CYSC2
CYSC2
CYSC2
Tina-quant Cystatin C Gen.2 Specific proteins
Order information
Analyzer(s) on which cobasc pack(s) can
be used
COBASINTEGRA400plus
06600239 190 Tina-quant Cystatin C Gen.2 (225 tests) System-ID 0775509
COBASINTEGRA800
04975901 191 C.f.a.s. Cystatin C (4 1 mL) System-ID 0775665
Cystatin C Control Set
04975936 190* Control I (low) (4 1 mL) System-ID 0769908
Control II (high) (4 1 mL) System-ID 0769916
Cystatin C Control Set Gen.2
Control 1 (3 1 mL) System-ID 0775614
06729371 190
Control 2 (3 1 mL) System-ID 0775622
Control 3 (3 1 mL) System-ID 0775630
20756350 322 NaCl Diluent 9 % (6 22 mL) System-ID 0756350
*Not for use in the US
CYSC2
Tina-quant Cystatin C Gen.2 Specific proteins
The sample types listed were tested with a selection of sample collection Antigen excess check No
tubes that were commercially available at the time of testing, i.e. not all
available tubes of all manufacturers were tested. Sample collection systems Predilution factor No
from various manufacturers may contain differing materials which could Unit mg/L
affect the test results in some cases. When processing samples in primary
tubes (sample collection systems), follow the instructions of the tube
manufacturer. Pipetting parameters
Centrifuge samples containing precipitates before performing the assay.
Diluent (H2O)
Blood collected in capillary blood collection tubes is unsuitable for use in
this assay.24 R1 154 L
7days at (20)(+20)C25 SR 34 L 20 L
CYSC2
Tina-quant Cystatin C Gen.2 Specific proteins
CYSC2
Tina-quant Cystatin C Gen.2 Specific proteins
8 Newman DJ, Thakkar H, Edwards RG, et al. Serum Cystatin C 29 Bkenkamp A, van Wijk JAE, Lentze ML, et.al. Effect of Corticosteroid
measured by automated immunoassay: a more sensitive marker of Therapy on Serum Cystatin C and 2-Microglobulin Concentrations.
changes in GFR than serum creatinine. Kidney Int 1995;47(1):312-318. Clin Chem 2002;48:1123-1126.
9 Mussap M, Dalla Vestra M, Fioretto P, et al. Cystatin C is a more 30 Wiesli P, Schwegler B, Spinas AS, et al. Serum Cystatin C is sensitive
sensitive marker than creatinine for the estimation of GFR in type 2 to small changes in thyroid function Clin Chim Acta 2003;338(1):87-90.
diabetic patients. Kidney Int. 2002;61:1453-1461. 31 Glick MR, Ryder KW, Jackson SA. Graphical Comparisons of
10 Dharnidharka VR, Kwon C, Stevens G. Serum cystatin C is superior to Interferences in Clinical Chemistry Instrumentation.
serum creatinine as a marker of kidney function: a meta analysis. Am J ClinChem1986;32:470-475.
Kidney Dis 2002 Aug;40(2):221-226. 32 Breuer J. Report on the Symposium Drug effects in Clinical Chemistry
11 Risch L, Drexel H, Huber AR. Differences in glomerular filtration rate Methods. Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1996;34:385-386.
estimates by two cystatin C-based equations. Clinical Chemistry 33 Sonntag O, Scholer A. Drug interference in clinical chemistry:
2005;51:2211-2212. recommendation of drugs and their concentrations to be used in drug
12 Grubb A, Nyman U, Bjork J, et al. Simple Cystatin C-Based prediction interference studies. Ann Clin Biochem 2001;38:376-385.
equations for glomerular filtration rate compared with the modification 34 Bakker AJ, Mcke M. Gammopathy interference in clinical chemistry
of diet in renal disease prediction equation for adults and the Schwartz assays: mechanisms, detection and prevention.
and the Counahan-Barratt prediction equations for children. Clinical ClinChemLabMed2007;45(9):1240-1243.
Chemistry 2005;51:1420-1431.
35 Bablok W, Passing H, Bender R, et al. A general regression procedure
13 Hoek FJ, Kemperman FA, Krediet RT. A comparison between Cystatin for method transformation. Application of linear regression procedures
C, plasma creatinine and the Cockcroft and Gault formula for the for method comparison studies in clinical chemistry, Part III. J Clin
estimation of glomerular filtration rate. Nephrol Dial Transplant Chem Clin Biochem 1988 Nov;26(11):783-790.
