0% found this document useful (0 votes)
52 views7 pages

National Board of Accreditation: Pro-Forma For Pre-Qualifiers For UG Engineering Programs (Tier II)

The document contains a pro-forma for pre-qualification requirements for undergraduate engineering programs seeking Tier II accreditation from the National Board of Accreditation. It requests information about the institute, affiliated university, programs offered, student and faculty details for programs under consideration. Specifically, it asks for the institute name and address, year established, affiliating university information, ownership status, student intake and admissions data, faculty list and details including the head of department, student-faculty ratios, and placement ratios for relevant programs.

Uploaded by

karthikeyanme
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
52 views7 pages

National Board of Accreditation: Pro-Forma For Pre-Qualifiers For UG Engineering Programs (Tier II)

The document contains a pro-forma for pre-qualification requirements for undergraduate engineering programs seeking Tier II accreditation from the National Board of Accreditation. It requests information about the institute, affiliated university, programs offered, student and faculty details for programs under consideration. Specifically, it asks for the institute name and address, year established, affiliating university information, ownership status, student intake and admissions data, faculty list and details including the head of department, student-faculty ratios, and placement ratios for relevant programs.

Uploaded by

karthikeyanme
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION

Pro-forma for Pre-Qualifiers for UG Engineering Programs (Tier II)

PARTA- Profile of the Institute

A1. Name and Address of the College:-


City:- State:-

Pin Code:-

Phone No (including STD Code):- Fax

Website:- E-mail:-

A2. Year of Establishment:-

A3. Head of the Institution:-


Name:- Designation:-

Nature of Appointment:-

Phone No:- Mobile:-

E-mail:- Fax No:-

A4. Name and Address of the Affiliating University:-


City:-

State:- Pin Code:-

Website:- E-mail:-

Phone No (Including STD Code):- Fax:-

A5. Type of the Institution:


Institute of National Importance Autonomous
University *Any other (Please specify)
Deemed University

*Provide Details:

A6. Ownership Status:


Central Government Trust
State Government Society
Government Aided Section 25 Company
Self financing *Any Other (Please specify)

*Provide Details:

1
A7. Students Admissions (Institute level considering all UG programs):
CAY CAYm1 CAYm2
Item Total
2016-17 2015-16 2014-15

Sanctioned intake

Number of students admitted (Corresponding to


sanctioned intake)
% of Students Admitted over last three assessment years
(Total Admitted/Sanctioned Intake )
Table A7
CAY: Current Academic Year
CAYm1: Current Academic Year minus 1 = Current Assessment Year
CAYm2: Current Academic Year minus 2 = Current Assessment Year minus 1

A8. Campus Information:-


Does the College have its own building:-

Sports Complex:-

Canteen and Hostel (If any):-

Medical Room:-

Computer Laboratories:-

Counselling and guidance:-

Placement:-

A9. Names of programs offered by the College:-


Sr. No. Name of the Department Level Name of the Program

Table A9
Note: - Please mention department wise.

A10. Programs to be considered for Accreditation vide this application.


S. No. Program Name

Table A10

2
PART B- Program information
(To be filled separately for all the programs applied for)

B1. Provide separate Information for each program applied for including shifts, if any:-

Name of
Name of the
Year Increase
Name of the the program Year of AICTE Accreditation
of in intake,
Department programs to be Intake increase Approval Status*
Start if any
running consider-
ed

Table B1
Note: Please mention all increase intake starting from the first increase for all programs

* Write applicable one:


 Applying first time
 Granted provisional accreditation for two/three years for the period(specify period)
 Granted accreditation for 5/6 years for the period (specify period)
 Not accredited (specify visit dates, year)
 Withdrawn (specify visit dates, year)
 Not eligible for accreditation
 Eligible but not applied

B2. Student Admissions (Program specific):-


Item CAY CAYm1 CAYm2 Total
2016-17 2015-16 2014-15

Sanctioned intake

Number of students admitted (Corresponding to


sanctioned intake)
% of Students Admitted over last three assessment years
( Total Admitted/Sanctioned Intake )

Table B2

B3. Information of Faculty

Please provide the list of faculty in the program as per the below format

S. Date of
Name PAN No. Qualification Designation
No. Joining

1.

2.

3.

..

N.
Table B3

3
B3.1. No. of the Available Faculty

Number of Faculty in the Department for

S. No. Designation/Numbers both UG and PG

CAY CAYm1

1. Professor

2. Associate Professor

3. Assistant Professor

Number of Ph. D
4. (as per the AICTE norms)
Table B3.1
 At least one Professor or one Associate professor should be available exclusively for the
department of the program under consideration during last two years including current
academic year.

