The Eriophyidae Mites of California - Keifer 1952
The Eriophyidae Mites of California - Keifer 1952
VOLUME 2, NO. 1
Price $2.00
CALIFORNIA
L O N D O N , ENGLAND
Hostlist ........................... 5
Bib 1iography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
Host index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
L i s t of c o m n names . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
P l a t e symbols . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
L i s t of plates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
Plates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
THE ERIOPHYID MITES OF CALIFORNIA
Introduction
I h i s B u l l e t i n i s t h e r e s u l t of f i f t e e n years would c l a s s i f y these mites a t the present, faces
of intermittent exploration of California f o r t h e prospect of a growing number of species i n the
Friophyid mites. hhen t h e work began i n 1937 t h e large genera, and of broad revisions t o come. B u t
principal species recognized were the r e l a t i v e l y I believe the average type of Eriophyid t o have a l -
few economic species. Ihis s i t u a t i o n not only l e f t ready been p r e t t y w e l l defined, since these mites
an opportunity t o discover and describe new spe- a r e widespread, and ancient i n o r i g i n .
c i e s , i t a l s o demanded t h a t a s many new Eriophyids As w e now know these tiny creatures, they con-
as possible be put i n p r i n t i n order t o erect a s t i t u t e a closed group, s t r u c t u r a l l y pointing t o
taxonomic framework. As a r e s u l t , t h i s sumnary now themselves. On t h e outside, c e r t a i n Phytoptopal-
presents a l i s t of 186 species i n 39 genera. p i d s , by reduction of l e g number, and elongation of
Certain c m o n names a r e current f o r mites of t h e abdomen, would seem t o suggest some r e l a t i o n -
t h i s family. The most usual one is g a l l m i t e . s h i p to Eriophyids. B u t t h i s question needs much
Another term is b l i s t e r m i t e . More specialized f u r t h e r study, and f u r t h e r exploration of the
names a r e bud mite and r u s t mite. 1 am using world f o r intermediate forms.
t h e term Eriophyid m i t e because t h e majority of Ihe Demodecids have been taxonomically asso-
the species do not cause any noticeable i n j u r y t o c i a t e d with Eriophyids. Ihese mites, which are
t h e i r hosts and any name depending on a p a r t i c u l a r animal p a r a s i t e s , have e i g h t stumpy l e g s , which
plant deformation, and used f o r a l l of the mites i n bear claws not s i m i l a r t o those on t h e Eriophyid
t h i s family, emphasizes some c h a r a c t e r i s t i c of but leg.
a small f r a c t i o n of the whole. For example, i f w e Eriophyids average about 1/5 of a millemeter
c a l l these mites b l i s t e r mites, w e are s t r e s s i n g i n length. Iheir main d i s t i n c t i o n i s the presence
the a c t i v i t i e s of Eriophyes pyri alone and i g - of only four l e g s ( I have seen nothing on these
noring t h e remainder. mites t o suggest the f a t e of t h e other two p a i r of
hodern Eriophyid taxonomy o r i g i n a t e s from t h e legs; perhaps some undiscovered form may give the
basis l a i d down by t h e Austrian, Alfred Nalepa. He answer t o t h i s question.) Eriophyids also have the
worked on these mites from 1887 t o 1929, and h i s g e n i t a l i a placed proximally, j u s t behind the coxae.
descriptions were the f i r s t adequate ones. A l l The abdomen i s elongate and its surface is charac-
names given to these mites previous to the begin- t e r i z e d by t h e presence of narrow transverse rings
ning of h i s work a r e r e s t i n g on inadequate de- which a r e typically set with small rounded or
s c r i p t i o n s a t best. I f i t were not f o r the s p e c i f i c pointed bead-like s t r u c t u r e s , here called micro-
hostplant relationships of the species w e could tubercles.
probably hardly recognize any of them, since t h e The Eriophyid chelicerae are a p a i r of s l e n -
authors inadequately described or ignored t h e actu- der s t y l e t s which puncture the plant t i s s u e with-
a l m i t e structure. n e s e pre-Nalepa names a r e most- out causing t h e death, or imnediate death, of the
l y names without descriptions. effected cells. These s t y l e t s rest i n a groove on
It has been my i n t e n t i o n a l l along to build as the dorso-anterior s i d e of the rostrum. ?he ros-
much a s possible on Nalepas foundation. I have trum is a j o i n t e d s t r u c t u r e with what appears t o be
principally added t o h i s generic and higher a r - a basal and an apical j o i n t . Ihe basal j o i n t bears
rangements by u t i l i z i n g t h e beak s t r u c t u r e t o cre- a seta on each s i d e of t h e cheliceral groove. lhere
a t e the, tribe Diptilomiopini; by using t h e s i t u a - is a l s o a subapical seta i n this same position on
t i o n of the dorsal tubercles to erect new genera; t h e d i s t a l j o i n t of t h e rostrum. lhe apex of the
and by elevating t h e s t a t u s of e x t r a s h i e l d and rostrum c o n s i s t s of a p a i r of pads, apparently f o r
abdominal setae to subfamily significance. t h e purposes of conducting s a l i v a t o the chelicerae
\\e have before u s a world t h a t is but s l i g h t l y and sucking up t h e p l a n t juices. Ihese pads bear
explored f o r Eriophyids. This is not surprising, sensory p a p i l l a e on t h e i r r e a r edge. The main
considering the microscopic s i z e of these mites. s t r u c t u r e of t h e rostrum evidently represents what
Not many people understand how t o c o l l e c t Erio- Snodgrass (1948) designated as t h e palps i n the
phyids. Be have l i t e r a t u r e t r e a t i n g a considerable Tetranychidae. For further information 0 1 1 the anat-
number of t h e species t h a t occur i n Europe, and i n omy of these mites s e e Hassan, 1928.
California. B u t with the possible exception of J a - Ihe subfamily and t r i b a l arrangement which I
va, other areas a r e e s s e n t i a l l y blank. Anyone who use is based on what I consider t o be certain fun-
1
2 BULLETIN OF THE CALIFORNIA INSECT SURVEY
damental characters. ' h e r e are four subfamilies i n egg t o the adult takes from about ten days t o two
t h e k e y s . They f i t themselves i n t o a c i r c l e divided Neeks.
i n t o quarters. ' h e v e r t i c a l d i v i s i o n of t h i s c i r c l e B u t Eriophyid l i f e h i s t o r i e s a r e not a l l s i m -
separates the two subfamilies bearing three or four ple. ' h e r e is an explanation, gained through exper-
s h i e l d s e t a e from the two having two or no s h i e l d imental taxonomy, f o r the functions of two types of
setae. l h e horizontal d i v i s i o n separates the worm- females i n c e r t a i n species. But no experimental
l i k e budmites from the fusiform l e a f vagrants or d a t a a r e on hand t o e l u c i d a t e the s i t u a t i o n s i n
rustmites. 'his l a t t e r d i v i s i o n depends primarily complex populations i n l e a f g a l l s .
on whether or not the s h i e l d p r o j e c t s over the ros- I n the case of two types of females i n one
trum base. lhe projection of t h e s h i e l d over the species, t h e condition is known a s deuterogyny.
rostrum base is an important character. M i l e i t is Ijeuterogyny, so f a r a s i t is known, is present only
usually accompanied by t h e presence of broad back i n Phyllocoptine species on deciduous t r e e s and
p l a t e s or t e r g i t e s , i t still c a r r i e s t h e m i t e along shrubs. reuterogynous s p e c i e s have, f i r s t , the p r i -
w i t h a l l other species t h a t have this projection mary form or protogyne, which is the female resem-
even when the broad back p l a t e condition i s not b l i n g the male, t h a t e x i s t s only on the leaves of
present. P l a t e B i l l u s t r a t e s t h e circle arrange- its hostplant. The protogyne and male make up the
ment of the subfamilies and lists the separation p e r f e c t form of t h e species.
criteria. The secondary female ar deutogyne is the i m -
Bud and g a l l mites of the genera Eriophyes and p e r f e c t form and i s s p e c i a l i z e d f o r hibernation
Aceria have evenly ringed, wormlike abdomens, which (including a e s t i v a t i o n i n some cases). Deutogynes
we can c a l l Eriophyiform. Opposed t o t h i s the broad appear i n response to l e a f maturing or the coming
back-plate types a r e PhyZ locoptiform. A l l nymphs of lower f a l l temperatures. They cannot reproduce
with one exception are Eriophyiform. The broad back i n the year t h a t they grow and must q u i t t h e leaves
p l a t e condition and the lack of microtubercles a r e when f u l l y fed, regardless of t h e t i m e of year.
s t r u c t u r a l modifications t h a t e x i s t only i n the ?hey usually become dormant i n bark crevices, but
adult s t a g e s of p a r t of the species, that is, i n some sequester themselves around l a t e r a l buds. h r -
the Phyllocoptinae and Sierraphytoptinae. &Some spe- i n g the s p r i n g these deutogynes come out of h i -
c i e s with the s h i e l d projecting over t h e rostrum bernation and l a y eggs on the new leaves, which
base and classed i n these t w o subfamilies neverthe- eggs hatch i n t o t h e p e r f e c t form of the species.
less have Eriophyiform abdomens. One possible ex- Since t h e d e u t o g p e is an imperfect s t a g e i t
planation i s t h a t the abdominal condition is a is not e n t i r e l y s u i t a b l e f o r taxonomic purposes.
carry-over from the nymphal stage. The keys i n t h i s b u l l e t i n do not take deutogynes
I have systematically disregarded almost a l l i n t o consideration and mst would run t o the wrong
male Eriophyids i n developing the taxonomy of the categories. k u t o g y n e s tend to resemble each oth-
California species. With the exception of t h e geni- er regardless of species or genus. l h u s t h e i r prin-
t a l s t r u c t u r e s (and the males of Anthocoptes punc- c i p a l taxonomic s i g n i f i c a n c e may be to i n d i c a t e
tidorsa and PhyZZocoptes dirorphus 1, males only t r u e r e l a t i o n s h i p between genera and species. The
d i f f e r from the females by being a l i t t l e smaller. account of experiments proving deuterogyny is i n
I have c o n s i s t e n t l y i l l u s t r a t e d c e r t a i n female gen- Eriophyid S t u d i e s XII.
i t a l s t r u c t u r e s lying j u s t under t h e coverflap. Eriophyid mites a r e c r e a t u r e s of perennial
lhese are: 1. the g e n i t a l opening; 2. t h e a n t e r i o r p l a n t s s i n c e annuals do not a f f o r d a s t a b l e b a s i s
projection which I c a l l t h e anterior genital apo- f o r developement and colony founding. h e n an Erio-
deae; 3. two p o s t e r i o r gland-like s t r u c t u r e s sup- phyid k i l l s its host (example: tomato r u s s e t mite)
posed t o be t h e semenile vesicles. 'Ihe apodeme the r e l a t i o n s h i p is unnatural. ne reason back of
appears t o have a c e r t a i n amount of s p e c i f i c s i g - t h i s is t h a t these mites a r e not f a c u l t a t i v e trav-
nificance i n its s t r u c t u r a l variations. However, elers and must depend on forces o u t s i d e t h e i r con-
when t h e g e n i t a l i a are 'appressed' t o t h e coxae, trol t o reach new i n d i v i d u a l s of t h e i r host p l a n t
t h i s apodeme is shortened i n v e n t r a l view and has species.
generic significance. Eriophyid host r e l a t i o n s are intimate and
The student can only examine these i n t e r n a l nearly always show a high degree of s p e c i f i c i t y .
g e n i t a l s t r u c t u r e s i n c h l o r a l hydrate or l a c t i c For t h a t reason a host list is a valuable and nec-
acid media by c u t t i n g the specimen before heat e s s a r y means f o r i d e n t i f y i n g mite species. Part of
t r e a t i n g . Otherwise t h e i n t e r n a l pressures derelop- the m i t e s w i l l go from one p l a n t species t o another
i n g i n the m i t e body invariably blow o u t these i n one p l a n t genus. (Exanrple: Aceria brachytarsus
structures. forms purse g a l l s on both species of black walnuts
Eriophyids have a simple d i r e c t development n a t i v e to C a l i f o r n i a , but w i l l not go t o the im-
a f t e r hatching. 'Ihey pass t h r u t w o nymphal i n s t a r s , ported English walnut.) Sane have a host range ex-
t h e second producing the a d u l t a f t e r a r e s t i n g pe- tending through r e l a t e d p l a n t genera. B u t only the
r i o d or 'pseudopupa'. I n t h i s r e s t i n g stage the b i g beaked plum m i t e (Diptacus gigantorhynchus)
g e n i t a l i a form and protrude through the body w a l l crosses p l a n t family l i n e s , i n California.
(nymphs have the g e n i t a l s e t a e but no e x t e r i o r i n - Most Eriophyids cause no noticeable i n j u r y t o
d i c a t i o n of t h e g e n i t a l organs). Growth from the t h e i r hosts. ?he p l a n t deformations t h a t a minority
THE ERIOPHYID MITES OF CALIFORNIA 3
of the species cause a r e w e l l known. A list of gum arabic. Add no glycerin or water as both have
types of deformations and i n j u r y is a s follows: undesirable r e s u l t s i n t h i s mixture.
