Seismic Analysis MasonryCastle 2009
Seismic Analysis MasonryCastle 2009
Engineering Structures
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/engstruct
0141-0296/$ see front matter 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.02.030
1448 S. Casolo, C.A. Sanjust / Engineering Structures 31 (2009) 14471459
Table 1
Earthquakes with local intensity Is 5.0 registered in Syracuse.
Date (dd/mm/yy) Epicentral zone Is (MCS)
Table 2
Frequency of the first four natural modes measured by ISMES [12] and calculated by the numerical models.
Mode ISMES [12] (Hz) University of Padua [13] (Hz) Present 3D model (Hz)
Table 3
Mechanical characterisation of the materials employed in the whole and partial 3D FEM model (Figs. 4 and 11).
Material Global 3D FEM model Partial 3D FEM model
Density (kg/m3 ) E (MPa) Density (kg/m3 ) E (MPa)
Columns, capitals 2200 10 000 0.2 2200 250020 000 0.050.2
Infill of hypostyle hall vault 1300 1 500 0.1 1100 400 0.1
Hypostyle hall vault (exterior side) 2200 10 000 0.1
Hypostyle hall vault (courtyard side) 1500 5000 0.1
Arches 2200 10 000 0.2
Roof of hypostyle hall 1000 350 0.1
Hypostyle hall boundary walls 2000 4 400 0.1 1800 5000 0.1
Buttresses 1800 5000 0.1
Fig. 4. Different materials used in the 3D FE model of the whole castle (see Table 3).
Fig. 5. Deformed shapes of the first four natural modes of vibration that involve the hypostyle hall of the castle.
and the vaults. Mode 4, as well as the other higher modes are not
important from a seismic point of view, because of their reduced
participation factor and effective mass.
Thanks to the tuning process, the matching of the mean values
of stress due to the gravity load with those reported from the
previously published experimental and computational studies was
acceptable in the most critical parts of the building: the columns
and the buttresses.
The spectral analyses, performed using the response spectra
prescribed by the Italian seismic code for the site of Syracuse,
and taking into account both vertical and lateral acceleration,
highlighted peaks of stress close to the cracking values for good
limestone in the central columns of the hall and in the buttresses. Fig. 6. Different materials used in the partial 3D FE model (see Table 3). The grey
These results picked out the need for a more accurate model of scale is proportional to the Young modulus given to the material.
the most stressed parts of the monument, with higher geometric
accuracy and taking into account the heterogeneities in the
columns, due to the presence of damaged materials, as resulted
from the diagnostic surveys [14].
size or larger than the unit cell i , i.e. equal or larger than the
representative volume element of the masonry [21,9].
The elastic characteristics of these springs are defined by a
specific procedure of identification with the objective to transfer
some characteristics of the internal texture to the macro-scale
model [9]. On the other hand, a simplified phenomenological
approach [22], based on the experimental tests available in the
technical literature [2325], has been followed in order to model
the response under cyclic loading.
The geometry and the kinematics of the RBSM are described
by considering a global Cartesian coordinate frame {O, x, y} that is
placed with the x-axis parallel with the horizontal bed-joints. The
domain is partitioned into m quadrilateral elements such that no
vertex of one quadrilateral lies on the edge of another quadrilateral.
As shown in Fig. 10, on the left, a local reference frame {oi , i , i }
is fixed in the element barycentre oi , with the i -axis initially
parallel with the global x-axis. The deformed configuration of the
discrete model is described by the variations of position of these
local reference frames with respect to the global one, and the 3m
Lagrangian coordinates are assembled into vector {u} as follows:
in the innermost parts of the columns, as detected by ultrasonic Three connection points named P, Q and R are defined for
surveys [12]. each side in common between two adjoining rigid elements, as
The deformed shape that corresponds to the first natural mode shown in Fig. 10, on the right, and the corresponding measures
of vibration of this partial model, with a frequency of 4.6 Hz, is of axial and shear strain are assigned to a volume of pertinence
shown in Fig. 8 (top), while the map of the vertical axial stress opportunely associated to each of these points. The following
is reported in the same figure (bottom) for the case in which the vector of generalised strains {} is assembled in order to contain
model was loaded by the vertical acceleration of gravity plus a the mean strain measures:
lateral acceleration equal to 2.5 m/s2 . This analysis showed that
n o
the central columns of the hypostyle hall were subjected to high
{}T = 1P , 1Q , 1R , 2P , 2Q , 2R , . . . , rP , rQ , rR (3)
values of stress, locally up to 10 MPa, quite close to the limit for an being r the number of sides that connect the elements of the whole
ancient masonry block of limestone.3 In the actual configuration of discrete model. A vector of generalised stresses { }, conjugated
the castle, no longer symmetric because of the collapsed arches in in virtual work, is correspondingly assembled, together with a
18th century, the present buttresses are clearly no longer capable diagonal matrix [V ] that contains the volumes of pertinence of the
of contracting and limiting the lateral displacements that can cause connecting devices.
