0% found this document useful (0 votes)
57 views

Tips, Fundus

This document discusses principles of visual field testing and perimetry. It provides guidelines for evaluating visual field tests, including following a "cookbook" approach of analyzing defects by location and comparing between eyes. Key features that localize defects to different parts of the visual pathway are described. Different types of visual field tests and their advantages/disadvantages are outlined. Factors that can influence test results and various pathological conditions that cause characteristic visual field defects are also reviewed.

Uploaded by

Amanina Amir
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
57 views

Tips, Fundus

This document discusses principles of visual field testing and perimetry. It provides guidelines for evaluating visual field tests, including following a "cookbook" approach of analyzing defects by location and comparing between eyes. Key features that localize defects to different parts of the visual pathway are described. Different types of visual field tests and their advantages/disadvantages are outlined. Factors that can influence test results and various pathological conditions that cause characteristic visual field defects are also reviewed.

Uploaded by

Amanina Amir
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Principles of Visual Field Testing and Perimetry

Chris A. Johnson, PhD, DSc, FAAO


Professor and Director of the Visual Field Reading Center
University of Iowa Department of Ophthalmology

1. Why are visual fields performed ?

(a) It is the only clinical test that measures peripheral visual function.
(b) Visual fields improve detection of disease (many ocular and neurologic deficits
affect peripheral vision before the fovea or macula is involved.
(c) Visual fields provide useful differential diagnostic information – the pattern and
location of visual loss is specific to damage at particular locations along the visual
pathways, unlike visual acuity loss, which is not very specific.
(d) Many people are unaware of peripheral vision loss, particularly if it is gradual,
and even if it affects their ability to perform daily tasks such as navigation, etc.

2. A cookbook for visual field evaluation

(a) Place the left eye visual field on the left and the right eye visual field on the right.
(b) For each eye, is the visual field normal or abnormal ? (If normal in both eyes, you’re
done)
(c) If abnormal, is it one eye or both eyes ?
(d) If in one eye, it’s retina or optic nerve.
(e) Where is the defect ? (sup, inf, nasal, temporal)
(1) Nasal or binasal – glaucoma, optic nerve or retina
(2) Bi temporal – chiasm
(3) Nasal in one eye, temporal in the other – postchiasm
(f) What is the shape (features) of the defect ?
(1) Respect the vertical, respect the horizontal, point to the blind spot, point to
fixation, etc.
(g) How do the two eyes compare ? (homonymous, congruous)
(h) Where is the most likely location of the deficit ?

3. Key features to remember

(a) Respect the horizontal - Glaucoma, optic nerve, retina


(b) Respect the vertical - Chiasm, post-chiasm
(c) Point to the blind spot - Optic nerve, glaucoma
(d) Point to fixation - Chiasm, post-chiasm
(e) Bitemporal – Chiasm
(f) Homonymous - Post-chiasm - The greater the congruity between eyes, the farther
back in the optic radiations.
(g) Central - Retina, optic nerve
4. Types of visual field testing

(a) Kinetic Perimetry


(1) Tangent Screen
(2) Goldmann Perimetry
(3) Octopus 900 Perimeter (semi-automated kinetic perimetry)
(4) Advantages and disadvantages of kinetic perimetry
(b) Static Perimetry
(1) Goldmann Perimeter (manual)
(2) Humophrey Field Analyzer (automated)
(3) Octopus 900 (automated)
(4) Other automated perimeters
(5) Advantages and disadvantages of static perimetry
(c) Suprathreshold Static Perimetry
(1) Mainly used for rapid screening
(2) There are many different procedures (some take as long as threshold testing)
(3) Little formal research has been conducted in this area
(4) Advantages and disadvantages of suprathreshold static perimetry

5. Test strategies

(a) Ascending method of limits


(b) Full Threshold (staircase)
(c) SITA (Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm) – Bayesian strategy
(d) Armany-Drance procedure (suprathreshold static perimetry)

6. Stimulus presentation pattern and target size are important (examples)

(a) Comparison of Full Threshold and SITA


(b) Size III, Size V and Full visual field evaluation in an RP patient
(c)
7. The printout for static perimetry

(a) Demographic information


(b) Patient information (age, pupil size, visual acuity etc.)
(c) Reliability indices (fixation losses, false positives, false negatives)
(d) Numerical sensitivity values
(e) Gray scale graphical presentation
(f) Summary Statistics (Mean Deviation [MD], Pattern Standard Deviation [PSD},
Glaucoma Hemifield Test [GHT]
(h) Total Deviation Plot
(i) Pattern Deviation Plot
(j) Gaze Tracking

