0% found this document useful (0 votes)
148 views3 pages

1 Duero Vs CA (Read)

1) Gabriel Duero filed a complaint against Bernardo Eradel for recovery of possession and ownership of a parcel of land covered by a tax declaration in Duero's name. 2) Duero presented evidence ex parte and obtained a judgment ordering Eradel to vacate the land. 3) Eradel claimed he had been occupying the land as a tenant since 1958 and had turned over the complaint to the alleged landlord, believing the landlord had the right to defend the land. However, the trial court denied Eradel's motions for new trial and relief from judgment.

Uploaded by

Farhan Jumdain
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
148 views3 pages

1 Duero Vs CA (Read)

1) Gabriel Duero filed a complaint against Bernardo Eradel for recovery of possession and ownership of a parcel of land covered by a tax declaration in Duero's name. 2) Duero presented evidence ex parte and obtained a judgment ordering Eradel to vacate the land. 3) Eradel claimed he had been occupying the land as a tenant since 1958 and had turned over the complaint to the alleged landlord, believing the landlord had the right to defend the land. However, the trial court denied Eradel's motions for new trial and relief from judgment.

Uploaded by

Farhan Jumdain
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

6/8/2017 x_oand:B:DuerovsCA(RemedialLaw)

0 HigitPa SusunodnaBlog BumuongBlog Magsignin

x_oand:B
"howdoyoueatanelephant?cutitintosmallportions."thisisacollectionofcasedigestswhichareactuallynotsomuchina
digestedformbecauseilikedetails,andamparanoidthatprofessorsmightaskaboutthetissuesandcellsandnotjustthemeatofthe
case.ifyoulikedetails(thoughGRRMartinsaysthedevilisinit)thenyou'dfindthesedigestshelpful(ihope).

Thursday,September11,2014 AboutMe

BebeGurl
DuerovsCA(RemedialLaw)
Viewmy
completeprofile
GABRIELL.DUERO
vs.
CA,andBERNARDOA.ERADEL
BlogArchive

G.R.No.131282January4,2002QUISUMBING,J.: 2015(6)
2014(41)

FACTS: November(1)
September(22)
Sometimein1988,accordingtopetitioner,privateEradel SnippetsandDoctrinesof
enteredandoccupiedpetitioner'slandcoveredbyTax CasesonLegalSeparatio...

DeclarationNo.A1613302,locatedinBaras,SanMiguel, SnippetsandDoctrinesof
CasesonPresumptive
SurigaodelSur.Asshowninthetaxdeclaration,thelandhad Dea...

anassessedvalueofP5,240.Petitionerinformedrespondent SnippetsandDoctrinesof
CasesonBigamous
thatthelandwashis,andrequestedthelattertovacatethe Marria...

land.However,despiterepeateddemands,privaterespondent SunInsurancevsAsuncion
(RemedialLaw)
remainedsteadfastinhisrefusaltoleavetheland.
SeranavsSandiganbayan
OnJune16,1995,petitionerfiledbeforetheRTCacomplaint (RemedialLaw)

forRecoveryofPossessionandOwnershipwithDamagesand LigangMgaBarangayvs
Atienza,Jr(Remedial
Attorney'sFeesagainstprivaterespondentandtwoothers, Law)...

namely,ApolinarioandInocencioRuena. EscobalvsGarchitorena
(RemedialLaw)
GonzagavsCA(Remedial
PetitionerandtheRuenasexecutedacompromiseagreement, Law)

whichbecamethetrialcourt'sbasisforapartialjudgment DuerovsCA(RemedialLaw)

renderedonJanuary12,1996.Inthisagreement,theRuenas HeirsofSaezSabanpanvs
Comorposa(Remedial
recognizedandboundthemselvestorespecttheownershipand Law)...

possessionofDuero.HereinprivaterespondentEradelwasnot EspaolvsFormoso(Remedial
Law)
apartytotheagreement,andhewasdeclaredindefaultfor People'sBankvsSyvel's(Civil
failuretofilehisanswertothecomplaint. Law)
MillarvsCA(CivilLaw)
InternationalCorporateBank
PetitionerpresentedhisevidenceexparteonFebruary13, vsIAC(CIvilLaw)
1996.OnMay8,1996,judgmentwasrenderedinhisfavor,and PNBvsOngAcero(Civil
privaterespondentwasorderedtopeacefullyvacateandturn Law)
RepublicvsOrbecidoIII(Civil
overthelot. Law)
MorigovsPeople(CivilLaw)
OnJune10,1996,privaterespondentfiledaMotionforNew VanDornvsRomillo(Civil
Law)
Trial,allegingthathehasbeenoccupyingthelandasa
MetroBankvsPBCom
tenantofArtemioLaurente,Sr.,since1958.Heexplainedthat (RemedialLaw)
heturnedoverthecomplaintandsummonstoLaurenteinthe ImmaculatavsNavarro(Civil
Law)
honestbeliefthataslandlord,thelatterhadabetterright
CommissionerofPublic
tothelandandwasresponsibletodefendanyadverseclaimon HighwaysvsBurgos(Civil
L...
it.However,thetrialcourtdeniedthemotionfornewtrial.
KalalovsLuz(CivilLaw)