1. l e a f d i s c o l o r a t i o n such a s browning or s i l v e r - lhis medium c l e a r s and expands the m i t e s by
ing; 2. l e a f erineum, which is the developement of heating. It is b e s t used a s a bulk recovery f l u i d
patches of h a i r s or p a p i l l a e : 3. l e a f pocketing, f o r simnering i n a small casserole, but is a l s o
such a s bead g a l l s , purse g a l l s ; 4. l e a f b l i s t e r s useable on a s l i d e under a coverslip. ?he casserole
i n which the t i s s u e becomes spongy and d i e s be- method is mainly f o r finding m i t e s preserved with
tween the epidermal l a y e r s ; 5. l e a f f o l d s , diagonal dry p l a n t p a r t s . Pour t h e processed specimens i n
or longitudinal; 6. l e a f edgerolling; 7. l e a f t h i s onto glass s l i d e s and pick out the mites by
s t u n t i n g and l e a f deformation (extending t o the using transmitted l i g h t . Needle them i n t o the f o l -
f r u i t a t times); 8. woody g a l l s around buds; 9. de- lowing mixture which s t a r t s the process of s t a i n
velopment of h a i r s on a l l leaves on an in- s e t t i n g and resorcinol polymerization, and removes
f e s t e d branch; 10. stunted shoots becoming a clus- excess resorcinol.
ter of buds harboring numerous mites; 11. i n one B. Intermediate solution:
case drying of bulbs. 12. bud b l a s t i n g . 1. Table sugar (sucrose) . . . 1.0 gram
Certain g a l l mite species of the Eriophyidae (Or sucrose 0.5 gr. , and
a t t r a c t a t t e n t i o n by the l e a f modifications they glycerin 0.5 cc)
produce. lhese modifications, or g a l l s , a r e char- 3. Chloral hydrate c r y s t a l s . 8.n grams
a c t e r i s t i c f o r t h e m i t e s p e c i e s making them. B u t 3. Potassium iodide . . . . . 0.2 gram
c e r t a i n p l a n t s , harboring g a l l m i t e s , a l s o have 4. Iodine c r y s t a l s . . . . . . 0.35 gram
populations of what appear t o be s t r u c t u r a l l y these Grind i n mortar, t r a n s f e r
same mites, t h a t do not produce g a l l s . Examples to screw-cap v i a l
are: the grape erineum m i t e and t h e grape bud mite; 5. Formaldehyde sol. 1/2 s t r e n g t h
t h e pear l e a f b l i s t e r m i t e and the pear bud m i t e ; 30 drops
and the linden g a l l mite, with c e r t a i n linden trees S c r e w cap down t i g h t l y and warm f o r several hours
t h a t have mites of t h i s same type which never pro- a t 45O C.
duce l e a f g a l l s . Men needling mites i n t o t h i s second medium be
l h e c o l l e c t i o n of Eriophyids i s not as d i f f i - c a r e f u l not t o allow the resorcinol t o become con-
c u l t f i e l d work as one might suppose. A ten-power centrated enough t o j e l l . a s the mites do not sep-
hand l e n s is necessary f o r exploration. P l a n t de- a r a t e r e a d i l y from t h i s J e l l . Ihe mites can be l e f t
formations and i n j u r y a r e t h e e a s i e s t to see and f o r an i n d e f i n i t e period i n t h i s medium, and usual-
draw a t t e n t i o n t o t h e m i t e s causing them, but the l y should be l e f t i n i t f o r a f e w hours a t l e a s t .
most i n t e r e s t i n g Eriophyids, taxonomically, a r e I f mites a r e given t h e s o l u t i o n A treatment, this
those which cause no noticeable a l t e r a t i o n on t h e i r second mixture would be a very s a t i s f a c t o r y medium
hosts. Random searching w i l l usually d i s c l o s e more i n which t o s h i p them i n a v i a l . \%henproperly
mites than one might expect. To find these g a l l - cured i n B, t r a n s f e r the mites t o the following
l e s s species examine buds, p e t i o l e bases, both mixture, which is the permanent mounting medium and
s i d e s of the leaves, and green stems. No Erio- which a t t a i n s a c e r t a i n degree of firmness.
phyids w i l l be found on annuals. C. Final or permanent medium
Wrap w e l l i n f e s t e d p l a n t p a r t s i n s o f t t i s s u e , I. Gun a r a b i c powder . . . . 0 . 5 gram
place i n an envelope bearing the d a t a , e s p e c i a l l y 2. Table sugar . . . . . . . 0.5 gram
the name of the h o s t p l a n t , and allow t o dry. File 3. Chloral hydrate c r y s t a l s 7.0 grams
f o r f u t u r e reference, or send to a s p e c i a l i s t . 4. Potassium iodide c r y s t a l s 0 . 2 gram
Lightly i n f e s t e d p l a n t p a r t s may not be s a t i s f a c - 5. Iodine c r y s t a l s . .0.3 t o 0.35 grams
tory when handled t h i s way, but putting the m i t e s Grind i n mortar, t r a n s f e r
i n alcohol or o t h e r l i q u i d should be avoided a s t o screw-cap v i a l
much a s possible (except as noted below). 6 . Formaldehyde, 1/4 t o 1/2 strength
For the preparation and study of Eriophyids I 18 drops (or more)
recommend the following formulae: Gum a r a b i c w i l l not d i s s o l v e readily i n the above
A. The preparatory solution: mixture. The b e s t method is t o put 2 grams of
1. Gum a r a b i c powder . . . . . 1.0 gram c h l o r a l hydrate i n t h e o r i g i n a l mix, heat a t 450
2. Resorcinol c r y s t a l s . . . . 3.0 grams under a t i g h t l y screwed cap u n t i l the gum is i n
3. Potassium iodide c r y s t a l s . 0.2 gram solution, and then add the rest of t h e c h l o r a l hy-
4. Iodine c r y s t a l s . . .0.2 to 0.35 gram d r a t e . Orient t h e m i t e s by pushing t h e coverslip.
Grind i n mortar, t r a n s f e r As hardening progresses it w i l l be increasingly
powder t o screw-cap v i a l d i f f i c u l t t o t u r n the mites.
5. L a c t i c acid, comnercial I have experimented with g i a n t molecule w a t e r
s o l u t i o n . . . . . . . . 10.0 cc soluble s y n t h e t i c r e s i n s , but t h e i r rubbery nature,
6 . Hydrochloric acid . . . . . 8 drops and t h e f a c t t h a t they imbibe too much w a t e r while
Screw the cap down t i g h t l y and heat i n a 45 C oven dissolving, makes them fundamentally u n s a t i s f a c -
for 4 t o 5 hours, or long enough t o dissolve t h e tory. Gum arabic, i n s p i t e of i t s f a u l t s , is a
4 BULLETIN OF THE CALIFORNIA INSECT SURVEY
small molecule substance and therefore dissolves b o t h e r example concerns the pear r u s t mite,
i n a minimum amount of water. Sugars a r e a l s o which I have named Epitrimerus pirifoliae. Nalepa
based on small molecules. has described Epitrimerus pyri of Europe without
Some remarks a r e a l s o necessary about the mentioning the most s t r i k i n g character of piri-
keys t o genera and species. I n the f i r s t place foliae, namely the prominent l a t e r a l lobes of the
poor preparations o f the mites w i l l not show the shield.
necessary characters. Use of the o i l inunersion A l l specimens r e f e r r e d t o i n t h i s paper t h a t
lens w i l l be necessary t o examine the featherclaws are i n existence are i n t h e c o l l e c t i o n o f the
and skin microtubercles. ' h e characters separating State Gepartment of Agriculture a t Sacramento. I n
the genera should be f a i r l y c l e a r i n most cases. the case of p a r t of t h e records of comnon species
Subdorsal longitudinal furrows may give consider- I have saved no specimens. Before 1942 I was not
able trouble a t times, e s p e c i a l l y on f l a t t e n e d using the formaldehyde medium and a l l specimens
species. I have r e l i e d much on s h i e l d p a t t e r n s i n placed on s l i d e s before then a r e now destroyed.
some of the keys. Shield p a t t e r n s a r e variable, Most of the specimens s i n c e then, i n formaldehyde
frequently being unequal on t h e two s i d e s of the medium, a r e i n existence, and i n tolerably good
same s h i e l d . So the student should study more than condition, although many a r e shriveled.
one specimen. B u t t h e r e is always the host l i s t t o
use f o r a check.
As already s t a t e d , deutogynes will not f i t 'Ihis publication has been possible through
i n t o t h e keys. lhe big-beaked forms w i l l run t o t h e generosity of Drs. E. Gorton Linsley, H. L.
the Giptilomiopini, but t h e o t h e r s w i l l a l l go to Usinger, and A. E. Pritchard of t h e University of
the genera PhyZZocoptes or Vasates. It is possible California Division of Entomology and Parasitology.
t o recognize deutogynes by t h e suppression or Many people have contributed specimens and t h e i r
absence of the microtubercles, p l u s t h e i r associ- names appear under "California records. " My work
ation with the primary forms. on Eriophyids began i n 1937 a t the suggestion of
Much work remains t o be done i n c o r r e l a t i n g D. B. Mackie, who was then Chief of the S t a t e Bu-
the California Eriophyids with the e a r l i e r de- reau of Entomology. I a l s o acknowledge the en-
scribed European species. lhis work cannot proceed couragement of t h e Present Chief of theBureau,
rapidly a t a long distance. An example of t h e need H. M. Armitage. To Dr. A. V. Massee, of the Ebtham-
f o r c o r r e l a t i o n is the s i t u a t i o n of a mite which I stead Experiment S t a t i o n , England, I am indebted
have described a s Aceria parapopuli. "his species for r e p r i n t s otherwise unobtainable. To Edna Willis
has a hump over the caudal lobes, a s t r u c t u r e not G a s k i l l , l i b r a r i a n of the State Department of 4-
mentioned f o r populi Nal. of Europe. ?he two popu- r i c u l t u r e , I am indebted f o r much help i n publish-
l a t i o n s of mites form woody bud g a l l s on poplar i n g a l l of the o r i g i n a l d e s c r i p t i o n s of these
twigs. mites .
Each genus bears a number based on i t s con- For example: Aceria heterothecae bears the
secutive arrangement i n t h e keys. Each species is number 9-24. ?his is t h e 24th species under genus
numbered consecutively under the genus. To f i n d a #9 i n t h e keys. I n t h e t e x t it occurs under h i n
species i n the key note the species number i n the genus #9, Aceria. The i l l u s t r a t i o n is on P l a t e
index. lhis number is also the p l a t e number. To 9-24.
f i n d a species i n the Species Treatment look f o r
the genus nunher and then f i n d t h e species alpha-
b e t i c a l l y arranged.
11. Host List
POLYPOD1 ACEAE Needle vagrant
P t e r i s aquilina lanuginosa ( H ory) ,Bracken 32- 10. Epi trimerus taxodii ( K .
Vagrant on t h e underside of t h e fronds CU PRESSA CEAE
?5-4. Phyl locoptes dimorphus K. Cupressus rnacnabiana Murr., M&ab Cypress
PINACEAE Vagrant on new growth
Abies concolor L. & G . , Fhite f i r 3?-7. Epitrimerus cupressifoliae k.
Needle vagrant on new growth Cupressus macrocarpa Iiartw. , blonterey cypress
3?-4. Epitrimerus abietis K . Tip swellings on the twigs.
Abies magnifica klurr., Red F i r 1-2. Trisetacus cupressi f K . )
Needle vagrant on new growth Vagrant on new growth
7-1. Nalepella e&ae K. 28-1. Cupacarus cuprifestor K .
Cedrus a t l a n t i c a glauca Carr., Glaucus cedar Cupressus s a r g e n t i i Jepson, Sargent cypress
Needle vagrant on new growth Vagrant on new vigorous t i p s
5 - 5 . Phyl locoptes cedri I;. 3?-7. Epitrimerus cupressifoliae li.
Pinus j e f f r e y i Vasey, J e f f r e y pine G p r e s s u s sempervirens L., I t a l i a n cypress
Inhabitant of needle sheaths Vagrant on t h e t i p s
1-1. Trisetacus pini (Pial.) 31-5. Epitrimerus cupressi (K. )
? - I . Setoptus jonesi ( K . ) Juniperus c a l i f o r n i c u s Carr., California
Pinus muricata Ton., Bishop Pine juniper
Inhabitant of needle sheaths Vagrant on vigorous t i p s
3 - 1 . Setoptus jonesi ( K . ) 31-7. Epitr imerus cupressif o l iae K.
Pinus rnurrayana Balfour, Tamarac pine Juniperus chinensis procumbens Ehdl.,
Inhabitant of needle sheaths p r o s t r a t e juniper
30-2. Platyphytoptus mu1 tisternatus K. K i l l i n g twig t i p s
Pinus pinea L . , Stone or urnbrella pine 1-2. Trisetacus cupressi (K.)
Inhabitant of needle sheaths Libocedrus decurrens Torr. , incense cedar
30-1. Platyphytoptus sabinianae K. Vagrant on t h e twigs
Pinus ponderosa h u g l . , Yellow pine 32-8. Epitrimerus liboce.dri ( K . )
Inhabitant of needle sheaths GRAMIN A E
1-1. Trisetacus pini (Nal. Andropogon s p . , a coarse g r a s s
2-1. Setoptus jonesi (K. 1 Vagrant on t h e underside of t h e leaves
30-1. Ptatyphytoptus sabinianae K. 33-2. C a lepi t r imerus andropogonis I(.
Pinus r a d i a t a I b n . , Monterey pine Elymus t r i t i c o i d e s h c k l . , a perennial grass
Inhabitant of needle sheaths Inhabiting t h e longitudinal l e a f furrows
1-1. Trisetacus pini (Nal.) on t h e upper surface, possibly causing
Pinus sabiniana Dougl., Cigger pine some browning
Inhabitant of needle sheaths 17-5. Vasates rnckenziei K.
1-1. Trisetacus pini (Nal.) 20-1. Abacarus hystrix (Nal.)
30-1. Platyphytoptus sabinianae K. CYP ERACEA E
Pinus torreyana Parry, Torrey pine Carex barbarae Dew., Sedge
Inhabitant o f needle sheaths Inhabitant i n t h e l e a f bases
1-1. Trisetacus pini (Nal.) 11-14. Eriophyes caricis K.
2-1. Setoptus jonesi ( K . ) PALMACEAE
30-1. Platyphytoptus sabinianae K. Phoenix d a c t y l i f e t a L., d a t e palm
Pinus tuberculata Gord., Knobcone pine Inhabiting t h e folded center leaves
Inhabitant of needle sheaths 6-1. Mackiella phoenicis K.
30- 1. Platyphytoptus sabinianae K. Trachycarpus excelsa Wendl., Windmill palm
Pseudotsuga t a x i f o l i a (Lamb.1, Douglas f i r Inhabiting t h e folded center leaves
Vagrant on new growth 22-1. Tumescoptes trachycarpi K.
32-9. Epitrimerus pseudotsugae K . LILI ACEAE
Tsuga mertensiana (Bong. 1, Mountain hemlock A l l i u m cepa L., Onion
Vagrant on needles on new growth Living i n t h e bulb between the layers
7-2. Nalepella tsugae K. producing a dry condition
TAXODI ACEAE 9-49. Aceria tulipae ( K . )
Taxodium distichum Rich. Bald Cypress A l l i u m sativum L . , G a r l i c
5
6 BULLETIN OF THE CALIFORNIA INSECT SURVEY
v i n i r e r a L., grape
V l t l s 13-Y. vxypleurrtes glabratae K.
Forming leaf erineum, a l s o i n buds Cornus n u t t a l l i Aud., Flowering dogwood
11-1. Eriophyes uitis (Pgst.) In buds and among seeds
Undersurface leaf vagrant causing 3-2. Phytoptus corniserninis K.
