0% found this document useful (0 votes)
75 views1 page

Establishment Military Justice:: Ency Board Except To Try To Keep in Liaison With It

This document discusses the procedures of the military clemency board. It describes that cases are reviewed by officers and recommendations are made. A special board also reviews cases where evidence is considered weak. The percentages of cases sent to the special board is unknown. The clemency board handles cases directly from prisons, while the clemency division reviews requests from prisoners. The witness concludes that the rights of the accused are carefully protected in the review process.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
75 views1 page

Establishment Military Justice:: Ency Board Except To Try To Keep in Liaison With It

This document discusses the procedures of the military clemency board. It describes that cases are reviewed by officers and recommendations are made. A special board also reviews cases where evidence is considered weak. The percentages of cases sent to the special board is unknown. The clemency board handles cases directly from prisons, while the clemency division reviews requests from prisoners. The witness concludes that the rights of the accused are carefully protected in the review process.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

830 ESTABLISHMENT OF MILITARY JUSTICE:

Q . You are a member of the so-called clemency board?A . Not of the recentl y
created clemency board, but I am head of the clemency section of the Militar y
Justice Division . I ought to add, sir, that I was for a short time one of th e
original three members of the clemency board, but I was relieved by Gen .
Crowder in order to go back to my old clemency section .
Q . Who are the members of the clemency board at the present time?A.
Lieut . Col. Ansell, Col . Easby-Smith, Maj . Conner, Maj . G . Rogers, Maj . Ash-
man, Lieut . Tittman, and I think one additional major whose name I do no t
know .
Q . State briefly the procedure in the case of the clemency board .-A . With
regard to the prisoners in the three disciplinary barracks a memorandum i s
filled out by the commandant of the barracks in question, giving the materia l
facts that would be releveut upon the question of clemency, together with th e
commandant's recommendation as to clemency . That memorandum is sent di -
rectly from the barracks to the Judge Advocate General's Office, is attached to
the record of trial, and together with any other papers in the case is referre d
to one of the 10 or 11 officers, who reviews the case, in the first instance fo r
the clemency board, makes a short summary of the facts attending the offens e
as shown by the record of trial, and also makes his own tentative recommenda-
tion as to clemency . The hoard then goes over this case, approves or amend s
the tentative recommendation of clemency, and the case then goes in to th e
Judge Advocate General for his approval .
In addition to this procedure there was appointed by Gen . Crowder, after I
had been relieved from the clemency board, a special board of review, of three .
officers, of which Maj . Sannur is the head, whose duty it is to review any case s
from the clemency board where the reviewing officer has indicated that th e
evidence is weak or not convincing or not sufficient to sustain the findings of th e
court. This special board reports on such cases whether in its opinion the evi-
dence is sufficient or is convincing. I do not think it has yet been definitel y
decided in what way, if any, the findings of this special board are incorporate d
in the clemency review that goes from the Judge Advocate General's Offic e
to the Secretary of War.
So far as my information goes, heretofore the findings of the special boar d
have merely been set on a slip of paper, which is placed among the papers o f
the case, and which, of course, is the basis for the recommendation of th e
clemency board, but it has not been incorporated in the clemency review tha t
goes to the Secretary of War. I understand that the question of incorporatin g
the findings of the special board as to the evidence into the clemency revie w
is now being taken up by Gen . Kreger.
. Q . Can you give me any definite idea as to what percentage of the case s
which go before the clemency board are such as to require their being sent o n
to this special board?A . I really, sir, have no information upon which I coul d
even hazard an approximation on that . The difference between the present
clemency section, which is a part of the Military Justice Division, and th e
clemency board is that the clemency section handles all applications, letters, an d
petitions for clemency made by the prisoners themselves or by anyone on thei r
behalf, while the clemency board handles cases, as it were, on their own motio n
which cone direct from the barracks or from the penitentiaries with the momo-
randa as to facts that I have heretofore referred to .
Q . Who determines whether or not those cases shall actually go to the
clemency board?A . That question is determined by the record room upstair s
because they see at once where a case has an application or letter or petitio n
asking for clemency such case shall go to the clemency section, whereas th e
memoranda from the barracks or a list of prisoners from the penitentiary will
go to the clemency board .
Q . The clemency board is not, then, under you as chief of the clemenc y
division?A . No, sir ; I have actually_ nothing whatever to do with the clem-
ency board except to try to keep in liaison with it .
Q . How long have you been on duty in the Department of Military Justice ?
A. Since the latter part of 1918 .
Q . As a result of your experience, in the Division of Military Justice, an d
as a result of your observation, what are your conclusions as to the workin g
of the system of military justice in the Army as now applied?A . I woul d
say that the rights of every accused are scrupulously protected in this office .
First, the records are carefully examined to see that (luring the trial his sub-
stantial rights have been protected, and secondly, after he has been legall y
convicted of the offenses in question both the prisoner himself and anyone

You might also like