0% found this document useful (0 votes)
36 views

Anuual Income Occupation Best Investment Avenue: Case Processing Summary

The document is a case processing summary that examines the relationship between annual income, occupation, and best investment avenue for 75 cases. It provides frequency tables showing the distribution of cases across each variable and their intersections. A chi-square test was performed and found a significant relationship between annual income, occupation, and best investment avenue for mutual funds but not for other investment types.

Uploaded by

Mani Krish
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
36 views

Anuual Income Occupation Best Investment Avenue: Case Processing Summary

The document is a case processing summary that examines the relationship between annual income, occupation, and best investment avenue for 75 cases. It provides frequency tables showing the distribution of cases across each variable and their intersections. A chi-square test was performed and found a significant relationship between annual income, occupation, and best investment avenue for mutual funds but not for other investment types.

Uploaded by

Mani Krish
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 38

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Anuual Income * Occupation 75 100.0% 0 .0% 75 100.0%


* Best Investment Avenue
Anuual Income * Occupation 75 100.0% 0 .0% 75 100.0%
* Percentage of Saving from
Your Total Income
Anuual Income * Occupation 75 100.0% 0 .0% 75 100.0%
* Bank Savings

Anuual Income * Occupation * Best Investment Avenue


Crosstab
Count

Occupation

Pvt Firm Self Busines Profession Agriculturi


Best Investment Avenue Employee Employed s al st

Bank Saving Anuual 1 Lakhs 0 0 2 0


Income Between 1 Lakhs to 0 4 1 1
2 Lakhs

Between 2 Lakhs to 1 0 0 0
3 Lakhs

Between 3 Lakhs to 0 0 0 0
4 Lakhs

Total 1 4 3 1
Fixed Deposit Anuual 1 Lakhs 0 1 0
Income Between 1 Lakhs to 2 0 1
2 Lakhs
Between 4 Lakhs to 1 0 0
5 Lakhs
Total 3 1 1
Postal Saving Anuual Between 2 Lakhs to 1
Income 3 Lakhs
Total 1
Company Anuual 1 Lakhs 0 1
Deposit Income Between 2 Lakhs to 1 0
3 Lakhs
Total 1 1
Shares/Debentu Anuual Between 3 Lakhs to 3
res Income 4 Lakhs
Total 3
Gold/Sliver Anuual 1 Lakhs 2 0 0
Income Between 3 Lakhs to 2 2 2
4 Lakhs
Total 4 2 2
Real Estate Anuual Between 3 Lakhs to 2 1
Income 4 Lakhs
Between 4 Lakhs to 1 2
5 Lakhs
ABove 5 Lakhs 0 1
Total 3 4
Crosstab
Count

Occupation

Best Investment Avenue Others Total

Bank Saving Anuual Income 1 Lakhs 4 6

Between 1 Lakhs to 2 Lakhs 0 6

Between 2 Lakhs to 3 Lakhs 0 1

Between 3 Lakhs to 4 Lakhs 1 1

Total 5 14
Fixed Deposit Anuual Income 1 Lakhs 0 1
Between 1 Lakhs to 2 Lakhs 1 4
Between 4 Lakhs to 5 Lakhs 0 1
Total 1 6
Postal Saving Anuual Income Between 2 Lakhs to 3 Lakhs 1
Total 1
Company Deposit Anuual Income 1 Lakhs 1
Between 2 Lakhs to 3 Lakhs 1
Total 2
Shares/Debentures Anuual Income Between 3 Lakhs to 4 Lakhs 1 4
Total 1 4
Gold/Sliver Anuual Income 1 Lakhs 2 4
Between 3 Lakhs to 4 Lakhs 4 10
Total 6 14
Real Estate Anuual Income Between 3 Lakhs to 4 Lakhs 3
Between 4 Lakhs to 5 Lakhs 3
ABove 5 Lakhs 1
Total 7
Mutual Fund Anuual Income Between 1 Lakhs to 2 Lakhs 1
Between 3 Lakhs to 4 Lakhs 6
Between 4 Lakhs to 5 Lakhs 11
ABove 5 Lakhs 7
8 1
Total 26
Insurance Anuual Income Between 3 Lakhs to 4 Lakhs 1 1
Total 1 1
Total Anuual Income 1 Lakhs 6 12

Between 1 Lakhs to 2 Lakhs 1 11

Between 2 Lakhs to 3 Lakhs 0 3


Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-


Best Investment Avenue Value df (2-sided) sided) sided)
a
Bank Saving Pearson Chi-Square 25.822 12 .011

