MSC General Structural Engineering October 2010
MSC General Structural Engineering October 2010
PLEASE NOTE. This specification provides a concise summary of the main features of the programme and the learning outcomes that a
typical student might reasonably be expected to achieve and demonstrate if he/she takes full advantage of the learning opportunities that
are provided. This specification provides a source of information for students and prospective students seeking an understanding of the
nature of the programme and may be used by the College for review purposes and sent to external examiners. More detailed information
on the learning outcomes, content and teaching, learning and assessment methods of each module can be found in the course handbook
or on-line at http://www3.imperial.ac.uk/structuralengineering/msccourses. The accuracy of the information contained in this document
is reviewed by the College and may be checked by the Quality Assurance Agency.
4. Name of Final Award (BEng / BSc / MEng etc): MSc and DIC (Equates to 90 ECTS Credits)
9. Relevant QAA Subject Benchmarking Group(s) and/or other external/internal reference points
Engineering
10. Level(s) of programme within the Framework for Higher Education Qualifications (FHEQ):
To provide students with a solid technical basis in the key areas of the engineering
profession through delivery of a coherent, coordinated and balanced degree programme,
integrating core engineering science with practical application
To enable students to acquire a mature appreciation of the context in which engineering
projects are developed within the industry
To develop in our students excellence in oral, written and graphical communication.
To provide students with sufficient material to explore the subject, to carry out self-
organised study, and to think about the issues and challenges of the material, in preparation
for, or advancement in, professional practice
The General Structural Engineering MSc/DIC course at Imperial College provides advanced training in
the design, analysis, assessment and evaluation of concrete, steel and composite structures
including bridges and buildings. These courses are career-orientated and cover both the theoretical
background and practical design considerations. The courses are suitable for practicing engineers
with several years experience and recent graduates.
The courses consist of a number of core subjects and electives modules which are taken in the first
two terms. All core courses must be taken, in addition to electives in both taught terms, to a total of
12 modules in completion of the programmes. For certain spring term modules, the related module
in autumn term is a prerequisite. The electives enable students to develop a primary study theme
(e.g. advanced structural analysis, concrete materials and structural assessment or seismic design of
concrete structures). The courses attach considerable importance to design which is reflected in the
design projects undertaken as part of the Design and Construction core module which is assessed
entirely by course- and project work.
In the final five months of the courses, students undertake either one two-week conceptual design
project and a major investigative research dissertation, or two two-week conceptual design projects
and a major detailed design oriented project.
Distinctive features of this programme include a strong quantitative element and pathways
focussing on different elements of structural engineering through a diverse set of options supported
by world-class teaching and research expertise in relevant disciplines.
16. The following reference points were used in creating this programme specification
16. Programme structure and features, curriculum units (modules), ECTS assignment and award
requirements
Students take a mixture of core and elective modules in the first term (October-December) and second
term (January-March).
An individual investigative design or research oriented project (final project) is carried out continuously
from May. From May onwards, all student time is devoted to the final project. The overall pass mark is
50% with a requirement to achieve 50% in the taught modules (written examination and associated
coursework) and 50% in the final project/dissertation. This is in line with the policy on assessment of
advanced postgraduate courses provided by Imperial College London.
The following tables lists the modules to be undertaken by students on the programmes to which
this Specification refers, for completion of all requirements of the degrees:
Modules Undertaken
The modules are assessed by means of unseen examination papers, courseworks, design projects and a
major dissertation. ECTS allocations are listed above by module and in the following tables by
assessment.
The programmes are also offered on a part time basis. The academic requirements associated with
the part time modes are the same as those for full time study, but attendance at College is spread
over two or three years on a day release or term release basis. In day release mode, students attend
College between one and two days per week over two or three years. In term release mode, the
student attends College full time for a term in each of three years. Throughout their period of part
time study, students are supported through contact with their Personal Tutors and other members
of staff.
Term 1 (autumn)
All MSc students attend an induction programme, which includes the following:
an introduction to the Department, Safety and use of support facilities, including ICT and
computing
introductions to the library and information retrieval, referencing and avoiding plagiarism
Cluster staff, the programme of studies, the timetable and assessment.
In addition, they meet with their Personal Tutor. Those students with perceived English language
deficiencies are encouraged to at this stage to seek remedial support from the English Language
Support Unit. A series of Maths Workshops are made available to students to assist with the
mathematical components of the programmes. An evening social event, to which all students and
staff are invited, is held in the first few weeks.