collapse due to the central columns because of the combined action
of flexure and compression in the case of strong earthquakes. { }T = {1P , 1Q , 1R , 2P , 2Q , 2R , . . . , rP , rQ , rR } (4)
4. The RBS model [V ] = Diag{V1P , V1Q , V1R , V2P , V2Q , V2R , . . . , VrP , VrQ , VrR }. (5)
Then, by assembling a diagonal matrix [D] that contains the
4.1. Mechanical formulation elastic stiffnesses of all the connecting springs, we have:
Fig. 9. On the left: scheme of a regular masonry texture. On the right: an example of the corresponding unit cell made of rigid elements connected by line springs.
Fig. 10. On the left: couple of rigid elements with the adopted notation for the displacements. On the right: notation adopted for the external forces and the springs.
Fig. 11. Rigid element models with indications of the 8 different materials M1 M8 (Tables 4 and 5) assigned to the elements. Present buttress (right) and proposed new
buttress (left).
A viscous damping that acts essentially on the first few modes at 4.2. The plane rigid element model
low frequency is adopted by defining the viscous damping matrix
[C ] as proportional to the mass matrix [C ] = a0 [M ].4 Finally, In order to perform the non-linear dynamic analyses with
in the general case of non-linear force-displacement relation, the rigid elements, the geometry of the proposed plane model should
linearised incremental form of the system of equations of the be simple. Moreover, since this model was designed to make
motion of the discrete system during a time interval can be computations at the macro-scale, as well as to limit the difference
expressed as follows: [22]: of size of the elements in the various parts of the model, we
renounced to describe the material heterogeneities in the columns.
[M ]{u} + [C ]{u} + {f 0 } + [K ]{u} = {p} (10) The two meshes of the plane model in the actual configuration
and with the proposed buttress are shown in Fig. 11. Eight
being {f 0 } the vector of the internal generalised forces, and [K ] different materials (M1 M8 ) were assigned to these discrete
the generalised tangential stiffness matrix. The implicit method models. The characteristics of these materials were assigned to the
of Newmark is adopted to integrate this system of equations, elements after performing a fine-tuning in order to obtain a good
performing full NewtonRaphson iterations until convergence is approximation with the previous three-dimensional models.
attained. The main parameters of these materials in the linear elastic
field are reported in Table 4, together with the thickness given to
the corresponding elements. The numerical response in the linear
4 In order to obtain a damping factor equal to 5% for the first natural mode of elastic field proved to be satisfactory with regards to the correct
vibration, we have a0 = 3.35 s1 and a0 = 3.77 s1 for the rigid element model in prediction of the static stress due to the gravity load as well as
the actual configuration and with the proposed intervention, respectively. in the presence of a lateral load. A reasonable agreement with the
S. Casolo, C.A. Sanjust / Engineering Structures 31 (2009) 14471459 1453
Fig. 12. Deformed shape of the first two modes of the RBS model that approximate the first mode (left) and third mode (right) of the 3D FE model (Fig. 5).
Table 4
Mechanical characteristics in the linear-elastic field and element thickness of the RBSM (Fig. 11).
Material Density (kg/m3 ) Ex /Ey (MPa) 2G (MPa) Thickness (m)
Table 5
Main characteristics assigned to the six materials for defining the non-linear elastic behaviour. The central values are reported, while variations of 10% and 20% have also
been considered into the parametric study. The symbols make reference to Fig. 13.
