DWDM Ciena
DWDM Ciena
Dense
Wavelength
Division
Multiplexing
Table of Contents
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
The Growing Demand . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Bandwidth Demand Driven By . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Telecomunications Infrastructure Good
But Overwhelmed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Achieving Bandwith Capacity Goals . . . . . . . . . . 6
Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing . . . . . . . 9
Parlaying New Technologies into
a DWDM System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Network Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Measurements of Performance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Applications for DWDM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
The Future of DWDM—Building Block
of the Photonic Network . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
ANNEX: Practical Considerations of
DWDM Deployment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
CASE STUDY: How CIENA Corporation
Teamed With Sprint to Break the
Fiber Bandwidth Barrier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Glossary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
About the Editor…
Gerald P. Ryan is the founder of Connections Telecommunications Inc., a
Massachusetts-based company specializing in consulting, education and soft-
ware tools which address Wide Area Network issues. Mr. Ryan has developed
and taught numerous courses in network analysis and design for carriers, gov-
ernment agencies and private industry. Connections has provided consulting
CIENA Corporation develops, manufactures and markets high capacity support in the areas of WAN network design, negotiation with carriers for
fiber optic transmission systems for public networks. These systems contract pricing and services, technology acquisition, customized software
development for network administration, billing and auditing of telecommuni-
unlock fiber bandwidth, improve network reliability, and significantly cations expenses, project management, and RFP generation. Mr. Ryan is a
reduce the cost of providing new broadband services. CIENA’s transpar- member of the Networld+Interop program committee.
ent optical systems deliver transmission capacities many times greater
This book is the property of The Applied Technologies Group and is made
than any in service today. Development of such advanced, high capacity available upon these terms and conditions. The Applied Technologies
transmission and switching systems represent a challenge that can not be Group reserves all rights herein. Reproduction in whole or in part of this
addressed solely by application of electronic time division multiplexing. book is only permitted with the written consent of The Applied Tech-
Through the application of its advanced technology, CIENA is setting a nologies Group. This report shall be treated at all times as a proprietary
document for internal use only. This book may not be duplicated in any way,
new standard for bandwidth. except in the form of brief excerpts or quotations for the purpose of review.
In addition, the information contained herein may not be duplicated in
other books, databases or any other medium. Making copies of this book, or
any portion for any purpose other than your own, is a violation of United
States Copyright Laws. The information contained in this report is believed
to be reliable but cannot be guaranteed to be complete or correct.
Copyright © 1997 by The Applied Technologies Group, One Apple Hill,
Suite 216, Natick, MA 01760, Tel: (508) 651-1155, Fax: (508) 651-1171
CIENA Corporation, 920 Elkridge Landing Rd, Linthicum, MD 21090 E-mail: [email protected] Web Site: http://www.techguide.com
phone: 410-865-8500 e-mail: [email protected]
Ciena.Final 6/3/97 5:56 PM Page 2
and thereby create new demand for additional services usage, which some analysts predict will grow by 700
and capacity. Moreover, while early competition among percent annually in coming years, is threatening to
long distance carriers was based mainly on a strategy of overwhelm telephone access networks and further
price reduction, today’s competitive advantage depends strain the nation’s fiber backbone. The growth of
increasingly on maximizing the available capacity of cellular and PCS is also placing more demand on fiber
network infrastructures and providing enhanced relia- networks, which serve as the backbone even for wireless
bility. communications.