10 BULLETIN OF THE CALIFORNIA INSECT SURVEY
15. Abdominal microtubercles rounded . . . . . 16. 25. Abdominal microtubercles rounded . . . . . 26.
hlicrotubercles d i s t i n c t l y pointed or each Microtubercles pointed m extended i n t o a
bearing a spinule. . . . . . . . . . . . 21. spinule ................ 33.
Tergites not a s broad and graduating evenly t o Flattened species, or dorsal ridges present,
the rear . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6. no c e n t r a l furrow ........... 18.
1. Featherclaw 2-rayed; on e l m . . . . . . . . . .
8. Shield design obsolete; on Unbelliferae ...
........ 16-1. punctidorsa K. (p. 42)
. . . . . . .17-13. eurynotus (Nal.) (p. 44)
Featherclaw 5 or 6-rayed . . . . . . . . . . 2.
Shield design d i s t i n c t .......... 4.
9. Shield strongly d e c l i v i t o u s on front of ante-
2. Featherclaw 6-rayed; . . . .
on Pickeringia
...........
r i o r lobe; on Sol an^
........ 16-2. pickeringiae K. (p. 4) ....... 17-14. destructor (K.) (p. 44)
Featherclaw 5-rayed ............ 3. Anterior s h i e l d lobe tapering to leading edge --
3. Tergites non-tuberculate, s h i e l d with c e n t r a l
.................... .lU.
12. Tergites strongly microtuberculate; on Rhamnus row; on oak . . . 23-1. segundus K. (p. 50)
..... 17-16'. rhamniuagrans ( K . ) (p. 47) Shield hardly keeled, l i n e s broad; on ivy . .
Tergites smooth or nearly so ....... 13. ......... 23-2. hederae (K. 1 (p. 50)
. . . . . . . . . 32-3. p y r i (Nal.) ( p . 55) . 36. Quadracus urticarius (C. & M.) (p. 57 )
Featherclaw 5-rayed; on Abies concolor . . . A t most only s l i g h t subdorsal furrows; no
......... 32-4. abietis K. (p. 54) broad c e n t r a l ridge, t e r g i t e s even i n s i d e
Featherclaw 6-rayed; on Cupressus ...... view .... 37. Rhyncaphytoptus K. (p. 1 9 )
........ 32-5. cupressi ( K . ) (p. 54)
5. Dorsal ridges with wax glands forming lon- 4. Dorsal s e t a e missing . 38. Rhynacus K. ( p . 1 9 )
g i t u d i n a l bands of wax; on Sambucus . . . . Dorsal s e t a e present . 39. Diptacus K. ( p . 1 9 )
. . . . . . . 32-6. trilobus (Nal.) (p. 55)
No d e f i n i t e longitudinal wax s t r i p e s formed, Species of Rhyncaphytoptus
or no wax ............... 6.
1. Fore t i b i a s h o r t e r than tarsus ...... 2.
6. Female coverflap with diagonal f u r r a w . 7. Fore t i b i a as long or longer than tarsus . 3.
- e n i t a l coverflap with numerous s h o r t
Female g
longitudinal streaks . . . . . . . . . . 8. 2. Dorsal tubercules f i n g e r l i k e ; on sycamore . .
7. T e r g i t e s much broader than s t e r n i t e s ; on
.......... 37-1. platani K. (p. 58.)
Dorsal tubercles only moderately produced; on
Cupressus . 32.7. cupressifoliae K. (p. 54) oak ..... 37-2. megarostris ( K . ) ( p . 5 8 )
Tergites but l i t t l e broader than s t e r n i t e s ; on
Libocedrus . . 32.8. Zibocedri (K.) (p:54) 3. T e r g i t e s q u i t e similar t o s t e r n i t e s i n form
and number; coverflap with longitudinal
8. Featherclaw 4-rayed; on Pseudotsuga ..... scoring; on boxelder ............
....... 32-9. pseudotsugae K. (p. 55) ......... 37-3. strigatus K. (p. 59)
Featherclaw 10-rayed; on ToxwIiun ...... T e r g i t e s fewer and broader than s t e r n i t e s . 4.
. . . . . . . . 32-10. tarodii (K.) (p. 55)
4. Microtubercles strongly s p i n e l i k e ; on Kellogg
Species of Calepitrirnerus oak . . . . . . . 37-4. spinifera K. (p. 59)
Microtubercles a t most but moderately spine-
1. Dorsal tubercles produced f i n g e r - l i k e ; feath-
erclaw 5-rayed; i n surface h a i r s on Umbel-
like. ................. 5.
Zularia t i p s 33-1. umbellulariae K. (p. 57) 5. Tergites .smooth, covering 2 or 3 s t e r n i t e s ; on
Dorsal tubercles but moderately raised' . . 2. high mountain w i l l o w . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . 37-5. salicifoliae K. (p. 5 8 )
2. Featherclaw 8-rayed; on Andropogon ...... T e r g i t e s bearing smll spines, a t l e a s t lat-
....... 33-2. d r o p o g o n i s K. (p. 5 6 ) e r a l l y , each cavering 4 t o 5 s t e r n i t e s f o r
Featherclaw 7-rayed; on Amelanchier leaves . . most of body length . . . . . . . . . . . 6.
.......... 33-3. anatis K. (p. 5 6 )
Featherclaw 4-rayed . . . . . . . . . . . . 3. 6. Featherclaw 5-rayed; on e l m .........
. . . . . . . . 37-6. ulniuagrans K. (p. 59 )
3. Central dorsal ridge one h a l f abdominal Featherclaw &rayed; on f i g . . . . . . . . .
length; on apple . 33-4. baileyi K. (p. 56) . . . . . . . . 37-7. ficifoliae K. (p.,58 1
Central ridge two t h i r d s or inore abdomen Featherclaw 9-rayed; on l m l a n d w i l l o w . . . .
length. ................ 4. . . . . . . . . . . 37-8. acilius K. (p. 5 8 )
4. Shield design obscure, large area of l a t e r a l
granulations; on Artemisia heterophylla . . Species of Rhynacus
........ 33-5. carinijerus K. (p. 56) 1. T e r g i t e s broader than and d i s t i n c t l y less
The admedian lines and some others d i s t i n c t
..................... nuraerous than s t e r n i t e s ; on manzanita ...
5. . . . . . . 38-1. arctostaphyli (K.) (p. 60)
Tergites and s t e r n i t e s about same number and
5. Admedian l i n e s forking between the d o r s a l tu- s t r u c t u r e ; on Rubus . . . . . . . . . . . .
bercles; on grape 33-6. uitis ( N a l . ) (p. 57) . . . . . . . . 38-2. abronius (K.) (p. 59)
Admedian lines curving outward between the
dorsal tubercles; M Crataegus ....... Species of Diptacus
. . . . . . . . 33-7. arkatus (Nal.) (p. 56) I. Dorsal tubercles s l i g h t l y produced, the s e t a e
Diptilorniopini, Key to Genera s h o r t ; a n t e r i o r s h i e l d lobe s h o r t ; design on
s h i e l d n e t - l i k e ; on plum, peach, blackberry,
1. Featherclaw silrple . . . . . . . . . . . . 2. grape and other hosts ...........
Featherclaw divided . . . . . . . . . . . 4. . . . . 39-1. gigantorhynchus (Nal.) (p. 60)
Dorsal tubercles f i n g e r - l i k e ; a n t e r i o r s h i e l d
2. No d o r s a l setae . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . lobe produced w e l l over rcxitrm . . . . . 2.
. . . . . . 35. Asetacus nadronae K. (p. 57)
Dorsal setae present . . . . . . . . . . . 3. 2. Median s h i e l d line 3/4 as long as s h i e l d ; on
a l d e r . . . . 39-2. sacrarnentae (K.) (p. 6 0 )
3. Broad mid-dorsal abdominal ridge, t h e t e r g i t e s Median line i n d i s t i n c t ; on native Corylus . .
uneven i n lateral view . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39-3. caZicoryZi (K.) (p. 6 0 )
IV. Discussion of Species
Phytoptus pini Nalepa. Ab. &ad. Wiss. math-nat. Setoptus jorresi (K.) (2-1)
Wien. V 96, p. 133, 1887 P l a t e 2-1
Eriophyes p i n i (Nal.) Keifer, BCDA V . 27, p. 182,
1938 Platyphytoptus jonesi Keifer, BCDA V . 27, p. 189,
Type l o c a l i t y : Austria 1938
Type host: Pinus s y l v e s t r i s L. Type l o c a l i t y : Torrey Pines
Additional hosts: Pinus spp. Type host: Pinus torreyana Parry
Cannon name: Pine bud m i t e (approved) Additional hosts: Pinus j e f f r e y i Vasey; P . mcrri-
Relation t o host: In California the mites inhab- cata Don; P. ponderosa Dougl.
it the needle sheaths and have occasionally Canmon name: Torrey pine sheath m i t e
been found t o cause yellowing of the needles. Relation t o host: The m i t e s inhabit the needle
In Europe on the type host t h i s species pro- sheaths with no apparent damage t o their hosts.
duces twig enlargements. Discussion: This is t h e l a r g e s t Eriophyid i n Cal-
Discussion: 'Ihis mite is widely d i s t r i b u t e d , ap- i f o r n i a . It is widely d i s t r i b u t e d although
parently by n a t u r a l means. It occurs on any search has f a i l e d t o indicate t h a t i t inhabits
pine i n California t h a t has M adequate needle Monterey pine i n its three mainland stands:
20
THE ERIOPHYID h1ITE.S OF CALIFORNIA 21
Cambria, Monterey and An0 Nuevo Point. I t oc- No damage would seem t o r e s u l t from the a c t i v -
curs north and south of these l o c a l i t i e s , i t i e s of the mite.
hcwever.
California records:
California records : EL h A W a.: Riverton, RII-24-1938 (HHK)
MADOR CO.: Lumber Yard S t a t i o n , VIII-17-1947
(HHK)
El. DORAW CO.: Twin Bridges, E-9-1945 (HHK) Pbyfoptzrs bedericola K . (3-3)
MARIN CO.: Inverness, vII-1939 (HHK) P l a t e 3-3
SAN D I E 0 0.: Torrey Pines, E-7-1937
(M. L. Jones) Phytoptus hedericola Keifer, D A V . 32, p. 212,
1943
Genus 3. Pbytoptm Dujardin, 1851 Type l o c a l i t y : San Mateo
Type host: Hedera helix L., English Ivy
Ann. Sci. nat. ser. 3, V. 15, p. 166, 1851 Comncn name: Ivy budmite
Type of genus: Phytoptus avellanae Nal., Keifer, Relation t o host: 'Ihe m i t e s inhabit the buds and
V. 27, p. 301, 1938 cause s t u n t i n g of the leaves. ckt dwarf potted
ivy t h i s mite produces severe s t u n t i n g of the
Pbytoptru avellaiiae Nal. (3-1) shoots .
P l a t e 3-1
California records:
Phytoptus avellanae Nalepa, Sb. Akad. Wiss. math- Los ANGELES CO. : Montebe110, IX-15-1942
nat. Wien, V. 98, p. 126, 1889 (V. E. W i l l i a m )
Type l o c a l i t y : A u s t r i a SAN MATE0 CO.: %n Mateo, XII-26-1942 (HHK)
Type host: Corylus aveZlma L . , F i l b e r t
Comnon name: F i l b e r t bud m i t e (approved)
Relation t o host: The mites overwinter i n the t e r - Genus 4. Anchiphytopttcs Keifer, 1952
minal buds and change them i n t o an enlarged
s t r u c t u r e which is a gall and is known as "big BCS)A V. 41, p. 31, 1952
bud". During the surmer the nymphs apparently Type of genus: Anchiphytoptus lineatus K.
e x i s t i n t w o f o r m . ?he one resembling the
a d u l t is found i n the buds. The one on the un- At~cbiphytoptzrslivzeatus K. (4-1)
derside of the leaves is of a form which could P l a t e 4-1
not be expected f o r t h i s type of m i t e s i n c e
t h i s nymph resembles Oxypleurites m i t e s . Anchiphytoptus lineatus Keifer, BCaA V. 41, p. 31,
Discussion: The m i t e is widely d i s t r i b u t e d on its 1952
host, and m c u r s on what is probably a n a t i v e Type l o c a l i t y : Rocky Camp, Hat Creek
Corylus in t h e Eastern United States. Vallot i n Type host: Cercocarpus ledifolius Nutt., Mountain
1836 named t h i s m i t e Acarus pseudogallarum : mhogany
Mem. Ac. Dijon p. 189. Relation t o host: 'his species is presumably a
budmite. It was recovered from dry sections of
Ca 1i f ornia records : t h e host p l a n t while the writer was studying
BUTI%: CO.: Paradise V-16-1939 (A. E. h v e y ) the leaf vagrant, T. cercocarpi, on t h i s host.
Mackiella phoenicis K. (6-1) Nalepella ednae Keifer, BCM V. 40, p. 93, 1951
P l a t e 6-1 Type l o c a l i t y : Twin Bridges
Type host: Abies magnifica Murr., red f i r
Mackiella phoenicis Keifer, m A V. 28, p. 147, Relation t o host: The mites are needle vagrants on
1939 the c u r r e n t season's growth, becoming more nu-
'Type l o c a l i t y : Indio rnerous i n l a t e sumner.
Type host: Phoenix dactylifera L., d a t e p a l m
Comnon name: Date p a l m budmite C a l i f o r n i a records:
Relation t o host: The mites l i v e between the s u r - EL co. : Twin k i d g e s , M-1-1946 (HHK);
faces of the folded fronds as they rise out of Fallen k a f Lake, M-11-1947
the bud. No apparent damage has ever been
noted. Nalepella tsrrgae K. (7-2)
Discussion: 'Ihis mite is without doubt of Old P l a t e 7-2
World o r i g i n , but apparently no one has ever
searched f o r it on date palm i n its n a t i v e Nalepella tsugae Keifer, BCM V. 40, p. 94, 1951
h a b i t a t . To c o l l e c t the mite t h e c o l l e c t o r Type l o c a l i t y : Lassen National Park, 8000 f e e t
must c u t away the numerous sharp spines 'to g e t e l e v a t ion.
t o the folded leaves. Type host: Tsuga mertensiana Bong., Mamtain
hemlock
California records: Fielation t o host: The mites a r e vagrants on the new
RIVERSIDE CO. : Indio, x-
10-1938 (HHK) growth.