Material xc /yc (MPa) xt /yt (MPa) xr /yr (MPa) Ex1 /Ey1 (MPa) vm /hm (MPa) vr /hr (MPa) vr /hr 1000
1
(M ) Columns 4.0/5.0 0.8/1.0 0.4/0.5 2000 0.5/0.4 0.05/0.04 0.05
(M2 ) Roof 1.0 0.2 0.1 200 0.1 0.01 0.05
(M3 , M8 ) Infill of the vault 0.7 0.14/0.20 0.07/0.10 140 0.07 0.007 0.05
(M4 ) External main wall 2.0/2.5 0.8/0.6 0.4/0.3 800 /1000 0.15/0.10 0.02/0.015 0.05
(M5 ) Buttress 2.0/2.5 0.8/0.6 0.4/0.3 800/1000 0.15/0.10 0.02/0.015 0.05
(M6 , M7 ) Arches and vault 2.0/2.5 1.0/0.8 0.5/0.4 2000 0.15/0.10 0.02/0.015 0.05
previous 3D finite element models was also obtained for the first input accelerograms compatible with the local seismicity, and the
natural mode of vibration, both in terms of frequency and of global convenience to perform a large number of analyses with different
shape (see Fig. 12). The agreement for the higher modes is less parameters. For these reasons, and considering the unwillingness
satisfactory, since the frequency of natural mode 2, which mainly of adequate commercial codes, the Italian and the European
involves the vertical displacement of the roof and of the vault, seismic design codes [26] allow one to use non-linear static
is significantly higher than the frequency of the corresponding procedures [27,28] (usually referred to as pushover analyses) as
natural mode 3 of the global 3D model. In any case, the estimated well as full dynamic analyses. In this paper both analysis strategies
values of stress were correct, in particular for what regards the are performed and compared by adopting the proposed RBSM.
vertical axial stress in the columns and in the buttress, that are the
more critical parts of this structure. 5.1. The parametric study
The hysteretic rules assigned to the shear and axial springs are
sketched in Fig. 13, [24,25], while the main values of the material The uncertainty in the determination of the material parame-
parameters that govern the post-elastic behaviour are reported in ters has been dealt with by a parametric study. To limit the num-
Table 5. The adoption of these specific and relatively simple rules ber of varying parameters, a variation of the whole skeleton curve
allowed to perform a large set of non-linear static and dynamic that defines the hysteretic response of the axial and shear springs
analyses whose results are presented in the following section. This has been considered. Fig. 14 shows an example of this proce-
was the basis for the design of the new buttress shown in Fig. 11, dure applied to the case of a shear spring: the positive branch
on the right, that is proposed as a possible strategy to improve the of the skeleton curve OEYUS is translated to OEn+ Yn+ Un+ Sn+ or to
seismic performance of the hypostyle hall. OEn Yn Un Sn by moving the points E, Y , U, S, along a direction
parallel with the initial stiffness of the spring to obtain an increase
5. Seismic analysis or a reduction of the stress equal to n% of the value at the elastic
limit. The analogue has been also done for the negative branch as
Assessing the seismic vulnerability of a masonry monumental well as for the axial springs.
building by carrying out full dynamic analyses in the non-linear The six rows of Table 5 report the central values given
elastic field is a challenging task, due to many factors: the to the material parameters in order to define their non-linear
uncertainties in defining the constitutive laws for the materials, the response. These parameters are varied in order to produce a
problems of convergence in solving non-linear problems, the large set of materials improved or worsened by 10% and 20%.
computational resources required, the difficulty in the choice of In this manner, for each material M i we have five cases,
1454 S. Casolo, C.A. Sanjust / Engineering Structures 31 (2009) 14471459
Fig. 13. Scheme of the hysteretic rules of the axial (top) and of the shear spring
(bottom).
Fig. 15. Forcedisplacement curves obtained by parametric analyses. The solid line
corresponds to the model response with the central values given to all the materials.
The shaded area represents to the median curve the mean deviation from it.
9 The spectrum was calculated for rock soil (type A) according to Eurocode 8
monitored during the process in order to obtain the non-linear
(Section 3.2.2.2). The values used for parameters were: S = 1.0, TB = 0.15,
force-displacement curves shown in Fig. 15. It is worth observing TC = 0.40, TD = 2.0. The design ground acceleration ag = 0.25 g, corresponding
that in both the cases there is a sudden decrease of the strength to a return period T = 475 years, was provided by the Italian sesmic code (O.P.C.M.
after the peak base reaction force is attained. 3274) for seismic zone 2 [29].