Students are required to attend course modules lectures and submit coursework assignments.
Term 2 (spring)
Students are advised of available dissertation topics in February and are required to select their topic by
March. They are encouraged to begin to put in place those arrangements that are deemed appropriate
for their research projects from March onwards and especially to focus on developing an understanding
of the research problem.
Those students opting for the Detailed Design project are given their project specifications at the
commencement of their projects.
Term 3 (summer)
The first two weeks of the Summer Term are given over to examination of the modules undertaken in
the Spring Term. Following the examinations all students must undertake a two week conceptual
design project followed either by the research dissertation or a further two week conceptual design
project and then the Major Design Project. Students dedicate themselves full-time to their investigative
design or research orientated project; at this stage it is expected that the students have a full
understanding of the nature and needs associated with the project. All projects and dissertations are
conducted at Imperial College, but may involve an industrial collaboration.
The Design project assessment is based primarily on the written document, initially marked by the
supervisor, and 2nd marked by another academic, then presented to members of staff, industrial
contributors and other MSc Students.
The Research Dissertation is also primarily based on the written document, again 1st and 2nd marked,
then defended by the student at viva-voce examination attended by both markers.
Subsequently, further scrutiny is provided the External Examiner and the Board of Examiners.
The minimum qualification for consideration for admission is normally an Upper Second Class
Honours degree in Civil Engineering from a UK academic institution or an equivalent overseas
qualification, or an Upper Second Class Honours degree in another engineering discipline or a
science-based subject from a UK academic institution or equivalent overseas qualification with
relevant experience.
Where an applicant has a lesser degree qualification but has substantial work experience and
outstanding references, the Admissions Panel may, exceptionally, make a special case for
admission; few such applications are made, and are subject to the approval of the Graduate
School.
Selection is primarily based on the information supplied in the application and supporting
documentation, with particular weight being given to the reference letters, work experience and
academic history. All applications are reviewed by an Admissions Panel, and all decisions are
joint. Historical knowledge and familiarity with qualifications presented inform judgements. A
number of candidates are interviewed in each cycle.
21. Methods for evaluating and improving the quality and standards of teaching and learning.
a) Methods for review and evaluation of teaching, learning, assessment, the curriculum and
outcome standards:
The Faculty Studies Committees and the Graduate Schools Postgraduate Quality Committees review
and consider the reports of external examiners and accrediting bodies and conduct periodic
(normally quinquennial) and internal reviews of teaching provision. Regular reviews ensure that
there is opportunity to highlight examples of good practice and ensure that recommendations for
improvement can be made.
At programme level, the Head of Department has overall responsibility for academic standards and
the quality of the educational experience delivered within the department.
The Departments MSc courses are accredited by the relevant professional engineering and science
Institutions via the quinquennial Joint Board of Moderators (JBM) review. Accreditation provides the
College with additional assurance that its programmes are of an appropriate standard and relevant
to the requirement of industry and the professions. This accreditation recognised our MSc
programmes as Periods of Further Learning towards Chartership.
b) Committees with responsibility for monitoring and evaluating quality and standards:
The Senate oversees the quality assurance and regulation of degrees offered by the College. It is
charged with promoting the academic work of the College, both in teaching and research, and with
regulating and supervising the education and discipline of the students of the College. It has
responsibility for approval of changes to the Academic Regulations, major changes to degree
programmes and approval of new programmes.
The Quality Assurance Advisory Committee (QAAC) is the main forum for discussion of QA policy
and the regulation of degree programmes at College level. QAAC develops and advises the Senate on
the implementation of codes of practice and procedures relating to quality assurance and audit of
quality and arrangements necessary to ensure compliance with national and international standards.
QAAC also considers amendments to the Academic Regulations before making recommendations for
change to the Senate. It also maintains an overview of the statistics on completion rates,
withdrawals, examination irregularities (including cases of plagiarism), student appeals and
disciplinaries.
The Faculty Teaching Committees maintain and develop teaching strategies and promote inter-
departmental and inter-faculty teaching activities to enhance the efficiency of teaching within
Faculties. They also identify and disseminate examples of good practice in teaching.
Departmental Teaching Committees have responsibility for the approval of minor changes to course
curricula and examination structures and approve arrangements for course work. They also consider
the details of entrance requirements and determine departmental postgraduate student numbers.
