Laboratory Quality Control Manual
Laboratory Quality Control Manual
1996
Prepared by:
These guidelines have been developed to assist operators and technicians at Vermont
Wastewater Treatment Facilities to prepare acceptable Quality Control Manuals specific to their
facilities. It is further hoped that the guidelines will encourage the implementation of these
procedures. The quality control procedures outlined in this manual represent the minimum
requirements considered acceptable by the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation
for facilities regulated under the NPDES program.
1
-1-
The laboratory quality control manual described in this guidance document is an integral
part of the appropriate quality assurance procedures required of all NPDES regulated facilities
pursuant to Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 122.41 (e) any commercial
laboratory performing analyses for an NPDES regulated facility must certainly meet these
minimum requirements.
To satisfy minimum NPDES requirements a quality control manual must address the
following items. (Each of which will be discussed in detail in the following pages.)
2
-2-
In order to produce a truly useful QA/QC manual a table of contents should be
included. You may also wish to include things such as laboratory utilities information,
electrical supply, compressed air source, etc. or anything that might effect the function of
the laboratory.
This section of the manual simply lists the topics which will be included in your
quality assurance plan. It is basically a table of contents without the page numbers. It
should be the first step in preparing the manual as it will help you to organize your
thoughts and establish distinct sections.
This section of the manual should identify all persons responsible for laboratory
activities from sampling to preparation and signing of the Discharge Monitoring Report.
It should describe the responsibilities of each of the individuals in certain terms;
identifying each individual using that persons name (not just the position - i.e. Andy
Fish, QA coordinator not QA coordinator).
1). The town manager as the person responsible for signing the WR-43.
2) The chief operator as the preparer of the WR-43.
3). Assistant operator as responsible for sample collection.
4) Lab tech - responsible for performing analyses maintaining bench sheets,
3
-3-
assisting in data review etc.
----This clearly shows that the analysts responsibility ends with informing his
supervisor of a problem. It is presumably the chief operators responsibility to determine
the action taken from that point.
An organization chart is very useful in identifying positions (where they fit into
the scheme of things).
This section, besides being useful to inspectors and certification officials can be
very helpful to the person preparing the manual to figure out just what am I trying to
demonstrate in this manual? What am I really after here?
4
-4-
6. To ensure that each sample is tracked from collection time until the report is
finalized - with records maintained for the required intervals. Of course in
addition to simply listing the objectives you might summarize referencing specific
sections of the manual, how these objectives will be met.
5
-5-
V. Sample Handling and Documentation Procedures
A written description of exactly how the samples are handled after collection.
The methods for documentation must be clearly stated. The following items must be
included in this section.
As many of us are painfully aware, the quality of the water we use in rinsing
glassware, preparing reagents and standards, sample dilution, and blank preparations can
be the determining factory between accurate and inaccurate analytical results.
6
-6-
V. Laboratory Water Quality (continued)
In wastewater analysis our main concerns regarding laboratory water quality are
conductivity, chlorine and metals that might interfere with certain analyses (i.e. high
copper level can affect results in the BOD analysis).
Generally accepted monitoring frequencies and limits for those parameters are
listed below.
7
-7-
V. Laboratory Water Quality (continued)
This section of the manual should include a simple step - by step procedure which
details the exact method in which the analysis is performed. It should NOT simply be a
copy of an analytical method from Standard Methods but instead a practical What you
really do to perform this analysis, type of description in an easy to read format.
8
-8-
VII. Standard Operating Procedures - For Each Analytical Method (continued)
Include specific items such as Turn the blender to setting 6 and blend for 5
minutes to get a good homogenous sample or Use only Class A volumetric glassware
from drawer #2.
You may reference an SOP manual to satisfy #5 if you have a separate and
complete manual.
This section of the manual should describe the general procedures for preparation
of reagents and standards. The types of questions that should be addressed include:
1) Grade of materials used i.e. ASC or Analytical Reagent grade chemicals primary
standards, etc.
2) Measuring methods i.e. calibrated analytical balance, class A volumetric
glassware etc.
3) Reagent labeling: Must Include
9
-9-
VIII. Reagent/Standard Quality, Preparation and Traceability (continued)
A. Reagent name
B. Concentration
C. Preparation and Expiration dates and/or received the dates a chemical is
received as well as the date it is opened.
This section should detail the procedures, frequencies and type of calibration as
well as whether it was routine or professionally performed and finally who performed the
calibration.
1) Established frequency of routine calibration for each piece of equipment i.e. daily,
weekly, monthly.
2) Established frequency of professional calibrations for each piece of equipment.
3) Calibration procedures - Standards used, etc.
4) Dates and times calibrations are performed.
5) The name (* not just initials of the person who calibrated the instrument.)
10
-10-
X Data Handling - Reduction Validation and Reporting
Reduction of Data
Data reduction is the process of transforming raw data into final results that are
reported in standard units to some authority. An efficient method of data reduction must
exist to reduce transcription and calculation errors. That methodology, whatever it may
entail, should be described in this section.
Validation of Data
Data validation starts with the analyst. It is usually the analysts responsibility to
ensure that instruments have been properly calibrated and are operating properly. He or
she then records the results on a bench sheet. Generally someone then transfers the data
to another form after, perhaps performing some calculations.
At this point there should be some mechanism in place to ensure that the data has
been accurately transferred and that any calculations were performed properly.
At least one other person beside the analyst should look over and double check
the bench sheet data vs. final results. One or both of these individuals must understand
the concept of significant figures and units of measures.
* More than one technical violation could have been avoided had this knowledge
been applied.
This section should describe the procedure by which data is checked. Specific
responsibilities should be spelled out here.
11
-11-
X Data Handling - Reduction Validation and Reporting (continued)
It would seem reasonable then to involve this person in the data validation
process.
Examples on description of
12
-12-
XI. Preventive Maintenance, Procedures and Schedules (continued)
The old excuse I couldnt report pH results for the month of April because my
pH probe was broken, just isnt acceptable as a defense.
This section must describe procedures for routine and scheduled contract services.
Include:
This section of the manual will outline the steps taken when any portion of the
quality assurance process become questionable or invalid.
13
-13-
XI. Corrective Action (4) (continued)
in the manual and include a reference describing where the actual list(s) is/are
located if you desire.
5) Procedure for informing superiors of other authorities (if applicable).
6) Protocol for resampling and retesting.
Quality control is defined in the 18th edition of Standard Methods for the
Examination of Water and Wastewater, 1992.
Quality control consists of analyzing and reporting the results of quality control
standards, sample duplicates and replicates, spikes and blanks.
EPA recommends that a frequency of 10% to 20% be applied for quality control
measures. That is, for every 5 to 10 samples analyzed there should be one quality control
sample analyzed for each parameter being tested.
14
-14-
XIII. Quality Control Procedures: (continued)
Calibration/ QC Duplicates/
Parameter Standardization Standards Replicates Spikes Blanks
BOD Meter before each use 1/10 Tests 1/10 Tests 1/Yr 1/each
IGGA/Each
if seeded
Nitrate Nitrogen as per method 1/10 Tests 1/10 Tests 1/Yr 1/each
Total Suspended constant weights before and after 1/10 Tests 1/each N/A 1/each
Solids filtering sample
15
-15-
XIII. Quality Control Procedures: (continued)
From the results of analysis of a spike and unspiked sample, percent recovery can
be calculated using the equation:
S&U
% Recovery ' 100% x
Csa
If the Percent Recovery is outside the range of 80% to 100% the contents of the
sample may be interfering with the method of measurement for that analysis.
In this event the cause of the interference must be determined and corrective
actions must be initiated (i.e. change methods, etc.)
* One spike or Quality Control Standard should be run with one of every 10
samples run.
16
-16-
XIII. Quality Control Procedures: (continued)
Quality control standards are substances of known concentration. They are used
to verify the accuracy of your analysis.
1) Must be prepared from a source different than what was used to calibrate
the instrument or prepare the standard curve.
2) The quality control standard must be specific for the parameter being
analyzed.
4) Remember: Quality control standards are not used to adjust the instrument
as are calibration standards. The resulted quality control standards are
simply recorded an compared to the actual known value.
17
-17-
XIII. Quality Control Procedures: (continued)
5) Unless control charts are used to determine the acceptable quality control
standard range. Results of the quality control standard must fall within a
range of 20% of the known value. That is the Percent Error must be
from 80% to 120% of the actual standard
III. Duplicates/Replicates
1) Duplicate samples are samples which are collected in two separate containers at
the same time and place.
