MSD Prevention Ont Guideline 2007
MSD Prevention Ont Guideline 2007
PREVENTION GUIDELINE
M U S C U LO S K E L E TAL D I S O RD E R S P RE V E N T I O N S E RI E S
PART 1:
MSD Prevention
Guideline for Ontario
MSD
Musculoskeletal Disorders
Disclaimer
The material contained in this guideline is for information and reference
purposes only and not intended as legal or professional advice. The adoption of
the practices described in this Guideline may not meet the needs, requirements
or obligations of individual workplaces.
Use, reproduction and/or duplication of this guideline is recommended and
encouraged.
XX%
5157A (02/07)
Occupational Health and Safety Council of Ontario (OHSCO)
M U S C U LO S K E L E TAL D I S O RD E R S P RE V E N T I O N S E RI E S
PART 1:
MSD Prevention
Guideline for Ontario
Table of Contents
Acknowledgements .......................................................................................... iii
Scope of the Guideline ..................................................................................... iii
MSDMusculoskeletal Disorders
Resources ................................................................................................ 25
Acknowledgements
This document, the Musculoskeletal Disorder (MSD) Prevention Guideline for Ontario, is part
1 of the Occupational Health and Safety Council of Ontarios Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSD)
Prevention Series. It was developed in partnership with the members of the Occupational Health
and Safety Council of Ontario (OHSCO), with the support of the Centre of Research Expertise for
the Prevention of Musculoskeletal Disorder (CRE-MSD), and in consultation with representatives
from Ontarios labour organizations, employer associations, and individual employers and workers.
Supporting organizations include:
Construction Safety Association of Ontario
Education Safety Association of Ontario
Electrical & Utilities Safety Association
Farm Safety Association
Industrial Accident Prevention Association
Institute for Work & Health
Mines and Aggregates Safety and Health Association
Municipal Health and Safety Association
Occupational Health Clinics for Ontario Workers
Ontario Forestry Safe Workplace Association
Ontario Ministry of Labour
Ontario Safety Association for Community and Healthcare
Ontario Service Safety Alliance
Pulp and Paper Health and Safety Association
Transportation Health and Safety Association of Ontario
Workers Health and Safety Centre
Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (Ontario)
The support and participation of everyone who contributed to the development of the MSD
Prevention Guideline for Ontario and its related documents is greatly appreciated.
M
usculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) are the number one type MSD FACTS
of work-related lost-time claim reported to the Workplace In Ontario, MSDs account for:
Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) in Ontario. MSDs: 42% of all lost-time claims
42% of all lost-time claim costs, and
cause pain and suering for thousands of workers every
50% of all lost-time days.
year, and
(Averages for 19962004)
cost Ontarios workplaces hundreds of millions of dollars
due to absenteeism and lost productivity.
DEFINITION OF MSD
MSDs are injuries and disorders of the musculoskeletal system. They may be caused or aggravated by
various hazards or risk factors in the workplace.
The musculoskeletal system includes:
muscles, tendons and tendon sheathes
nerves
bursa
blood vessels
joints/spinal discs, and
ligaments.
MSDs do not include musculoskeletal injuries or disorders that are the direct result of a fall, struck by
or against, caught in or on, vehicle collision, violence, etc.
MSD is an umbrella term for a number of injuries and disorders of the muscles, tendons, nerves,
etc. Other terms that mean the same include:
repetitive strain injury (RSI)
cumulative trauma disorder (CTD)
work-related musculoskeletal disorder (WMSD)
musculoskeletal injury (MSI, MSK)
occupational overuse syndrome (OOS), and
sprain and strain.
MSDs are strongly linked to known risk factors or hazards in the workplace. We can take action
to prevent MSDs in Ontario.
A
number of suggested steps for creating a foundation for a successful MSD prevention
program are outlined below. These steps have been shown to be important. However, the
elements listed for each step are not all inclusive, and not all elements may be required
or applicable in all workplaces. Among the most important steps are management commitment,
vision, leadership and worker participation.
See Section 3 of the Resource Manual for the MSD Prevention Guideline for Ontario for
more information on how to establish a foundation for success.
for Success
or H&S reps, and workers in preventing MSDs
review reports of MSD hazards and take corrective action
annually review the MSD prevention aspects of the overall health and safety policy and
program in consultation with the JHSC or H&S rep, and
report on progress of MSD prevention eorts.
Establish and Communicate a Process for Identifying and Controlling MSD Hazards
Workplace parties are encouraged to:
look for MSD hazards during regular workplace inspections
identify MSD hazards when doing job task analysis
review reports of MSD concerns and hazards during JHSC meetings
establish a process for assessing MSD risk
consider potential MSD hazards when making any change in the workplace
ensure that all workers are aware of how MSD hazards will be identied and controlled,
and
create an MSD prevention plan that outlines the objectives for, methods to be used in and
expectations of any MSD prevention activities implemented in the workplace.
