1 R 1+r R 1 R
1 R 1+r R 1 R
SNEHAL SHEKATKAR
The formula for the sum of the square roots of first n natural numbers has
been given by Srinivas Ramanujan ([Ra15]). Here we extend his result to the
case of r th roots, where r is a real number greater than 1.
Statement of result:
Proof. For a closed interval [a,b] we define partition of this interval as a set of
points x0 = a, x1 , ..., xn1 = b where xi < xj whenever i < j . Now consider the
closed interval [0,n] and consider a partition P of this interval,where P is a set
{0, 1, 2, ..., n}.
1
Consider a function defined as f (x)=x r .
We have,
Z n n1
X
I= f (x)dx = lim f (xi )xi
0 xi 0
i=0
1
2 SNEHAL SHEKATKAR
where
xi = xi+1 xi
We define lower sum for partition P as:
n1 n1
1
X X
L= f (i)xi = ir
i=0 i=0
2I = L + U +
Z n n1
1 1 1
X
2 x r dx = i r + (i + 1) r +
0 i=0
n1
2r 1+r n 1
X 1 1
x r 0 = 0r + 2 ir + nr +
r+1 i=1
n1 1
X 1r 1+r nr
i = r n r
i=1
r+1 2
1
where the term of 2
has been absorbed into .
n
X 1 r 1+r 1 1
(2) ir = (n + 1) r (n + 1) r
i=1
r+1 2
1
Taking limit of (2) as r ,L.H.S. n and R.H.S. (n + 2
), so
that in the limit 21
On the other extreme, for r = 1,
1 1
R.H.S. = (n + 1)2 (n + 1)
2 2
1 2
= (n + n)
2
n(n + 1)
=
2
SUM OF rTH ROOTS 3
and,
n(n + 1)
L.H.S. =
2
This gives n (1) = 0
Since the difference between first and second term can easily be shown to be
monotonic, we see that is bounded between between 0 and 21 for 1 r <
In the above expression, L.H.S is just log(n!). Let us assume that limit in
the last term of the above equation exists and is finite and say that it is . Then
we can rewrite above equation as follows:
1
(5) n! = (n + 1)n+ 2 en1 e
Numerically it turns out that the quantity e indeed converges to finite value,
the value being close to 2. This formula is similar to precise version of
Stirlings formula ([St1]).
Equation (3) allows us to find one more interesting formula. After putting
r = 1 in (3) and after little rearrangement, we get following beautiful formula:
n(n + 1) 1 d
log 11 .22 ...nn = log(n + 1) (n + 1)2 +
(6) |r=1
2 4 dr
d
Numerically it turns out that quantity |
dr r=1
is very small and can be ne-
glected.
4 SNEHAL SHEKATKAR
References
[Ra15] Ramanujan S., On the sum of the square roots of the first n natural numbers., J.
Indian Math. Soc., V II, (1915), 173-175.
[St1] Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, I. (2002), Handbook of Mathematical Functions.