…Network Survivability
Another significant cause of bandwidth demand is Telecommunications
the carriers’ need to guarantee fail-safe networks. As
telecommunications has become more critical to busi- Infrastructure Good But
nesses and individuals, service providers have been Overwhelmed
required to ensure that their networks are fault tolerant
and impervious to outages. In many cases, telephone
companies must include service level guarantees in Since the early 1980s, the telecommunications
business contracts, with severe financial penalties infrastructure—built on a hierarchy of high
should outages occur. performance central office switches and copper lines—
To meet these requirements, carriers have broad- has been migrating to massive computerization and
ened route diversity, either through ring configurations deployment of fiber optic cables. The widespread use
or 1:1 point-to-point networks in which back-up of fiber has been made possible, in part, by the
capacity is provided on alternate fibers. Achieving industry’s acceptance of SONET and SDH as the
100% reliability, however, requires that spare capacity standard for signal generation.1 Using SONET/SDH
be set aside and dedicated only to a backup function. standards, telecommunication companies have gradu-
This potentially doubles the bandwidth need of an ally expanded their capacity by increasing data trans-
already strained and overloaded system, since the mission rates, to the point that many carriers now
“protective” path capacity must equal that of the routinely transport 2.4 Gb/s (STM–16/OC–48).
revenue-generating “working path.” The bad news, however, is that the once seemingly
inexhaustible capacity promised by ever increasing
SONET rates is reaching its limit. In fact, bandwidth
…New Applications demand is already approaching the maximum capacity
At the same time that carriers are enhancing available in some networks. Primarily because of tech-
network survivability, they must also accommodate nical limitations and the physical properties of
growing customer demand for services such as video, 1 SONET is a North American standard promulgated by the American National
high resolution graphics, and large volume data Standards Institute (ANSI). There is an equivalent standard approved by the
International Telecomunications Union (ITU) called Synchronous Digital
processing that require unprecedented amounts of Hierarchy (SDH). SONET and SDH refer to similar data transmission rates.
bandwidth. Technologies such as Frame Relay and Synchronous Transfer Mode (STM) is used to describe SDH rates, while the
Optical Carrier (OC) designation applies to SONET–based systems.
ATM are also adding to the need for capacity. Internet STM–16/OC–48 transmits 2.48 Gb/s, while STM–64/OC192 transmits
almost 10 Gb/s.
embedded fiber, today there is a practical ceiling of 2.4 associated support systems and electronics, has been
Gb/s on most fiber networks, although there are estimated to be about $70,000 per mile, with costs esca-
instances where STM–64/OC–192 is being deployed. lating in densely populated areas. While this projection
Surprisingly, however, the TDM equipment installed varies from place to place, installing new fiber can be a
today utilizes less than 1% of the intrinsic capacity of daunting prospect, particularly for carriers with tens of
the fiber! thousands of route miles. In many cases, the right-of-
way of the cable route or the premises needed to house
transmission equipment is owned by a third party, such
as a railroad or even a competitor. Moreover, single-
Achieving Bandwidth mode fiber is currently in short supply owing to produc-
Capacity Goals tion limitations, potentially adding to costs and delays.
For these reasons, the comprehensive deployment of
additional fiber is an impractical, if not impossible,
Confronted by the need for more capacity, carriers solution for many carriers.
have three possible solutions:
• Install new fiber. Higher Speed TDM — Deploying
• Invest in new TDM technology to achieve faster STM-64/OC-192 (10 Gb/s)
bit rates. As indicated earlier, STM–64/OC–192 is becoming
• Deploy Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing. an option for carriers seeking higher capacity, but there
are significant issues surrounding this solution that may
restrict its applicability. The vast majority of the existing
fiber plant is single-mode fiber (SMF) that has high
dispersion in the 1550 nm window, making
Current
Bandwidth
Demand Fiber
STM–64/OC–192 transmission difficult. In fact, disper-
Capacity
sion has a 16 times greater effect with STM–64/OC–192
equipment than with STM–16/OC–48. As a result, effec-
tive STM–64/OC–192 transmission requires either some
Time form of dispersion compensating fiber or entire new fiber
builds using non-zero dispersion shifted fiber (NZDSF)—
which costs some 50 percent more than SMF. The greater
carrier transmission power associated with the higher bit
Installing New Fiber to Meet Capacity Needs
rates also introduces nonlinear optical effects that cause
For years, carriers have expanded their networks by degraded wave form quality.
