Super-Hydrophobicity On Textiles - A Review: Chinchwade S.S. Landage S.M. Bonsule S.
Super-Hydrophobicity On Textiles - A Review: Chinchwade S.S. Landage S.M. Bonsule S.
Abstract: Engineering interfaces with unique chemical, physical and mechanical properties
has become a major branch of material science. Surfaces that combine a low surface energy
with a high surface roughness, so called superhydrophobic surfaces, are ascribed the
greatest potential in terms of their exceptional water repellent properties. Superhydrophobic
surfaces have developed great deal of interest among researchers because of their unique
ability to shed water off the surface. The two key elements that determine
superhydrophobicity are surface energy and surface roughness. Superhydrophobicity is
somewhat ambiguously applied to surfaces exhibiting a water contact angle of more than
150. Surfaces with water and oil repellency have attracted increasing interest for their
applications in diverse fields such as self-cleaning paint, sports and outdoor clothing,
biomedical layers, integrated sensors, micro-fluidic channels. Such surfaces are usually
achieved by the combination of surface geometrical structure and low surface energy
chemical compositions.
Key words: superhydrophobicity, self-cleaning, nanoparticles, surface energy etc.
*Prof., Dept. of Textiles, D.K.T.Es Textile & Egg. Institute, Ichalkaranji, India
**Asstt. Prof., Dept. of Textiles, D.K.T.Es Textile & Egg. Institute, Ichalkaranji, India
***M.Text. (Tech.Text.) candidate, D.K.T.Es Textile & Egg. Institute, Ichalkaranji, India
1. INTRODUCTION
Wettability is one of the most important properties of a solid surface and the contact angle
has been commonly used to characterize the surface wettability. Superhydrophobic surfaces
have attracted much interest because of their potential practical applications such as anti-
sticking, anti-contamination, and self-cleaning coating. Attracted by their potential industrial
applications, numerous attempts to preparing artificial superhydrophobic surfaces have
been done by mimicking the lotus leaf structure. Porous structures, nano-fibers and carbon
nanotubes have also been used to develop superhydrophobic surfaces.
1.1. Superhydrophobicity
For many years, people have been attracted by the self-cleaning property of the lotus leaf,
and dream to develop man-made superhydrophobic surfaces. Superhydrophobic and self-
cleaning surfaces exist widely in nature. Butterfly wings, legs of a water strider and leaves of
some plants are good examples. Thanks to the innovation of scanning electron microscopy,
today, scientists know the plants ability to repel water and dirt results from the
superhydrophobicity, due to the combination of micrometer-scale hills and valleys and
nanometer-scale waxy bumps, in combination with the reduced adhesion between surfaces
and particles. A surface with water contact angle large than 150 and a low sliding angle (the
critical angle where a water droplet with a certain weight begins to slide down the inclined
plate) is usually called a superhydrophobic surface. A combination of low surface energy and
adequate surface roughness is necessary to obtain superhydrophobic and superoleophobic
surface. High contact angles are achieved by reducing the surface energy of the solid surface
and increasing its roughness in an appropriate manner, thus reducing wetting. Techniques
involved in developing such surfaces include plasma treatment, chemical etching, chemical
vapor deposition, lithography, and so forth.
The value of the angle is determined by three surface tensions where the chemical
potential in the three phases should be at equilibrium. Therefore, the contact angle
relationship C derived by balancing the three tension forces onto the solid surface
sv sl
Cos c = lv
(2)
liquid, respectively. Surfaces with the water contact angle between 1500 and 1800 are
usually referred to as super-hydrophobic.
2.1. Classical models for contact angles on rough surfaces
Homogeneous solidliquid interface: Wenzel model Youngs equation is an
oversimplified expression, and is only valid for ideally flat surfaces that are atomically
smooth and chemically homogeneous. Conversely, very few solids are atomically flat.
Wetting on rough surfaces was first considered by Wenzel In the Wenzel state,
where the roughness grooves are completely filled with liquid (Fig. 2b), the contact
angle (W) can be described by.
Cos (w) = Rf [SV SL / LV]. (3)
where R is the surface roughness factor, which is defined as
Rf = actual area/projected area.. (4)
Combining Eq. (4) with Youngs equation yields
cos (w) = Rf. cos (c)................... (5)
Since the roughness factor is always larger than unity in practical situations, it is
obvious that the apparent angle on a roughened surface will become smaller if its
intrinsic contact angle on a smooth surface is less than 900. Similarly, the apparent
contact angle will be larger, if its intrinsic contact angle is larger than 900.