SOLNO CO.: Winters d i s t r i c t (Wolfskill
Ranch), V-3-1945 (HHK) California record:
S H A S T A CO. : Lassen National Park, VIII-22-1949
Genus 7. Nalepella Keifer, 1944 (HHK 1
Liiscussion: The writer has not seen the type of with the d o r s a l setae projecting d i r e c t l y back-
the genus and has no information on it except wards from t u b e r c l e s on the r e a r margin of the
through Nalepas publications. Nalepa used the s h i e l d . The long a x i s of these d o r s a l tubercles
genus for s h o r t , stocky mites, and then d i s - is transverse t o the d i r e c t i o n of i n c l i n a t i o n .
carded it when t h i s viewpoint became untenable. I n Aceria t h i s a x i s is transverse t o the body
The lack of dorsal s e t a e did not impress him a s length. I n some genera the d o r s a l tubercles are
anything more than a s p e c i f i c character. s i t u a t e d near the r e a r s h i e l d margin but have
t h e i r long a x i s p a r a l l e l t o the body length,
d i r e c t i n g the d o r s a l s e t a e up and c e n t r a l l y .
Cecidophyes malpi~hiauus (C.& M.) (8-1)
P l a t e 8-1
Aceria abalis (K.)(9-36)
Phytop tus malpighianus Canestrini and Massalongo, P l a t e 9-36
EM. SOC.Veneto-Trent. V. 5, p. 127, 1e93;
Eriophyes at. Keifer, Bca4 V. 28, p. 334, 1930 Eriophyes abalis Keifer, BCDA V. 29, p. 25, 194@
Type l o c a l i t y : I t a l y Type l o c a l i t y : Sacramento
Type host: Laurus nobilis L . , Grecian l a u r e l Type host: Artemisia heterophytla Nutt., womood
Common name: Laurel budmite Relation t o host: The m i t e s cause erineum pockets
Helation to host: The m i t e s i n h a b i t t h e buds and on t h e undersides of t h e leaves. n e s e pockets
opening flowers. In the latter p o s i t i o n they bulge out on t h e upper surface. ?he e x t r a
may cause b l a s t i n g of the f l a v e r parts, or de- growth of h a i r mikes the pockets white below.
formation. I n f e s t a t i o n s would seem t o remain Discussion: This mite is undoubtedly close t o
localized on t h e i n f e s t e d l a u r e l s , however. Aceria artenisiae (Can.) of Europe.
Discussion: The o r i g i n a l d e s c r i p t i o n does not pre-
c i s e l y match our Sacramento specimens. There Ca 1i f o r n i a record :
seems t o be a complex of t h i s type of m i t e i n SACRAMWW CO. : Sacramento, X-19-1939 (HHK)
the Mediterranean region, l a u r e l leaves from
I s r a e l bearing erineurn having a very s i m i l a r
m i t e on them. Aceria alleurolfeae K. (9-43.1)
P l a t e 9-43.1
C a l i f o r n i a record:
SACFiAMIPIZO CO. : Sacramento, IV-6-1939 (HHK) Aceria allenrolfeae Keifer, BCDA V. 41, p. 67,
1952
Type l o c a l i t y : Wheeler Hidge a r e a of Kern County
Cecidophyes verilicis (K.) (8-2) Type host: Allenrolfea occidentalis (Wats.),
P l a t e 8-2
Iodine bush
Additional host: Salicornia s p . , pickleweed
Eriophyes verilicis Keifer, BcIy\ V. 28, p. 418,
Relation t o host: The m i t e s l i v e i n the crevices
1939 betmeen the j o i n t s , and in t h e flower heads. In
Type l o c a l i t y : Sacramento
these locations they usually produce a s l i g h t
Type host: Ilex aquifolim L., h o l l y
browning and s h r i v e l i n g of t h e tissue.
Relation t o host: ?he mites l i v e i n the buds and
under the f r u i t buttons.
C a l i f o r n i a records :
KERN CO. : Wheeler Ridge d i s t r i c t , XI-18-1951
C a l i f o r n i a records :
(HHK1
ALAMEDA CO. : Berkeley, 111-15-1939
SAN DIEGO CO. I Oceanside, X-2-1951, (HHK)
(G. B. Ling)
SACRAMENZO CO. : Sacramento, VI-21-1939 (HHK)
Aceria aloiiiis (K.)(9-46)
P l a t e 9-46
Genus 9. Aceria Keifer, 1944
Eriophyes aloinis K e i f e r , BCDA v. 30, p. 205, 1941
Bul. Cal. Dept. Agr. V. 33, p. 22, 1944 Type l o c a l i t y : North Hollpood
Type of Genus: Aceria tulipae K . , BCIM v. 27, Type host: Aloe spinossissina, a l o e
p. 185, 1938 Additional host: Haworthia sp.
Discussion: This genus accomnodates worm-like mites Comnon name: Aloe wart m i t e .
24. BULLETIN OF THE CALIFORNIA INSECT SURVEY
Relation t o host: On aloe the mite produces a of Baccharis which is comnon t o dry washes i n
large mass of d i s f i g u r i n g warts on the inner northern C a l i f o r n i a . The other host is the same
base of the leaves. The minute purple mites s o r t of thing but confined t o the south.
l i v e i n the crevices formed by the warts. The
wart mass is e n t i r e l y out of proportion t o the C a l i f o r n i a records:
s i z e of the c a u s i t i v e organism. BU'ITE CO.: ,-C XI-23-1944 (H. G. White)
KFRN CO.: Ebkersfield, 1-14-1946 (B. L. Fox)
C a l i f o r n i a records: L o 6 ANGELES CO. : Glendale, VIII-12-1941
LOS ANGELES C O . : h r b a n k , IV-13-1944: &
G (V. E. Williams)
d a l e , IV-15-1942 (L. E. Myers); ?L RIVERSIDE CO. : Riverside, 1938
Angeles, XII-12-1940 (V. E. Williams); (K. E. Maxwell)
North Hollywood, XI-18-1940 (W); R 2 - SAN MATE0 CO.: k l m o n t , V-31-1947
do Beach, 11-25-1942; Van Nuys, IV-24-1944 VENRJRA C O . : Santa Faula, VIII-8-193O
SAN DIEGO CO.: P a c i f i c Beach, XII-9-1940 (E. L. Smith)
(T. Aller): San Diego, E-16-1944
(D. F. Palmer)
SANTA BARBARA CO. : Santa Barbara, VII-24-194i Aceria heevori K. (9-38)
(H. S. Cumnings) P l a t e 9-38
C a l i f o r n i a records:
vmmw cO. : Wheeler Canyon, Santa Paula, Aceria boycei (K.) (9-22)
X-4-1939 (Cyril Gamnon) P l a t e 9-22
YOLO CO.: Davis, X-10-1939 (HHK)
Eriophyes boycei K e i f e r , BCDA V . 32, p. 213, 1943
Type l o c a l i t y : Fillmore
Type host: Ambrosia psilostachya D C . , western
ragweed
Aceria haccharices K. (9-37) h e l a t i o n t o host: I h e mites form numerous bead
P l a t e 9-37 g a l l s on the terminal leaves.
Discussion: This m i t e does not occur on the same
Aceria baccharices Keifer, BCW V . 34, p. 139, host i n northern C a l i f o r n i c a .
1945
Type l o c a l i t y : Chic0 Ca 1i f o r n i a record :
Type host: Baccharis uirninea E., mule f a t , the VFNTUFtA CO.: Fillmore, VIII-8-1940
northern p l a n t (A. M. Ebyce)
Additional host: Baccharis glutinosa Fers., the
southern plant Aceria brachytarsus (K.) (9-7)
Comnon name: Baccharis gallmite P l a t e 0-7
Relation t o host: ' h e mites produce bead g a l l s on
the leaves with the opening on the under sur- Eriophyes brevitarsus Keifer, BCDA V . 28, p. 224,
face. A t times these galls a r e numerous enough 1939
t o deform the leaves. Eriophyes brachytarsus Keifer, Ea4 V . 28, p. 328,
Discussion: ?he type host is the long-leaf type 1939
THE ERIOPHYID MITES OF CALIFORNIA 25
Eriophyes cactorur Keifer, BIJ# V. 27, p. 185, Eriophyes calibaccharis Keifer, BCDA V. 28, p.
1938 331, 1939
Type l o c a l i t y : Santa Paula Type l o c a l i t y : Stanford Campus
Type host: *ita sp. (occidentalis Engelm.?), Type host: Baccharis pilularis DC., chaparral
cactus broom
Relation t o host: The mites a r e most e a s i l y found Relation t o host: 'Ihe m i t e s occur along l a t e r a l
i n developing flowers. They a l s o occur around buds on the s t e m below the terminal area w h e r e
new pads. there is too much v i s c i d i t y .
26 BULLETIN OF THE CALIFORNIA INSECT SURVEY
Type host: Fraxinus excelsior L. ash the leaf bases on the lower p a r t of the sea-
California host: Fraxinus oregona N u t t . , Oregon son's current growth.
ash
Comnon name: Ash g a l l mite California record:
Helation t o host: The mites cause the formation of LC6 ANGELES CO.: Harbor city, IV-6-1939
rough hanging b a l l s i n the f r u i t i n g bodies. (L. E. Myers)
Nalepa's term for these is 'klunkern.' The spe-
cies evidently ranges around the northern
hemisphere. Aceria heterothecae ( K . ) (9-24)
Discussion: The only tree t h a t the writer has seen P l a t e 9-24
infested i n California was a tree in Capitol
Park, labelled Fraxinus oregona, which has re- Eriophyes heterothecae Keifer, BcDA V. 28, p.
cently been removed. The above indicated synon- 330, 1939
ymy probably does not e n t i r e l y settle t h e ques- Type l o c a l i t y : E l Monte
tion, as fraxini and f r a x i n i f l o r a are essen- Type host: Heterotheca grandiflora Nutt.,
t i a l l y nude narnes. Ferhaps Nalepa validated telegraph weed
fraxini i n h i s 1898 publicaticm. Relation to host: The m i t e s inhabit t h e l e a f
bases and t h e surface h a i r s cm leaves and
California record: stems.
SACRAMENTO CO. : Sacramento, x-3-1944 (HHK)
California record:
LOS ANGELES CO. : E l h n t e , IV-25-1939
Aceria granati ( C . & M.) (9-20) (V. E. Williams)
P l a t e 9-20
Aceria haplopappi (K.) (9-42) Eriophyes larreac Keifer, BCDA V . 29, p. 26, 1940
P l a t e 9-42 Type l o c a l i t y : Whitewater
Type host: Larrea tridentata glutinosa Rydb.,
Eriophyes haplopappi Keifer, BCDA v. 28, p. 331, Creosote bush
1939 Relation t o host: "he mites l i v e under t h e bruwn
Type l o c a l i t y : Harbor City scales a t the petiole bases.
Type host: Haplopappus venetus f l I H ( . , an Aster- Discussion: This plant is extreraely viscid and it
aceous Composite is remarkable t h a t it could harbor an Eriophyid
Relation t o host: The mites inhabit the a r e a on The mites have picked about the m l y non-sticky
the p l a n t of l e a s t v i c i d i t y and can be found i n place on new growth in which t o e x i s t .
30 BULLETIN OF THE CALIFORNIA INSECT SURVEY
Relation t o host: 'Ihe mites produce bud clusters C(1NIRA COSTA CO. : Martinez, V-17-1940
on the stems, s t u n t i n g the graarth a t that (V. G. Stevens)
point. b l i n e a . 11-6-1949
FRESiO CO. : V'
LOS ANGELES CO. ! bs h g e l e s , E-10-1938
California records: (R. H. Smith)
LOS ANGELES CO.: Val Verde, X-4-1951 SACRAMMXI CO.: Sacramento, VI-10-1938 (HHK)
(L. E. Myers & "K) TULARE CO.: V i s a l i a , VIII-1939 (F. T. S c o t t )
SAN BERNARDINO CO.: h v o r e d i s t r i c t , VI-28-
1946 (J. B. Steinweden & HHK)
Aceria magitoliae (K.) (9-44)
P l a t e 9-44
Aceria ligustri (K.) (9-17) Eriophyes magnoliae Keifer, BCDA V. 28, p. 335,
P l a t e 9-17 1939
Type l o c a l i t y : Sacramento
Eriophyes Zigustri Keifer, BUM V. 32, p. 213, Type host: Magnolia fraseri Walt., a park tree
1943 Relation t o hast: The mites inhabit the buds and
Type l o c a l i t y : Sacramento may be found i n the h a i r around the flwier
Type host: Ligustrum oualifolium Hassk., p r i v e t buds.
Gnmnan name: P r i v e t bud m i t e Discussion: The native home of t h i s mite is pre-
Relation to host: The m i t e s inhabit the buds. sumably the native home of its host. A t t h i s
w r i t i n g the trees a r e still standing.
California record:
SACRAMWTO CO. : Sacramento, wI-1943 (HHK) GIl i f o r n i a record:
SACRAMB(TO CO. : %cramento, I I I - 2 - 1939 (HHK)
(V. Daniels)
S i e r r a Madre, 111-24-1952 Aceria pezicedani (Can.) (9-21)
(V. Daniels) P l a t e 9-21
Van Nuys , 111-24-1952
(L. E. Myers) Phytoptus peucedani Canestrini, A t t i SOC. Veneto-
THE ERIOPHYID MITES OF CALIFORNIA 33
Ca 1i f orn i a record :
Paraphytoptus iizaequalis K. (10-7) RIVERSIDE CO. : Riverside, x- 11-1938 (HHK)
P l a t e 10-7
Paraphytoptus inaequalis Keifer, D A V. 27, p. Genus 11. Eriophyes von Siebold, 1850
304, 1938
Type l o c a l i t y : Sacramento, VI-20-1938 (HHK) Jahresber. Schles. Ges. V. 28, p. 89, 1850
Type host: Artenisia heterophyZZa Nutt., worm- Type of genus: Eriophyes uitis (Pgst.) Keifer.
wood EKT)A V. 27, p. 301, 1938
Helation t o host: The mites l i v e among t h e h a i r s Discussion: This genus d i f f e r s from Aceria by the
on the underside of the leaves and along t h e i n c l i n a t i o n of t h e dorsal tubercles which d i -
stems. r e c t s the dorsal s e t a e up and ahead, or c e n t r a l -
ly. These tubercles a r e usually set a l i t t l e
California records: ahead of the r e a r s h i e l d margin.
