0% found this document useful (0 votes)
27 views

Mann-Whitney Test: Ranks

This document contains statistical analyses comparing various characteristics between groups with good nutrition status versus poor nutrition status. Chi-square tests were performed to examine the relationships between nutrition status and factors like exclusive breastfeeding, infection history, occupation, education level, and number of children. Most results were not statistically significant, except for exclusive breastfeeding and infection history which were significantly associated with nutrition status.

Uploaded by

regin
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
27 views

Mann-Whitney Test: Ranks

This document contains statistical analyses comparing various characteristics between groups with good nutrition status versus poor nutrition status. Chi-square tests were performed to examine the relationships between nutrition status and factors like exclusive breastfeeding, infection history, occupation, education level, and number of children. Most results were not statistically significant, except for exclusive breastfeeding and infection history which were significantly associated with nutrition status.

Uploaded by

regin
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Mann-Whitney Test

Ranks

STATUSGIZI N Mean Rank Sum of Ranks

SUSU_FORMULA gizi kurang 17 57.91 984.50

Gizi baik 93 55.06 5120.50

Total 110

Test Statisticsa

SUSU_FORMUL
A

Mann-Whitney U 749.500

Wilcoxon W 5120.500

Z -.395

Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .693

a. Grouping Variable: STATUSGIZI

ASI Eksklusif

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

ASI_EKSKLUSIF *
110 100.0% 0 .0% 110 100.0%
STATUSGIZI
Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-


Value df sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 12.300a 1 .000

Continuity Correctionb 10.420 1 .001

Likelihood Ratio 11.627 1 .001

Fisher's Exact Test .001 .001

Linear-by-Linear Association 12.188 1 .000

N of Valid Casesb 110

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5,72.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

RIWAYAT_INFEKSI *
110 100.0% 0 .0% 110 100.0%
STATUSGIZI

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-


Value df sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 30.756a 1 .000

Continuity Correctionb 27.559 1 .000

Likelihood Ratio 27.671 1 .000

Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000

Linear-by-Linear Association 30.476 1 .000

N of Valid Casesb 110

a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4,64.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table


Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

PEKERJAAN * STATUSGIZI 110 100.0% 0 .0% 110 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-


Value df sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square .852a 1 .356

Continuity Correctionb .352 1 .553

Likelihood Ratio .946 1 .331

Fisher's Exact Test .516 .288

Linear-by-Linear Association .845 1 .358

N of Valid Casesb 110

a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3,40.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

PENDIDIKAN * STATUSGIZI 110 100.0% 0 .0% 110 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-


Value df sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 1.457a 1 .227

Continuity Correctionb .884 1 .347

Likelihood Ratio 1.507 1 .220

Fisher's Exact Test .291 .174

Linear-by-Linear Association 1.444 1 .230

N of Valid Casesb 110

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7,26.
Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-


Value df sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 1.457a 1 .227

Continuity Correctionb .884 1 .347

Likelihood Ratio 1.507 1 .220

Fisher's Exact Test .291 .174

Linear-by-Linear Association 1.444 1 .230

N of Valid Casesb 110

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7,26.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

JUMLAH_ANAK *
110 100.0% 0 .0% 110 100.0%
STATUSGIZI

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-


Value df sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 2.045a 1 .153

Continuity Correctionb 1.184 1 .277

Likelihood Ratio 2.531 1 .112

Fisher's Exact Test .301 .135

Linear-by-Linear Association 2.026 1 .155

N of Valid Casesb 110

a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3,09.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

You might also like