deploying new fiber and transmission equipment. For The effects of Polarization Mode Dispersion
each new fiber deployed, the carrier could add capacity (PMD)—which, like other forms of dispersion affects the
up to 2.4 Gb/s. Unfortunately, such deployment is distance a light pulse can travel without signal degrada-
frequently difficult and always costly. The average cost tion—is of particular concern for STM-64/OC–192.
to deploy the additional fiber cable, excluding costs of This problem, barely noticed until recently, has become
Transmitter Receiver
1 Transmission 1
Transmitter Receiver
Demultiplexer
2 2
Multiplexer
Transmitter Receiver
3 3
Transmitter Receiver
n n
600 KM
Demultiplexers
To transmit 40 Gb/s over 600 kms using a
traditional system would require 16 separate With signals as precise and as dense as those used
fiber pairs with regenerators placed every 35 in DWDM, there needed to be a way to provide accu-
kms for a total of 272 regenerators. rate signal separation, or filtration, on the optical
A 16 channel DWDM system, on the other receiver. Such a solution also needed to be easy to
hand, uses a single fiber pair and 4 amplifiers implement and essentially maintenance free. Early
positioned every 120 kms for a total of 600 kms. filtering technology was either too imprecise for
DWDM, too sensitive to temperature variations and
polarization, too vulnerable to crosstalk from
neighboring channels, or too costly. This restricted the
evolution of DWDM. To meet the requirements for
16 channel WDM multiplexers higher performance, a more robust filtering technology
was developed that makes DWDM possible on a cost
effective basis: the in–fiber Bragg grating.
The new filter component, called a fiber grating,
The most common form of DWDM uses a fiber consists of a length of optical fiber wherein the refrac-
pair—one for transmission and one for reception. tive index of the core has been permanently modified
Systems do exist in which a single fiber is used for bi- in a periodic fashion, generally by exposure to an ultra-
directional traffic, but these configurations must sacri- violet interference pattern. The result is a component
fice some fiber capacity by setting aside a guard band to which acts as a wavelength dependent reflector and is
prevent channel mixing; they also degrade amplifier useful for precise wavelength separation. In other
performance. In addition, there is a greater risk that words, the fiber grating creates a highly selective,
reflections occurring during maintenance or repair narrow bandwidth filter that functions somewhat like a
could damage the amplifiers. In any event, the mirror and provides significantly greater wavelength
availability of mature supporting technologies, like selectivity than any other optical technology. The filter
precise demultiplexers and Erbium Doped Fiber wavelength can be controlled during fabrication
Amplifiers (EDFA), has enabled DWDM with eight, through simple geometric considerations which enable
sixteen, or even higher channel counts to be commer- reproducible accuracy. Because this is a passive device,
cially delivered. fabricated into glass fiber, it is robust and durable.
Demultiplexer
channel uits
Spontaneous
Multiplexer
Emissions • •
Emissions • •
• •
16 16
1550 nm band Erbium doped fiber W-E-E-W
signal input Terminal Terminal
pump signal
pump signal input output
Spectrum of a typical EDFA Fiber Circuits Dropped
-20 and Added to Location B
-30
-40
4,000 GHz
-50
-60
-70
Parlaying New Technologies
1500 1520 1540 1560 1580 1600
wavelength into a DWDM System
The fiber Bragg grating and the EDFA represented
The advent of the Erbium Doped Fiber Amplifier
significant technological breakthroughs in their own
(EDFA) enabled commercial development of DWDM
right, but the bandwidth potential associated with these
systems by providing a way to amplify all the
innovations could only be realized by their incorporation
wavelengths at the same time. This optical amplification
into integrated DWDM transport systems for optical
is done by incorporating Erbium ions into the core of a
networks. Without such a development the fiber grating
special fiber in a process known as doping. Optical pump
would retain component status similar to other passive
lasers are then used to transfer high levels of energy to
WDM devices, while the power potential of EDFAs
the special fiber, energizing the Eribum ions which then
would remain underutilized. The ability to harness the
boost the optical signals that are passing through.