1456 S. Casolo, C.A. Sanjust / Engineering Structures 31 (2009) 14471459
Fig. 18. Elastic response spectra at 5% of damping (first row), and time histories of the horizontal (left) and vertical (right) accelerograms used for dynamic analyses.
S. Casolo, C.A. Sanjust / Engineering Structures 31 (2009) 14471459 1457
Fig. 19. Time history of the mean horizontal (left) and vertical (right) displacement of points P 1 P 2 (see Fig. 12) subjected to recorded and artificial generated earthquakes.
Fig. 20. Deformed shape and vertical axial stress under simple gravity load (a), after the application of Colfiorito accelerograms (b), after the couple of artificial accelerograms
with T = 475 years (c), just before the collapse of the column, and after the couple of artificial accelerograms with T = 140 years (d).
these non-linear dynamic results are in substantial accord with the at the end of the application of the earthquake accelerograms. As
results previously obtained with the pushover analysis. expected, the two most critical elements are the buttress at the
Figs. 20 and 21 compare the maps of the deformed shape right side of the model, and the central column. It is remarkable
and of the vertical axial compression at the end of the simple that the buttress mainly suffers damage due to the shear action that
application of the vertical gravity load with the maps obtained produces a permanent shear deformation as well as a reduction
1458 S. Casolo, C.A. Sanjust / Engineering Structures 31 (2009) 14471459
Fig. 21. Deformed shape and vertical axial stress under simple gravity load (a), after the application of Colfiorito accelerograms (b), after a couple of artificial accelerograms
with T = 475 years (c), and after a couple of artificial accelerograms with T = 140 years (d).
of the lateral stiffness. As a consequence, the central column also intervention that increases the seismic strength and ductility,
suffers from flexural deformation due to the lateral displacements without a significant change of the stress state under the static
of the roof, that combines with the peaks of vertical axial stress gravity conditions, and avoiding having to modify the present
due to the vertical seismic acceleration. This is the main reason masonry structure of the vaulted hypostyle room.
for the reaching of compression stress values that are close the A noticeable outcome of this work is also the substantial
strength of the masonry material. It appears that the proposed new agreement between the non-linear dynamic results and the results
buttress seems to be capable of reducing the lateral displacements obtained with the pushover analysis.
without suffering significant shear damage. It is also worth noting
that the proposed intervention does not significantly modify the Acknowledgments
stress regime with the simple gravity loading.
This work was carried out thanks to an agreement between
6. Concluding remarks the Politecnico di Milano and the Soprintendenza ai Beni Culturali
e Ambientali di Siracusa. The Authors wish to thank, in particular,
The seismic analysis and the strengthening design of the arch. Mariella Muti from the Soprintendenza di Siracusa, prof.
Maniace Castle, in Syracuse, has been approached by means Vincenzo Petrini from the Politecnico di Milano, and prof.
of a complex multi-step strategy that integrates the diagnostic Giuseppina Uva from the Politecnico di Bari, for their valuable
investigations, the traditional FE modelling and a new specific rigid comments and suggestions.
body and spring model (RBSM) capable of performing non-linear
dynamic analyses. References
The first part of the work was devoted to the global analysis of
the building in the linear elastic field, with the aim of individuating [1] Bertero VV. Innovative approaches to earthquake engineering. In: Oliveto G,
editor. Innovative approaches to earthquake engineering. WIT press; 2002.
the main damage mechanism that can be activated by seismic
p. 154 [Chapter 1].
excitation. Then, the non-linear seismic response was investigated [2] Housner GW. Earthquake engineering. Strong ground motion, Prentice-Hall;
in order to propose a strengthening strategy that should have 1970. p. 7591 [Chapter 1].
the minimum architectural impact on the existing monumental [3] Petrini V, Casolo S. Vulnerability of historical and monumental buildings:
Significant ground motion parameters and evaluation of the seismic
structure. This is desirable when dealing with historical buildings, performance. In: Oliveto G, editor. Innovative approaches to earthquake
because in this case it is often necessary to take into account the engineering. WIT press; 2002. p. 20328 [Chapter 4].
effective hysteretic behaviour, with the energy dissipation and the [4] Uang CM, Bertero VV. Evaluation of seismic energy in structures. Earthq Eng
Struct Dyn 1990;19(1):7790.
