Project Excellence Model ENGLISH Version
Project Excellence Model ENGLISH Version
500 500
They create a culture where they are enabled They are aware of their influence on the
and motivated to apply their knowledge and environment and the society, and steer it
abilities for the success of the project. responsibly.
The skills and capacities that are Partners and suppliers are steered and
necessary to fulfill the project supported towards sustainable benefit.
objectives are identified.
The cooperation is based on mutual
People are deployed accordingly. The dialogue trust, respect and openness.
with people takes place systematically and
transparently. 4b. Financial resources
Legal and moral responsibilities for people, Financial resources are deployed and
especially work safety, are carried out steered towards sustainable success.
consciously.
3c. Empowerment
Perception
ce indic
rman
PEOPLE
Strategy for the o ato
rf rs
project management Pe
Objectives
fulfilled
rs
P erfor
Dealing with
ic ato
Dealing with
stakeholders objectives Perfor-
Enablement Results
m a e pt
in d
mance
Pe
n
nc
tio
ce
rc
in an
e
di
ep
io ca m rc
n tors for Pe
P er
Communication Project management
and social processes methods
Dealing responsibly
with people
Satisfaction of other
People satisfaction
interested parties
Empowerment
External interfaces
and processes of projects
PROJECT
Materials, knowledge
and other resources
6. Customer satisfaction 7. People satisfaction
Excellent projects do not only fulfill the Excellent projects are not just carried out, but
requirements, but go further by creating create enthusiasm, satisfaction and recognition
enthusiasm, satisfaction and recognition on the on the side of their people.
side of their customers.
Based on the requirements and expectations of
Based on the requirements and expectations of their people, they develop a set of performance
their customers, they develop a set of indicators. They monitor the progress of the
performance indicators. They monitor the project using these indicators and reveal positive
progress of the project using these indicators and trends or continually good results.
reveal positive trends or continually good results.
They understand how the values that they fulfill
They understand how the values that they fulfill are positioned in comparison to similar projects,
are positioned in comparison to similar projects, and use this data, if relevant, to adjust their own
and use this data, if relevant, to adjust their own approach.
approach.
7a. People perception
6a. Customer perception
The people perceive the project management
The customers perceive the project management and the project result as excellent.
and the project result as excellent.
7b. Performance indicators
6b. Performance indicators
Key figures and measurements can be used to
Key figures and measurements can be used to prove the satisfaction of people without asking
prove the satisfaction of customers without them directly.
asking them directly.
In the assessment of a project, all sub criteria are Criterion 1, Leadership, is collectively assessed
examined with the help of assessment tables, with Assessment Table A, which includes all
each of which represent fundamental principles of three sub criteria.
excellence.
For all other enablement criteria, Assessment
In the process, assessors look for proof and Table B is used to check whether the methods
evidence of excellence. It is about finding a and measures of each sub criterion are sound
suitable assessment of the performance of the and systematically applied, according to the
project, compared with the requirements of the PDCA logic (Plan-Do-Check-Act).
assessed project and the performance of other
The results criteria are assessed with Table C,
projects, as well as the current and recognised
also for each criterion. Not only is the level of
status of project management as a discipline.
objective fulfillment assessed, but also whether
On the basis of the assessment tables, a these were continuously checked or whether the
percentage value is generated for each sub successes can be attributed to the approach of
criterion. The average percentage of the sub the project management.
criterion is then multiplied by the maximum
(See next page for assessment tables)
possible score of its higher-level criterion. The
sum of the scores of the nine criteria equals the
total score.
Definitions
Proof
Maximum scores of the criteria Proof is provided when the depiction in the
Enablement criteria application documents or the portrayal of the
project manager seems credible to the assessors
1. Leadership 100
and they decide to accept these as proven.
2. Objectives and strategy 100
3. People 100 Evidence
4. Partnerships and resources 100 Evidence is provided when the applicant can
5. Methods and processes 100 demonstrate the situation on the basis of
Results criteria documents or other facts. Evidence is generally
preferable to proof.
6. Customer satisfaction 150
7. People satisfaction 100 The assessors should be committed to
8. Satisfaction of other interested parties 100 questioning depictions and requesting evidence.
9. Objectives fulfilled 150
20
No proof No proof No proof
Proof and evidence - Proof and evidence - Proof and evidence - Proof and evidence -
could serve as a role could serve as a role could serve as a role could serve as a role 90
model model model model
80
Extensive proof Extensive proof Extensive proof Extensive proof
70
with evidence with evidence with evidence with evidence
60
Some proof Some proof Some proof Some proof
50
and evidence and evidence and evidence and evidence
40
20
No proof No proof No proof No proof
[email protected]
www.pe-award.de