potential of these technologies, however, is realizable
Significantly, the atomic structure of Erbium provides
today through commercially available, integrated,
amplification to the broad spectral range required for
DWDM systems. Such a system is attained through the
densely packed wavelengths operating in the 1550–nm
use of Optical Add–Drop Multiplexers (OADM) and
region, optically boosting the DWDM signals. Instead of
sophisticated network management tools.
multiple electronic regenerators, which required that the
optical signals be converted to electrical signals then back Add/Drop Configuration
again to optical ones, the EDFA directly amplifies the
Express
optical signals. Hence the composite optical signals can Traffic
Terminal
ATM
= Regenerators
OC-3 ASYNCH/PDH
OC-12 SONET/SDH
Proprietary
OC-48 Optical Optical DIG VIDEO Systems
PC-48 Amplifier Amplifier
Terminals
Optical Add/Drop
Multiplexer
• Finally, DWDM systems that comply with the 1. Compatibility with Fiber Plant.
ITU channel plan will reassure carriers that they The majority of the legacy fiber plant cannot
are deploying technology with recognized industry support high bit rate TDM. Earlier vintage fiber
standards and the flexibility needed to grow their has some attributes that lead to significant disper-
optical networks into long distance, local sion and would, therefore, be incompatible with
exchange, and eventually access networks. high bit rate TDM. Recently produced fiber—
NZDSF, for example—is flexible enough for the
In the space of two years, DWDM has become latest TDM equipment, but it is expensive and
recognized as an industry standard that will find accep- may limit the ability of carriers to migrate to the
tance in any carrier environment. Deployment of greater bandwidth available through DWDM at
DWDM will allow new services to come on-line more STM–16/OC–48 rates.
quickly, help contain costs so that prospective customers 2. Transparency and Interoperability.
can more easily afford new services, and readily over- The chosen solution must provide interoperability
come technological barriers associated with more tradi- between all vendors’ transmission equipment,
tional solutions. Its acceptance will drive the expansion both existing and new. It must be vendor
of the optical layer throughout the telecommunications independent and conform to international stan-
network and allow service operators to exploit the enor- dards such as the proposed ITU channel spacing
mous bandwidth capacity that is inherent in optical and be based on the Open Systems
fiber but that has gone largely untapped—until now. Interconnection (OSI) model. Furthermore, it
must be capable of supporting mixed protocols
and signal formats. Some commercially available
DWDM systems provide such transparency and
ANNEX: Practical can be used with any SONET/SDH bit rates, as
Considerations of well as with asynchronous/PDH protocols.
DWDM Deployment 3. Migration and Provisioning Strategy.
The best solution must also offer the ability to
expand. It must be capable of supporting
Based on bit rate alone, DWDM has a fourfold
differing bit rates and have channel upgrade
advantage even over the latest—albeit nascent—TDM
capability. It has to be a long-term solution and
option, STM–64/OC–192. To fairly compare the two
not just a short-term fix. TDM systems already
technologies, however, we need to review and outline
are reaching their technological barriers and
what would be an ideal technological solution for
STM–64/OC–192, although rich in capacity,
expanding network capacity. This has to be done in a
may represent a practical limit that could only be
broad sense, recognizing that there are instances in
superseded by DWDM.
which TDM may offer a better solution than DWDM.
Analyzing the alternative attributes and benefits of 4. Network Management. A properly engineered
each approach would require a comparison of several solution should also support a comprehensive
key issues: network element management system. The solu-
Ideally, the bandwidth capacity expansion solution In short, the CIENA MultiWave 1600 builds on
Sprint sought would also complement the carrier’s existing fiber optic technology and increases its
complete commitment to a SONET fiber network. In efficiency dramatically. By expanding the transmission
1993, Sprint committed to a Synchronous Optical capability of fiber already installed, Sprint can meet
Network (SONET) technology, and the company is and exceed its customers’ current requirements, as well
now the only long-distance carrier with a four-fiber, bi- as the anticipated delivery of new interactive
directional, line-switching ring topology (four-fiber, multimedia services.