2) Replicate samples are samples that are collected in a single container and are
poured off into a second container for separate analyses of the same parameter(s).
4) The result of duplicate/replicate samples should not vary by more than 20% from
the original sample.
18
-18-
III. Duplicates/Replicates (continued)
5) Do not average original and duplicate/replicate results. Record the result of the
original sample. Then record on bench sheets or other appropriate record book
the Percent error for the duplicate/replicate.
If the duplicate/replicate results fall outside the acceptable ( 20%) range of the
original sample a note should be made in the comments section of the WR-43
report form and on the bench sheet. Corrective action should be implemented.
IV. Blanks
19
-19-
XIII. 2B. Quality Control Standards (continued)
For example:
If blank limit values are exceeded a note must be included in the comment section of the
WR-43 report form, and on the bench sheet. In some instances such as in the E. Coli
analysis, this invalidates the sample data. (Check the method info) In any blank
exceedance corrective action contingencies must be implemented.
20
-20-
The following pages contain an
Example QC Manual
21
-21-
Table of Contents
A. Title Page Page 17A
B. Introduction Page 18
1. Quality Assurance Project Plan Elements Page 19
2. Laboratory Staff Organization and Responsibilities Page 20
2.1. Town Manager Page 21
2.2 Chief Operator Page 21
2.3 Lab Supervisor Page 21
2.4 Operators Page 22
. 2.5 Skills and Training Page 22
3.0 Quality Assurance Objectives and Activities Page 23
4.0 Sample Collection Procedures Page 23
4.1 General Guidelines Page 23
4.2 Sample Type and Holding Times Page 24
4.3 Sample Preservation Page 25
5.0 Sample Handling and Documentation Procedures Pages 27 & 28
6.0 Laboratory Water Quality Page 28
6.1 Deionized Water Pages 28 & 29
7.0 Standard Operating Procedure for Each Analytical Method Pages 30
7.1 pH Pages 30 to 32
7.2 Total Residual Chlorine Pages 32 to 35
7.3 Settleable Solids Pages 35 to 36
7.4 Total Suspended Solids Pages 36 to 40
8.0 Reagent/Standard Quality, Preparation and Traceability Pages 40 to 41
9.0 Calibration Procedures and Frequencies Page 41
9.1 Instrument Calibration Procedures Pages 41 to 43
10.0 Data Handling-Reduction, Validation and Reporting Page 43
10.1 Data Reduction Pages 43 to 44
10.2 Data Validation Page 44
10.3 Reporting Pages 45 to 46
11.0 Preventive Maintenance, Procedures and Schedules Page 47
12.0 Corrective Action Contingencies Pages 48 to 49
13.0 Quality Control Procedures (General) Pages 50 to 55
22
-22-
INTRODUCTION
23
-23-
I. Quality Assurance Project Plan Elements
The fourteen Quality Assurance Project Plan Elements addressed in this manual
are:
Title Page
Introduction
Staff Organization and Responsibilities
Quality Assurance Objectives and Activities
Sample Collection Procedures
Sample Handling and Documentation Procedures
Laboratory Water Quality
Standard Operating Procedure for Each Analytical Method
Reagent/Standard Quality Preparation and Traceability
Calibration Procedures and Frequencies
Data Handling - Reduction, Validation and Reporting
Preventive Maintenance, Procedures and Schedules
Corrective Action Contingencies
Quality Control Procedures (General)
24
-24-
2.0 Laboratory Staff Organization and Responsibilities
One employee is dedicated to laboratory work only, while all 5 might perform
daily analyses including pH, Cl2 and settleable solids.
Table I
25
-25-
2.1 Town Manager
The town manager is responsible for signing the WR-43 report form.
Before signing he/she questions the chief operator or to the reports accuracy and
any special comments.
Makes final decision on equipment purchases after conferring with chief operator.
The chief operator is responsible for signing the WR-43 report form as the
preparer.
Transfer all results from bench sheets to the WR-43 report form.
26
-26-
Is responsible for purchasing laboratory equipment.
27
-27-
2.4 Operators
Are properly training and responsible for analysis of pH, Total Residual Chlorine
and Settleable solids when necessary.
EDUCATION
EXPERIENCE
Time & Type
RESPONSIBILITIES
REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIC TO A POSITION
Example:
SPECIAL
NAME POSITION EDUCATION EXPERIENCE SKILL RESPONSIBILITIES REQUIREMENTS
28
-28-
EXAMPLE
f. To ensure that each sample is tracked from collection time until the report is
finalized - with records maintained for the required intervals.
a. Samples are collected in a well mixed area at the center of the channel avoiding
eddies, backwaters and area where settling might take place.
b. Influent samples are collected after the comminuter but above the RAS line. See
Diagram.
c. Effluent samples are collected after all treatment processes just before discharge
to the stream. See Diagram for specific parameters.
29
-29-
4.1 General Guidelines (continued)
d. Grab samples
*Note* E. Coli - collected directly into sterilized 250 ml. Plastic bottle containing
4 drops 10% Sodium Thiosulfate solution.
e. Composite samples
All composite samples consist of 24 disrete samples collected hourly via an Isco
automatic sampler. Each disrete sample (approximately 500 mls) is distributed
into properly cleaned, 1 liter Isco sample bottles. Composite samples are cooled
by ice packs which are placed in the sampler wells. Samples are composited at
the lab based on readings from flow charts.
30
-30-
SAMPLING PROCEDURES
31
-31-
4.3 Sample Preservation
If samples are taken and not run within the time frame as in Chart 9.1 then the following
chart applies.
PRESERVATION CONDITIONS
P = Plastic Bottle
32
-32-
4.4 Sample Collection Location
BETTER : The effluent grab samples for pH and Total Residual Chlorine are
collected at the outfall end of the chlorine contact tank at a point
approximately 1 foot upstream of the v-notch weir.
BEST : The effluent grab samples for pH and Total Residual Chlorine are
collected at the outfall end of the chlorine contact tank at a point
approximately 1 foot upstream of the v-notch weir, in the center of
the channel at a depth of approximately 1 foot. The open container
attached to a 6 foot aluminum pole is lowered into the waste
stream with the open end facing down stream as shown in pictures
#1 and #2.
Picture #1 Picture #2
Be specific and include
descriptions for each different type of sample (re: grab, composite)
33
-33-
5. Sample Handling Documentation Procedures
5.1 All grab samples collected for analysis of pH, Total Residual Chlorine and
Settleable Solids are immediately taken to the lab. The pH and Chlorine analyses
are begun immediately. The settleable solids sample is poured immediately into
the Imhoff cone.
5.2 The grab sample collected for analysis of E. Coli is immediately placed into a
cooler with four blue ice packs and sealed. It is immediately transported by WWW
to WWW laboratory. The approximate travel time is 35 minutes.
Each bottle is properly labeled and accompanied with a chain of custody form.
One copy of the COC form is maintained at the facility.
Immediately after the last 24 disrete sample is collected the entire sampler is
brought into the laboratory where the hourly sample volumes are calculated
measured and poured into a four liter jug. Aliquots are poured from the container
for specific parameters (BOD, TSS etc.) After thorough shaking. Sample
containers are then placed into the refrigerator at 4C until the analysis is
performed.
34
-34-
5. Sample Handling Documentation Procedures (continued)
2) Parameter to be analyzed
5) Preservation information
35
-35-
5. Sample Handling Documentation Procedures (continued)
R/O Deionized water is used in the laboratory for reagent preparation, glassware
rinsing, and BOD dilution water.
36
-36-
6.1 Deionized Water (continued)
R/O system is back flushed daily for one half of an hour. Water for BOD dilution
water and reagent dilution is made fresh after morning flush cycle.
Tubing and associated hardware (if in contact with the water) are replaced as needed.
37
-37-
6.1 Deionized Water (continued)
The quality specifications for this bottled water are included on the product label
and meets all requirements for analytical use.
7.1 pH
7.1 B. Apparatus
pH meter (make and model)
pH temperature probe (type)
Buffer solutions Fisher, NIST certified, 4.0, 7.0, 10.0
Glass beakers (50 ml)
Magnetic stirrer and stir bars
Safety Glasses, gloves
Squeeze bottle for RO/DI water
7.1 C. Standardization
- The meter is standardized before each use with fresh pH 4.0 and 10.0
buffer solutions.