The Faculty Studies Committees and the Graduate School Postgraduate Quality Committees receive
regular reports from the Departmental Teaching Committees.
c) Mechanisms for providing prompt feedback to students on their performance in course work
and examinations and processes for monitoring that these named processes are effective:
a. Students are advised on their progress in examinations within six weeks of the sittings.
This is done in letter format using grades as indications of progress
b. GTAS, specifically trained in the marking of coursework and minor project elements are
used to ensure return of marked work within the 4-week specification
c. Marked and annotated Coursework is returned to students
d. Some academic staff provide verbal feedback in class, others distribute written
overviews
d) Mechanisms for gaining student feedback on the quality of teaching and their learning
experience and how students are provided with feedback as to actions taken as a result of
their comments:
Student Feedback Questionnaires reports are sent to individual staff. The Course Director
is responsible for action on points raised with the relevant member of staff where necessary
SSLC minutes (including actionable items) are posted to the Department Intranet
Meetings with Personal Tutors
f) Mechanisms for recognising and rewarding excellence in teaching and in pastoral care:
Staff are encouraged to reflect on their teaching, in order to introduce enhancements and develop
innovative teaching methods. Each year College awards are presented to academic staff for
outstanding contributions to teaching, pastoral care or research supervision. A special award for
Teaching Innovation, available each year, is presented to a member of staff who has demonstrated
an original and innovative approach to teaching. Nominations for these awards come from across
the College and students are invited both to nominate staff and to sit on the deciding panels.
All new lecturing staff are required to undertake CASLAT and Workshops appropriate to teaching.
Each probationary lecturer is allocated a mentor, one of the requirements of the mentor is to audit
teaching.
The MSc degree is awarded to any student who achieves all of the following:
(1) An aggregate mark of not less than 50% in all examinations and associated coursework, AND
(2) A mark of not less than 50% in the major project or dissertation.
* In line with the policy on assessment of advanced postgraduate courses provided by Imperial
College, no compensation will be given in assessments in which a candidate has achieved less than
40% in one or more of the examination papers.
Provided that all thee of the above criteria are satisfied, the MSc degree will be awarded in one of
the following classifications:
Summary of grades, marks and their interpretation for MSc degree classification
For postgraduate taught programmes: A candidate for a Masters degree who is prevented owing to
illness or the death of a near relative or other cause judged sufficient by the Graduate Schools from
completing at the normal time the examination or Part of the examination for which he/she has
entered may, at the discretion of the Examiners,
(a) Enter the examination in those elements in which he/she was not able to be examined on the
next occasion when the examination is held in order to complete the examination,
or
(b) be set a special examination in those elements of the examination missed as soon as possible
and/or be permitted to submit any work prescribed (e.g. report) at a date specified by the Board of
Examiners concerned. The special examination shall be in the same format as specified in the course
regulations for the element(s) missed.
Applications, which must be accompanied by a medical certificate or other statement of the grounds
on which the application is made, shall be submitted to the Academic Registrar who will submit
them to the Board of Examiners.
For postgraduate taught programmes: Candidates should only be considered for promotion to Pass,
Merit or Distinction if their aggregate mark is within 2.5% of the relevant borderline. Nevertheless,
candidates whom the Board deems to have exceptional circumstances may be considered for
promotion even if their aggregate mark is more than 2.5% from the borderline. In such cases the
necessary extra marks should be credited to bring the candidates aggregate mark into the higher
range.
External examiners (from other universities and research institutes) are nominated by the MSc
Academic Board and approved by the Graduate School of Engineering & Physical Sciences
Management (or Executive) Committee. A External Examiner is appointed for each course; and
normally serve for 3 years. The role of External Examiner is that of moderator.
The primary duty of external examiners is to ensure that the degrees awarded by the College are
consistent with that of the national university system. External examiners are also responsible for
approval of draft question papers, assessment of examination scripts, projects and coursework and
24. Key sources of information about the programme can be found in:
Key sources of information about this course can be found in:
Postgraduate Prospectus, Imperial College London (available on-line
http://www.imperial.ac.uk)
Postgraduate Training in Structural Engineering at Imperial College (available on-line
http://www.cv.imperial.ac.uk/courses/msc/pg_index.asp)
MSc Course Handbook & Assessment Handbook (available on request to
[email protected])