BLSR) installed from coast-to-coast and from border- Fiber optics transmit data as pulses of light moving
to-border. The four-fiber BLSR allows customers on at 124,000 miles per second. More than 2.5 billion bits
Sprint’s SONET network to survive network outages of information per second can be carried over long-
and fiber cuts in milliseconds. The company anticipates distance fiber. To keep the pulses from fading, fiber-
that the majority of its customers will be on the optic cables use amplifiers and regenerators to recharge
SONET network by the end of 1997. the power of the light approximately every 60 miles.
“We started looking for the solution at the concep- “Traditionally, we could carry about 32 thousand
tual stage,” recalled Bill Szeto, Manager of Engineering transmissions in a fiber at one time,” explains Szeto.
for Sprint. “We needed the best companies in the busi- “With CIENA’s MultiWave 1600 system we can carry
ness to focus their resources on this capacity problem so 16 times this. All at once, we essentially expanded from
we called in a few well-known manufacturers along our 32 thousand capacity to a capability of carrying
with CIENA Corporation, a relatively new company in 512 thousand calls at the same time.
Maryland which we knew was developing high-capacity “Efficiency is also a factor,” he continued. “When
fiber optic transmission systems. you used fiber without DWDM for high-bandwidth
“Teaming with CIENA was just the right thing to applications, you had to use more fiber. If we can use
do. Starting with just the concept, the solution took less fewer fibers, we can increase capacity for new services
than a year to complete. It was unheard of in the using our existing fiber base. And, that can translate into
industry, considering the complexity of the problem to cost savings for customers.” Economies of scale are also
have this happen in such a short time frame. One of apparent to Sprint with the technology offering 16 times
the reasons it was able to happen this way is because the capacity at a fraction of the cost, according to Szeto.
CIENA is knowledgeable. And, working right along The CIENA MultiWave product is a high-capacity,
with Sprint’s technical people, there was synergy to optical transmission system which enables aggregate
work efficiently, closely, and effectively.” transmission capacities up to 40 Gigabits per second
The solution that CIENA developed, called the (40 Gb/s) over existing fiber facilities. Sixteen discrete
CIENA MultiWave™ 1600 system, far exceeded the channels can transmit over one fiber. Each channel is
parameters required. The 16 window, dense wavelength bit-rate transparent from 150 Mb/s to 2.4 Gb/s and
division multiplexing (DWDM) technology allows Sprint operates with existing SONET/SDH/Asynchronous
to increase the capacity of its fiber network by a factor of fiber optic terminals.
16 without installing more fiber optic cable. In essence, it This available capacity per fiber allows Sprint’s
gives Sprint 16 virtual fibers where it once had one. The network designers to fine tune each network span
system meets the need for more bandwidth and provides according to the customer’s or Sprint’s own internal
Sprint with more capability in its installed plant. requirements.
The system also incorporates optical line ampli- to incrementally expand the transmission capacity of
fiers to extend the transmission range. Designed specifi- our network as we deliver new broadband services to
cally for DWDM, the amplifier is capable of our customers,”
amplifying the system’s entire 16 channel, 40 Gb/s And, demand for more capacity to deliver those
capacity. Two optical service channel modems enable services isn’t going away soon. “Nineteen months ago
access to local network management data and all the analysts were saying they thought four - and eight -
elements of the MultiWave system. channel WDM would be enough for the foreseeable
In addition, CIENA’s MultiWave system for Sprint future,” noted Steve Chaddick, senior vice president of
is equipped with an integrated network management products and technologies at CIENA. “The foreseeable
system that includes an optical service channel with a future turned out to be about three months.”
2.048 Mb/s capacity, that supports the Data
Communications Network (DCN). The DCN commu- “The CIENA solution protects our existing
nicates system management information throughout investment and allows us to incrementally
the Sprint network and enables vital remote access to expand the transmission capacity of our
performance monitoring and control, as well as network...” Marty Kaplan, Senior Vice President
multiple simultaneous craft interface access. Self- and Chief Technology Officer, Sprint
healing information routing in the event of network
disruption and dual homing access is also included.
