Tools For A Multiaxial Fatigue Analysis of Structures Submitted To Random Vibrations
Tools For A Multiaxial Fatigue Analysis of Structures Submitted To Random Vibrations
X.Pitoiset, A.Preumont
Active Structures Laboratory, ULB - CP 165/42
Av F.D. Roosevelt 50, B-1050 Brusssels
Mail: [email protected], http://www.ulb.ac.be/scmero
A.Kernilis
Société Européenne de Propulsion, Division de SNECMA
Forêt de Vernon, BP 802 F-27 000 Vernon
tic S-N curve of the form N S β = c, where S is It takes its name from the fact that it depends only
the constant amplitude of the alternating sinusoidal on the spectral moment m2/β . Although there is
stress and N is the number of cycles to failure; the no theoritical base to Equ.(6), it gives the correct
constant c and β are characteritics of the material dependence on both ω and σx and is equivalent to the
(5 < β < 20). We assume that the linear damage Rayleigh approximation for narrow-band processes.
theory apply. The single moment method is in closer agreement
with rainflow simulations for various spectral shapes,
According to the classical theory of random fatigue, including for bimodal PSD.
every positive maximum of amplitude a contributes
for one cycle to the damage, that is: Rainflow cycle counting :
In high-cycle uniaxial fatigue, the most accurate vari-
D = c−1 aβ (1) able for correlating damage is the stress amplitude of
closed hysteresis loops of the local stress-strain path
The contribution to the damage rate from the in- at the crack location site. In the elastic domain these
finitesimal range [a, a + da[ is given by: loops are flat. The proper way of extracting such cy-
cles is the rainflow counting method (N.E.Dowling,
1972). This counting is applied after Monte Carlo
∆(a)da = c−1 aβ ν0 p(a)da (2) simulations of stress time histories of a given spec-
tral content.
where ν0 p(a)da is the average number of cycles in the
range [a, a + da[. For a narrow-band process, p(a) is Definition : Let σ(t), 0 ≤ t ≤ T be a stress and
the Rayleigh distribution and the rate of maxima denote by Mi the peaks of σ(t) at time ti , ti ≤ ti+1
can be approximated by the central frequency ν0 . (see Figure 1). To define the rainflow cycles, each
Integrating from 0 to infinity, we get the well known local maximum Mi has to be paired with one par-
result : ticular local minimum mi , found as follows : from
a local maximum Mi with height u, say, one shall
try to reach above u (in the forward and backward
Z ∞ direction) with an as small downward excusion as
E[D] = ∆(a)da = c−1 σxβ ν0 2β/2 Γ(1 + β/2) (3) possible. The minimum m+ i = mi
RF C
, which repre-
0
sents the smallest deviation form the maximum Mi ,
is defined to be the corresponding rainflow minimum.
where σx is the RMS value of the stress and Γ(.) is Thus the rainflow cycle starting at Mi is (mRF C
, Mi )
i
the Gamma function. Equation (3) can be written (I.Rychlik, 1987).
alternatively in terms of the spectral moments as
Z ∞
ma = 2 ω a Φ(ω)dω (5)
0
3. EQUIVALENT VON MISES STRESS where Φss (ω) is the PSD matrix of the stress vector.
Equivalently,
X
Fatigue cracks normally initiate at free surfaces, Φc (ω) = Trace{QΦss (ω)} = Qij Φsi sj (ω) (13)
where the stress state is biaxial. For such multiax- i,j
ial stress fields, the fatigue phenomenon is generally
regarded as being governed by a combination of the Note that, in the uniaxial case [where only sx 6= 0,
shear and normal stress acting on a critical plane. with a PSD ΦSx (ω) ], Equ.(13) supplies Φc (ω) =
It has also been reported in the literature (G.Sines ΦSx (ω). Equation (13) defines the equivalent alter-
and G.Ohgi, 1987) that the von Mises criterion corre- nating stress (von Mises stress) as the scalar ran-
lates fairly well with a large amount of experimental dom process whose PSD is obtained from the PSD
data for biaxial stress states with constant principal matrix of the stress components according to the von
directions. When the excitation is random, the prin- Mises quadratic combination rule. The von Mises
cipal directions can rotate continuously with time ; stress is then considered as an equivalent counting
the von Mises stress is proportional to the root mean variable taking into account the multiaxiality. It is
square of the shear stress over all planes. this scalar process that we propose to use in the sub-
sequent fatigue damage analysis according to a uni-
In this study, we propose to base a first estimate
axial prediction model for Gaussian processes such
of the fatigue life on the von Mises stress which
as the Rayleigh approximation, the Single Moment
is used as an equivalent uniaxial counting vari-
or rainflow simulations. The methodology developed
able (A.Preumont, 1994; A.Preumont and V.Piéfort,
for biaxial stress states can readily be extended to
1994).
triaxial stress states, it is formally the same, with
For a biaxial stress, the von Mises stress sc is defined different definitions of the stress vector and the Q
by the quadratic relationship matrix. A finite element formulation of the foregoing
method is presented in (A.Preumont and V.Piéfort,
1994).
s2c = s2x + s2y − sx sy + 3s2xy (7)
where sx , sy and sxy are the normal and tangential 4. FREQUENCY DOMAIN FORMULATION OF
stresses, respectively. Defining the stress vector as THE MULTIAXIAL RAINFLOW METHOD
s = (sx , sy , sxy )T , Equ.(7) can be rewritten
Figure 2: Map of the fatigue damage per time unit of the aluminium rectangular plate
thus defining a sphere (K.Dressler et al., 1995; where Φss (ω) is the PSD matrix of the stress vector.
A.Beste et al., 1992). Such a scalar process can be defined for every vector
c.
A frequency domain formulation
The damage is computed for each scalar process
After defining the two vectors c = (c1 , c2 , c3 )T and Φmrf , and the most critical combination is deter-
s = (sx , sy , sxy )T , Equ. (14) can be rewritten mined. Equation (20) shows that the formulation
of the equivalent von Mises stress method can be
smrf = cT s (16) easily generalized to include the multiaxial rainflow
method. Both formulations are formally similar,
The auto-correlation function of smrf (t) can be com- with different definitions of the Q matrix.
puted as follows:
5. APPLICATION
Figure 3: Sphere damage for the selected element Figure 4: Power spectral densities of the stress com-
ponents, the von Mises stress and the multiaxial rain-
6. STRESS TENSOR HISTORY flow
where Λ(ω) contains the eigenvalues of Φss (ω) and Combining with Equ.(21) we get:
6
REFERENCES