38
-38-
7.1 C. Standardization (continued)
- The pH of a fresh pH 7.0 buffer is checked and the result is recorded in the
QC log.
- If the result of the checked buffer varies by more than .1 standard unit.
The meter is restandardized and the problem is corrected.
- The Fill hole and electrode cap are removed during use and replaced
after each use.
7.1 D. Interferences
39
-39-
7. Standard Operating Procedures for Each Analytical Method (continued)
7.1 F. Procedure
7.1 G. Calculation
40
-40-
7. Standard Operating Procedures for Each Analytical Method (continued)
41
-41-
7.2. Total Residual Chlorine (continued)
7.2 B. Apparatus
7.2 C. Standardization
7.2 D. Interference
42
-42-
7.2 D. Interference (continued)
The sample is collected into an airtight BOD bottle which has been
covered with black electrical tape. The bottle is filled well into the neck
so as to overflow when the ground glass stopper is inserted. Make sure
there are no bubbles in the bottle. It is then taken to the dab for immediate
analysis (within 5 minutes from collection to analysis).
7.2 F. Procedure
Empty the contents of one Total Cl2 powder pillow or packet into
one of the sample cells. Cap and invert 10 - 15 minutes to mix.
Wait 3 minutes.
43
-43-
7.2 F. Procedure (continued)
Using the up and down arrows set the device to mode 5207 (515
nanometers).
Place the cell containing untreated sample (Blank) into the cell
compartment. Close the light shield and press the zero button.
The meter should read 0.00 mg/L.
Place the cell containing treated sample into the cell compartment
and push the read button.
7.2 G. Calculations
1. All reagents are NIST traceable and preparation and expiration dates are
recorded.
44
-44-
7.2 H. Quality Control (continued)
4. Hach Volette Ampule Certified Standards are used daily, and are recorded
as a standard curve for a control chart.
6. Grab samples are recorded at the exact time of sampling and are analyzed
immediately after entering the laboratory. The time of analysis and date
are recorded.
NO HOLD TIME
ml of standard addition
x Chlorine conc. of Vol. Ampule
ml of standard additional % ml of sample
45
-45-
7.3. Settleable Solids
7.3 B. Apparatus
7.3 F. Procedure
Place one liter of well mixed sample into a clean Imhoff cone.
46
-46-
7.3 F. Procedure (continued)
After a total of elapsed time of 60 minutes from the time the sample was
poured. The settled solids are read in ml/liter and recorded.
7.3 G. Calculations
7.4 B. Apparatus
Buchner Funnel
47
-47-
7.4 B. Apparatus (continued)
Rubber stopper (to fit Buchner funnel to 1 liter side arm flask)
Graduated Cylinders
Forceps
48
-48-
7.4. C. Standardization (or more accurately pre-test preparation)
(continued)
7.4. D. Interferences
Dont include large floating particles in the sample unless they are
truly representative of the actual sample conditions.
49
-49-
7.4 E. Sample Preparation and Preservation (continued)
7.4 F. Procedure
1. Prepare the funnel and vacuum apparatus. Make sure the vacuum
is not excessive so as to rip the filter.
3. Seat the filter by rinsing the funnel and filter with about 25 mls of
RO/DI water. Turn on the vacuum pump until DI water is drawn
through the filter.
5. Pour the sample slowly into the center of the filter with the
vacuum on.
50
-50-
7.4 F. Procedure (continued)
- Place the filter into an aluminum weighing pan and place onto the
center rack of the drying oven at 104C for 2 - 3 hours (preferably
overnight).
- Weigh (if the aluminum pan was included in the initial weighing it
must certainly be included in all weighings.)
- Reweigh
7.4 G. Calculations
A & B x 100,000
TSS in mg/L =
C
51
-51-
7.4 G. Calculations (continued)
52
-52-
7.4 H. Quality Control (continued)
53
-53-
7.5 B. Apparatus (continued)
54
-54-
7.5 C. Reagents:
55
-55-
7.5 C. Reagents (continued)
2. Fill 1R graduated Cylinder with DI water and siphon into 3 BOD bottles,
without aerating water.
56
-56-
7.5 D. DO Meter Standardization (continued)
4. Invert bottles until uniform consistency. Let stand until floc settles to
50% bottle volume. Invert a second time and let stand again.
5. Add 2 mls of DO #3, cap and invert until floc is complete gone.
9. Place DO probe into third bottle making sure there are no air bubbles
trapped. Turn knob to zero and adjust until zeroed.
57
-57-
7.5 D. DO Meter Standardization (continued)
11. Let sit 2 minutes and adjust until meter reads average of two Winkler
titrations. If the average DO of the Winkler Titrations and the DO from
the meter differ by more than .5, rerun Winkler. Run samples within 4
hours of calibration.
7.5 E. Interferences
Presence of copper and other metals in the sample can adversely affect results.
It is placed in a warm water bath before analysis until the sample temp
reaches 20 C. The sample is thoroughly mixed just before being poured
58
-58-
7.5 F. Sample Preparation and Preservation (continued)
Seeding - All samples are seeded. The process is described in the Procedure
section 7.5 G.
pH: The sample pH is adjusted to between 6.5 to 7.5 if necessary using sulfuric
acid or sodium hydroxide (usually not necessary).
7.5 G. Procedure
1. Wash 20 R carboy and siphon tubing with micro and rinse very
well with DI water.
ex: 7 samples would require 28R (10 for the first then 3 X 6 = 18
for rest.)
59
-59-
7.5 G. Procedure (continued)
MgSO4
CaCl2
FeCl3
7. Be sure temp. Is 20 to 23 C.
60
-60-
7.5 G. Procedure (continued)
C. Dechlorination of samples.
- 100 ml sample
61
-61-
7.5 G. Procedure (continued)
4. Using standardized 0.00282N FAS, titrate to clear endpoint. Ml
FAS used equals mg/l Cl2.
62
-62-
7.5 G. Procedure (continued)
F. Seeding Chart
Expected Seed BOD mg/l Seed Dilution (%)* Seed (ml) to dilutions +
50 (Polyseed range) 2, 5, 10 20
75 2, 5, 10 15
100 1, 2, 5 8
125 1, 2, 5 8
150 1, 2, 5 6
175 1, 2, 5 6
200 0.51, 2, 5
225 0.5, 1, 2 5
250-400 0.5, 1,2 3
2. Seed Calculation:
0.8 mg/l ml seed used in samples % GGA
x 1000 '
Expected seed BOD mg/l
63
-63-
7.5 G. Procedure (continued)
G. Dilution Technique.
1. BOD rules:
2 mg/l x 1000 ml
' mls sample to dilute 1R
Expected sample BOD
2 mg/l x 1000 ml
' 133 ml to 1R or 13.3%
15 mg/l
64
-64-
1. Add 10 ml GGA ampule to 1R graduated cylinder (gives 2%
GGA).
8. Read DO final after 5 days 3 hours and record both values for
each dilution.
65
-65-
7.5 G. Procedure (continued)
Calculations:
40 mg/l x 15 ml
Example: ' 0.6 mg/l
1000 ml
B. DO depletion:
DO1' Initial DO
Example: 8.20 mg/l & 5.4 mg/l ' 2.8 mg/l (depletion)
66
-66-
7.5 G. Procedure (continued)
Quality Control:
1. Blanks are run as a bottle and dilution water check. Values #0.2 mg/l are
acceptable.
67
-67-
5 Day BOD Data Sheet
Sample Locations:Sample Data Sheet
Lab ID Numbers: 96274 99385
Date & Time Sampled: 10-21-92 10:00 a.m. Date & Time Sample arrived at Lab: 10-
12-92 1:00 pm
Date & Time BOD Setup: 10-21-92 3:00 p.m. Date & Time Final DO Read: 10-26-92
1:00 p.m.
Analyst:
Blank --- --- 8.80 8.75 8.65 8.70 0.10 --- --- ---
GGA 2 20 8.75 4.30 4.25 4.28 4.47 0.46 4.01 200.5
S1 2 20 8.75 8.20 8.20 8.20 0.55 --- --- <2
Depl.
S2 5 50 8.75 7.70 7.65 7.68 1.07 --- --- <2
Depl.