8. Artifactual Test results


(a) Small Pupils
(b) Poor refractive correction
(c) Excessively high sensitivity, high false positives high fixation losses (trigger happy)
(d) Droopy upper lid (ptosis)
(e) Trial lens rim artifact (peripheral rim deficit)
(f) Limited attention span

9. Types of deficits associated with pathology to various portions of the visual pathways
(refer to the cookbook and key features)

(a) Optical factors (cataract, corneal abnormalities)


(1) Usually diffuse or widespread losses
(b) Retinal Disease
(1) Ring Scotomas (retinitis pigmentosa), arcuate defects (branch artery
occlusion), central and centrocecal (between the blind spot and fixation –
candle flame shaped) irregular (scalloped) edges to deficits.
(c) Glaucoma
(1) Nasal steps, paracentral defects, arcuate scotomas, temporal wedges,
fan-shaped defect that points to the blind spot.
(d) Other optic neuropathies (AION, optic neuritis, optic atrophy, idiopathic
intracranial hypertension, etc)
(1) Central scotomas, centrocecal scotomas, altitudinal defects, nasal
depression, enlarged blind spot.
(e) Chiasmal lesions (pituitary adenoma, pituitary apoplexy) – Bitemporal defects.
Defects point to fixation and vertical meridian is respected.
(f) Lateral geniculter lesions – Are very rare. Deficits appear as a tongue shape
along the horizontal meridian or the tonue is the only remaining visual
field.
(g) Post-chiasmal defects (temporal lobe, parietal lobe, occipital lobe deficits) The
vertical meridian is respected
(1) Temporal Lobe – Defects are “pie in the sky” deficits and are incongruous
between eyes and point to fixation.
(2) Parietal lobe - Defects are “pie on the floor” are more congruous between
eyes and point to fixation.
(3) Occipital lobe - Cookie cutter punched out lesions that are highly
congruous between eyes and point to fixation.

10. Remember the key features and the cookbook when making an evaluation. Don’t skip steps.

11. Visual Field Progression


(a) Use all of the visual field information (don’t just compare the current results with
the previous one – you will make many incorrect judgments.
(b) When in coubt do a repeat test (to confirm a suspected change) or assess with other
clinical information (history, other medical conditions, optic disc and retina
appearance, etc).
(c) Method of determining visual field progression

(1) Clinical judgment – Highly variable among practitioners, and there is a


tendency to overcall change
(2) Classification system - AGIS, CIGTS, etc. – Simple methods that use a 20
point scale. Does a difference from 8 to 10 mean the
same thing as one from 4 to 6 ?
(3) Event analysis - Change from baseline (Glaucoma Progression
Analysis). Can detect change quite rapidly, but ignores
data between baseline exam and current test.
(4) Trend Analysis - Usually linear regression (Progressor). Requires about
6-7 visual fields and can estimate rate of progression.
Uses all of the data.
(5) In general event analysis usually can detect change earlier than trend
analysis, but trend analysis can provide rate whereas event cannot provide a
good estimate.
(6) Every multicenter trial has used a different procedure for determining visual
field progression, and they only agree with each other 50-60% of the time.

12. New visual field test procedures

(a) Short Wavelength Automated Perimetry (SWAP) – Uses a high luminance


yellow background and a large blue spot to isolate and measure the short
wavelength pathways.
(b) Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) Perimetry – Uses a low spatial
frequency sinusoidal grating undergoing high frequency counterphase flicker.
The Matrix perimeter is the second generation FDT device that can provide
more stimulus presentation patterns, analysis and storage capabilities.
(c) Pulsar perimetry – Similar to FDT, except that it uses a 2 dimensional sine
wave pattern and varies the spatial and temporal frequency of the target.
(d) Flicker Perimetry – Can occur in many forms (critical flicker frequency,
flicker modulation perimetry, luminance pedestal flicker perimetry).
(e) Motion Perimetry – Also in many forms (displacement of a single stimulus,
coherent motion of random dots or motion of a subset of dots).
(f) Rarebit perimetry – A suprathreshold test that performs fine detail mappingof
the visual field.
(g) Microperimetry – A fine detail mapping technique that compensates for eye
movements during testing.
(h) Multifocal Visual Evoked Potentials (mfVEP). – An electrophysiological
procedure that determines local visual evoked cortical potentials from the
visual area (area 17 or occipital lobe) of the brain.
(i) Pupil perimetry – Measures the pupil dynamics of the visual field to stimuli
presented at different visual field locations.

You might also like