Embedded throughout the system is instrumenta-
tion that observes, measures, and records the status and
operation of every module. Distributed system intelli-
gence analyzes, processes, and stores the data gleaned
from the instrumentation. On an element-by-element
basis, performance and fault information data can be
accessed and manipulated by Sprint network
managers.
Sprint is deploying CIENA’s MultiWave 1600 on
selected routes throughout its network. In fact, DWDM
is pervasive throughout the Sprint network, especially
in high traffic areas.
“CIENA was given a business problem and we
gave them only a short time to solve it. By working
closely with us, CIENA has helped Sprint maintain its
technology leadership in the telecommunications
industry,” McKinley commented.
Marty Kaplan, senior vice president and chief
technology officer for Sprint, added, “The CIENA
solution protects our existing investment and allows us
path between two or more points of termination. ingly simple, is that they are not frequency dependent,
(3) The smallest subdivision of a circuit that provides a and therefore allow bandwidth upgrades (within limits)
type of communication service; usually a path with without replacing the entire transmission systems.
only one direction. Undersea transmission systems, such as Americas 1,
TAT-12/13, and TCP-5 use EDFA technology.
CIENA MultiWave™ 1600—A dense wavelength
division multiplexing (DWDM) system that is capable Fiber In the Loop (FITL)—Optical technology
of transmitting up to sixteen (16) discrete optical chan- from CO to customer premises.
nels over one fiber pair. Each channel is bit-rate trans-
Fiber Optical Bragg Grating—An optical fiber
parent from 150 Mb/s to 2.4 Gb/s and operates with
grating is an optical fiber component consisting of a
existing SONET/SDH/Asynch fiber optic terminals.
length of optical fiber wherein the refractive index of
This system incorporates optical line amplifiers to
the core has been permanently modified in a periodic
extend the transmission range, and it offers integrated
fashion, generally by exposure to an optical interfer-
network management facilities.
ence pattern as generated by an ultraviolet laser.
Deregulation—The removal of regulatory authority
Fiber Optic Cable—A transmission medium that
to control certain activities of telephone companies. An
uses glass or plastic fibers, rather than copper wire, to
attempt by federal authorities to make the telephone
transport data or voice signals. The signal is imposed
industry more competitive. Deregulation is meant to
on the fiber via pulses (modulation) of light from a
benefit the consumer.
laser or a light-emitting diode (LED). Because of its
Erbium Doped Fiber Amplifier (EDFA)— high bandwidth and lack of susceptibility to interfer-
Erbium Doped Fiber Amplifiers have become the ence, fiber-optic cable is used in long-haul or noisy
dominant method for signal amplification in long-haul applications.
lightwave transmission systems. EDFAs differ from the
Fiber Optics—A method for the transmission of
normal method of regenerative or electro-optic
information (sound, pictures, data). Light is modulated
repeaters in that light does not have to be converted to
and transmitted over high purity, hair-thin fibers of
an electrical signal, amplified, and then converted back
glass. The bandwidth capacity of fiber optic cable is
to light. Optical amplifiers contain a length of fiber
much greater than that of conventional cable or
that is doped with erbium doped (a rare earth
copper wire.
substance) that provides the gain medium, an energy
source or “pump” from a laser source at the correct Fiber Plant—Arial or buried fiber optic cable that
frequency, and a coupler to couple the pump laser to established connectivity between fiber optic transmis-
the doped fiber. Both the signal to be amplified and the sion equipment locations.
pump energy are coupled into the doped fiber section Frequency—(1) Measures the number of electromag-
of the transmission system. The pump laser puts the netic waves that pass a given point in a given time
erbium-doped fiber into an excited state where it is period. It is equal to the speed of light, divided by
able to provide optical gain through emission wavelengths and is expressed in cycles per second or
stimulated by a passing signal photon. One of the most hertz. (2) The number of cycles of periodic activity
important features, after the fact that EDFAs are amaz- that occur in a discrete amount of time.