S3 10 100 8.80 6.60 6.40 6.50 2.30 --- --- 23
96274 A 5 20 8.75 6.00 6.05 6.07 2.68 0.46 2.22 44.4
B 10 20 8.75 3.65 3.70 3.67 5.08 0.46 4.62 46.2
C 30 80 <1 <1 --- --- --- --- --- ---
68
-68-
Sample % Dil ml Seed DOI DOF DOF Avg. DO Seed DO BOD
DOF Depl. Factor Depl. mg/l
23 mg/l x 20 mg/l
Seed Factor: ' 0.46 mg/l
1000 ml
69
-69-
5 Day BOD Data Sheet - Continued
70
-70-
8.0 Reagent/Standard Quality, Preparation and Traceability
8.1 All standards and reagents are prepared from reagent grade materials, primary standards or they
are purchased from reputable vendors. Reagents are stored according to manufacturers
instructions and discarded upon expiration. Standards and reagents are prepared using bala
nces that are calibrated daily, Class A volumetric glassware and ASTM Type II reagent water.
Once a solution is prepared it is labeled with the solution name or description, storage
requirements, concentration or normality, preparation and expiration dates and initials of
preparer. Expiration dates for standards and reagents are specified in methods that are adhered
to unless degradation prior to this date is observed. Log books are utilized to record the
preparation of standards.
Quality control reference samples are analyzed along with most analytes, depending upon
availability to validate standards, technique and methodology. Quality control reference samples
are prepared from a different source than that used in the preparation of standards for use in the
standard curve and are US EPA certified, if possible.
71
-71-
9.1 Instrument Calibration Procedures
All instruments and equipment used are routinely calibrated by laboratory personnel or by
external calibration agencies or equipment manufacturers. Maintenance schedules can be found in the
Preventative Maintenance Section of this manual (Section 1.0). Instrument calibration procedures,
frequencies, standards and traceability are summarized in Table 9.2 To insure that instruments have
performed adequately throughout the analysis, it is laboratory practice to run a standard or quality
control reference sample at the end of an extended run.
72
-72-
9.1 Instrument Calibration Procedures (continued)
Table 9.2
2 Point
Calibration
Probe
73
-73-
9.1 Instrument Calibration Procedures (continued)
Table 9.2
Raw data is recorded directly onto bench sheets by the technician who actually
performed the analysis.
If more than one analyst is involved in setting up an analysis or reading results (Ex. BOD
initials DCs determined by one person and final DOs by another) both analysts initial the bench
sheet. All calculations are included on bench sheets.
Only the chief operator can transfer information from the bench sheets to WR-43 report
forms.
74
-74-
Data Handling - Reduction, Validation and Reporting (continued)
The analyst who generates the data has the prime responsibility for its correctness and
completeness. It is the analysts responsibility to verify that the instrument was calibrated and
was performing properly.
The chief operator looks over and double checks the bench sheets. He checks all
calculations, looks to see that all data makes sense and that the numbers were rounded properly
(section 10.5) and that proper significant numbers were recorded (section 10.4).
After transferring the data to the WR-43 report forms he checks for transcription errors.
The assistant operator performs a quick check of bench vs. WR-43 data before the report
is given to the town manager for his signature.
The town manager looks at the WR-43 report form and questions the chief operator
concerning any unusual or suspicious looking result before signing the report. As a rule the
town manager and chief operator meet to discuss the report regardless of whether or not there are
irregularities.
75
-75-
Data Handling - Reduction, Validation and Reporting (continued)
TKN, NH3, NO3 - One digit after decimal point. 17.6 mg/L
D.O. - Two digits after decimal point. 7.35 mg/L
All digits are used in calculations, then are rounded, using the following guidelines.
Numbers following decimals shall be rounded to the next higher or lower number based on this
method.
76
-76-
11.0 Preventive Maintenance Procedures and Schedules
11.1 All laboratory equipment is serviced and professionally calibrated by QC Services on an annual
basis. A service contract is maintained to include annual equipment calibration.
11.2 Routine and professional calibration/maintenance schedules are summarized in Table 11.2.
11.3 Preventive maintenance responsibilities are assigned to specific laboratory personnel. Only the
lab supervisor is allowed to perform other than routine calibration or minor repair.
11.4 A maintenance log is kept in the lab for each instrument. All calibration, repairs and service
visits are recorded an entitled by the responsible party.
77
-77-
11.0 Preventative Maintenance Procedures and Schedules Table 11.2 (Continued)
78
-78-
12.0 Corrective Action Contingencies
12.1 Corrective actions are required as a result of less than acceptable Performance Evaluation study
results, or poor comparison in split sample analyses (State lab results significantly different than
facility results). The steps taken in the corrective action process include:
Usually the lab supervisor is responsible for initiating the corrective action under these
conditions. Documentation of actions taken and their effectiveness is forwarded to the lab
supervisor for review and distribution.
12.2 Corrective actions might also be initiated by an analyst during or after sample analysis. These
actions may be necessary because of
Suspicious positive control results (every few colonies on E Coli. positive control
sample).
QC data outside the warning or control limits for precision and accuracy.
79
-79-
12.0 Corrective Action Contingencies (continued)
Under these conditions the analyst generating the data is expected to initiate and
document corrective action.
12.3 Corrective Actions Required for Specific Problems are Listed in Table 12.4
Table 12.4
80
-80-
13.0 Quality Control Procedures (General)
This section describes the method used at this laboratory to evaluate the quality of data
generated.
Sampling QC checks provide information regarding the precision and accuracy of the
entire process from sample collection through analyses. Included in this category are:
Clean laboratory water is pumped through the Isco sampler. We usually place the
sampler probe in a 4 liter jug of RO/DI water, pump for 10 - 15 seconds, purge for 5
seconds. This process is repeated 2 to 3 times before the equipment blank sample is
collected. This sample is then taken to the lab and processed along with other samples.
Split samples are replicate samples, two aliquots taken from the same sample
container. The samples are then analyzed independently by our own lab and a contract
laboratory. If significant differences are noted the cause is determined and corrected.
81
-81-
13.0 Quality Control Procedures (General) (continued)
Duplicate samples are samples collected at the same location at the same time.
Collection of duplicate samples serves as a check on sampling and processing technique.
Each sample is analyzed individually. Results must be within an acceptable range (10%)
or the cause must be determined and corrected.
Replicate sample are two aliquots taken from the same sample container that are
processed and analyzed separately. The results are used to measure analytical precision
from sample preparation through analysis. Certain analyses are run in replicate every
time the test is performed. A minimum 10% replication schedule is established for all
analyses.
13.2.1 Precision
Precision is a measure of the closeness with which multiple analyses of a sample agree
with each other. We calculate precision from results of replicates and duplicate analyses of
quality control samples.
82
-82-
13.2 Procedures Used to Assess Data Quality (continued)
Here at the WWW Wastewater laboratory we use Relative Percent Difference (RPD) as a
measure of precision. The formula used to calculate RPD is:
If calculated from three or more replicates, we use relative standard deviation rather than
RPD:
'Xi &
('Xi)
n
SD '
n & 1
83
-83-
13.2 Procedures Used to Assess Data Quality (continued)
Control charts are used to demonstrate the precision calculated from replicates
and quality control sample duplicates.
The Relative Percent Difference (RPD) values for each sample are plotted on
control charts and where upper and lower warning and control limits are depicted.
These control charts are used by the analysts to help make them aware of
suspicious or out-of-control variability at the time of analysis. The warning and control
limits are recalculated annually. An example of a control chart cal be found at the end of
the section.
Control limits are defined as the mean + / - 3 standard deviations. An RPD value
that falls outside the control limits is considered out-of-control and requires the analysts
to repeat the analysis immediately. If the repeat value is within the control limit analysis
may continue. If the repeat value exceeds the control limit analysis must stop and the
problem must be corrected.
Warning limits are narrower than control limits and are defined as the mean + / -
2 standard deviations. An RPD value that falls outside the warning limit is considered
suspicious. If two out of three consecutive points exceed a warning limit the analyst
must calculate the RPD on another sample. If the warning limit is exceeded analysis
must stop and the problem must be corrected.
84
-84-
13.2 Procedures Used to Assess Data Quality (continued
13.2.2 Accuracy
Accuracy is expressed as a percent bias or percent recovery and is determined from the
analysis of quality control reference samples or spikes. Method accuracy is calculated on a daily
basis and summarized annually in the Laboratory Quality Assurance Plan.