Likelihood Ratio 22.068 12 .037

Linear-by-Linear 1.337 1 .248


Association

N of Valid Cases 14
Fixed Deposit Pearson Chi-Square 7.000b 6 .321
Likelihood Ratio 6.592 6 .360
Linear-by-Linear .373 1 .542
Association
N of Valid Cases 6
Postal Saving Pearson Chi-Square .c
N of Valid Cases 1
Company Deposit Pearson Chi-Square 2.000d 1 .157
Continuity Correctione .000 1 1.000
Likelihood Ratio 2.773 1 .096
Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .500
Linear-by-Linear 1.000 1 .317
Association
N of Valid Cases 2
Shares/Debentures Pearson Chi-Square .f
N of Valid Cases 4
Gold/Sliver Pearson Chi-Square 2.567g 3 .463
Likelihood Ratio 3.568 3 .312
Linear-by-Linear .006 1 .941
Association
N of Valid Cases 14
Real Estate Pearson Chi-Square 1.556h 2 .459
Likelihood Ratio 1.923 2 .382
Linear-by-Linear 1.333 1 .248
Association
N of Valid Cases 7
Mutual Fund Pearson Chi-Square 15.882i 4 .003
Likelihood Ratio 19.588 4 .001
Linear-by-Linear 9.360 1 .002
Association
N of Valid Cases 26
Symmetric Measures

Best Investment Avenue Value Approx. Sig.

Bank Saving Nominal by Nominal Phi 1.358 .011

Cramer's V .784 .011

N of Valid Cases 14
Fixed Deposit Nominal by Nominal Phi 1.080 .321
Cramer's V .764 .321
N of Valid Cases 6
Postal Saving Nominal by Nominal Phi .a
N of Valid Cases 1
Company Deposit Nominal by Nominal Phi -1.000 .157
Cramer's V 1.000 .157
N of Valid Cases 2
Shares/Debentures Nominal by Nominal Phi .b
N of Valid Cases 4
Gold/Sliver Nominal by Nominal Phi .428 .463
Cramer's V .428 .463
N of Valid Cases 14
Real Estate Nominal by Nominal Phi .471 .459
Cramer's V .471 .459
N of Valid Cases 7
Mutual Fund Nominal by Nominal Phi .782 .003
Cramer's V .782 .003
N of Valid Cases 26
Insurance Nominal by Nominal Phi .a
N of Valid Cases 1
Total Nominal by Nominal Phi 1.029 .000

Cramer's V .460 .000

N of Valid Cases 75

a. No statistics are computed because Anuual Income and Occupation are constants.
b. No statistics are computed because Anuual Income is a constant.
Anuual Income * Occupation * Percentage of Saving from Your Total
Income
Crosstab
Count

Occupation

Pvt Firm
Percentage of Saving from Your Total Income Employee Self Employed Business

<=25% Anuual Income 1 Lakhs 1 1

Between 1 Lakhs to 2 Lakhs 2 4

Between 2 Lakhs to 3 Lakhs 2 0

Between 3 Lakhs to 4 Lakhs 0 0

Between 4 Lakhs to 5 Lakhs 2 0

Total 7 5
25% to 50% Anuual Income 1 Lakhs 1 0 0
Between 1 Lakhs to 2 Lakhs 1 0 0
Between 3 Lakhs to 4 Lakhs 12 2 4
Between 4 Lakhs to 5 Lakhs 9 0 4
ABove 5 Lakhs 0 0 8
8 0 0 1
Total 23 2 17
50% to 75% Anuual Income Between 1 Lakhs to 2 Lakhs 0 1
Between 2 Lakhs to 3 Lakhs 1 0
Total 1 1
Total Anuual Income 1 Lakhs 2 1 0

Between 1 Lakhs to 2 Lakhs 3 4 1

Between 2 Lakhs to 3 Lakhs 2 1 0

Between 3 Lakhs to 4 Lakhs 12 2 4

Between 4 Lakhs to 5 Lakhs 11 0 4

ABove 5 Lakhs 0 0 8

8 0 0 1

Total 30 8 18
Crosstab
Count

Occupation

Percentage of Saving from Your Total Income Professional Agriculturist

<=25% Anuual Income 1 Lakhs 0

Between 1 Lakhs to 2 Lakhs 1

Between 2 Lakhs to 3 Lakhs 0

Between 3 Lakhs to 4 Lakhs 0

Between 4 Lakhs to 5 Lakhs 0

Total 1
25% to 50% Anuual Income 1 Lakhs 2
Between 1 Lakhs to 2 Lakhs 1
Between 3 Lakhs to 4 Lakhs 0
Between 4 Lakhs to 5 Lakhs 0
ABove 5 Lakhs 0
8 0
Total 3
Others Anuual Income 1 Lakhs 1
Total 1
Total Anuual Income 1 Lakhs 3 0

