1. The document discusses potential solutions to the Exxon Valdez oil spill, including dispatching a second tanker to remove remaining oil, using chemical dispersants, and deploying floatable booms.
2. Four options are identified and priorities are set based on the urgency, likelihood of worsening the problem, and potential impact.
3. The highest priority options are deploying additional floatable booms to contain oil slick movement and protect fisheries, due to the urgency and significant impact on nearby environments and industries.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
161 views
Exxon Valdes Group Problem
1. The document discusses potential solutions to the Exxon Valdez oil spill, including dispatching a second tanker to remove remaining oil, using chemical dispersants, and deploying floatable booms.
2. Four options are identified and priorities are set based on the urgency, likelihood of worsening the problem, and potential impact.
3. The highest priority options are deploying additional floatable booms to contain oil slick movement and protect fisheries, due to the urgency and significant impact on nearby environments and industries.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2
Decision Making Group Task
Syndicate 5 :
Fithri Hidayani Megantari 29116377
Yunia Apriliani Kartika 29116364
Bayu Rifqi Aulia Rachman 29116483
I Nyoman Sujana Giri 29116418
Exxon Valdes Group Problem
Identify Concerns Set Priority Process
Solution Sub-Concern about Timing Trend Impact Action Needed solution The second Tanker be The number of the H L L PA dispatched to remove damaged Urgent Less worse If the tanker capsized in the the remaining oil from compartements is not reef too it will worsen the the exxon valdez known, and if the problem tanker slips off the reef it could capsize the oil Use of chemical It is not known if there H L L PPA dispersants is enough chemical. Urgent for oil The problem get worst if Detrimental to the fishing Extremely detrimental using it industry to the fish industry Alaskan Governor L L L PA Office : Use of floatable Less urgent Not to worse Less impact to nearby booms to surround the environment Using Floatable shore Booms, but not The Coast Guard: H H H DA Floatable booms should urgent enough boom be used to contain the Can contain the oil spill for a Will save nearby village and material slick movement in fjord while nearby fisheries The Wildlife L H H DA Department : The urgent Less worse Save nearby fisheries boom have to be used to protect the four fisheries
Oh Nuts! Case Problem
IS IS NOT DISTINCTION CAUSE
WHAT Corrosion on bolts Other spare parts Company has three different Pengaruh lapisan (identify) parts pembungkus baut dan jarak distribusi produk tersebut menyebabkan beberapa baut berkarat WHERE Houston, Atlanta Phoenix, Denver The Difference on The difference on Geoghrapical location distribution distance WHEN Between Juni to August Januari to February Seasonal difference Humidity level in certain (timing) season is higher than atoher season. EXTENT Some products Other products Has different Supplier Every product get different & random packaging, thus theres product that influenced by salt content on the package