mechanical degradation during the seismic excitation. [5] Doglioni F, Moretti A, Petrini V. Le Chiese e il Terremoto. Trieste: Lint press;
The RBSM proved to be effective in this context, since it allowed 1994 [in Italian].
to enhance our awareness by allowing to perform pushover as well [6] Petrini V, Casolo S, Doglioni F. Models for vulnerability analysis of monuments
and strengthening criteria. In: Proceedings of the XI European conference on
as non-linear dynamic analyses, in accord with the procedures of earthquake engineering. Volume of invited lectures, 1999. p. 17998.
the European seismic design code [26]. As an application example [7] Loureno PB. Computations on historic masonry structures. Prog Struct Eng
and numerical test, we have proposed and verified a simple Mater 2002;4(3):30119.
S. Casolo, C.A. Sanjust / Engineering Structures 31 (2009) 14471459 1459
[8] Casolo S, Pea F. Rigid element model for in-plane dynamics of masonry walls [20] Lemos JV. Discrete element modeling of masonry structures. Internat J Archit
considering hysteretic behaviour and damage. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2007; Heritage 2007;2(1):190213.
36(8):102948. [21] Casolo S. Modelling in-plane micro-structure of masonry walls by rigid
[9] Casolo S. Macroscale modelling of the micro-structure damage evolution by a elements, International Journal of Solids and Structures. Internat J Solids
rigid body and spring model. J Mech Mater Struct [in press]. Structures 2004;41(13):362541.
[10] Bottari S. Monumenti svevi di Sicilia. Palermo: Societ Siciliana per la Storia [22] Casolo S. Macroscopic modelling of structured materials: relationship
patria; 1950. [in Italian]. between orthotropic cosserat continuum and rigid elements. Internat J Solids
[11] Agnello G. Larchitettura Sveva in Sicilia Tivoli; 1935 [in Italian]. Structures 2006;43(3):47596.
[12] ISMES (Enel Group). Castello Maniace - Siracusa, indagini diagnostiche sulle [23] Atkinson RH, Amadei PB, Saeb S, Sture S. Response of masonry bed joints in
strutture murarie. 1999 [in Italian]. direct shear. ASCE J Struct Engrg Div 1989;115(9):227696.
[13] Modena C, Franchetti P, Zonta D, Menga R, Pizzigalli E, Ravasio F, Muti M, [24] Magenes G, Calvi GM. In-plane seismic response of brick masonry walls. Earthq
Meloni R, Bordone G. Static and dynamic analyses of Maniace Castle in Eng Struct Dyn 1997;26(11):1091112.
Siracusa-Sicily. In: Loureno PB, Roca P, editors. Historical constructions. [25] Naraine K, Sinha S. Cyclic behaviour of brick masonry under biaxial
Guimaraes; 2001. p. 93343. compression. ASCE J Struct Engrg 1991;117(5):133655.
[14] Ipertec srl. Indagini strutturali sulle murature del Castello Maniace. 2003 [in [26] European standard approved by CEN on 23 April 2004. EuroCode8: Design of
Italian]. structures for earthquake resistance - Part 1: General rules, seismic actions
[15] Hibbitt, Karlsson & Sorensen, Inc. ABAQUS manuals, version 6.5. 2005. and rules for buildings.
[16] Griffiths DV, Mustoe GGW. Modelling of elastic continua using a grillage of [27] Fajfar P. Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra. Earthq
structural elements based on discrete element concepts. Internat J Numer Eng Struct Dyn 1999;28:97993.
Methods Engrg 2001;50:175975. [28] Fajfar P. A nonlinear analysis method for performance based seismic design.
[17] Kawai T. New discrete models and their application to seismic response Earthq Spectra 2000;16(3):57392.
analysis of structures. Nucl Eng Des 1978;48:20729. [29] Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri Ordinanza 3274 come modificata
[18] Ostoja-Starzewski M. Lattice models in micromechanics. Appl Mech Rev ASME dallOPCM 3431 del 3/5/05 Italian seismic code. 2005 [in Italian].
2002;55(1):3560. [30] Sabetta F, Pugliese A. Estimation of response spectra and simulation of
[19] Chen S-Y, Moon FL, Yi T. A macroelement for the nonlinear analysis of in-plane nonstationary earthquake ground motions. Bull Seismol Soc Amer 1996;(86):
unreinforced masonry piers. Engrg Struct 2008;30(8):224252. 33752.