Scribd
Upload
124 views1 page

REVENUE MEMORANDUM CIRCULAR NO. 6-2005 Issued On February 14, 2005

This circular summarizes a Supreme Court decision regarding waivers of the statute of limitations under the Tax Code. The decision stipulates that for a waiver to be valid, it must: 1) specify a definite agreed upon date for tax assessment and collection; 2) be accepted by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue; and 3) provide the taxpayer a copy of the accepted waiver. Additionally, waivers must be carefully construed as they derogate taxpayer rights, and represent a bilateral agreement between the taxpayer and BIR to extend the assessment period to a certain date rather than waive the right to invoke prescription.

Uploaded by

Francis Diaz
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
124 views1 page

REVENUE MEMORANDUM CIRCULAR NO. 6-2005 Issued On February 14, 2005

This circular summarizes a Supreme Court decision regarding waivers of the statute of limitations under the Tax Code. The decision stipulates that for a waiver to be valid, it must: 1) specify a definite agreed upon date for tax assessment and collection; 2) be accepted by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue; and 3) provide the taxpayer a copy of the accepted waiver. Additionally, waivers must be carefully construed as they derogate taxpayer rights, and represent a bilateral agreement between the taxpayer and BIR to extend the assessment period to a certain date rather than waive the right to invoke prescription.

Uploaded by

Francis Diaz
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

REVENUE MEMORANDUM CIRCULAR NO.

6-2005 issued on February 14, 2005


circularizes the salient features of Supreme Court decision on waiver of the statute of
limitations under the Tax Code.
The decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Philippine Journalists, Inc. vs.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, G.R. No. 162852, promulgated on December 16,
2004, stipulates the following provisions on the waiver of the statute of limitations under
the Tax Code:
1. A waiver of the statute of limitations must conform strictly with the following
provisions of Revenue Memorandum Order No. 20-90 in order to be valid and
binding:

1.1 The waiver must specify a definite agreed date between the BIR and the taxpayer
within which the former may assess and collect revenue taxes.

1.2 The waiver must be accepted by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue or his
duly authorized representative, and the date of acceptance must be indicated.

1.3 The taxpayer must be furnished a copy of the waiver accepted by the BIR.

2. To a certain extent, a waiver of the statute of limitations is a derogation of the


taxpayers right to security against prolonged and unscrupulous investigations and
must therefore be carefully and strictly construed.

3. A waiver of the statute of limitations is not a waiver of the right to invoke the defense
of prescription but rather an agreement between the taxpayer and the BIR that the
period to issue an assessment and collect the taxes due is extended to a date certain.

4. A waiver of the statute of limitations is not a unilateral act by the taxpayer or the BIR
but is a bilateral agreement between two parties.

You might also like