BW"E CO.: Honcut, VIII-3-1941 (HHK)
SACRAMENTO CO. : Sacranrento, VI-20-1938 (HHK)
Eriophyes breechii K. (1 1-6)
Paraphytoptus mcgregori K. (10-3) P l a t e 11-6
P l a t e 10-3
Paraphytoptus mcgregori Keifer, BCDA V. 28, e- Eriophyes breechii Keifer, BCa9 V. 28, p. 416,
228, 1939 1939
36 BULLETIN OF THE CALIFORNIA INSECT SURVEY
Eriophyes caricis Keifer, BCDA V . 33, p. 22, 1944 Eriophyes heteromeles K. (11-10)
Type l o c a l i t y : Sacramento P l a t e 11-10
'Type host: Carex barbarae Dew., sedge
Helation t o host: The mites l i v e down i n t h e bases Eriophyes heteromeles Keifer, BCDA V 28, p. 226,
of the leaves which a r e wrappd around the s t e m 1939
and where the t i s s u e is turning fran yellou t o Type l o c a l i t y : Sacramento
green. Type host: Photinia arbutifolia Lindl., Toyon or
Discussion: h h i l e t h i s is the only North American Christmas berry
l o c a l i t y on record, Roivainen (1951) r e p o r t s it Relation to host: 'Ihe m i t e s l i v e around the ter--
from Sweden and Finland on Carex ericetorum L., minal buds
and C. panicea L. California record:
SACRAMMTO CO. : Sacramento. 1-24-1939 (HHK)
C a l i f o r n i a record:
SACRAMENTO CO. : Sacramento, E-19-1943 (HHK) Eriophyes ilicifoliae K. (11-8)
P l a t e 11-8
Eriophyes coizvolveizs (Nal.) (11-12) Eriophyes ilicifoliae Keifer, BCDA V. 30, p. 204,
P l a t e 11-12 1941
Type l o c a l i t y : Rockville
Cecidophyes convolvens Nalepa, Anz. Akad. Wiss. Type host: Prunus ilicifolia Walp., holly-leaf
math-nat, Wien, V. 26, p. 162, 1889 cherry
Type l o c a l i t y : Austria R e l a t i o n t o host: The m i t e s w e r e c o l l e c t e d i n a
Type host: Euonymus europa L. sparse population i n the terminal buds.
THE ERIOPHYID MITES OF CALIFORNIA 37
Discussion: A mite which produces g a l l s on the Eriophyes prunandersoni Keifer, FKlN V. 28, p . 416,
leaves of Chamise, Adenostoma fasciculatun 1939
H. & A., seems t o be indistinguishable from Type l o c a l i t y : Coleville
t h i s mite. "he cherry shrubs from which the Type host: Prunus andersoni Gray, d e s e r t peach
m i t e s cam grow i n the v i c i n i t y of a h i l l t o p of Relation t o host: "he mites cause a baggy depres-
chemise. This Adenostona -ins t o be inves- sion i n t h e leaves in which erineum develops.
tigated f o r the presence of l e a f galls. How-
ever, Adenostona growing across the Sacramento California record:
Valley near Shingle Springs i n E l Dorado MCNO CO. : Coleville, VI-13-1939 (E. A. Breech)
County, is heavily infested with the g a l l m i t e .
Mites from these Shingle Springs shrubs are
exceedingly s i m i l a r t o those from t h e holly- Eriophyes pyri (Pgst.) (11-7)
leaf cherry. It is possible t h a t t h i s cherry is P l a t e 11-7
but a casual host of the mite and t h a t Ade-
nostoma may be the primary host. Phytoptus (?) pyri Pagenstecher, Verh. Ver.
Heidelb. V. 1, p. 48, 1857
California record: Type l o c a l i t y : Germany
SOLANO CO. : Rockville, IX-17-1940 (HHK) Type host: Pyrus communis L., pear
Additional hosts: see discussion
Comnon name: Pear l e a f b l i s t e r mite (approved)
Eriophyes laevis (Nal.) (11-3) Relation t o host: "he mites typically form ' b l i s -
P l a t e 11-3 ters' i n t h e leaves. These b l i s t e r s open on
t h e under surface and consist of an area of
Phytoptus laevis Nalepa, Sb. Akad. Wiss. math-nat. dead and shrunken tissue. The mites feed on
Wien, V. 98, p. 132, 1889 the periphery of t h i s dead t i s s u e . The so-
Eriophyes Zaeuis (Nal.), Das T i e r r e i c h , 4th Issue: c a l l e d ' pear budmite' i s s t r u c t u r a l l y the same
Acarina, p. 7 , Berlin, 1898 a s the b l i s t e r mite, but does not make the b l i s -
Eriophyes rhombifoliae Hassan ( ? ) , UC h b l . in ters. These mites overwinter i n the terminal
Ent. V. 4, p. 381, 1928 buds and when numerous enough w i l l blacken and
Eriophyes narinalni Keifer, BCDA V.28, p. 223,1939 destroy t h e tender developing bud p a r t s i n t h e
Type l o c a l i t y : Austria spring.
Type host: A l m s glutinosa Gart. alder Discussion: Nalepa (see references) has given t h i s
California hosts: A l m s rubra Ebng., Alnus tenui- type of mite a series of v a r i e t a l names t o
folia N u t t . designate t h e host from which each 'variety'
Comnon name: Alder g a l l mite originated. The writer is leaving t h i s problem
Relation t o host: "he mites form bead galls on t o a l a t e r date f o r explanation and application
the leaves. This g a l l i n Europe o r i g i n a l l y re- to C a l i f o r n i a mites of t h e pyri canplex. Nalepa
ceived t h e name: Cephalaneon pustulatm Bremi records these m i t e s form Pomaceous trees and
Discussion: The Marin County form has ventral shrubs of the following genera: Anelanchier,
microtubercles more c o n s i s t e n t l y than the Cotoneaster, Crataegus, Cydonia, Sorbus, and
Sierran form. Otherwise the body r i n g s a r e Pyrus. Apple i n California a l s o has b l i s t e r
smooth. No attempt has been made t o c o r r e l a t e m i t e s hut, a s a r u l e , is not so badly attacked
these California mites with Nalepa' s v a r i e t i e s . as pear. Apple trees with leaf b l i s t e r s may be
Hassan' s characterization of "rhollbifoliae" sug- growing near pears t h a t have no b l i s t e r s , and
gests a species of Aceria; otherwise It rmght vice versa. The following C a l i f o r n i a records
be supposed t h a t he figured a second stage nymph are exemplary of range, r a t h e r than being ex-
of laevis. lhis species (laevis), with erar- haust ive.
ginatae, c o n s t i t u t e s a d i s t i n c t group i n t h e
genus. California records:
LAKE Co.: Big Valley, x-30-1941 (M. R. Bell)
California records: LASSEN 120. : Susanville, V-14-1936 (Taylor)
EL DCRADO CO. : Fallen Leaf Lake, IX- 13-1951 (HHK) L a S ANGELES CO.: b s Angeles, V-1934 (G. R.
MARIN 0. : Stinson Beach, VIII-13-1938 ("K) Gortcm)
NAPA 0. : *, 111-24-1931
Eriophyes prunandersoni K. (11-9) ORANGECO. : Rancho Santa Fe, 111-29-1939
P l a t e 11-9 ( C . E. Norland)
38 BULLETIN OF THE CALIFORNIA INSECT SURVEY
Discussion: This mite is widely d i s t r i b u t e d on Pareria fremontiae Keifer, BCDA V. 41, p. 32, 1952
i t s host. 'Ihe writer knows of no i n f e s t a t i o n s Type l o c a l i t y : Phelan d i s t r i c t
on American grapes. Type host: Frernontia californica Torr., Flannel
bush
California records: Helation t o host: ' h e mites l i v e around and under
AMALXR CO.: b e , VI-15-1939 (R. J. Corbin) the s t e l l a t e h a i r s on the under s i d e s of t h e
Bu?TE CO.: Oroville, VII-23-1938 (J. B. leaves and along the stems.
Ste inweden) Discussion: The exact location of t h i s collection
FRESNO CO. : Fresno, VIII-21-1942 (F. P. is south of Phelan i n the canyon through which
Fbul lar d) t h e highway leaves the Mojave Desert.
KERN CO. : Bakersfield, IV-9-1943 (Grim)
Ix)S ANGELES CO.: Huntington Park, VI-25-1936 California record:
(V. E. Williams) SAN BEflNARDINO CO. : Phelan d i s t r i c t , IX-30-
MADERA C O . : Madera, VIII-21-1942 (L. M. Smith) 1951
MERCED C O . : S e l l i n g , IV-24-1940 (C. H.
Kins ley)
NEVADA CO. : Nevada City, VII-26-1940 PHYLLOCOPTINAE
ORANGE CO.: Atwood, VI-3-1942 (K. Sloop)
PLACER a.: Auburn, VII-17-1935 (F. Clark) Phyllocoptini
SAmAMENTO CO. : Sacramento, V-22- 1946
SAN BERNARDINO CO. : Ontario, M I - 11-1941 Genus 13. Oxypleuvites Nulepa, 1891
(C. R. Tower)
SAN DIEGO CO. : Borego, IX-20-1950 (Barnes) Iknk. &ad. Wiss. math-nat. Wien, V. 58, p. 868,
SANTA CLARA CO. : Almaden, nII-10-1944 (HHK) 1891
SANTA CRUZ CO.: vine H i l l , VIII-10-1944 (HHK) Type of genus: Oxypleurites heptacmthus (Nal. ) ,
SHASTA 03.: Redding, V-9-1949 b i f e r , BCDA V. 27, p. 312, 1938
SCtWMA m.: Healdsburg, V-18-1943 (L.M.Smith)
TULARE C O . : w, VIII-9-1940 (J. B.
Steinweden) Oxypletlrites acidotus K. (13-6)
YOLO CO.: Davis, VIII-21-1941 (G. L. S t o u t ) P l a t e 13-6
Bul. Cal. Dept. Agr. V. 41, p. 32, 1952 Phyllocoptes aesculifoliae Keifer, Kab V. 27, 307,
Type of genus: Pareria fremontiae Keifer, BCDA V. 1938 (deutogyne)
41, p. 32, 1952 Oxypleurites neocarinatus Keifer, BCDA V . 28, p. 11,
Discussion: This genus bears the same r e l a t i o n 1939 (protogyne)
t o Eriophyes t h a t Paraphytoptus bears t o Aceria. l o c a l i t y : Novato
Type host: Aesculus californicus (Spach), buckeye
Camnon name: Buckeye rust m i t e
Pareria fremontiae K. (12-1) Relation to host: The mites l i v e on both leaf
P l a t e 12-1 surfaces: They cause some r u s t i n g of the leaves.
40 BULLETIN O F THE CALIFORNIA INSECT SURVEY
Oxypleurites baccharis Keifer,BUIA V. 28, p.237 1939 Oxypleurites juglandis Keifer, BCDA V. 40, p. 97,
Type l o c a l i t y : Riverside 1951
Type host: Baccharis e m r y i Gray Type l o c a l i t y : San Jose
Relation to host: The m i t e is a l e a f vagrant, Type host: Juglans regia L., English walnut
usually on t h e upper surface. hname: Walnut r u s t mite
Relation t o host: The mites a r e vagrants on the
California record: under s i d e s of the leaves.
RIVERSIDE CO. : Riverside, X-11-1938 (MK)
California record :
SANTA CLARA CO.: san Jose d i s t r i c t , VII-29-
Oxyplezrrites cornifoliae K. (13-8) 1947 (W. H. Hart)
P l a t e 13-8
Genm 14. Coptophylla Keifer, 1944 E?ul. Cal. Dept. Agr. V. 29, p. 163, 1940
Type of Genus: Calacarus pulviferus K.
BCDA V. 33, p. 26, 1944
Type of genus: Coptophylla laminmi ( K . ) , BCDA
Calacartls adornatus (K.) (15-2)
P l a t e 15-2
Coptopbylla arbtlti (K.)(14-2)
P l a t e 14-2 Epitrimerus adornatus Keifer, BCDA V. 29, p. 32,
1940
Phyllocoptes arbuti Keifer, BCDA V. 28, p. 489, Type l o c a l i t y : Sacramento (Capitol Park)
1939 Type host: Viburnum opulus L. , snowball
Type l o c a l i t y : Berkeley Additional host: Camellia japonica L.
Type host: Arbutus m i d o L. , Strawberry tree Comnon name: Purple camellia m i t e
Relation t o host: The mites occur on t h e under Helation to host: The mites are vagrants on both
s i d e s of the leaves and due t o pulverulent wax leaf surfaces. In the case of camellia the
leave considerable debris. mites cause sane browning of the surfaces, but
a l s o leave considerable d e b r i s in the form of
California record: waxy shed skins and carcases.
AIAMEDA a.: Berkeley, VII-25-1939 ("K) Discussion: The occurrence of the m i t e on Vibur-
nun was probably due t o population pressure,
since the species is f a r more c h a r a c t e r i s t i c
Coptopbylla caliquerci K. (14-3) of camellia.
P l a t e 14-3
California records:
Coptophylla raliquerci Keifer, BCDA V. 33, p- 26, ALAMEDA CO. : Oakland, X-31-1942 (G. B.
1944 Laing)
Type l o c a l i t y : Sacramento BUTT? CO. : b,11-18-1942 (R. Swett)
Type host: Q e r c u s lobata Nee, Valley white oak FRESNO CO. : Fresno, XI-14-1947
Relation t o host: The m i t e s a r e upper surface US A N G E E S CO: Altadena, 1-7-1943 (V. E.
leaf vagrants. Williams)
PLACER CO. : b i s , XI-9-1943
California record: (J. B. Steinweden)
SACRAMUW) CO. : Sacramento (Capitol Park), RIVERSIDE CO. : Riverside, X-19-1942 (Ehmann)
E-9-1943 (HMO SACRAMMTO CO.: Sacramento, X-2-1939 (HHK)
SAN DIEGO CO. : san Diego, VI-22-1944
Coptopbylla lamimatzi (K.)(14-1) (D. F. Palmer)
P l a t e 14-1 SAN JWQUIN CO.: 111-12-1943
(J. E. Steinweden)
Phyllocoptes lamiaani Keifer, X D A V. 28, p. 419, SANTA CLARA CO. : Campbell, IV-15-1948
1939 SANTA CRUZ CO.: Watsonville, XI-14-1944
Type l o c a l i t y : Paradise (M. H. Bell)
42 BULLETIN OF THE CALIFORNIA INSECT SURVEY
Type of genus: Vasates quadripedes Shiner; Keifer, Vasates cornutus (Banks) (17-18)
BCDA V . 33, p. 25, 1944 P l a t e 17-18, 17-18d
Discussion: Unlike the majority of the species
s t r u c t u r a l l y referable t o t h i s genus, the type, Phyllocoptes cornutus Banks, Proc. Ento. SOC.
quadripedes, is a gall-former on m p l e leaves. Wash. V. 7 , p. 141, 1905
Type l o c a l i t y : Nashington D. C.