2003;18:2034-2031.
A point (period/stop) is always used in this Method Sheet as the decimal
14 Lassus J, Harjola VP, Sund R, et al. Prognostic value of Cystatin C in separator to mark the border between the integral and the fractional parts of
acute heart failure in relation to other markers of renal function and NT- a decimal numeral. Separators for thousands are not used.
proBNP. European Heart Journal (February)
doi:10.1093/eurheart/ehl507. Symbols
15 Strevens H, Wide-Swensson D, Torffvit O, et al. Serum Cystatin C for Roche Diagnostics uses the following symbols and signs in addition to
assessment of glomerular filtration rate in pregnant and non-pregnant those listed in the ISO 152231 standard.
women. Indications of altered filtration process in pregnancy. Scand J
Clin Lab Invest 2002;62:141-148. Contents of kit
16 Andersen TB, Eskild-Jensen A, Frokiaer J, et al. Measuring glomerular Volume after reconstitution or mixing
filtration rate in children; can Cystatin C replace established methods?
Pediatr Nephrol 2009;24:929-41. GTIN Global Trade Item Number
17 Grubb A, Nyman U, Bjrk,J Improved estimation of glomerular filtration FOR US CUSTOMERS ONLY: LIMITED WARRANTY
rate (GFR) by comparison of eGFR (cystatin C) and eGFR (creatinine.). Roche Diagnostics warrants that this product will meet the specifications
Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2012;72:73-77.
stated in the labeling when used in accordance with such labeling and will
18 Filler G, Huang S-HS, Yasin A.. The usefulness of Cystatin C and be free from defects in material and workmanship until the expiration date
related formulae in pediatrics. Clin Chem Lab Med
2012;50(12):2081-2091. printed on the label. THIS LIMITED WARRANTY IS IN LIEU OF ANY
OTHER WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING ANY IMPLIED
19 Grubb A. Cystatin C- and creatinine-based GFR-prediction equations
for children and adults. Clinical Biochemistry 2011;44:501-502. WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR PARTICULAR
PURPOSE. IN NO EVENT SHALL ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS BE LIABLE
20 Rollins G. Predicting risk of ESRD in Diabetics, Clinical Laboratrory
Strategies, Jan.2013,1-4. FOR INCIDENTAL, INDIRECT, SPECIAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL
DAMAGES.
21 Leseley A, Inker M.D., Christopher H, et al, Estimating Glomerular
COBAS, COBASC, COBASINTEGRA and TINAQUANT are trademarks of Roche.
Filtration Rate from Serum Creatinine and Cystatin C. N Engl J Med
2012;367:20-29. All other product names and trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
Additions, deletions or changes are indicated by a change bar in the margin.
22 Horio M, Imai E, Yasuda Y, et al. GFR Estimation Using Standardized 2015, Roche Diagnostics
Serum Cystation C in Japan. Am J Kidney Dis 2013;61(2):197-203
23 Grubb A, Horio M, Hansson LO, et al. Generation of a New Cystatin C-
Based Estimating Equation for Glomerular Filtration Rate Using Seven
Assays Standardized to the International Calibrator.Clin Chem 2014, in Roche Diagnostics GmbH, SandhoferStrasse116, D-68305 Mannheim
press. www.roche.com
24 van Deutekom AW, Zur B, van Wijk JAE, et al. Measurement of cystatin Distribution in USA by:
C in capillary blood samples in pediatric patients. Clin Biochem Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN
US Customer Technical Support 1-800-428-2336
2010;43:335-337.
25 Erlandsen EJ, Randers E, Kristensen JH. Evaluation of the Dade
Behring N Latex Cystatin C assay on the Dade Behring Nephelometer
II System. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1999;59:1-8.
26 Mussap M, Ruzzante N, Varagnolo M, et al. Quantitative Automated
Particle-Enhanced Immunonephelometric Assay for the Routinary
Measurement of Human Cystatin C. Clin Chem Lab Med
1998;36(11):859-865.
27 Gislefoss RE, Grimsrud TK, Morkrid L. Stability of selected serum
proteins after long-term storage in the Janus Serum Bank. Clin Chem
Lab Med 2009;47(5):596-603.
28 Data on file at Roche Diagnostics.