Between 1 Lakhs to 2 Lakhs 1 1

Between 2 Lakhs to 3 Lakhs 0 0

Between 3 Lakhs to 4 Lakhs 0 0

Between 4 Lakhs to 5 Lakhs 0 0

ABove 5 Lakhs 0 0

8 0 0

Total 4 1
Crosstab
Count

Occupation

Percentage of Saving from Your Total Income Others Total

<=25% Anuual Income 1 Lakhs 2 4

Between 1 Lakhs to 2 Lakhs 1 8

Between 2 Lakhs to 3 Lakhs 0 2

Between 3 Lakhs to 4 Lakhs 2 2

Between 4 Lakhs to 5 Lakhs 0 2

Total 5 18
25% to 50% Anuual Income 1 Lakhs 4 7
Between 1 Lakhs to 2 Lakhs 0 2
Between 3 Lakhs to 4 Lakhs 5 23
Between 4 Lakhs to 5 Lakhs 0 13
ABove 5 Lakhs 0 8
8 0 1
Total 9 54
50% to 75% Anuual Income Between 1 Lakhs to 2 Lakhs 1
Between 2 Lakhs to 3 Lakhs 1
Total 2
Others Anuual Income 1 Lakhs 1
Total 1
Total Anuual Income 1 Lakhs 6 12

Between 1 Lakhs to 2 Lakhs 1 11

Between 2 Lakhs to 3 Lakhs 0 3

Between 3 Lakhs to 4 Lakhs 7 25

Between 4 Lakhs to 5 Lakhs 0 15

ABove 5 Lakhs 0 8

8 0 1

Total 14 75
Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-


Percentage of Saving from Your Total Income Value df sided)
a
<=25% Pearson Chi-Square 15.814 12 .200

Likelihood Ratio 16.896 12 .154

Linear-by-Linear Association .273 1 .601

N of Valid Cases 18
25% to 50% Pearson Chi-Square 55.762b 20 .000
Likelihood Ratio 54.496 20 .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 5.733 1 .017
N of Valid Cases 54
50% to 75% Pearson Chi-Square 2.000c 1 .157
d
Continuity Correction .000 1 1.000
Likelihood Ratio 2.773 1 .096
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear Association 1.000 1 .317
N of Valid Cases 2
Others Pearson Chi-Square .e
N of Valid Cases 1
Total Pearson Chi-Square 79.455f 30 .000

Likelihood Ratio 75.982 30 .000

Linear-by-Linear Association 5.639 1 .018

N of Valid Cases 75
Chi-Square Tests

Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-


Percentage of Saving from Your Total Income sided) sided)

<=25% Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Linear-by-Linear Association

N of Valid Cases
25% to 50% Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Cases
50% to 75% Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiond
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .500
Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Cases
Others Pearson Chi-Square
N of Valid Cases
Total Pearson Chi-Square

Likelihood Ratio

Linear-by-Linear Association

N of Valid Cases

a. 20 cells (100.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .11.
b. 27 cells (90.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .04.
c. 4 cells (100.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .50.
d. Computed only for a 2x2 table
e. No statistics are computed because Anuual Income and Occupation are constants.
f. 39 cells (92.9%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .01.
Symmetric Measures

Percentage of Saving from Your Total Income Value Approx. Sig.

<=25% Nominal by Nominal Phi .937 .200

Cramer's V .541 .200

N of Valid Cases 18
25% to 50% Nominal by Nominal Phi 1.016 .000
Cramer's V .508 .000
N of Valid Cases 54
50% to 75% Nominal by Nominal Phi -1.000 .157
Cramer's V 1.000 .157
N of Valid Cases 2
Others Nominal by Nominal Phi .a
N of Valid Cases 1
Total Nominal by Nominal Phi 1.029 .000

Cramer's V .460 .000

N of Valid Cases 75

a. No statistics are computed because Anuual Income and Occupation are constants.
Anuual Income * Occupation * Bank Savings
Crosstab
Count

Occupation

Pvt Firm Self Busines Profession Agriculturi


Bank Savings Employee Employed s al st

Most Preferred Anuual 1 Lakhs 0 0 0 1


Income Between 1 Lakhs to 0 1 1 0
2 Lakhs

Between 3 Lakhs to 0 1 0 0
4 Lakhs

Between 4 Lakhs to 2 0 1 0
5 Lakhs

ABove 5 Lakhs 0 0 1 0

Total 2 2 3 1
Preferred Anuual 1 Lakhs 0 0 0
Income Between 1 Lakhs to 0 0 1
2 Lakhs
Between 2 Lakhs to 2 0 0
3 Lakhs
Between 3 Lakhs to 1 0 0
4 Lakhs
Between 4 Lakhs to 1 0 0
5 Lakhs
ABove 5 Lakhs 0 1 0
Total 4 1 1
Moderately Anuual 1 Lakhs 1 0 0
Preferred Income Between 1 Lakhs to 2 1 0
2 Lakhs
Between 2 Lakhs to 0 1 0
3 Lakhs
ABove 5 Lakhs 0 0 1
Total 3 2 1
Slightly Anuual 1 Lakhs 0 1 1
Preferred Income Between 1 Lakhs to 0 1 0
2 Lakhs
Between 3 Lakhs to 0 1 0
4 Lakhs
Between 4 Lakhs to 1 0 0
5 Lakhs
Crosstab
Count