W
hile not strictly part of the MSD prevention framework, it is important to understand
what MSD hazards are before trying to recognize them in the workplace.
Many jobs have MSD hazards things about the job or the way the job is done that
increase the risk of a worker developing an MSD. While a number of things can increase MSD risk,
the primary MSD hazards are force, xed or awkward postures, and repetitions.
Force
Force refers to the amount of eort made by the muscles, and the amount of pressure
on body parts as a result of dierent job demands. All work tasks require workers to use
their muscles to exert some level of force. However, when a task requires them to exert a
level of force that is too high for any particular muscle, it can damage the muscle or the
related tendons, joints and other soft tissue.
This damage can occur from a single movement or action that requires the muscles
to generate a very high level of force. However, more commonly, the damage results when
muscles generate moderate to high levels of force repeatedly, for a long duration, and/or while
the body is in an awkward posture.
Some job tasks result in high force loads on dierent parts of the body. For example, lifting
a heavy load that is far from the body increases the pressure (compressive force) on the spinal
discs and vertebrae in the lower back. This can potentially damage both the discs and the verte-
brae.
Another source of force on the body that can potentially cause damage comes from working
with hand tools that have hard or sharp edges, resting the forearms on the hard edge of a desk,
etc. This force can compress the tendons, muscles, blood vessels and nerves under the skin, which
can damage these tissues.
With force, it is important to consider not only how much force is involved but also:
how long workers need to keep exerting the force
Section 4: Understanding
how many times the force is exerted in a given period of time, and
the posture used when exerting the force.
MSD Hazards
Fixed or Awkward Postures
Posture is another name for the position of various parts of the body during any activity. For
most joints, a good or neutral posture means that the joints are being used near the middle of the
full range of motion.
The farther a joint moves towards either end of its range of motion, or the farther away from the
neutral posture, the more awkward or poor the posture becomes and the more strain is put on the
muscles, tendons and ligaments around the joint. For example, when arms are fully stretched out,
the elbow and shoulder joints are at the end of their range of motion. If the worker pulls or lifts
Repetition
The risk of developing an MSD increases when the same parts of the body are used repeatedly, with
few breaks or chances for rest. Highly repetitive tasks can lead to fatigue, tissue damage, and, even-
tually, pain and discomfort. This can occur even if the level of force is low and the work postures
are not very awkward.
With repetitive tasks, it is not only important to consider how repetitive the task is but also:
how long workers perform the task
the posture required, and
the amount of force being used.
whole-body vibration
cold temperatures
work methods.
See Section 4 of the Resource Manual for the MSD Prevention Guideline for Ontario for
more information on understanding MSD hazards.
W
orkplaces are encouraged to set up a process for recognizing jobs with MSD hazards
even if no MSDs, worker concerns, or reports of discomfort have been recorded. While
this may seem like a great deal of work, identifying and controlling MSD hazards
before workers actually report an MSD, e.g. being proactive, can actually save you money, since you
avoid all of the cost associated with an MSD related claim.
Workplaces are also encouraged to take advantage of information that they may already collect
and review to help recognize jobs with existing MSDs and related concerns (i.e. accident/injury
statistics, discomfort surveys, etc). Although this is a more reactive approach, for workplaces just
starting, identifying problem jobs or tasks through MSD injuries and
concerns may be an excellent starting point. Once MSD injuries and POINT TO REMEMBER
concerns are identied such workplaces may then wish to look at the If you already have a process for
proactive approaches to help identify the types of MSD hazards present. improving production, quality
and/or service levels (e.g., Lean, 5S or
Activities that can be used to recognize jobs with MSD Hazards and Kaizen), make sure that you consider
jobs with MSDs or related concerns are briey described below. MSD hazards when you look for
See Section 5 of the Resource Manual for the MSD Prevention opportunities to improve and make
Guideline for Ontario for more information on recognizing MSD any changes to any job or workstation.
Risk Assessment
Risk Assessment
T
his section outlines a 2-step risk assessment process:
a simple assessment used when the root causes of the
MSD hazard appear to be obvious, and
a more in-depth assessment for more complex MSD
hazards and issues.
See Section 6 of the MSD Resource Manual for the MSD
Prevention Guideline for Ontario for more information on
conducting an MSD risk assessment.
Encourage the workers to focus on the parts of the job that they consider dicult or demanding.