Gigabits Per Second (Gb/s)—Billion bits per Multimode—Used to describe optical fiber that
second. A measure of transmission speed. allows more than one mode of light signal transmission.
Multimode fibers are generally used for short-distance
Infrastructure—The basic facilities, services, and
links.
installations needed for the functioning of a commu-
nity or society such as transportation and communica- Multimode Fiber—Optical fiber supporting propa-
tions systems. gation of multiple modes of light.
Interexchange Carrier (IXC) or Interexchange Multiplexer (MUX)—Equipment that enables
Common Carrier—(1) Any individual, partnership, several data streams to be sent over a single physical
association, joint-stock company, trust, governmental line. It is also a function by which one connection from
entity, or corporation engaged for hire in interstate or an (ISO) layer is used to support more than one
foreign communication by wire or radio, between two connection to the next higher layer. (2) A device for
or more exchanges. (2) A long-distance telephone combining several channels to be carried by one line or
company offering circuit-switched, leased-line or fiber.
packet-switched service or some combination.
Multiplexing—In data transmission, a function that
Interoperability Technology Association for permits two or more data sources to share a common
Information Processing (INTAP)—The technical transmission medium such that each data source has its
organization which has the official charter to develop own channel.
Japanese OSI profiles and conformance tests.
Network Element (NE)—Any device which is part of
ITU—International Telecommunications Union a communications transmission path and serves one or
more of the section, line, or path terminating functions.
Local Exchange Company (LEC)—A telephone
company that provides customer access to the world- Network Management System (NMS)—A system
wide public switched network through one of its responsible for managing at least part of a network.
central offices. NMSs communicate with agents to help keep track of
network statistics, resources, and performance.
Megabit (Mb/s)—One million bits.
OC-192—Optical carrier Level 192. Sonet bit rate of
Megabits Per Second (Mb/s)—A digital transmis-
10 Gb/s.
sion speed of millions of bits per second.
OC-48—Optical carrier Level 48. Sonet bit rate of
Multi-conductor copper cable—Provides trans-
2.4 Gb/s.
mission facilities for VF and digital services up to
1.5MB/s. Upper bit rate growth possible through new Optical Carrier (OC-x)—Fundamental unit used in
technology such as ADSL (Adaptive Digital Subscriber SONET (Synchronous Optical NETwork) hierarchy.
Loop). OC indicates an optical signal and x represents incre-
ments of 51.84 Mbps. OC-1, -3, and -12 equal optical
rates of 51, 155, and 622 Mbps.
Optical Carrier 1 (OC-1)—ITU-ISS physical stan- Public Switched Network—The combined trans-
dard for optical fiber used in transmission systems mission facilities of the world’s telephone companies
operating at 51.84 Mb/s. and administrations, including all those circuits avail-
able to subscribers on an unrestricted basis.
Optical Carrier 3 (OC-3)—Optical Carrier level 3,
SONET rate of 155.52 Mb/s, matches STS-3. Regenerator—Device that restores a degraded digital
signal for continued transmission; also called a
OSI—Open Systems Interconnection. The only inter-
repeater.
nationally accepted framework of standards for
communication between different systems made by Regional Bell Operating Company (RBOC)—
different vendors. OSI was developed by the (1) One of six telephone companies created after
International Standards Organization (ISO). ISO’s AT&T divestiture. (2) The acronym for the local tele-
major goal is to create an open systems networking phone companies created in 1984 as part of the break-
environment where any vendor’s computer system, up of AT&T. The six RBOCs are Ameritech, Bell
connected to any network, can freely share data with Atlantic, Bell South, NYNEX, Southwestern Bell,
any other computer system on that network or a linked and U.S. West.
network. Most of the dominant communications proto-
Repeater—(1) A device that regenerates and propa-
cols used today have a structure based on the OSI
gates electrical signals between two network segments.
model. The OSI model organizes the communications
(2) Device that restores a degraded digital signal for
process into seven different categories and places the
continued transmission; also called a regenerator.
categories in a layered sequence based on their relation
to other user. Layers seven through four deal with end Ring—Connection of network elements in a circular
to end communications between the message source logical topology.
and the message destination, while layers three through Ring Topology—Topology in which the network
one deal with network access. consists of a series of repeaters, add-drop multiplexers,
Pleisiochronous Digital Hierarchy (PDH)— or terminals. Ring networks are relatively immune to
Asynchronous multiplexing scheme from T1 to T3 and interruption and fiber cuts, because of the multiple
higher; contrast with SDH. transmission paths that are implied in the ring.
