CIRED2015 0254 Final
CIRED2015 0254 Final
Paper 0254
INTRODUCTION
Distribution system operators (DSO) face the challenge Residential
areas
of coping with aging grid assets on one hand, while on
the other hand consumer demands increase due to Figure 1: Typical lay-out of a MV distribution grid
increasing dependency on availability of electrical
energy. The distribution of electrical energy in a safe,
reliable and affordable manner is crucial for many aspects Distribution automation
of modern society. DA systems are all systems, consisting out of an
Distribution automation (DA) can be implemented into arbitrarily number of components, which contribute
the (smart) grid in order to improve reliability, decrease somehow to the automation and remote operation of the
the need for manual labour and reduce grid losses. This distribution network. The automation of switching is
paper focuses on grid loss reduction in the medium usually performed based on measurements done within
voltage (MV) distribution grid by operating the grid in a
that same grid, in order for the system to react on
closed-ring lay-out, supported by a DA system. The
results of a field test done in a live distribution network in changing circumstances. In this way DA can be deployed
The Netherlands are presented. The goal of this test was for a number of different purposes, such as, but not
to investigate the effect of closed-ring operation with limited to, load control, remote metering, power flow
regards to grid losses. A comparison is made between optimization, protection adaptability and self-healing
theory and practice, comparing earlier found results in capabilities.
simulation with the newly found results from the field In the study case presented later in this paper, the grid has
test in the grid. been equipped with DA for its self-healing capabilities.
Whenever a fault would occur within the grid, it is
CLOSED-RING GRID OPERATION possible to either remotely or automatically perform
Typically distribution grids are structured according to switching actions, in order to quickly and effectively
the lay-out depicted in Figure 1. Medium voltage restore power to unaffected parts of the grid after a fault.
distribution rings are usually fitted with a normally-open A major factor in selecting a grid for the field test
point (NOP), splitting the ring into two separate feeders presented in this paper was the presence of a DA system
from an electrical-technical point of view. The purpose of for quick recovery after a potential fault. Closed-ring
the NOP is to ensure selectivity for protection systems operation affects reliability in a negative manner. It will
and reduce the impact of faults in the grid by limiting the straight-away double the system average interruption
number of customers that are affected when protection frequency index (SAIFI), due to the tripping of a whole
trips. However, on the downside, the NOP might distribution ring instead of just one half. Furthermore, it
indirectly incur additional grid losses, by obstructing an will increase the system average interruption duration
optimal power flow. With a power flow that shows index (SAIDI), because detecting and locating a fault will
strongly dynamic behaviour throughout the day, the take longer, which will in turn have its effect on average
optimal location for the NOP would continuously change, restoration times.
Paper 0254
2 250
ACH 4
WER KOP
ACH 10
Figure 2: Grid under investigation in the network of the “Breda” 200
in red in Figure 2 and each of them is labelled, these Figure 4: Power measurement at location of NOP. Red vertical lines
labels will be used throughout the rest of the paper and indicate NOP switching moments.
1
One of the larger distribution system operators in The Netherlands
Paper 0254
Network characteristics
Closing the NOP has a similar effect on the power flow at In order to fully understand the phenomena seen in the
other locations within the grid. For example Figure 5 & 6 previous section, it is important to look at some essential
indicate a similar shift in power flow for the locations network characteristics. An important factor in the
labelled as WER and WOU. redistribution of power flows after closing the NOP are
600
Power flow at WER station
the cable resistances. In Table 1, an overview is given of
the cable resistance between several stations within the
500
distribution ring.
Cable section(s) Impedance [Ω] Length [m]
ACH4 1st station 0.38 2812
400
ACH4 WOU 0.60 3886
WOU KOP 0.39 1779
Power [kW]
500 1400
400 1200
Power [kW]
300
1000
Power [kW]
200
800
100
600
0
400
-100
01/12 03/12 05/12 07/12 09/12 11/12 13/12 15/12 17/12 19/12
Time [days]
200
01/12 03/12 05/12 07/12 09/12 11/12 13/12 15/12 17/12 19/12
Figure 6: Power measurement at location of WOU station. Red Time [days]
vertical lines indicate NOP switching moments.
Figure 7: Power measurement at location of ACH10. Red vertical
lines indicate NOP switching moments.