If workers are expressing concerns about pain and discomfort related to the job, ask them which
actions or activities they believe are contributing to their pain and discomfort. Share the results of
these discussions with the JHSC or H&S rep.
complete. If a workplace does not have anyone with this knowledge and experience, it may be
necessary to bring in a qualied individual.
See the Resource Manual for the MSD Prevention Guideline for Ontario for more infor-
mation and guidance on in-depth MSD risk assessments.
T
he process for choosing and implementing controls for MSD hazards is described below.
See Section 7 of the Resource Manual for the MSD Preven-
POINT TO REMEMBER
check to make sure that it is working as expected and there are no surprises. Check that:
the expectations of the workers involved in the project have been met
the correct solution was installed and it was installed correctly
all appropriate workers have been trained on how to use the control
all workers can demonstrate how and when to use the control
the concerns of maintenance personnel are addressed
up- and downstream processes have been reviewed to ensure that no new hazards have
been introduced, and
initial feedback of workers is documented.
T
he recommended steps for evaluating all MSD prevention projects are described below.
See Section 8 of the Resource Manual for the MSD Prevention Guideline for
Ontario for more information on following up on and evaluating success of implemented
controls.
Evaluate Success
fully successful. If this is the case, you
workers and supervisors have been trained on how to use may not have properly identified all of
the control, and the MSD hazards. Return to Section 5
(Recognize MSD hazards and related
all workers have had a chance to use and get used to the concerns).
control.
Shortly after implementing the control, you should:
observe workers to see whether they are using the controls and using them correctly
use the MSD hazard identication tool(s) to verify that the hazards continue to be
controlled and that no new hazards have been introduced, and
ask all appropriate workers for their feedback on the control.
Document the information collected during this evaluation and report back to all appropriate
workers and the JHSC or H&S rep. If concerns are noted, ask the project team to discuss them and
suggest ways to alleviate them.
A more formal and in-depth evaluation should be done once the nalized control has been in
use for a period of time (e.g., 36 months). By this time, the workers should have a very good idea
of how the control works and the positives or negatives associated with its use.
Cole D, Rivilis I, Van Eerd D, Cullen K, Irvin E, Kramer D. 2005. Eectiveness of Participatory Ergonomic Interventions:
A Systematic Review. Toronto: Institute for Work and Health (www.iwh.on.ca)
Hagbert M, Silverstein, B., Wells R, et al. 1995. Work Related Musculoskeletal Disorders (WMSDs): A Reference Book for
Prevention. Bristol PA: Taylor & Francis
Health and Safety Executive. 2002. Upper Limb Disorders in the Workplace. United Kingdom (www.hsebooks.com)
National Research Council, 1999. Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders. National Academy of Sciences. Washington,
DC: National Academy Press
NIOSH. 1997. A Critical Review of Epidemiologic Evidence for Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders of the Neck,
Upper Extremity and Low Back (http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/97-141/)
Occupational Health and Safety Council of Ontario, 2007. Occupational Health and Safety Council of Ontarios MSD
Prevention Series. Part 2: Resource Manual for the MSD Prevention Guideline for Ontario. (WSIB Form Number:
5158A).
Occupational Health and Safety Council of Ontario, 2007. Occupational Health and Safety Council of Ontarios MSD
Prevention Series. Part 3: MSD Prevention Toolbox. (WSIB Form Number: 5159A).
Review Process
The MSD Prevention Guideline for Ontario (the Guideline) will be regularly reviewed and
modied in order to provide Ontario workplaces with information on new research ndings,
assessment methods, control approaches, etc. The review process is described below:
1) The Guideline will be formally reviewed by a technical committee appointed by OHSCO every
ve (5) years from the date of publication. The committee will consider all received requests
for modications and the current state of research related to MSD prevention. The technical
committee will make a recommendation to OHSCO to re-arm or update the Guideline.
2) If the recommendation is to update the Guideline, the technical committee will meet to
consider the specic changes to be made.
3) The recommended changes will be presented to OSHCO for approval. Once approved by
OHSCO the recommended changes will be distributed to external stakeholders for comment.
4) After the comment period, the technical committee will meet to review all comments received
and submit a nal version of the updated Guideline to OSHCO.
5) An early review of the Guideline may be considered if information regarding new and well-
supported research ndings is received, and if the new research ndings suggest that informa-
tion in the Guideline is not providing Ontario workplaces with a reasonable approach to MSD
prevention.
6) The Chair of OHSCO will ensure that all comments or requests for modications are reviewed
on an annual basis.
7) All requests for changes or modications to the Guideline should be sent to:
By Email: [email protected]
Please put MSD Prevention Guideline c/o Best Practices Branch in the e-mails subject eld.