Type host: Amygdalus p e r s i c a S. R: Z., peach
Vasates udvens (K.) Comnon name: Peach s i l v e r m i t e (approved)
Relation t o host: The m i t e s a r e f r e e l i v i n g on the
Phyllocoptes advens Keifer, m A V. 27, p. 192, leaf surfaces. This is the well-known peach
1938 s i l v e r m i t e , which produces a s i l v e r y sheen on
Type l o c a l i t y : Fomona Heights older peach leaves. Less w e l l known is the e f -
Type host: Citrus linronia b b . , lemon f e c t t h i s m i t e has on imnature and young
Discussion: This m i t e appeared on lemon under the leaves. In t h i s l a t t e r case the mites may
f r u i t buttons during the survey f o r C i t r u s bud cause a mottling of y e l l w dots on the l e a f ,
m i t e . It is now apparent t h a t the m i t e a s de- or r o l l the leaf longitudinally. Peach trees
scribed is a deutogyne. The characters of the with glandless leaves s u f f e r mast from t h i s
protogyne a r e unknown a s is the t r u e host. Until longitudinal r o l l i n g .
the type area is explored nothing f u r t h e r can be Discussion: t h e name paracornutus, proposed by the
done with t h i s MIW. w r i t e r for mites of t h i s type on almond (BCDA
V. 32, p. 214, 19431, is nothing more than
California record: cornutus.
LOS ANGELES CO. : Pomona Heights, XII-13-1937 The w r i t e r is n o t acquainted w i t h Banks'
(K. L. Wolff) species amygdalina, s a i d t o occur on Prunus
davidiana i n Southern California.
The peach s i l v e r m i t e probably occurs
Vasates ambrosiae (K.) (17-10) nearly everywhere i n California t h a t peaches
Plate 17-10 a r e grown. The mite a l s o occurs on nectarine.
Type host: Cotyledon caespitosa Haw., stonecrop RIVERSIDE CO. : Corona, VIII-4-1943 ( P l a t t )
Relation t o host: The m i t e s severely brown and SACRAMENTO C O . : Elkhorn d i s t r i c t , XI-7-1941
wrinkle the l e a f surfaces, and cause uneven (S. F. Bailey)
w h i t e surface pulverulence. SAN BENIT0 CO.: H o l l i s t e r , IX-30-1942,
,(H. A. Hunt)
California record:
SAN BEFNARDINO CO.: Loma Linda, 1-25-1943
WRIN CO. : Stinson Beach, VII-3-1939 (HHK) W DIEGO C O . : J J l , XII-22-1942 (F. Thorne)
SAN JCL\QUIN CO. : Tracy, VIII-13-1941
Vasates destructor (K.) (17-14) (H. W. Graves)
P l a t e 17-14 %N LUIS m I S P 0 co.: San Luis Obispo, M-16-
1942 (R. M. Drake)
Phyllocoptes destructor Keifer, D A V. 29, p. SAN MATE0 CO.: Sari Carlos, V-21-1943
160, 1940 (Cambe 111
Type l o c a l i t y : Modesto SANTA BARBARA CO. : GoleCa, VIII-20-1942
Type host: Lycopersicum esculentum M i l l . , t a t p (W. Gurmings)
-
Additional hosts: Solanum douglasii h a l , night- SANTA CLARA CO. : Almaden, VIII-5-1942
shade; Solanum tuberosum, potato; Petunia; (L. R. Cody)
Solanwn sp., a vine; Physalis prob. ixocarpa SANTA CXUZ CO. : Watsonville, VIII-24- 1946
Brot.; Datura sp. SHASTA CO. : French Gulch, VII-26-1950
Cornmon name: Tomato r u s s e t mite (approved) (B. F. Stroup)
Relation t o host: The mites a r e free l i v i n g on the STANISLAUS CO.: Modesto, V-16-1940
green surfaces of t h e i r h o s t . P o t a t o and petu- (S. F. Bailey)
nia show sane d i s c o l o r a t i o n of the leaves but SUTIER CO. : Verona, IX-2-1942
t h e plants continue t o l i v e . In the case of TULARE C O . : V i s a l i a , X-11-1942
tomato the a t t a c k of t h i s mite is f a t a l t o any V M W R A CO. : Camarillo, IX-16-1942
susceptible p l a n t (one or more v a r i e t i e s seem (C. J. B a r r e t t )
.
i m e ) Since Eriophyids need perennial h o s t s YOLO CO. : Elkhorn d i s t r i c t , M-3-1940
and cannot afford t o k i l l t h e i r h o s t s , the (S. F. Bailey)
r e l a t i o n of t h i s m i t e t o tomato is unnatural. YUEH C O . : Marysville, VII-11-1944
The persistance and speed with which t h i s m i t e (A. W. Worledge)
reappears every year i n newly planted tornato
f i e l d s , i n d i c a t e s the ease w i t h which it d i s - Vusates eurytrotus (Nal.) (17-13)
seminates i t s e l f . The m i t e overwinters on P l a t e 17-13
perennial hosts such a s petunia and nightshades.
Discussion: The s h i e l d p a t t e r n and d e c l i v i t o u s PhylEocoptes eurymtus Nalepa, Am. Akad. Wiss.
front shield lobe are d i s t i n c t i v e for the m t h - n a t . Wien, V. 31, p. 38, 1894
species. Type l o c a l i t y : Austria
Type host: T o r i l i s infesta Koch.
California records: California hosts: Apium graveolens L., c e l e r y ;
ALAMEM CO.: Irvington, IX-15-1941 Daucus carota L., c a r r o t
(G. B. L i n g ) COrmKln name: Celery r u s t mite
BUTTE CO.: Oroville, X-3-1942 (HHK) Relation t o host: The m i t e s a r e f r e e l i v i n g on the
CALAvEM CO.: San Andreas. VII-15-1942 green surfaces. On c e l e r y some s u r f a c e b r m -
(H. L. Leonard) ing evidently r e s u l t s from the a c t i v i t y of the
IMPERIAL CO. : Niland, IV- 18- 1944 mites. On c a r r o t the m i t e s are associated i n
KERN CO.: S h a f t e r , VI-16-1942 (S. F. Bailey) p a r t with t h e flower heads, where i n company
LOS ANGELES C O . : k ? e l l f h e r , VIII-14-1942 with Aceria peucedani, they cause discoloration
(V. E. Williams) of the heads.
MERCED CO. : Merced, VII-17-1942
(C. H. Kinsley) California records:
MONTEREY CO. : S a l i n a s , IX-30-1942 FREgYO C O . : Fresno, X-25-1941 (S. F. Bailey)
(H. A. Hunt) LOS ANGELES CO.: San Pedro, M-28-1944
NAPA CO.: &, VIII-14-1943 ( B u t l e r ) (H. T. &born)
ORANGE C O . : San Juan Capistrano, X-27-1948 CRANGE CO. : Stanton, IX-16-1949
P L A E R CO. : Thermolands, IX-26-1941 SAN JOAQUIN a0.: Terminous, XI-4-1940
(Fred Clark) (P. F. Wright)
THE ERIOPHYID MITES OF CALIFORNIA 45
mite, has no deutogynes. The p r i v e t m i t e starts which Nalepa (1890) gives f o r schlectendali
t o multiply earlier i n the spring, is depressed do not f i t the Santa Cruz Cwnty Specimens.
by t h e warm suIRIEr weather, and revives its (The Sam t h i n g can be s a i d f o r specimens re-
population again i n the f a l l . ceived from other p a r t s of the United States.)
Until authentic European material of
California records: schlectendali is available t h i s problem w i l l
LOS ANGELES CO.: Pasadena, 111-4-1938 remain unsettled. The mite (maliuagrans) is
(C. Gamnon) presumably deuterogynous.
NEVADA CO. : Nevada City, VI-8-1948
ORANGE CO.: Orange, XI-14-1938 (T. Gallion) California records:
SACRAMENTO CO. : Sacramento, IV-25-1939 (HHK) YONTEREY CO.: Salinas, V-22-1944
SAN DIEOO CO. : s a n Diego, 111-25-1940 (W. H. Lange)
(J. W. Dixon) SANTA C A W CO. : Vine H i l l , VIII-10-1944 (HHK)
SAN FRANCISCO 0. : San Francisco, VIII-1-1939
(HHK1
SANTA CLARA CO.: Palo Alto, v-1-1947 Vasates manzunitue (K.) (17-8)
SANTA CRUZ CO. : Watsonville, IV-10-1950 P l a t e 17-8
(Huston)
SOLANO a.: F a i r f i e l d , 111-27-1950 (Goodman) Phyllocoptes manzanitae Keifer, BCM V . 29, p.
YOLO CO.: DaDa, V-30-1942 (S. F. Bailey) 160, 1940
Type l o c a l i t y : Magalia
Type 'host: Arctostaphylos s p . , manzanita
Vusutes mugnoliuoru ( K . ) (17-7) Relation t o host: The m i t e s a r e f r e e - l i v i n g on
P l a t e 17-7 both leaf surfaces. There are imny species of
manzanita i n California and t h i s mite probably
Phyllocoptes magnolivora F e i f e r , @UIA V . 28, p. occurs on a number of them.
486, 1939
Type locality: San Jose California records:
Type host: Magnolia grandiflora L., b u l l bay B U ~ ECO.: Magalia, VII-2-1940 (HHK)
Relation t o hast: The mites l i v e i n the n a t u r a l SCNOMA CO. : Occidental, M-6-1951 (HHK)
h a i r on the under s i d e s of the leaves. They
a r e a l s o found around the flower buds but no
damage has been a t t r i b u t e d t o them. Vusutes mckenziei K. (17-5)
Discussion: Roivainen (1951) reports this m i t e on P l a t e 17-5
a house-grown magnolia i n Finland. The native
home of the host is presumably the o r i g i n of Vasates mckenziei Keifer, D A V . 33, p. 26, 1944
the m i t e . Type l o c a l i t y : Sacramento
Type host: Elymus triticoides Buckl., a perennial
California record: grass
SANTA CLARA CO. : San Jose, VIII-25-1939 (HHK) Relation t o host: The mites l i v e i n the longitu-
d i n a l furrows on the upper leaf surface. The
r e l a t i o n s h i p t h i s m i t e bears t o dubius Nal.
Vusutes mulivugrans K. (17-15) remains t o be determined.
P l a t e 17-15
Celifornia records:
Vasates malivagrans Keifer, Bc1# V . 35, p. 41, SACRAlvENTo CO. : Sacramento, X-3-1943
19%; as Vdsates schlectendali (Nal.) k i f e r , (H. L. McKenzie)
Jr. Ec. Ent. V. 39, p. 567, 1946 winters, VII-4-1944 (HHK)
YOLO 0.:
Type locality: Vine H i l l , Santa Cruz County
Type host: Pyrus malus L., apple
Comnon name: ( i f schlectendali) Apple r u s t m i t e
(approved) Vusutes paraglabri K. (17-20)
Helation t o host: The m i t e s l i v e on the under P l a t e 17-20
s i d e s of the leaves.
Discussion: The writer is uncertain whether t o Vasates paraglabri Keifer, V. 41, p. 34, 1951
c a l l t h i s m i t e the species named, or Type l o c a l i t y : Fallen Leaf Lake
schlectendal i. 'Ihe description and figures Type host: Acer glabrum Torr., S i e r r a maple
THE ERIOPHYID MITES OF CALIFORNIA 47
S c i . , V. 24, p. 323, 1917; Keifer, B(33A V. 27, Genus 19. Tetra Keifer, 1944
p. 191, 1938
Type l o c a l i t y : Western Oregon Bul. Cal. Dept. Agr. V. 33, p. 27, 1944
Type host: Rhus diversiloba T&G., poison oak Type of genus: Tetra concava (K.)
Comnon name: Poison oak l e a f - g a l l m i t e
Relation t o host: The mites form bead g a l l s on the
leaves. In some cases the terminal leaves a r e Tetra cercocarpi K. (19-1)
deformed by the mass of galls. P l a t e 19-1
Discussion: The m i t e is widespread i n C a l i f o r n i a ,
but only one d e f i n i t e l o c a l i t y is a v a i l a b l e a t Tetra cercocarpi Keifer, B m A V. 41, p. 68, 1952
t h i s writing. Type l o c a l i t y : Rocky Camp, Hat Creek
Type host: Cercocarpus ledifolius Nutt., Desert
California record: mountain mahogany
vEilJm co.: Santa Paula, VII-29-1937 Helation t o host: The mites a r e vagrants among the
(S. Lockwood) leaf h a i r s on the upper leaf surface.
California record:
Genus 18. Gummaphytoptus Keifer, 1939 SHASTA CO. : Rocky Camp, Hat Creek, VIII-10-
1948 (HHK)
hl. Cal. Dept. Agr. V. 28, p. 148, 1939
Type of genus: Ganunaphytoptus camphorae K.
Tetra concava (K.) (19-2)
P l a t e 19-2
Gammaphytoptus camphorae K . (18-1)
P l a t e 18-1 Phyllocoptruta concava Keifer, BCDA V. 28, p.
489, 1939
Ganunaphytoptus camphorae Keifer, BCDA V . 28, p. Type l o c a l i t y : Sacramento
148, 1939 Type host: U l m s (campestris ?}, e l m
Type l o c a l i t y : Sacramento Relation t o host: The mites a r e free l i v i n g on the
Type host: Cinnaaromum camphora M E . , camphor tree leaves, principaJly on t h e upper surfaces.
Relation t o host: This species s e e m t o be basi-
c a l l y a leaf vagrant type t h a t has taken up California record :
residence i n the n a t u r a l leaf glands that open SACRAk43NlU CO. : Sacramento, VI-27-1939 ( I N K )
on the under surface. These glands a r e i n the
angles formed by the large veins with the mid-
r i b near the leaf base. Genus 20. Abacartcs Keikr, 1 9 4
Discussion: This m i t e is polymorphic, only the
extreme form being shown i n the figure. There Bul. Cal. I k p t . Agr. V. 33, p. 28, 1944
a r e mny individuals i n each leaf gland pop- Type of genus: Abacarus acalyptus (K.)
u l a t i o n t h a t have a nearly Eriophyiform ab-
domen. A s i n Aceria camelliae and Eriophyes Abacarus acalyptrrs (K.) (20-2)
v i tis, t h i s m i t e combines the appressed geni- P l a t e 20-2
t a l i a and shortened apodeme w i t h the presence
of dorsal setae. I n t h e genera Ceciabphyes Galepitriserus acalyptus Keifer, BcIlA V. 28, p.
and Coptophylla, both of which have t h i s type 490, 1939
of g e n i t a l i a , the d o r s a l s e t a e a r e missing. Type l o c a l i t y : Baxters
Undoubtedly the native home of camphor is Type host: Ceanothus cordulatus Kell.
where the m i t e originated. Relation t o host: The m i t e s l i v e f r e e on the
leaves and green p a r t s of t h e twigs.