August(15)
July(3)

http://cantbelieveimadethisblog4casedigests.blogspot.com/2014/09/duerovscaremediallaw.html 1/3
6/8/2017 x_oand:B:DuerovsCA(RemedialLaw)
PrivaterespondentthenfiledbeforetheRTCaPetitionfor
RelieffromJudgment,reiteratingthesameallegationinhis
MotionforNewTrial.TheRTCagaindeniedthePetition.

PrivaterespondentfiledaMotionforReconsiderationinwhich
heallegedthattheRTChasnojurisdictionoverthecase
sincethevalueofthelandisonlyP5,240,whichiswithin
thejurisdictionoftheMTC.However,theRTCdeniedtheMR.
PrivaterespondentfiledwiththeCourtofAppeals,apetition
forcertiorariwhichthelattergranted.

ISSUES:
1)WhetherornotRTChasjurisdictionoverthecase
2)WONtheprivaterespondentEradelisestoppedfrom
questioningthejurisdictionofRTCafterhehas
successfullysoughtaffirmativerelieftherefrom

HELD:
1)None.ThecasefallsunderthejurisdictionoftheMTC
basedonRepublicAct7691amendingBP129.

2)No.Forestoppeltoapply,theactiongivingrisethereto
mustbeunequivocalandintentionalbecause,ifmisapplied,
estoppelmaybecomeatoolofinjustice.

Privaterespondent,anunschooledfarmer,inthemistaken
beliefthatsincehewasmerelyatenantofthelateArtemio
LaurenteSr.,hislandlord,gavethesummonstoaHipolito
Laurente,oneofthesurvivingheirsofArtemioSr.,whodid
notdoanythingaboutthesummons.Forfailuretoanswerthe
complaint,privaterespondentwasdeclaredindefault.

HethenfiledaMotionforNewTrialinthesamecourt,but
suchwasdenied.HefiledbeforetheRTCaMotionforRelief
fromJudgment.Again,thesamecourtdeniedhismotion,hence
hemovedforreconsiderationofthedenial.InhisMotionfor
Reconsideration,heraisedforthefirsttimetheRTC'slack
ofjurisdiction.Thismotionwasagaindenied.

Notethatprivaterespondentraisedtheissueoflackof
jurisdiction,notwhenthecasewasalreadyonappeal,but
whenthecase,wasstillbeforetheRTCthatruledhimin
default,deniedhismotionfornewtrialaswellasforrelief
fromjudgment,anddeniedlikewisehistwomotionsfor
reconsideration

Thefundamentalruleisthat,thelackofjurisdictionofthe
courtoveranactioncannotbewaivedbytheparties,oreven
curedbytheirsilence,acquiescenceorevenbytheirexpress
consent.Further,apartymayassailthejurisdictionofthe
courtovertheactionatanystageoftheproceedingsandeven
onappeal.Theappellatecourtdidnoterrinsayingthatthe
RTCshouldhavedeclareditselfbarrenofjurisdictionover
theaction

http://cantbelieveimadethisblog4casedigests.blogspot.com/2014/09/duerovscaremediallaw.html 2/3
6/8/2017 x_oand:B:DuerovsCA(RemedialLaw)
CitingJaviervCA,theCourtreiterated:Undertherules,it
isthedutyofthecourttodismissanaction'wheneverit
appearsthatthecourthasnojurisdictionoverthesubject
matter.'(Sec.2,Rule9,RulesofCourt)

DISPOSITIVEPORTION:

Thus,therulingoftheCAisaffirmed.Thedecisionofthe
RTCanditsOrderthatprivaterespondentturnoverthe
disputedlandtopetitioner,andtheWritofExecutionit
issued,areannulledandsetaside.

PostedbyBebeGurlat1:23AM Recommend this on Google

Labels:131282,digest,DuerovsCA,G.R.No.131282,jurisdictionbyestoppel,remediallaw

Nocomments:
PostaComment

Enteryourcomment...

Commentas: Selectprofile...

Publish
Preview

NewerPost Home OlderPost

Subscribeto:PostComments(Atom)

Simpletheme.Themeimagesbyluoman.PoweredbyBlogger.

http://cantbelieveimadethisblog4casedigests.blogspot.com/2014/09/duerovscaremediallaw.html 3/3

You might also like