Utility Mapping of Preferences
Utility Mapping of Preferences
him for the much colder weather. But he may prefer C to either: the salary in
Washington is higher than in Phoenix and the weather is much better than
in Minneapolis. Compromising on salary and location leaves Sam better off
than choosing an extreme of one or the other in this example.
FIGURE 2-3
Marginal
utility of Diminishing Marginal Utility
movies, MUM Holding the number of CDs con-
stant at 2, with a utility function of
1.41 U QC
QM , each additional
movie consumed raises utility by
less and less.
0.59
0.45 Marginal
utility
(QC = 2)
0 1st movie 2nd movie 3rd movie Quantity of
movies, QM