Occupation

Bank Savings Others Total

Most Preferred Anuual Income 1 Lakhs 3 4

Between 1 Lakhs to 2 Lakhs 0 2

Between 3 Lakhs to 4 Lakhs 2 3

Between 4 Lakhs to 5 Lakhs 0 3

ABove 5 Lakhs 0 1

Total 5 13
Preferred Anuual Income 1 Lakhs 1 1
Between 1 Lakhs to 2 Lakhs 0 1
Between 2 Lakhs to 3 Lakhs 0 2
Between 3 Lakhs to 4 Lakhs 0 1
Between 4 Lakhs to 5 Lakhs 0 1
ABove 5 Lakhs 0 1
Total 1 7
Moderately Preferred Anuual Income 1 Lakhs 1 2
Between 1 Lakhs to 2 Lakhs 0 3
Between 2 Lakhs to 3 Lakhs 0 1
ABove 5 Lakhs 0 1
Total 1 7
Slightly Preferred Anuual Income 1 Lakhs 1 3
Between 1 Lakhs to 2 Lakhs 1 2
Between 3 Lakhs to 4 Lakhs 0 1
Between 4 Lakhs to 5 Lakhs 0 1
Total 2 7
Less Preferred Anuual Income 1 Lakhs 0 1
Between 1 Lakhs to 2 Lakhs 0 3
Between 3 Lakhs to 4 Lakhs 5 20
Between 4 Lakhs to 5 Lakhs 0 10
ABove 5 Lakhs 0 5
8 0 1
Total 5 40
Least Preferred Anuual Income 1 Lakhs 1
Total 1
Total Anuual Income 1 Lakhs 6 12

Between 1 Lakhs to 2 Lakhs 1 11


Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-


Bank Savings Value df sided)
a
Most Preferred Pearson Chi-Square 21.594 16 .157

Likelihood Ratio 23.548 16 .100

Linear-by-Linear Association 3.301 1 .069

N of Valid Cases 13
Preferred Pearson Chi-Square 21.000b 15 .137
Likelihood Ratio 16.152 15 .372
Linear-by-Linear Association 1.976 1 .160
N of Valid Cases 7
Moderately Preferred Pearson Chi-Square 12.444c 9 .189
Likelihood Ratio 11.287 9 .257
Linear-by-Linear Association .000 1 .985
N of Valid Cases 7
Slightly Preferred Pearson Chi-Square 9.528c 9 .390
Likelihood Ratio 8.514 9 .483
Linear-by-Linear Association 2.048 1 .152
N of Valid Cases 7
Less Preferred Pearson Chi-Square 57.447d 20 .000
Likelihood Ratio 38.966 20 .007
Linear-by-Linear Association .128 1 .720
N of Valid Cases 40
Least Preferred Pearson Chi-Square .e
N of Valid Cases 1
Total Pearson Chi-Square 79.455f 30 .000

Likelihood Ratio 75.982 30 .000

Linear-by-Linear Association 5.639 1 .018

N of Valid Cases 75

a. 25 cells (100.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .08.
b. 24 cells (100.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .14.
c. 16 cells (100.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .14.
d. 28 cells (93.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .03.
e. No statistics are computed because Anuual Income and Occupation are constants.
f. 39 cells (92.9%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .01.
Symmetric Measures

Bank Savings Value Approx. Sig.

Most Preferred Nominal by Nominal Phi 1.289 .157

Cramer's V .644 .157

N of Valid Cases 13
Preferred Nominal by Nominal Phi 1.732 .137
Cramer's V 1.000 .137
N of Valid Cases 7
Moderately Preferred Nominal by Nominal Phi 1.333 .189
Cramer's V .770 .189
N of Valid Cases 7
Slightly Preferred Nominal by Nominal Phi 1.167 .390
Cramer's V .674 .390
N of Valid Cases 7
Less Preferred Nominal by Nominal Phi 1.198 .000
Cramer's V .599 .000
N of Valid Cases 40
Least Preferred Nominal by Nominal Phi .a
N of Valid Cases 1
Total Nominal by Nominal Phi 1.029 .000

Cramer's V .460 .000

N of Valid Cases 75

a. No statistics are computed because Anuual Income and Occupation are constants.

You might also like