Scribd
Upload
225 views

Adju Sheet Fix

This document contains adjudication sheets for a debating competition. It evaluates 6 speakers across 3 rounds and scores them on various criteria like case clarity, arguments, delivery, and more. It also identifies strengths and weaknesses of each speaker and determines after each round which side is winning and by how much. In the end, it indicates the overall winner of the debate and the reasons why.

Uploaded by

fajar hidayat
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
225 views

Adju Sheet Fix

This document contains adjudication sheets for a debating competition. It evaluates 6 speakers across 3 rounds and scores them on various criteria like case clarity, arguments, delivery, and more. It also identifies strengths and weaknesses of each speaker and determines after each round which side is winning and by how much. In the end, it indicates the overall winner of the debate and the reasons why.

Uploaded by

fajar hidayat
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Date: Sheet 1

BRAIN Debating Competition


Adjudication Sheet
Topic:

1st Speaker School: 2nd Speaker School:


Definition: Definition:

Allocation: 1st spkr. 2nd spkr. Allocation: 1st spkr. 2nd spkr.
Team Line? Team Line?

Case clear? Case clear?

Method score /16 Method score /16


Arguments: Rebuttal/Arguments:

Matter score /32 Matter score /32


Effectiveness of delivery: Effectiveness of delivery:

Manner score /32 Manner score /32


Total: /80 Total: /80
Commendable aspects: Commendable aspects:

Weaknesses: Weaknesses:
Which of these two speakers was more convincing?
Why?

Sheet 2
BRAIN Debating Competition
Adjudication Sheet
3rd Speaker 4th Speaker
Rebuttal/Arguments: Rebuttal/Arguments:

Matter score /32 Matter score /32


Effectiveness of delivery: Effectiveness of delivery:

Manner score /32 Manner score /32


Teamwork, continuity, consistency, use of time Teamwork, continuity, consistency, use of time

Method score /16 Method score /16


Total: /80 Total: /80
Commendable aspects: Commendable aspects:

Weaknesses: Weaknesses:
Which of these two speakers was more convincing? Why?

Who is winning the debate at this stage and by how much?

Sheet 3
BRAIN Debating Competition
Adjudication Sheet
5th Speaker 6th Speaker
Rebuttal/Summary Rebuttal/Summary

Matter score /32 Matter score /32


Effectiveness of delivery: Effectiveness of delivery:

Manner score /32 Manner score /32


Teamwork, continuity, consistency, use of time Teamwork, continuity, consistency, use of time,
no new material

Method score /16 Method score /16


Total: /80 Total: /80
Commendable aspects: Commendable aspects:

Weaknesses: Weaknesses:
Which of these two speakers was more convincing?

Who won the overall debate and why?

You might also like