Percent recovery is calculated from spike results using the following equation:
S&U
% R = 100% x
Csa
(O & T)
% B ' 100 x
T
o:\home\lori\andy\labqc.mnl
85
-85-
Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation
Quality Assurance Guidelines for
Wastewater Treatment Facility Laboratories
1996
Prepared by:
These guidelines have been developed to assist operators and technicians at Vermont
Wastewater Treatment Facilities to prepare acceptable Quality Control Manuals specific to their
facilities. It is further hoped that the guidelines will encourage the implementation of these
procedures. The quality control procedures outlined in this manual represent the minimum
requirements considered acceptable by the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation
for facilities regulated under the NPDES program.
1
-1-
The laboratory quality control manual described in this guidance document is an integral
part of the appropriate quality assurance procedures required of all NPDES regulated facilities
pursuant to Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 122.41 (e) any commercial
laboratory performing analyses for an NPDES regulated facility must certainly meet these
minimum requirements.
To satisfy minimum NPDES requirements a quality control manual must address the
following items. (Each of which will be discussed in detail in the following pages.)
2
-2-
In order to produce a truly useful QA/QC manual a table of contents should be
included. You may also wish to include things such as laboratory utilities information,
electrical supply, compressed air source, etc. or anything that might effect the function of
the laboratory.
This section of the manual simply lists the topics which will be included in your
quality assurance plan. It is basically a table of contents without the page numbers. It
should be the first step in preparing the manual as it will help you to organize your
thoughts and establish distinct sections.
This section of the manual should identify all persons responsible for laboratory
activities from sampling to preparation and signing of the Discharge Monitoring Report.
It should describe the responsibilities of each of the individuals in certain terms;
identifying each individual using that persons name (not just the position - i.e. Andy
Fish, QA coordinator not QA coordinator).
1). The town manager as the person responsible for signing the WR-43.
2) The chief operator as the preparer of the WR-43.
3). Assistant operator as responsible for sample collection.
4) Lab tech - responsible for performing analyses maintaining bench sheets,
3
-3-
assisting in data review etc.
----This clearly shows that the analysts responsibility ends with informing his
supervisor of a problem. It is presumably the chief operators responsibility to determine
the action taken from that point.
An organization chart is very useful in identifying positions (where they fit into
the scheme of things).
This section, besides being useful to inspectors and certification officials can be
very helpful to the person preparing the manual to figure out just what am I trying to
demonstrate in this manual? What am I really after here?
4
-4-
6. To ensure that each sample is tracked from collection time until the report is
finalized - with records maintained for the required intervals. Of course in
addition to simply listing the objectives you might summarize referencing specific
sections of the manual, how these objectives will be met.
5
-5-
V. Sample Handling and Documentation Procedures
A written description of exactly how the samples are handled after collection.
The methods for documentation must be clearly stated. The following items must be
included in this section.
As many of us are painfully aware, the quality of the water we use in rinsing
glassware, preparing reagents and standards, sample dilution, and blank preparations can
be the determining factory between accurate and inaccurate analytical results.
6
-6-
V. Laboratory Water Quality (continued)
In wastewater analysis our main concerns regarding laboratory water quality are
conductivity, chlorine and metals that might interfere with certain analyses (i.e. high
copper level can affect results in the BOD analysis).
Generally accepted monitoring frequencies and limits for those parameters are
listed below.
7
-7-
V. Laboratory Water Quality (continued)
This section of the manual should include a simple step - by step procedure which
details the exact method in which the analysis is performed. It should NOT simply be a
copy of an analytical method from Standard Methods but instead a practical What you
really do to perform this analysis, type of description in an easy to read format.
8
-8-
VII. Standard Operating Procedures - For Each Analytical Method (continued)
Include specific items such as Turn the blender to setting 6 and blend for 5
minutes to get a good homogenous sample or Use only Class A volumetric glassware
from drawer #2.
You may reference an SOP manual to satisfy #5 if you have a separate and
complete manual.
This section of the manual should describe the general procedures for preparation
of reagents and standards. The types of questions that should be addressed include:
1) Grade of materials used i.e. ASC or Analytical Reagent grade chemicals primary
standards, etc.
2) Measuring methods i.e. calibrated analytical balance, class A volumetric
glassware etc.
3) Reagent labeling: Must Include
9
-9-
VIII. Reagent/Standard Quality, Preparation and Traceability (continued)
A. Reagent name
B. Concentration
C. Preparation and Expiration dates and/or received the dates a chemical is
received as well as the date it is opened.
This section should detail the procedures, frequencies and type of calibration as
well as whether it was routine or professionally performed and finally who performed the
calibration.
1) Established frequency of routine calibration for each piece of equipment i.e. daily,
weekly, monthly.
2) Established frequency of professional calibrations for each piece of equipment.
3) Calibration procedures - Standards used, etc.
4) Dates and times calibrations are performed.
5) The name (* not just initials of the person who calibrated the instrument.)
10
-10-
X Data Handling - Reduction Validation and Reporting
Reduction of Data
Data reduction is the process of transforming raw data into final results that are
reported in standard units to some authority. An efficient method of data reduction must
exist to reduce transcription and calculation errors. That methodology, whatever it may
entail, should be described in this section.
Validation of Data
Data validation starts with the analyst. It is usually the analysts responsibility to
ensure that instruments have been properly calibrated and are operating properly. He or
she then records the results on a bench sheet. Generally someone then transfers the data
to another form after, perhaps performing some calculations.
At this point there should be some mechanism in place to ensure that the data has
been accurately transferred and that any calculations were performed properly.
At least one other person beside the analyst should look over and double check
the bench sheet data vs. final results. One or both of these individuals must understand
the concept of significant figures and units of measures.
* More than one technical violation could have been avoided had this knowledge
been applied.
This section should describe the procedure by which data is checked. Specific
responsibilities should be spelled out here.
11
-11-
X Data Handling - Reduction Validation and Reporting (continued)
It would seem reasonable then to involve this person in the data validation
process.
Examples on description of
12
-12-
XI. Preventive Maintenance, Procedures and Schedules (continued)
The old excuse I couldnt report pH results for the month of April because my
pH probe was broken, just isnt acceptable as a defense.
This section must describe procedures for routine and scheduled contract services.
Include:
This section of the manual will outline the steps taken when any portion of the
quality assurance process become questionable or invalid.
13
-13-
XI. Corrective Action (4) (continued)
in the manual and include a reference describing where the actual list(s) is/are
located if you desire.
5) Procedure for informing superiors of other authorities (if applicable).
6) Protocol for resampling and retesting.
Quality control is defined in the 18th edition of Standard Methods for the
Examination of Water and Wastewater, 1992.
Quality control consists of analyzing and reporting the results of quality control
standards, sample duplicates and replicates, spikes and blanks.
EPA recommends that a frequency of 10% to 20% be applied for quality control
measures. That is, for every 5 to 10 samples analyzed there should be one quality control
sample analyzed for each parameter being tested.
14
-14-
XIII. Quality Control Procedures: (continued)
Calibration/ QC Duplicates/
Parameter Standardization Standards Replicates Spikes Blanks
BOD Meter before each use 1/10 Tests 1/10 Tests 1/Yr 1/each
IGGA/Each
if seeded
Nitrate Nitrogen as per method 1/10 Tests 1/10 Tests 1/Yr 1/each
Total Suspended constant weights before and after 1/10 Tests 1/each N/A 1/each
Solids filtering sample
15
-15-
XIII. Quality Control Procedures: (continued)
From the results of analysis of a spike and unspiked sample, percent recovery can
be calculated using the equation:
S&U
% Recovery ' 100% x
Csa
If the Percent Recovery is outside the range of 80% to 100% the contents of the
sample may be interfering with the method of measurement for that analysis.
In this event the cause of the interference must be determined and corrective
actions must be initiated (i.e. change methods, etc.)
* One spike or Quality Control Standard should be run with one of every 10
samples run.
16
-16-
XIII. Quality Control Procedures: (continued)
Quality control standards are substances of known concentration. They are used
to verify the accuracy of your analysis.
1) Must be prepared from a source different than what was used to calibrate
the instrument or prepare the standard curve.
2) The quality control standard must be specific for the parameter being
analyzed.
4) Remember: Quality control standards are not used to adjust the instrument
as are calibration standards. The resulted quality control standards are
simply recorded an compared to the actual known value.
17
-17-
XIII. Quality Control Procedures: (continued)
5) Unless control charts are used to determine the acceptable quality control
standard range. Results of the quality control standard must fall within a
range of 20% of the known value. That is the Percent Error must be
from 80% to 120% of the actual standard
III. Duplicates/Replicates
1) Duplicate samples are samples which are collected in two separate containers at
the same time and place.