The feeder containing the WOU station mainly has Power flow at ACH4 station
industrial consumers connected to it, something that can 2200
1400
due to downstream loads being mainly fed through the
other feeder. This effect is therefore obviously opposite at 1200
Paper 0254
CONCLUSIONS
What can be seen from the measurement results at the
beginning of both feeders, is that that during closed-ring In order to have an indication of the effect of closed-ring
operation, in ACH4 the average power decreases, while in operation on grid losses, a field test was performed within
case of ACH10, the average power increases. The average the Enexis distribution grid, located in the south-west of
power flows at both locations with and without a closed the Netherlands. Due to limits on the time window in
NOP are presented in Table 2. which the ring could be operated in closed-ring layout
(closed-ring operation inhibits certain reliability risks),
Open ring Closed ring Difference the resulting available data was limited as well.
ACH10 687.5 kW 897.1 kW +30.5% Nevertheless, from the data it can be concluded that
ACH4 1225.3 kW 1101.1 kW -10.1% closed-ring operation of distribution grids has a positive
Total 1912.8 kW 1998.2 kW +4.5% effect on grid losses within that grid. This can be
Table 2: Average power flows through ACH4 & ACH10, both open- concluded from the fact that part of the transported power
and closed-ring operation.
is redistributed to the less-heavy loaded feeder. As well
To determine the difference in grid losses, the as from the fact that even though electricity consumption
measurement results are used to calculate losses within (week-on-week) has risen significantly, the increase in
the grid. In order to assign different current values to the grid losses was smaller than that. However, it was not
(not measured) loads within the grid, the yearly possible to pin-point an exact quantification of loss
maximum current levels per load are taken, and used to reduction, as it is impossible to determine what effect
calculate to the peak load ratio (Eq. 1.). This peak-load attributes to which difference in the measured and
ratio is then used to distribute the measured total loads calculated results.
among each individual load accordingly. Yearly peak- Therefore, in future research, it is desirable to have a
loading values used for calculating the peak-load ratio larger time window to perform measurements, so that
were obtained from ongoing field-measurements that are irregularities and natural differences in electricity
part of standard asset monitoring practices. consumption can be taken into account for and can be
levelled out by averaging over larger time windows.
𝑆𝑝𝑒𝑎𝑘,𝑛
𝑃𝑒𝑎𝑘 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜 = ∑𝑥 (1)
𝑛=1 𝑆𝑝𝑒𝑎𝑘,𝑛 FUTURE WORK
Once the current flowing through each of the loads is There’s a strong indication that closed-ring operation
determined, and with that the current through each cable leads to reduced grid-losses. However, the promise of
section, losses are calculated by simply applying Ohm’s grid loss reductions up to 10% [3], seen in simulation
law (Eq. 2.), and summating the losses found for each environments, is still nowhere to be found in the results
cable section accordingly. of this field-test. Not only might a single case study not
be representative of what can be expected throughout a
𝑃𝑙𝑜𝑠𝑠 = 𝐼 2 𝑅 (2) network. Also, the limited availability of measurement
data (due to practical reasons) and the obfuscation of this
The losses resulting from this calculation method are data due to variables that are outside the controlled
presented in Table 3 below. environment, complicates analysis.
Future work should comprise the collection of sufficient
Day NOP Losses Difference data, so that seasonal influences, random events, and
8/12 open 182 kWh - other uncontrollable phenomena can be factored out of
15/12 closed 188 kWh + 3.2% measurement results as much as possible. In a best-case
Table 3: Comparison of losses during open- and closed-ring situation, the time window in which the grid can be
operation.
operated in closed-ring layout is significantly larger.
What’s interesting to see is the fact that during closed- Ideally a year, since that would cover at least one cycle of
ring operation, the losses actually increase. On the seasonal influences, which can then be (partly) filtered
contrary, the average load increased by 4.5% during out of the end results.
closed-ring operation. As the losses increased less than
the increase in transported energy, losses have actually REFERENCES
decreased relative to the transported energy.
This strong increase in electricity consumption can be [1] T.C.A. Castelijns, R.J.W. de Groot, J. Morren, J.G.
(partly) attributed to the fact that the festive season (e.g. Slootweg, “Using Particle Swarm Optimization for
decorative lighting) is getting near and days are getting Placement of DA in Distribution Networks”,
shorter during the period in which the field-test was Universities’ Power Engineering Conference
performed. (UPEC2014), September 2014, Cluj-Napoca,
Romania.
Paper 0254