2.2. Heterogeneous solidliquid interface: CassieBaxter model:
The Wenzel regime is usually recognized as homogeneous wetting, since the liquid
completely penetrates into the grooves. Under some circumstances, especially with high
surface rough-ness, vapor pockets may become trapped underneath the liquid yielding a
composite interface (Fig.2c). This heterogeneous wetting phenomenon is usually described
by CassieBaxter (CB) theory, from which the apparent contact angle (CB) is given by Eq.
(6):
cos (CB) = fs. cos (c) + fv. cos (v) (6)
where C is the intrinsic contact angle on the original smooth surface, and fS and fv are
the area fractions of the solid and vapor on the surface, respectively. Since fs+ fv= 1,
and V = 1800 (implying that a suspended liquid droplet in air is a perfect sphere.),
Eq. (7) can be rewritten as follows:
cos (CB) = fs. (cos (C) +1) 1 .. (7)
From Eq. (7), it can be found that droplets will have a higher apparent contact angle
if less area is in contact with the solid substrate. The CB equation simply indicates the
contact angle can be increased even when the intrinsic contact angle of a liquid on
the original smooth surface is less than 900.
3. APPLICATION TECHNIQUES
Numerous techniques were employed to obtain super-hydrophobic and super-oleophobic
surfaces:
Covalent layer by layer assembly.
Polymer film roughening.
Chemical vapour deposition.
Sol-gel process
3.1. Covalent Layer by layer assembly
Ming, Wu, van Bentham and De With (2005) developed a procedure for preparing Super-
hydrophobic films with a dual-size hierarchical structure composed of raspberry-like
particles. These particles were silica based with amine-functionalized surface and were
chemically deposited on the epoxy films. Another layer of poly (dimethylsiloxane) was
grafted on the raspberry-like particles, thus hydrophobic characteristics were achieved.
Manca et al (2009) adopted a sol - gel process to produce a double-layer coating consisting
of silica nanoparticles with a trimethoxysiloxane-functionalized surface which were partially
embedded into an organosilica binder matrix. A glass substrate was used and the treated
surface showed super-hydrophobic contact angles.
3.2 Polymer film roughening
This process uses phase separation of a multicomponent mixture as a means to super-
hydrophobic polymer films. Franco, Kentish, Perera and Stevens (2008) designed a super-
hydrophobic polypropylene membrane by a solvent casting of polypropylene and utilizing
the surface roughness and porosity developed with a nonsolvent. Levkin, Svec and Frechet
(2009) used the phase dispersion technique where, in situ polymerization of common
monomers such as butylmethacrylate, ethylene dimethacrylate in the presence of a
pathogenic solvent such as 1-decanol, cyclohexanol and/or tetrahydrofuran resulted in
superhydrophobic surfaces with micro- and nanoscale roughness. Yuan, Chen, Tan and Zhao
(2009) prepared a stable super-hydrophobic high-density polyethylene (HDPE) surface using
REFERENCES:
1. Jeevani T, Nano-textiles: a broader perspective, Nanotechnology & Nano-medicine,
2011 edition.
2. M. Joshi, A. Bhattacharyya, Nanotechnology a new route to high-performance
functional textiles, Textile Progress, sep-2011.
3. Landage S.M., Kulkarni S.G. &Ubarhande D.P., Synthesis and application of Silica
Nanoparticles on Cotton to impart Superhydrophobicity, IJERT, Vol.1,July-2012
4. Reiner Furstner, Wilhelm Barthlott, ChristophNeinhuis, Peter Walzel, Wetting and
Self-Cleaning Properties of Artificial Superhydrophobic Surfaces, Langmuir 2005, 21,
956-961.
5. Spierings A. B., Ritter A., Henkel O., Holzdoerfer U., Investigation of Water
Repellence of Different Experimental and Commercial Coatings for Synthetic
Mountaineering Ropes, Textile Research Journal,Vol-78, Oct 2008, P 886.
6. Sato Y., Wakida T., Tokino S., Niu S., Ueda M., Mizushima H., Takekoshi S., Effects of
Crosslinking Agents on Water Repellency of Cotton Fabrics Treated with Fluocarbon
Resin, Textile Research Journal,Vol-64, June 1994, P 316.
7. Abidi N., Hequet E., Tarimala S., Functionalization of Cotton Fabric with
Vinyltrimethoxysilane, Textile Research Journal,Vol-77, Sept 2007, P 668.
8. Yu M., Gu G., Meng WD., Qing FL., Superhydrophobic Cotton Fabric Coating Based
on a Complex Layer of Silica Nanoparticles and Perfluorooctylated Quaternary
Ammonium Silane Coupling Agen., Applied Surface Science, Vol-253, May 2007, P
3669.