Provider—A company that provides an interface Signaling—(1) The process of sending a transmission
between the teleservices platform and an installed tele- signal over a physical medium for purposes of commu-
phone device, such as a telephone line or a fax nication. (2) Method of communication between
machine. network components to provide control management
and performance monitoring.
Public Network—A network operated by common
carriers or telecommunications administrations for the
provision of circuit-switched, packet-switched and
leased-line circuits to the public.
Single Mode—Used to describe optical fiber that Time Division Multiplexing (TDM)—Technique
allows only one mode of light signal transmission. where information from multiple channels may be allo-
cated bandwidth on a single wire based on time slot
Single-mode Fiber—Also called monomode. Single-
assignment.
mode fiber has a narrow core that allows light to enter
only at a single angle. Such fiber has higher bandwidth TMN—Telecommunication Management Network. A
than multimode fiber, but requires a light source with a concept where all OMCs (Operation and Maintenance
narrow spectral width (for example, a LASER). Centers) are linked together to form a network. A
centralization occurs to facilitate control, monitoring,
Survivability—A property of a system, subsystem,
and management of all devices in the communications
equipment, process, or procedure that provides a
network.
defined degree of assurance that the device or system
will continue to work during and after a natural or Transport Layer—OSI layer that is responsible for
man-made disturbance. reliable end-to-end data transfer between end systems.
Switch—A device which filters, forwards, and directs Unidirectional—Operating in only one direction.
frames or circuits based on destination address.
Wavelength—The length of one complete wave of
Synchronous Digital Hierarchy (SDH)—ITU- an alternating or vibrating phenomenon, generally
TSS international standard for transmission over measured from crest to crest or from trough to trough
optical fiber. of successive waves.
Synchronous Optical Network (SONET)— Wavelength Division Multiplexing (WDM)—
(1) A set of standards for transmitting digital informa- two or more colors of light on one fiber.
tion over optical networks. “Synchronous” indicates
that all pieces of the SONET signal can be tied to a
single clock. (2) A CCITT standard for synchronous
transmission up to multigigabit speeds. (3) A standard
for fiber optics.
Synchronous Transport Signal 1 (STS-1)—
(1) SONET standard for transmission over OC-1 optical
fiber at 51.84 Mb/s. (2) A SONET frame including
overhead and payload capacity. The basic SONET
frame is the STS-1. STS-1s can be multiplexed or
concatenated with no additional overhead.
MultiWave 1600 TM
Features:
• Operates over existing fiber plant
Visit ATG’s Web Site • Provides up to 16 channels of various bit
rates over one fiber
to read, download, and print • Integrates with existing transmission
systems
all the Technology Guides • Operates up to 600 km without
regeneration
in this series. • Provides for modular capacity upgrades
• Integrated network management
Benefits:
• Multiplies fiber capacity by 1600%
• Allows redeployment of existing
equipment
http://www.techguide.com • Relieves fiber constraints
• Facilitates deployment of survivable
networks
• Increases capacity for new services
• Provides rapid incremental expansion
• Reduces expensive fiber builds and
network costs
• Eliminates regenerators and repeater sites
• Consolidates equipment from multiple
fiber systems
CIENA CIENA
MultiWaveTM 1600 CIENA WaveWatcher MultiWaveTM 1600
Terminal Integrated Network Terminal
Management
Ciena.Final 6/3/97 5:57 PM Page 42
http://www.techguide.com