizational rewards and POS was rejected, which means there
was no a significant relationship between organizational rewards and POS. Finally, job satisfaction ad affective commitment have
shown strong association between them.

REFERENCES
[1] Sadiya Ahmed Mohamed and Maimunah Ali - The Influence of Perceived Organizational Support on Employees Job Performance - published at:
"International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications (IJSRP), Volume 5, Issue 4, April 2015 Edition".
[2] Liden, R.C., Bauer, T.N. and Erdogan, B. (2004), The role of leader-member exchange in the dynamic relationship between employer and employee:
implications for employee socialization, leaders, and organizations, in Coyle-Shapiro, J.A.M., Shore, L.M., Taylor, M.S. and Tetrick, L.E. (Eds), The
Employment Relationship: Examining Psychological and Contextual Perspectives, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 226-250.
[3] Cook, J. and Wall, T. (1980), New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non-fulfilment, Journal of Occupational
Psychology, Vol. 53, pp. 39-52.
[4] Coyle-Shapiro, J.A.M. and Conway, N. (2005), Exchange relationships: examining psychological contracts and perceived organizational support, Journal of
Applied Psychology, Vol. 90 No. 4, pp. 774-781.
[5] Coyne, I. and Ong, T. (2007), Organizational citizenship behaviour and turnover intention: a cross-cultural study, International Journal of Human Resource
Management, Vol. 18 No. 6, pp. 1085-1097.
[6] Cropanzano, R., Rupp, D. and Byrne, Z. (2003), The relationship of emotional exhaustion to work attitudes, job performance, and organizational citizenship
behaviors, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 88 No. 1, pp. 160-169.
[7] Donney, P.M. and Cannon, J.P. (1997), An examination of the nature of trust in buyerseller relationships, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 61 No. 2, pp. 35-51.
[8] Dulac, T., Coyle-Shapiro, J.A.M., Henderson, D.J. and Wayne, S.J. (2008), Not all responses to breach are the same: the interconnection of social exchange and
psychological contract processes in organizations, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 51 No. 6, pp. 1079-1098.
[9] Cropanzano, R., & Greenberg, J. (1997). Progress in organizational justice: Tunneling through the maze. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International
review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 317372). Oxford, England: Wiley.
[10] Cropanzano, R., Howes, J. C., Grandey, A. A., & Toth, P. (1997). The relationship of organizational politics and support to work behaviors, attitudes, and stress.
Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 159180.
[11] Daly, C. L. (1998). Explaining the extra-role behavior of part-time and full-time workers: A matter of support? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State
University.

AUTHORS
First Author Sadiya Ahmed Mohamed, Technology Management, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, [email protected]
Second Author Dr. Maimunah Ali Technology Management, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia.
Correspondence Author Sadiya Ahmed Mohamed, Technology Management, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia,
[email protected].

www.ijsrp.org