2) Replicate samples are samples that are collected in a single container and are
poured off into a second container for separate analyses of the same parameter(s).
4) The result of duplicate/replicate samples should not vary by more than 20% from
the original sample.
18
-18-
III. Duplicates/Replicates (continued)
5) Do not average original and duplicate/replicate results. Record the result of the
original sample. Then record on bench sheets or other appropriate record book
the Percent error for the duplicate/replicate.
If the duplicate/replicate results fall outside the acceptable ( 20%) range of the
original sample a note should be made in the comments section of the WR-43
report form and on the bench sheet. Corrective action should be implemented.
IV. Blanks
19
-19-
XIII. 2B. Quality Control Standards (continued)
For example:
If blank limit values are exceeded a note must be included in the comment section of the
WR-43 report form, and on the bench sheet. In some instances such as in the E. Coli
analysis, this invalidates the sample data. (Check the method info) In any blank
exceedance corrective action contingencies must be implemented.
20
-20-
The following pages contain an
Example QC Manual
21
-21-
Table of Contents
A. Title Page Page 17A
B. Introduction Page 18
1. Quality Assurance Project Plan Elements Page 19
2. Laboratory Staff Organization and Responsibilities Page 20
2.1. Town Manager Page 21
2.2 Chief Operator Page 21
2.3 Lab Supervisor Page 21
2.4 Operators Page 22
. 2.5 Skills and Training Page 22
3.0 Quality Assurance Objectives and Activities Page 23
4.0 Sample Collection Procedures Page 23
4.1 General Guidelines Page 23
4.2 Sample Type and Holding Times Page 24
4.3 Sample Preservation Page 25
5.0 Sample Handling and Documentation Procedures Pages 27 & 28
6.0 Laboratory Water Quality Page 28
6.1 Deionized Water Pages 28 & 29
7.0 Standard Operating Procedure for Each Analytical Method Pages 30
7.1 pH Pages 30 to 32
7.2 Total Residual Chlorine Pages 32 to 35
7.3 Settleable Solids Pages 35 to 36
7.4 Total Suspended Solids Pages 36 to 40
8.0 Reagent/Standard Quality, Preparation and Traceability Pages 40 to 41
9.0 Calibration Procedures and Frequencies Page 41
9.1 Instrument Calibration Procedures Pages 41 to 43
10.0 Data Handling-Reduction, Validation and Reporting Page 43
10.1 Data Reduction Pages 43 to 44
10.2 Data Validation Page 44
10.3 Reporting Pages 45 to 46
11.0 Preventive Maintenance, Procedures and Schedules Page 47
12.0 Corrective Action Contingencies Pages 48 to 49
13.0 Quality Control Procedures (General) Pages 50 to 55
22
-22-
INTRODUCTION
23
-23-
I. Quality Assurance Project Plan Elements
The fourteen Quality Assurance Project Plan Elements addressed in this manual
are:
Title Page
Introduction
Staff Organization and Responsibilities
Quality Assurance Objectives and Activities
Sample Collection Procedures
Sample Handling and Documentation Procedures
Laboratory Water Quality
Standard Operating Procedure for Each Analytical Method
Reagent/Standard Quality Preparation and Traceability
Calibration Procedures and Frequencies
Data Handling - Reduction, Validation and Reporting
Preventive Maintenance, Procedures and Schedules
Corrective Action Contingencies
Quality Control Procedures (General)
24
-24-
2.0 Laboratory Staff Organization and Responsibilities
One employee is dedicated to laboratory work only, while all 5 might perform
daily analyses including pH, Cl2 and settleable solids.
Table I
25
-25-
2.1 Town Manager
The town manager is responsible for signing the WR-43 report form.
Before signing he/she questions the chief operator or to the reports accuracy and
any special comments.
Makes final decision on equipment purchases after conferring with chief operator.
The chief operator is responsible for signing the WR-43 report form as the
preparer.
Transfer all results from bench sheets to the WR-43 report form.
26
-26-
Is responsible for purchasing laboratory equipment.
27
-27-
2.4 Operators
Are properly training and responsible for analysis of pH, Total Residual Chlorine
and Settleable solids when necessary.
EDUCATION
EXPERIENCE
Time & Type
RESPONSIBILITIES
REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIC TO A POSITION
Example:
SPECIAL
NAME POSITION EDUCATION EXPERIENCE SKILL RESPONSIBILITIES REQUIREMENTS
28
-28-
EXAMPLE
f. To ensure that each sample is tracked from collection time until the report is
finalized - with records maintained for the required intervals.
a. Samples are collected in a well mixed area at the center of the channel avoiding
eddies, backwaters and area where settling might take place.
b. Influent samples are collected after the comminuter but above the RAS line. See
Diagram.
c. Effluent samples are collected after all treatment processes just before discharge
to the stream. See Diagram for specific parameters.
29
-29-
4.1 General Guidelines (continued)
d. Grab samples
*Note* E. Coli - collected directly into sterilized 250 ml. Plastic bottle containing
4 drops 10% Sodium Thiosulfate solution.
e. Composite samples
All composite samples consist of 24 disrete samples collected hourly via an Isco
automatic sampler. Each disrete sample (approximately 500 mls) is distributed
into properly cleaned, 1 liter Isco sample bottles. Composite samples are cooled
by ice packs which are placed in the sampler wells. Samples are composited at
the lab based on readings from flow charts.
30
-30-
SAMPLING PROCEDURES
31
-31-
4.3 Sample Preservation
If samples are taken and not run within the time frame as in Chart 9.1 then the following
chart applies.
PRESERVATION CONDITIONS
P = Plastic Bottle
32
-32-
4.4 Sample Collection Location
BETTER : The effluent grab samples for pH and Total Residual Chlorine are
collected at the outfall end of the chlorine contact tank at a point
approximately 1 foot upstream of the v-notch weir.
BEST : The effluent grab samples for pH and Total Residual Chlorine are
collected at the outfall end of the chlorine contact tank at a point
approximately 1 foot upstream of the v-notch weir, in the center of
the channel at a depth of approximately 1 foot. The open container
attached to a 6 foot aluminum pole is lowered into the waste
stream with the open end facing down stream as shown in pictures
#1 and #2.
Picture #1 Picture #2
Be specific and include
descriptions for each different type of sample (re: grab, composite)
33
-33-
5. Sample Handling Documentation Procedures
5.1 All grab samples collected for analysis of pH, Total Residual Chlorine and
Settleable Solids are immediately taken to the lab. The pH and Chlorine analyses
are begun immediately. The settleable solids sample is poured immediately into
the Imhoff cone.
5.2 The grab sample collected for analysis of E. Coli is immediately placed into a
cooler with four blue ice packs and sealed. It is immediately transported by WWW
to WWW laboratory. The approximate travel time is 35 minutes.
Each bottle is properly labeled and accompanied with a chain of custody form.
One copy of the COC form is maintained at the facility.
Immediately after the last 24 disrete sample is collected the entire sampler is
brought into the laboratory where the hourly sample volumes are calculated
measured and poured into a four liter jug. Aliquots are poured from the container
for specific parameters (BOD, TSS etc.) After thorough shaking. Sample
containers are then placed into the refrigerator at 4C until the analysis is
performed.
34
-34-
5. Sample Handling Documentation Procedures (continued)
2) Parameter to be analyzed
5) Preservation information
35
-35-
5. Sample Handling Documentation Procedures (continued)
R/O Deionized water is used in the laboratory for reagent preparation, glassware
rinsing, and BOD dilution water.
36
-36-
6.1 Deionized Water (continued)
R/O system is back flushed daily for one half of an hour. Water for BOD dilution
water and reagent dilution is made fresh after morning flush cycle.
Tubing and associated hardware (if in contact with the water) are replaced as needed.
37
-37-
6.1 Deionized Water (continued)
The quality specifications for this bottled water are included on the product label
and meets all requirements for analytical use.
7.1 pH
7.1 B. Apparatus
pH meter (make and model)
pH temperature probe (type)
Buffer solutions Fisher, NIST certified, 4.0, 7.0, 10.0
Glass beakers (50 ml)
Magnetic stirrer and stir bars
Safety Glasses, gloves
Squeeze bottle for RO/DI water
7.1 C. Standardization
- The meter is standardized before each use with fresh pH 4.0 and 10.0
buffer solutions.