California record:
California records:
PLACER 03.: h x t e r s , VI-14-1939 (HHK)
B U n E CO.: Oroville, VII-23-1938
(J. B. Steinweden)
U)S ANGELES CD. : Pasadena, VII-6- 1938
Abacarus hystrix (Nal.) (20-1)
P l a t e 20-1
(C. Gamnon)
SACRAMLWTO CO. : Sacramento, M-29-1938 (HHK Callyntrotus hystrix Nalepa, Anz. Akad. Wiss.
math-nat. Wien, V. 33, p. 110, 1896.
THE ERIOPHYID MITES OF CALIFORNIA 49
Phyllocoktes adalins K. ( 2 5 - 2 )
P l a t e 25-2 Phyllocoptes dimorphus K. ( 2 5 - 4 )
P l a t e 25-4
Phyllocoptes adalius Keifer, BcDA V. 28, p. 487,
1939 Phyllocoptes dimorphus Keifer, BUM V. 29, p. 31,
Type l o c a l i t y : Berkeley 1940
Type host: Rosa sp., c u l t i v a t e d rose Type l o c a l i t y : Arrwhead Lake d i s t r i c t
Relation t o host: The mites a r e under surface l e a f Type host: Pteris aquilina Zanuginosa Borey,
vagrants. In addition t o the f o l l w i n g record, bracken
there is an undated one from San Francisco. Helation t o host: 'Ihe mites a r e f r e e - l i v i n g on
t h e under s i d e s of the fronds.
California record: Discussion: The males are smaller and of a darker
ALAMEDA 0. : Berkeley, VII-25-1939 (HHK) c o l o r than the females. This should be a most
i n s t r u c t i v e species t o study.
Phyllocoptes calirubi K. (25-7) California records:
P l a t e 25-7 EL CORAM) CO.: Twin Bridges, a-13-1947 (HHK)
Phyllocoptes calirubi Keifer, BcDA V. 27, p- 306, SAN BERIMDIN0 03. : Arrowhead bke d i s t r i c t ,
1938 M-16-1939 ("K)
Type l o c a l i t y : Clarksburg
Type host: Rubus vitifolius C. & S., n a t i v e black- Phyllocoptes fructiphilus K. ( 2 5 - 6 )
berry or dewberry P l a t e 25-6
Helation t o host: The m i t e s a r e f r e e - l i v i n g on the
under s i d e s of the leaves among the leaf h a i r s . Phyllocoptes fructiphilus K e i f e r , BCDA V. 29, p.
30, 1940
Type l o c a l i t y : Clarksburg
6.l i f ornia record: Type host: Rosa californica C. & S.
YOLO CO. : Clarksburg d i s t r i c t , VII-3-1938 (HHK) Relation t o host: 'Ihe mites l i v e around the peti-
o l e bases, but a l s o have the unusual h a b i t of
Phyllocoptes calisalicis K. ( 2 5 - 1 ) l i v i n g i n s i d e the f r u i t around the seeds.
P l a t e 25-1
Phyllocoptes calisalicis K e i f e r , BCDA V. 33, p. California records:
25, 1944 B U T T CO. : Wyandotte, XI-6-1942 (HHK)
52 BULLETIN OF THE CALIFORNIA INSECT SURVEY
Typhlodromus oliioorus Ashmead, Can Ent. V. 11, p. Platyphtoptus sabinianae Keifer, BCDA V . 27, p.
160, 1879 188, 1938
Type l o c a l i t y : Florida Type l o c a l i t y : Oroville (Palermo)
Type host: Citrus sinensis (Ckb.), orange Type host: Pinus sabiniana Dougl., digger pine
Additional host: Citrus limonia (ab.
1, lemon Additional hosts: Pinus spp., including pon-
Comnon name: C i t r u s r u s t mite (approved) derosa Dougl.; radiata Don: pinea L., tor-
Relation t o host: This m i t e i n f e s t s orange (Citrus reyana Parry; tuberculata Gord. ; and
sinensis), lemon (Citrus linonia) and probably probably others
other members of the genus Citrus. Relation t o host: This m i t e is usually found i n
Discussion: The m i t e is widespread and probably oc- the needle sheaths i n company with Trisetacus
curs i n nearly every c i t r u s growing area i n the pini, but a t times it apparently comes out and
world t h a t is near enough t o Ocean influence. I n becomes f r e e - l i v i n g on the needles for a p r i -
C a l i f o r n i a the mite s h w s a southern c o a s t a l .od.
d i s t r i b u t i o n from Santa Barbara t o San Diego Discussion: This is a peculiar m i t e which is
Counties. It does not go inland t o any degree abundantly d i s t i n c t from any other species
and is never found on c i t r u s in the Sacramento now known. It apparently can l i v e on nearly
or San Joaquin Valleys. In Southern California any pine which has the r i g h t kind of needle
its Occurrence i n damaging numbers is sporadic sheath. The genus Platyphytoptus appears t o
north of Orange County. have its nearest a l l y i n Epitrimerus.
Bul. Cal. Dept. Agr. V. 27, p. 188, 1938 Calljmtrotus scblectendali Nal. ( 3 1 - 1 )
Type of genus: Platyphytoptus sabinianae K. P l a t e 31-1
C a l i f o r n i a records:
RIVERSIDE CO.: Riverside, mII-16-1942
Calepitrimerus baileyi K. (33-4)
(F. R. P l a t t )
SACRAMENTO 0. : Sacramento, M-2-1943 ( H H K ) P l a t e 33-4; 33-4d
VENTUR4 C O . : Santa Paula, VIII-30-1940 (HHK)
YOLO CO.: r)avis, M-22-1941 ( H M O Calepitrirnerus b a i l e y i K e i f e r , BCDA V . 27, p. 310,
1938 (protogyne)
Phyllocoptes aphrastus Keifer, BCDA V . 29, p. 29,
Genus 33. Calepitrimerus Keifer, 1938 1940 (deutogyne)
Type l o c a l i t y : Davis
hl. Cal. b p t . Agr. V. 27, p. 310, 1938 Type host: Pyrus malus L., apple
Type o f genus: Calepitrirnerus cariniferus K. Comnon name: Baileys apple r u s t mite
Relation t o host: The m i t e s l i v e on the under
s i d e s of the leaves among the h a i r s , causing
Calepitrimerus auatis K. (33-3) s l i g h t brmning t o the l e a f surface. he
P l a t e 33-3 deutogynes hibernate around the buds j u s t
back of the terminal bud.
Calepitrirnerus anatis Keifer, EKDA V. 39, p. 31
1940 California records:
Type l o c a l i t y : Camp Sacramento MONTEREY CO.: S a l i n a s , VI-6-1944
Type host: Amlanchier alnifolia Nutt., western (W. H. Lange)
serviceberry PLACER CO.: Auburn, VI-22-1944 (F. Clark)
Helation t o host: The m i t e s a r e l e a f vagrants, SACRAMENTO CO. : Sacramento, VI- 10- 1946
favoring the under s i d e s of the leaves. NU- (H. L. McKenzie)
mrous deutogynes occur i n these pcpulatims. YOLO CO.: k, VI-24-1938 (S. F. Bailey)
BUITE C O . : Magalia, X-30-1939 (HHK)
C a l i f o r n i a records :
E L M)WW CO. : camp Sacramento, D(-10-1939
(HHK)
SHASTA CO. : Old S t a t i o n , VIII-9-1948 ( H H K )
Calepitrinierr4s cariniferiis K. (33-5)
Plate 33-5
Diptacus gigant orbyizcbtls (Nal.) (39- 1) Diptilomiopus sacramentae Keifer, BcaA V. 28, p.
P l a t e 39-1 232, 1939
Type l o c a l i t y : Sacramento
Phy I locoptes gigantorhynchus Nalepa, Anz. Akad. Type host: Alnus rhornbifolia Nutt., white a l d e r
BULLETIN OF THE CALIFORNIA INSECT SURVEY 61
A s h a d , W. F. Keifer, H. H.
1879. Orange H u s t & s t i o n Solved. Canadian 1939. Eriophyid Studies V. Bul. Cal. Dept.
Entomologist, 11:160. A s . , 28: 328-45.
Bailey, S. F. and Keifer, H. H. Keifer, H. M.
1943. The Tomato Russett M i t e . Jour. Ec. Ent., 1939. Eriophyid Studies VI. tpul. Cal. Qpt.
36: 706-712 Am., 28~416-26.
Ebker, E. W. and Wharton, G. VI.' Keifer, HT H.
1952. An Introduction to Acarology. LcMillan 1939. Eriophyid Studies MI. Bul. Cal. Dept.
CO. 465 pp. A s . , 28: 484-505.
(Eriophyidae,pp. 147- 158) Keifer, H. H.
Banks, N. 1940. Eriophyid Stdies -11. 3111.6 1 . Dept.
1905. A T r e a t i s e on the Acarina or Mites. hoc. A p . , 29:21-46.
U. S. N. Mus., 28:lOl-106. Keifer.
-~ ~~ H. H.
Banks, N. 1 9 4 . Eriophyid Studies M. Bul. Cal. Dept.
1905. Cecidobia salicicola, new genus and spe- Agr., 29: 112-117.
c i e s . Proc. Ent. SOC. kash., 7:141-2. Keifer, H. H.
Banks, N. 1940. Eriophyid Studies X. Bul. Cal. Dept.
1907. A Catalog of the Acarina or Mites of the Agr. , 29: 160- 79.
United States. Roc.U. S. N. Mus., 32: Keifer, H. H.
620-2 1. 1941. Eriophyid Studies XI. wI1. Cal. Qpt.
Banks, N. Agr., 30: 196-216.
1915. 'Ihe Acarina or Mites. U. S. Dept. of Agr. K e i f e r , H. H.
ReDort #108: 134-39. 1942. Eriophyid Studies XII. hl. Cal. b p t .
~a tche l o r , 'G. S. k r . , 31: 117-129.
1952. Ihe Eriophyid Mites of the S t a t e of Wash- Keifer, HY Hi
ington. Washington Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. 1943. Eriophyid Studies XIII. Bul. C 1. rJept.
Bul. #ti, April. Ap., 32~212-222.
h e a k y , E. P. and Betchelor, G. S. K e i f e r , H. H.
1951. Phyllody of ChrysantheRum and the Erio- 1944. Eriophyid Studies XIV. &1. & aept. .
phyid m i t e , Paraphytoptus chrysantheri. A s . , 33: 18-36.
Arm. Ent. soc. Am., 43:492. Keifer, H. H.
Essig, E. 0. 1945. Eriophyid Studies XV. Bul. Cal Dept.
1926. Insects of Western North America. Mac- Am.. 34: 137-40.
Millan GI.1035 DD. Keifer, Hu HI
(Eriophyidae pp.' i3-50) 1946. Eriophyid Studies XVI. wI1. Cal. Dept.
F e l t . E. P. Am., 35:39-48.
1 b . Eriophyes fraziniflora n. sp. Mem. #8, K e i f e r , HT Hi
N. Y. State Mus., 2:633. 1946. A heview of North American Eriophyid Mites.
Hassan, Ahmed S. Jour. Ec. Ent., 39:563-70.
1928. Biology of the Eriophyidae. U. C. publ. Keifer, H. H.
i n Ent. 4:341-394.
~
1951. Eriophyid Studies M I . h1. Cal. Dept.
Hodgkiss, H. E. Agr., 40:93-104.
1930. Eriophyidae of Neat York: Ihe Maple Mites. Keifer, H. H.
N. Y. Aer. EXD. Sta. Tech. Bul. #163.
0 1952. Eriophyid Studies XVIII. hl.Cal. b p t .
Keifer, H. H. k . .41~31-42.
1938. Eriophyid Studies. hl. Cal. Dept. Agr., Keifer, HT Hi
27: 181-206. 1952. Eriophyid Studies X M . hl.Cal. Ikpt.
Keifer, H. H. ~ g,-. 4i: 65-74.
1938. Eriophyid Studies 11. Bul. Cal. k p t . Leonard, M. D.
Agr. , 27~301-323. 1926. A List of Insects of New York (Eriophyid
Keifer, H. H. s e c t i o n ) . Cornel1 Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta.
1939. Eriophyid Studies 111. Bul. Cal. Dept. Mem. # 101:1076-78.
Agr., 28: 144-162. Liro, J. I. and Roivainen. H.
Keifer, H. Hi 1951. Eriophyidae (of Finland, in Finnish).
1939. Eriophyid Studies IV. Ehl. Cal. Dept. Animalia Fennica 6, Helsinki. 281 pp-
A g r . , 28:223-39.
62
0
Nalepa, A. Putman, I. L.
1890. Zur Systematic der Gdllmilben. Sitzb. Akad. 1939. The Plum Nursery Mite. Seventh Annual Hpt.
Wiss. math-nat. Wien, 89:23. Ent. SOC. &It. p. 33.
Kalepa, A. Hoivainen, H.
1898. Acarina: Eriophyidae. Das T i e r r e i c h , 1951. Contribution t o the h w l e d g e of the
Fourth Issue. Eriophyids of Finland. Acta Ent. Fen.
Kalepa, A. #8:28.
1910. Gallmilben. Zoologica, S t u t t g a r t , Heft 61. Hyder, John A.
Kalepa, A. 1878. A Protable new species of Fhytoptus or
1923. Polymorphe Eriophyiden. Marcellia, 20: 87. Gallmite. Amrican N a t u r a l i s t , 13:704-5.
Kalepa, A. Smith, L. M. and Stafford, E. M.
1925. Zur Kenntnis d e r auf einheimischen 1948. The awimite and t h e Erineum Mite of Grapes.
Pomacean und Amygdalen lebenden Eriophyes- Hilgardia (U. C. Berkeley), 18: 317-34.
a r t e n . Marcellia, 22:62. Snodgrass, ti. E.