B3.2. Detail of Head of the Department for the program under consideration:

Name:-

Qualification:-

Ph. D

Others

B.4.Student Faculty Ratio (No of Faculty as per the sanctioned intake):-


(To be calculated at Department Level)

No. of UG Programs in the Department (n): __________

No. of PG Programs in the Department (m): __________

No. of Students in UG 2nd Year= u1

No. of Students in UG 3rd Year= u2

No. of Students in UG 4th Year= u3

No. of Students in PG 1st Year= p1

No. of Students in PG 2nd Year= p2

No. of Students = Sanctioned Intake + Actual admitted lateral entry students

(The above data to be provided considering all the UG and PG programs of the department)
S=Number of Students in the Department = UG1 + UG2 +UG3 + PG1 + PG2

F = Total Number of Faculty Members in the Department (excluding first year faculty)

4
Year CAY CAYm1 CAYm3
u1.1
u1.2
u1.3
UG1 u1.1+u1.2+u1.3 u1.1+u1.2+u1.3 u1.1+u1.2+u1.3

un.1
un.2
un.3
UGn un.1+un.2+un.3 un.1+un.2+un.3 un.1+un.2+un.3
p1.1
p1.2
PG1 p1.1+p1.2 p1.1+p1.2 p1.1+p1.2
…..
pm.1
pm.2
PGm pm.1+pm.2 pm.1+pm.2 pm.1+pm.2
Total No. of Students in the UG1 + UG2 +.. UG1 + UG2 + .. +UGn UG1 + UG2 + ..
Department (S) +UGn + PG1 + + PG1+… + PGm=S2 +UGn + PG1+…
…PGm=S1 + PGm=S3
No. of Faculty in the F1 F2 F3
Department (F)
Student Faculty Ratio (SFR) SFR1=S1/F1 SFR2= S2/F2 SFR3= S3/F3
Average SFR SFR=(SFR1+SFR2+SFR3)/3
Table B.4
Student Faculty Ratio (SFR) = S / F

Note: 75% should be Regular/ full time faculty and the remaining shall be Contractual
Faculty/Adjunct Faculty/Resource persons from industry as per AICTE norms and
standards.

The contractual faculty will be considered for assessment only if a faculty is drawing a
salary as prescribed by the concerned State Government for the contractual faculty in
the respective cadre.

B.5. Placement Ratio

No. of Students
No. of students Placed +
appeared in final Placement Ratio
Year selected for higher studies +
year examination (Z/N)
opted Entrepreneurship (Z)
(N)
CAYm1

CAYm2

CAYm3

Average Placement Ratio

Percentage
Table B.5

5
Compliance status to Pre-Visit Qualifiers

Compliance
Status
S.N. Pre Visit Qualifiers Current Status
Complied/Not
Complied
Essential qualifiers
1 Vision, Mission & PEOs
i. Are the Vision & Mission of the
Department stated in the
Prospectus / Website?
ii. Are the PEOs of the Program listed
in the Prospectus / Website?

2 Whether approval of AICTE for the


programs under consideration has been
obtained for all the years including
current academic year

3 Whether admissions in the % Admission


undergraduate programs at the Institute
level has been more than or equal to
50% *average of the previous three
years including current academic year
4 Whether admissions in the % Admission
undergraduate programs under
consideration has been more than or
equal to 50% **average of the previous
three years including current academic
year
5 Whether faculty student ratio in the SFR
department under consideration is
better than or equal to 1:20 averaged
over previous three academic years
including current academic year.
6 Whether at least one Professor or one
Associate Professor available in the
respective Department during previous
two academic years including current
academic year.
7 Whether number of available faculty
with Ph.D. in the department is greater
than or equal to 10% of the required
number of faculty for previous two
academic years including current
academic year.
8 Whether the placement ratio(Placement
+ higher studies) is greater than or
equal to 40%
(average of the last three assessment
years)
9 Whether two batches have passed out in
the programs under consideration

6
Desirable parameters
1 Whether department has program
assessment and quality improvement
committee. If so, its constitution and
mandate.

2 Whether the departments under


consideration receives separately
earmarked funds for
i. Maintenance of
Laboratory/computational
facilities(recurring funds)
ii. Up-gradation of
laboratory/computation
facilities(non-recurring funds)
3 Whether HODs possess Ph.D degrees for
the programs under consideration
4 Whether number of available Ph.Ds in
the department exceeds 15% of the
required number of faculty for last two
years including current academic year.
5 Whether admissions in the
undergraduate programs under
consideration has been more than 60%
(average of the last three years
including current academic year.)

*Total number of students admitted in first year minus number of students migrated to other institutions,
plus the number of students migrated to this institution divided by the sanctioned intake.

**Total number of students admitted in first year in the respective program minus number of students
migrated to other programs/ institutions plus the number of students migrated to this program divided by the
sanctioned intake in the respective program.

You might also like