38
-38-
7.1 C. Standardization (continued)
- The pH of a fresh pH 7.0 buffer is checked and the result is recorded in the
QC log.
- If the result of the checked buffer varies by more than .1 standard unit.
The meter is restandardized and the problem is corrected.
- The Fill hole and electrode cap are removed during use and replaced
after each use.
7.1 D. Interferences
39
-39-
7. Standard Operating Procedures for Each Analytical Method (continued)
7.1 F. Procedure
7.1 G. Calculation
40
-40-
7. Standard Operating Procedures for Each Analytical Method (continued)
41
-41-
7.2. Total Residual Chlorine (continued)
7.2 B. Apparatus
7.2 C. Standardization
7.2 D. Interference
42
-42-
7.2 D. Interference (continued)
The sample is collected into an airtight BOD bottle which has been
covered with black electrical tape. The bottle is filled well into the neck
so as to overflow when the ground glass stopper is inserted. Make sure
there are no bubbles in the bottle. It is then taken to the dab for immediate
analysis (within 5 minutes from collection to analysis).
7.2 F. Procedure
Empty the contents of one Total Cl2 powder pillow or packet into
one of the sample cells. Cap and invert 10 - 15 minutes to mix.
Wait 3 minutes.
43
-43-
7.2 F. Procedure (continued)
Using the up and down arrows set the device to mode 5207 (515
nanometers).
Place the cell containing untreated sample (Blank) into the cell
compartment. Close the light shield and press the zero button.
The meter should read 0.00 mg/L.
Place the cell containing treated sample into the cell compartment
and push the read button.
7.2 G. Calculations
1. All reagents are NIST traceable and preparation and expiration dates are
recorded.
44
-44-
7.2 H. Quality Control (continued)
4. Hach Volette Ampule Certified Standards are used daily, and are recorded
as a standard curve for a control chart.
6. Grab samples are recorded at the exact time of sampling and are analyzed
immediately after entering the laboratory. The time of analysis and date
are recorded.
NO HOLD TIME
ml of standard addition
x Chlorine conc. of Vol. Ampule
ml of standard additional % ml of sample
45
-45-
7.3. Settleable Solids
7.3 B. Apparatus
7.3 F. Procedure
Place one liter of well mixed sample into a clean Imhoff cone.
46
-46-
7.3 F. Procedure (continued)
After a total of elapsed time of 60 minutes from the time the sample was
poured. The settled solids are read in ml/liter and recorded.
7.3 G. Calculations
7.4 B. Apparatus
Buchner Funnel
47
-47-
7.4 B. Apparatus (continued)
Rubber stopper (to fit Buchner funnel to 1 liter side arm flask)
Graduated Cylinders
Forceps
48
-48-
7.4. C. Standardization (or more accurately pre-test preparation)
(continued)
7.4. D. Interferences
Dont include large floating particles in the sample unless they are
truly representative of the actual sample conditions.
49
-49-
7.4 E. Sample Preparation and Preservation (continued)
7.4 F. Procedure
1. Prepare the funnel and vacuum apparatus. Make sure the vacuum
is not excessive so as to rip the filter.
3. Seat the filter by rinsing the funnel and filter with about 25 mls of
RO/DI water. Turn on the vacuum pump until DI water is drawn
through the filter.
5. Pour the sample slowly into the center of the filter with the
vacuum on.
50
-50-
7.4 F. Procedure (continued)
- Place the filter into an aluminum weighing pan and place onto the
center rack of the drying oven at 104C for 2 - 3 hours (preferably
overnight).
- Weigh (if the aluminum pan was included in the initial weighing it
must certainly be included in all weighings.)
- Reweigh
7.4 G. Calculations
A & B x 100,000
TSS in mg/L =
C
51
-51-
7.4 G. Calculations (continued)
52
-52-
7.4 H. Quality Control (continued)
53
-53-
7.5 B. Apparatus (continued)
54
-54-
7.5 C. Reagents:
55
-55-
7.5 C. Reagents (continued)
2. Fill 1R graduated Cylinder with DI water and siphon into 3 BOD bottles,
without aerating water.
56
-56-
7.5 D. DO Meter Standardization (continued)
4. Invert bottles until uniform consistency. Let stand until floc settles to
50% bottle volume. Invert a second time and let stand again.
5. Add 2 mls of DO #3, cap and invert until floc is complete gone.
9. Place DO probe into third bottle making sure there are no air bubbles
trapped. Turn knob to zero and adjust until zeroed.
57
-57-
7.5 D. DO Meter Standardization (continued)
11. Let sit 2 minutes and adjust until meter reads average of two Winkler
titrations. If the average DO of the Winkler Titrations and the DO from
the meter differ by more than .5, rerun Winkler. Run samples within 4
hours of calibration.
7.5 E. Interferences
Presence of copper and other metals in the sample can adversely affect results.
It is placed in a warm water bath before analysis until the sample temp
reaches 20 C. The sample is thoroughly mixed just before being poured
58
-58-
7.5 F. Sample Preparation and Preservation (continued)
Seeding - All samples are seeded. The process is described in the Procedure
section 7.5 G.
pH: The sample pH is adjusted to between 6.5 to 7.5 if necessary using sulfuric
acid or sodium hydroxide (usually not necessary).
7.5 G. Procedure
1. Wash 20 R carboy and siphon tubing with micro and rinse very
well with DI water.
ex: 7 samples would require 28R (10 for the first then 3 X 6 = 18
for rest.)
59
-59-
7.5 G. Procedure (continued)
MgSO4
CaCl2
FeCl3
7. Be sure temp. Is 20 to 23 C.
60
-60-
7.5 G. Procedure (continued)
C. Dechlorination of samples.
- 100 ml sample
61
-61-
7.5 G. Procedure (continued)
4. Using standardized 0.00282N FAS, titrate to clear endpoint. Ml
FAS used equals mg/l Cl2.
62
-62-
7.5 G. Procedure (continued)
F. Seeding Chart
Expected Seed BOD mg/l Seed Dilution (%)* Seed (ml) to dilutions +
50 (Polyseed range) 2, 5, 10 20
75 2, 5, 10 15
100 1, 2, 5 8
125 1, 2, 5 8
150 1, 2, 5 6
175 1, 2, 5 6
200 0.51, 2, 5
225 0.5, 1, 2 5
250-400 0.5, 1,2 3
2. Seed Calculation:
0.8 mg/l ml seed used in samples % GGA
x 1000 '
Expected seed BOD mg/l
63
-63-
7.5 G. Procedure (continued)
G. Dilution Technique.
1. BOD rules:
2 mg/l x 1000 ml
' mls sample to dilute 1R
Expected sample BOD
2 mg/l x 1000 ml
' 133 ml to 1R or 13.3%
15 mg/l
64
-64-
1. Add 10 ml GGA ampule to 1R graduated cylinder (gives 2%
GGA).
8. Read DO final after 5 days 3 hours and record both values for
each dilution.
65
-65-
7.5 G. Procedure (continued)
Calculations:
40 mg/l x 15 ml
Example: ' 0.6 mg/l
1000 ml
B. DO depletion:
DO1' Initial DO
Example: 8.20 mg/l & 5.4 mg/l ' 2.8 mg/l (depletion)
66
-66-
7.5 G. Procedure (continued)
Quality Control:
1. Blanks are run as a bottle and dilution water check. Values #0.2 mg/l are
acceptable.
67
-67-
5 Day BOD Data Sheet
Sample Locations:Sample Data Sheet
Lab ID Numbers: 96274 99385
Date & Time Sampled: 10-21-92 10:00 a.m. Date & Time Sample arrived at Lab: 10-
12-92 1:00 pm
Date & Time BOD Setup: 10-21-92 3:00 p.m. Date & Time Final DO Read: 10-26-92
1:00 p.m.
Analyst:
Blank --- --- 8.80 8.75 8.65 8.70 0.10 --- --- ---
GGA 2 20 8.75 4.30 4.25 4.28 4.47 0.46 4.01 200.5
S1 2 20 8.75 8.20 8.20 8.20 0.55 --- --- <2
Depl.
S2 5 50 8.75 7.70 7.65 7.68 1.07 --- --- <2
Depl.
