Book Building: Meaning, Process and Comparison
Book Building: Meaning, Process and Comparison
Comparison
Article shared by
Read this article to learn about the meaning of book building, its
process and comparison with fixed price method and reserve book
building.
During the IPO or FPO, the company offers its shares to the public
either at fixed price or offers a price range, so that the investors can
decide on the right price. The method of offering shares by providing
a price range is called book building method. This method provides
an opportunity to the market to discover price for the securities
which are on offer.
ADVERTISEMENTS:
On the other hand, in the fixed price method, the price is decided
right at the start. Investors cannot choose the price. They have to buy
the shares at the price decided by the company. In the book building
method, the demand is known every day during the offer period, but
in fixed price method, the demand is known only after the issue
closes.
3. The Issuer also appoints syndicate members with whom orders are
to be placed by the investors.
10. Generally, the number of shares is fixed; the issue size gets frozen
based on the final price per share.
Example:
In this method, the company doesnt fix up a particular price for the
shares, but instead gives a price range, e.g., Rs. 80 to 100. When
bidding for the shares, investors have to decide at which price they
would like to bid for the shares, e.g., Rs. 80, Rs. 90 or Rs. 100. They
can bid for the shares at any price within this range. Based on the
demand and supply of the shares, the final price is fixed.
The lowest price (Rs. 80) is known as the floor price and the highest
price (Rs. 100) is known as cap price. The price at which the shares
are allotted is known as cut off price. The entire process begins with
the selection of the lead manager, an investment banker whose job is
to bring the issue to the public.
Both the lead manager and the issuing company fix the price range
and the issue size. Next, syndicate members are hired to obtain bids
from the investors. Normally, the issue is kept open for 5 days. Once
the offer period is over, the lead manager and issuing company fix
the price at which the shares are sold to the investors.
If the issue price is less than the cap price, the investors who bid at
the cap price will get a refund and those who bid at the floor price
will end up paying the additional money. For example, if the cut off in
the above example is fixed at Rs. 90, those who bid at Rs. 80, will
have to pay Rs. 10 per share and those who bid at Rs. 100, will end up
getting the refund of Rs. 10 per share. Once each investor pays the
actual issue price, the share are allotted.
However, fixed pricing can lead to an undervaluing of the issuing company as the
price of the company's shares at IPO is often lower than a "fair" market value.
As a result, the low price attracts investors and the share price often rises
dramatically in the first few days of trading after the IPO, as investors positively
revalue the company. For the company, and its pre-IPO shareholders, they may
have given away substantial value as a result.
More efficient
The book building method is more efficient as it solves the "leakage" of value
often seen with fixed priced IPOs. Here the issuer sets a price range within which
the investor is allowed to bid for shares. The range is based on where comparable
companies are trading and an estimate of the value of the company that the
market will bear. The investors then bid to purchase an agreed number of shares
for a price which they feel reflects fair value. By compiling a book of investors, the
issuer can ascertain what price range the shares should be valued at, based on the
demand of the people who are going to buy them, the investors. In this process
supply and demand are matched.
Globally, the book building method is favoured for its mutually beneficial nature:
investors get the shares at a fair price that typically has potential upside, and the
issuing company receives fair compensation.
However regionally it is likely to take some time to adapt to this method. Issuers
clearly have a vested interest in moving to an approach that is more likely to lead
to a better price for their companies. This will upset some investors in the short
term, who are used to making a lot of money from these fixed price IPOs.
In the longer-term, however, efficient pricing should be seen as a sign of the
growing maturity of the capital markets in the region.