Nalepa, A. 1948. 'Ihe Feeding Organs of the Arachnida, in-
1929. Neuer Katalog der bisher beschriebenen cluding Mites and Ticks. Smiths. Misc.
Gallmilben, i h r e r Gallen und Wirtspflantzen. Gill. 110: $10
Marcellia, 25: 67.
i
#
Host Index
Abies concolor (Pinaceae), 5 Ceanothus velutinus (Rhamnaceae), 5,
Abies mgnifica (Piclaceae) , 5 Cedrus a t l a n t i c a elauca (Finaceae), 5
Acer glabrum (Aceracae), 9 Celery, see Apium-
Acer mcrophyllwn (Aceraceae) , 9 Cercis occidentalis (J..eguminosae . 8
Acer negundo californicum (Aceraceae), 9 Cercocarpus l e d i f o l i u s (Pasaceae , 7
Aesculus californicus ( H i p p a s t a n a c e a e ) , 9 Chaparral broan, see Baccharis
Alder, see Alnus Cherry, see Prunus
A l fa1 f a , see hkdicago Christmas terry, see Photinia
4llenrolfea occidentalis (Chenapodiaceae), 7 Chrysanthemum sp. fConpositae), 0
A l l i u m satinun ( L i l i a c e a e ) , 5 Chrysopsis oregana (Compos i t a e 1, 10
A l l i u m cepa ( L i l i a c e a e ) , 5 Cinnaminnum camphora (Lauraceae) , 7
Almond, see Pmygdalus C i t r u s limonia (ttutaceae) , R
Alnus r h d i f o l i a (Betulaceae), 6 Citrus sinensis (riutaceae), 8
Alnus rubra ( k t u l a c e a e ) , 6 Coffee berrv. see Ehamnus
Alnus tenuifolia (Hetulaceae), 6 , e
NOTE: ?he cormon names which have been approved by the American Association.of Economic Entomologists bear
the word approved i n parenthesis a f t e r than. The other names are mainly those proposed by myself
w h i c h are l i s t e d i n the t e x t under the treatment of each species.
67
Index to Genera, Species, and Higher Categories
&acarus (201, 16, 18, 48 c a l i r u b i (25-71, Fhyllocoptes, 8, 18, 51
Abacoptes (371, 59 c a l i s a l i c i s (25-11, Phyllocoptes, 6 , 18, 51
abaenus (25-31, Phyllocoptes, 8, 18, 51 Callyntrotus (311, 16, 53
a b a l i s (9-361, Aceria, 10, 14, 23 calulmi (17-11, Vasates, 7, 17, 43
a b i e t i s (32-41, E p i t r i m r u s , 5, 19, 54 c a m l l i a e (9-11, Aceria, 9, 12, 20
abnormis , Phytoptus, 38 calllphorae (18-11, Gamaphytoptus, 7, 16, 48
abronius (38-21, khynacp, 8 , 19, 59 c a n e s t r i n i i (11-161, Eriophyes, 8, 15, 36
acalyptus (20-21, Abacarus, 9, 18, 48 caricis (11-141, Eriophyes, 5, 15, 36
Acamina (341, 16, 57 c a r i n i f e r u s (33-51, Galepitrimerus, 10, 19, 56
Acaphylla (241, 16, 5C c a r p i n i , Phyllocoptes, 51
Acarelliptus (271, 16, 52 ceanothi (9-261, Aceria, 9, 13, 26
Acaricalus (231, 16, 18, 50 Cecidobia, 22
Aceria (91, 12, 23 Cecidophyes (81, 12, 22
acidotus (13-E), (hrypleurites, 10, 17, 39 cedri (25-51, Fhyllocoptes, 5, 18, 51
a c i l i u s (37-81, Hhyncaphytoptus, 6, 19, 58 cercocarpi (19-11, T e t r a , 7, 18, 48
adalius (25-21, Fhyllocoptes, 8, 18, 51 chrysanthemi (10-41, Paraphytoptus, 10, 14, 35
adornatus (15-2). &lacarus, 9 , 10, 17, 4 1 chrysopsis (9-23). Aceria, 10, 13, 26
advens, Vasates 43 cocciformis, Acarelliptus, 52
a e s c u l i f o l i a e (13-71, Oxypleurites, 9, 17, 39 COncava ( 19-21, Tetra 7, 18, 48
allenrolfeae (9-43.11, Aceria, 7 , 14, 23 convolvens ( l l - l 2 ) , Eriophyes, Q , 15, 36
alnivagrans (5-11, Sierraphytoptus, 0 , 12, 21, 22 Cbptophylla (141, 15, 17, 41
a l o i n i s (9-461, Aceria, 6 , 14, 23 cornifoliae (13-81, Oxypleurites, 9, 17, 40
ambrosiae (17-101, Vasates, 10, 17, 43 corniseminis (3-2), Phytoptus, 9, 11. 21
amiculus (9-81, Aceria 6, 12, 24 cornutus (17-18)! Vasates, 7, le, 43, 45
amygdalins, (Vasates ?), 43 cotyledonis (17-9), Vasates, 7, 17, 43
a n a t i s , (33-3), Calepitrimerus, 7, 19, 50 Cupacarus (281, 16, 52
Anchiphytoptus (41, 11, 2 1 cupressi (32-51, Epitrimerus, 5, 19, 54
andropogonis (33-21, Calepitrinerus, 5, 19, 56 cupressi (1-21, Trisetacus, 5, 11, 20
aphrastus (33-41, G i l e p i t r k r u s , 56 p p r e s s i f o l i a e (32-7). E p i t r i m r u s , 5, 19, 54
Anthocoptes (161, 15, 17, 42 cuprifestor (28-1). Cupacarus, 5, 16, 52
a r b u t i (14-2), Coptophylla, 10, 17, 4 1 depressus (13-11, &ypleurites, 6, 16, 40
arceuthobii (10-1. 11, Faraphytoptus, 7, 14, 34 d e s t r u c t o r (17-141, Vasates, l o , 17, 44
a r c t a s t a p h y l i (38-11, Hhynacus, 10, 19, 59, 60 d i m o r p h (25-41, Fhyllocoptes, 2 , 5 , 18, 51
armtus (33-71, (alepitrimerus, 7, 19, 56 d i a s p y r i (9-311, Aceria, 10, 13, 2
Asetacus (351, 19, 57 Diptacus (391, 19, 60
avellanae (3-1), Phytoptus, 6,. 11, 21, 38 dipterochelus I Eiptacus, 6 1
baccharices (9-371, Aceria, 10, 14, 24 Diptilaniopini, 15, 19, 57
baccharis (l3-5), Ocypleurites, 10, 17, 40 Diptilomiopus, 59, 60
Laileyi (33-4). C a l e p i t r i m r u s , 8, 19, 56 dracunculi (9-161, Aceria, 10, 13, 27
beevori (9-381, Aceria, 11. 14, 24 dubius, Vasates. 46
boycei (9-22). Aceria, 10, 13, 24 ednae (7-11, N a l e p l l a . 5, 12, 22
Lrachytarsus (9-71, Aceria, 2 , 6 , 12, 24 emarginatae (11-4). Eriophyes, 8, 15, 36, 37, 38
breechii (11-61, Eriophyes, 8, 15, 35 enceliae (9-141, Aceria, 11. 13, 27
brevitarsus (9-71, Aceria, 24 Epitrirnerus (32). 16, 18, 54
b r i c k e l l i a e (10-11, Faraphytoptus, 10, 14, 34 ericameriella (16-4), Anthocoptes, 11, 17, 42
cactorum (9-21, Aceria, 9 , 12, 25 erineus (9-3). Aceria, 6, 12, 27
Calacarus (151, 15, 17, 4 1 eriobotryae (9-301, Aceria, 7, 13, 27
c a l a c e r i s (9-91, Aceria. 9, 12, 25 eriodictyonis (9-24.1). Aceria, 10, 13, 27
C a l e p i t r i m r u s (33) 16, 19, 56 Eriophyes ( l l ) , 12, 14, 35
calibaccharis (9-401, Aceria, 10, 14, 25 Eriophyinae, 11, 12, 22
caliberberis (9-25.11, Aceria, 7 , 13, 26 e s s i g i (9-101, Aceria, 8, 12, 28, 32, 52
c a l i c o r y l i (39-31, Diptacus, 6 , 19, (io eurynotus (17-131, Vasates. 9, 17, 44
californicus (10-61, Faraphytoptus, 10, 14, 34 f a g i f o l i a e , Hhyncaphytoptus 59
c a l i f r a x i n i (21-21, Tegmotus, 10, 18, 49 f a s t i g a t u s , Tegonotus, 49
c a l i l u p i n i (9-4131, Aceria, 8, 14, 26 f e i j o a e (9-321, Aceria, 9, 13, 28
Caliphytoptus (20). 16, 52 f i c i f o l i a e (37-71, Rhyncaphytoptus, 7 , 19, 58
caliplucheae (10-8). Faraphytoptus, 11, 14, 35 f i c i , Aceria, 28
caliquerci (14-31, Coptophylla, 6. 17, 41 f i c u s (9-271. Aceria, 7, 13, 28
68
THE ERIOPHYID MITES OF CALIFORNIA 69
AP -
Anterior g e n i t a l apodeme ~1 - Left a n t e r i o r l e g
AP1 -
I n t e r n a l female g e n i t a l i a LZ - Left rear l e g
B - Aceria beevori, P l a t e 9-38 LM - b f t tarsus of male
c - Coxae fran below LT - Tarsus, and associated s t r u c t u r e s
CD - Cross-section o u t l i n e of deutogyne N l D - Dorsal view of f i r s t nymph
6 - Cross-section a u t l i n e of protogyne NlM -Dorsal view of anterior section of f i r s t
D - Dorsal view of mite nymph
t~ - Dorsal view of a n t e r i o r s e c t i o n or s h i e l d N1S - Side view of f i r s t nymph
)%) - Dorsal skin structure NlV - Ventral view of f i r s t nymph
EDs - Dorsal s k i n s t r u c t u r e i n si& view NlVA - Ventral view of anterior section of f i r s t
- Side skin s t r u c t u r e nymph
EV - Ventral skin s t r u c t u r e N 2 W - Dorsal view of anterior section of second
F - Featherclaw nynrph
F 1 - Featherclaw and tarsus N2S - Side view of second nymph
fs - Frontal s h i e l d s e t a 0 - Egg
GF - Female g e n i t a l i a , ventral view R - Rast-
GFl - Female g e n i t a l i a and coxae from below S - Side view of a d u l t m i t e
GFC - Female g e n i t a l coverflap SA - Side view of a n t e r i o r section of mite
GFD - Genitalia of deutogyne SD - Side view of deutogyne
GlT - Genitalia of protogyne F@ - Side view of posterior section of mite
gl - Semenile vesicles F@1 - Side view of protogyne
a - Male g e n i t a l i a w - Aceria uryethiae, P l a t e 9-39
- Male g e n i t a l i a and coxae
L - Left legs; a l s o Aceria Zepidosparti on Plate
9-29
71
List of Plates
72
BULLETIN OF THE CALIEORNIA INSECT SURVEY 73
CHELIcfRA-''
ROSTRUM'-
-=*LMIOINDUUL WRING
GENITAL SETA\ I
74
Harder fusrforrn types Wormlike soFf bodied types
Shield projecting over beo; 'Beak exposed above
C. I
a
cb
PLATE 1-1. Trisetacus pini (Nal.) PLATE 1-2. Trisetacus cupressi (K.)
-1
PLATE 2-1. Setoptus jonesi (K.1 PLATE- 3-1. Phytoptus avellanae Nal.
76
ES
PLATE 9-2. Aceria cactorum (K.) PLATE 9-3. Aceria ermeus (N.)
79
PLATE 9-5. Aceria paramackiei (K.)
PLATE 9-6. Aceria waltheri (K.1 PLATE 9-7. Aceria brachytarsus (K.)
80
PLATE 9-9. Aceria calaceris K.
81
PIATE 9-13.1 Aceria paracalifornica (K. ) 9-14.
p ~ m Aceria enceliae (K.)
PIA= 9-15. Aceria neoartemisiae (K.) PIATE 9-16. Aceria dracunculi (K.)
82
F
DA -
PLATE 9-17. Aceria ligustri (K.) PLATE 9-18. Aceria neosalriae (K.)
PLAm 9-20. Aceria granati (Can.) PLATE 9-21. Aceria peucedani (Can.)
,
PMTE 9-22. Aceria boycei (K.) PLATE 9-23. Aceria chrysopsis (K.
84
S
85
PLATE 9-29. Aceria lepidosparti K. (L)
PLAlE 9-39. Aceria wyethiae K. (W) PLATE 9-30. Aceria eriobotryae (K.)
PUm 9-38. Aceria beevori K. (B)
86
PIATE 9-33. Aceria mori (K.) PLATE 9-34. Aceria rnedicaginis (K.)
PU'IE 9-35.
. I.
87
F
A,
88
F
91
U T E 10-4. Paraphytoptus chrysanthemi K.
94
. .
PLATE 11-7. Eriophyes pyri (Pgst.) PLATE 11-8. Eriophyes ilicifoliae K.
GFl \ /
PLATE 11-9. Eriophyes prunandersoni K. PLATE 11-10. Eriophyes h e t e r e l e s K.
95
PLATE 11-11. Eriophles t i l i a e (Pgst.) PLATE 11-12. Eriophyes convolvens m a l . )
96
PLATE 12-1. Pareria fremntiae K. PLATE 13-1. Oxypleurites depressus Nal.
98
API
Es
PLATE 14-1. Coptophylla lamimuni (K.) PLATE 14-2. Coptophylla arbuti (K.)
99
w-
APl
100
F
101
PIATE 17-1. Vasates calulmi (K.) PLAm 17-2. Vasates prosopis (K.)
FUTE 17-7. Vasates magnolivora (K.1 'PLATE 1718. Vasates manzanitae (K.)
103
PIA'iE 17-9. Vasates cotyledonis (P.) PLATE 17-10. Vasates ambrosiae (K.)
/- I
107
PLATE 19-1. Tetra cercocarpi K. PLATE 19-2. Tetra concava ( K . )
108
PIA= 21-1. Tegonotus myersi ( K . ) PLATE 21-2. Tegonotus califraxini (K.)
\\
110
F
F
113
F
115
*._...-
116
PLATE 32-7. Epitrimerus cupressifoliae K. PLATE 32-8. Epitrimerus libocedri (K.)
\ I /
-
PLATE 33-3. Calepitrhrus anatis K. PLATE 33-4. Calepitriaerus baileyi K.
118
GF
119
PLATE 34-1. Acamina nolinae (K.) PLATE 35-1. Asetacus madronae K.
PLATE 39-2. Diptacus sacramntae (K.) PLATE 39-3. Diptacus calicoryli (K.)
123