S3 10 100 8.80 6.60 6.40 6.50 2.30 --- --- 23
96274 A 5 20 8.75 6.00 6.05 6.07 2.68 0.46 2.22 44.4
B 10 20 8.75 3.65 3.70 3.67 5.08 0.46 4.62 46.2
C 30 80 <1 <1 --- --- --- --- --- ---
68
-68-
Sample % Dil ml Seed DOI DOF DOF Avg. DO Seed DO BOD
DOF Depl. Factor Depl. mg/l
23 mg/l x 20 mg/l
Seed Factor: ' 0.46 mg/l
1000 ml
69
-69-
5 Day BOD Data Sheet - Continued
70
-70-
8.0 Reagent/Standard Quality, Preparation and Traceability
8.1 All standards and reagents are prepared from reagent grade materials, primary standards or they
are purchased from reputable vendors. Reagents are stored according to manufacturers
instructions and discarded upon expiration. Standards and reagents are prepared using bala
nces that are calibrated daily, Class A volumetric glassware and ASTM Type II reagent water.
Once a solution is prepared it is labeled with the solution name or description, storage
requirements, concentration or normality, preparation and expiration dates and initials of
preparer. Expiration dates for standards and reagents are specified in methods that are adhered
to unless degradation prior to this date is observed. Log books are utilized to record the
preparation of standards.
Quality control reference samples are analyzed along with most analytes, depending upon
availability to validate standards, technique and methodology. Quality control reference samples
are prepared from a different source than that used in the preparation of standards for use in the
standard curve and are US EPA certified, if possible.
71
-71-
9.1 Instrument Calibration Procedures
All instruments and equipment used are routinely calibrated by laboratory personnel or by
external calibration agencies or equipment manufacturers. Maintenance schedules can be found in the
Preventative Maintenance Section of this manual (Section 1.0). Instrument calibration procedures,
frequencies, standards and traceability are summarized in Table 9.2 To insure that instruments have
performed adequately throughout the analysis, it is laboratory practice to run a standard or quality
control reference sample at the end of an extended run.
72
-72-
9.1 Instrument Calibration Procedures (continued)
Table 9.2
2 Point
Calibration
Probe
73
-73-
9.1 Instrument Calibration Procedures (continued)
Table 9.2
Raw data is recorded directly onto bench sheets by the technician who actually
performed the analysis.
If more than one analyst is involved in setting up an analysis or reading results (Ex. BOD
initials DCs determined by one person and final DOs by another) both analysts initial the bench
sheet. All calculations are included on bench sheets.
Only the chief operator can transfer information from the bench sheets to WR-43 report
forms.
74
-74-
Data Handling - Reduction, Validation and Reporting (continued)
The analyst who generates the data has the prime responsibility for its correctness and
completeness. It is the analysts responsibility to verify that the instrument was calibrated and
was performing properly.
The chief operator looks over and double checks the bench sheets. He checks all
calculations, looks to see that all data makes sense and that the numbers were rounded properly
(section 10.5) and that proper significant numbers were recorded (section 10.4).
After transferring the data to the WR-43 report forms he checks for transcription errors.
The assistant operator performs a quick check of bench vs. WR-43 data before the report
is given to the town manager for his signature.
The town manager looks at the WR-43 report form and questions the chief operator
concerning any unusual or suspicious looking result before signing the report. As a rule the
town manager and chief operator meet to discuss the report regardless of whether or not there are
irregularities.
75
-75-
Data Handling - Reduction, Validation and Reporting (continued)
TKN, NH3, NO3 - One digit after decimal point. 17.6 mg/L
D.O. - Two digits after decimal point. 7.35 mg/L
All digits are used in calculations, then are rounded, using the following guidelines.
Numbers following decimals shall be rounded to the next higher or lower number based on this
method.
76
-76-
11.0 Preventive Maintenance Procedures and Schedules
11.1 All laboratory equipment is serviced and professionally calibrated by QC Services on an annual
basis. A service contract is maintained to include annual equipment calibration.
11.2 Routine and professional calibration/maintenance schedules are summarized in Table 11.2.
11.3 Preventive maintenance responsibilities are assigned to specific laboratory personnel. Only the
lab supervisor is allowed to perform other than routine calibration or minor repair.
11.4 A maintenance log is kept in the lab for each instrument. All calibration, repairs and service
visits are recorded an entitled by the responsible party.
77
-77-
11.0 Preventative Maintenance Procedures and Schedules Table 11.2 (Continued)
78
-78-
12.0 Corrective Action Contingencies
12.1 Corrective actions are required as a result of less than acceptable Performance Evaluation study
results, or poor comparison in split sample analyses (State lab results significantly different than
facility results). The steps taken in the corrective action process include:
Usually the lab supervisor is responsible for initiating the corrective action under these
conditions. Documentation of actions taken and their effectiveness is forwarded to the lab
supervisor for review and distribution.
12.2 Corrective actions might also be initiated by an analyst during or after sample analysis. These
actions may be necessary because of
Suspicious positive control results (every few colonies on E Coli. positive control
sample).
QC data outside the warning or control limits for precision and accuracy.
79
-79-
12.0 Corrective Action Contingencies (continued)
Under these conditions the analyst generating the data is expected to initiate and
document corrective action.
12.3 Corrective Actions Required for Specific Problems are Listed in Table 12.4
Table 12.4
80
-80-
13.0 Quality Control Procedures (General)
This section describes the method used at this laboratory to evaluate the quality of data
generated.
Sampling QC checks provide information regarding the precision and accuracy of the
entire process from sample collection through analyses. Included in this category are:
Clean laboratory water is pumped through the Isco sampler. We usually place the
sampler probe in a 4 liter jug of RO/DI water, pump for 10 - 15 seconds, purge for 5
seconds. This process is repeated 2 to 3 times before the equipment blank sample is
collected. This sample is then taken to the lab and processed along with other samples.
Split samples are replicate samples, two aliquots taken from the same sample
container. The samples are then analyzed independently by our own lab and a contract
laboratory. If significant differences are noted the cause is determined and corrected.
81
-81-
13.0 Quality Control Procedures (General) (continued)
Duplicate samples are samples collected at the same location at the same time.
Collection of duplicate samples serves as a check on sampling and processing technique.
Each sample is analyzed individually. Results must be within an acceptable range (10%)
or the cause must be determined and corrected.
Replicate sample are two aliquots taken from the same sample container that are
processed and analyzed separately. The results are used to measure analytical precision
from sample preparation through analysis. Certain analyses are run in replicate every
time the test is performed. A minimum 10% replication schedule is established for all
analyses.
13.2.1 Precision
Precision is a measure of the closeness with which multiple analyses of a sample agree
with each other. We calculate precision from results of replicates and duplicate analyses of
quality control samples.
82
-82-
13.2 Procedures Used to Assess Data Quality (continued)
Here at the WWW Wastewater laboratory we use Relative Percent Difference (RPD) as a
measure of precision. The formula used to calculate RPD is:
If calculated from three or more replicates, we use relative standard deviation rather than
RPD:
'Xi &
('Xi)
n
SD '
n & 1
83
-83-
13.2 Procedures Used to Assess Data Quality (continued)
Control charts are used to demonstrate the precision calculated from replicates
and quality control sample duplicates.
The Relative Percent Difference (RPD) values for each sample are plotted on
control charts and where upper and lower warning and control limits are depicted.
These control charts are used by the analysts to help make them aware of
suspicious or out-of-control variability at the time of analysis. The warning and control
limits are recalculated annually. An example of a control chart cal be found at the end of
the section.
Control limits are defined as the mean + / - 3 standard deviations. An RPD value
that falls outside the control limits is considered out-of-control and requires the analysts
to repeat the analysis immediately. If the repeat value is within the control limit analysis
may continue. If the repeat value exceeds the control limit analysis must stop and the
problem must be corrected.
Warning limits are narrower than control limits and are defined as the mean + / -
2 standard deviations. An RPD value that falls outside the warning limit is considered
suspicious. If two out of three consecutive points exceed a warning limit the analyst
must calculate the RPD on another sample. If the warning limit is exceeded analysis
must stop and the problem must be corrected.
84
-84-
13.2 Procedures Used to Assess Data Quality (continued
13.2.2 Accuracy
Accuracy is expressed as a percent bias or percent recovery and is determined from the
analysis of quality control reference samples or spikes. Method accuracy is calculated on a daily
basis and summarized annually in the Laboratory Quality Assurance Plan.
Percent recovery is calculated from spike results using the following equation:
S&U
% R = 100% x
Csa
(O & T)
% B ' 100 x
T
o:\home\lori\andy\labqc.mnl
85
-85-