AC Voltmeters and Ammeters: Chapter 12 - AC Metering Circuits
AC Voltmeters and Ammeters: Chapter 12 - AC Metering Circuits
ARTICLES
FORUM
EDUCATION
TOOLS
GIVEAWAYS
TEST DB
PART SEARCH
LOG IN / JOIN
1. Home
2. Textbook
4. AC Metering Circuits
Passing AC through this D’Arsonval meter movement causes useless flutter of the needle.
In order to use a DC-style meter movement such as the D’Arsonval design, the alternating
current must be rectified into DC. This is most easily accomplished through the use of devices
called diodes. We saw diodes used in an example circuit demonstrating the creation of harmonic
frequencies from a distorted (or rectified) sine wave. Without going into elaborate detail over
how and why diodes work as they do, just remember that they each act like a one-way valve for
electrons to flow: acting as a conductor for one polarity and an insulator for another. Oddly
enough, the arrowhead in each diode symbol points against the permitted direction of electron
flow rather than with it as one might expect. Arranged in a bridge, four diodes will serve to steer
AC through the meter movement in a constant direction throughout all portions of the AC cycle:
(Figure below)
Passing AC through this Rectified AC meter movement will drive it in one direction.
Another strategy for a practical AC meter movement is to redesign the movement without the
inherent polarity sensitivity of the DC types. This means avoiding the use of permanent magnets.
Probably the simplest design is to use a nonmagnetized iron vane to move the needle against
spring tension, the vane being attracted toward a stationary coil of wire energized by the AC
quantity to be measured as in Figurebelow.
Iron-vane electromechanical meter movement.
Electrostatic attraction between two metal plates separated by an air gap is an alternative
mechanism for generating a needle-moving force proportional to applied voltage. This works just
as well for AC as it does for DC, or should I say, just as poorly! The forces involved are very
small, much smaller than the magnetic attraction between an energized coil and an iron vane, and
as such these “electrostatic” meter movements tend to be fragile and easily disturbed by physical
movement. But, for some high-voltage AC applications, the electrostatic movement is an elegant
technology. If nothing else, this technology possesses the advantage of extremely high input
impedance, meaning that no current need be drawn from the circuit under test. Also, electrostatic
meter movements are capable of measuring very high voltages without need for
range resistors or other, external apparatus.
When a sensitive meter movement needs to be re-ranged to function as an AC voltmeter, series-
connected “multiplier” resistors and/or resistive voltage dividers may be employed just as in DC
meter design: (Figurebelow)
Multiplier resistor (a) or resistive divider (b) scales the range of the basic meter movement.
Capacitors may be used instead of resistors, though, to make voltmeter divider circuits. This
strategy has the advantage of being non-dissipative (no true power consumed and no heat
produced): (Figure below)
If the meter movement is electrostatic, and thus inherently capacitive in nature, a single
“multiplier” capacitor may be connected in series to give it a greater voltage measuring range,
just as a series-connected multiplier resistor gives a moving-coil (inherently resistive) meter
movement a greater voltage range: (Figurebelow)
An electrostatic meter movement may use a capacitive multiplier to multiply the scale of the
basic meter movement..
The Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) mentioned in the DC metering chapter is ideally suited for
measuring AC voltages, especially if the electron beam is swept side-to-side across the screen of
the tube while the measured AC voltage drives the beam up and down. A graphical
representation of the AC wave shape and not just a measurement of magnitude can easily be had
with such a device. However, CRT’s have the disadvantages of weight, size, significant power
consumption, and fragility (being made of evacuated glass) working against them. For these
reasons, electromechanical AC meter movements still have a place in practical usage.
With some of the advantages and disadvantages of these meter movement technologies having
been discussed already, there is another factor crucially important for the designer and user of
AC metering instruments to be aware of. This is the issue of RMS measurement. As we already
know, AC measurements are often cast in a scale of DC power equivalence, called RMS (Root-
Mean-Square) for the sake of meaningful comparisons with DC and with other AC waveforms of
varying shape. None of the meter movement technologies so far discussed inherently measure
the RMS value of an AC quantity. Meter movements relying on the motion of a mechanical
needle (“rectified” D’Arsonval, iron-vane, and electrostatic) all tend to mechanically average the
instantaneous values into an overall average value for the waveform. This average value is not
necessarily the same as RMS, although many times it is mistaken as such. Average and RMS
values rate against each other as such for these three common waveform shapes: (Figure below)
RMS, Average, and Peak-to-Peak values for sine, square, and triangle waves.
Since RMS seems to be the kind of measurement most people are interested in obtaining with an
instrument, and electromechanical meter movements naturally deliver average measurements
rather than RMS, what are AC meter designers to do? Cheat, of course! Typically the assumption
is made that the waveform shape to be measured is going to be sine (by far the most common,
especially for power systems), and then the meter movement scale is altered by the appropriate
multiplication factor. For sine waves we see that RMS is equal to 0.707 times the peak value
while Average is 0.637 times the peak, so we can divide one figure by the other to obtain an
average-to-RMS conversion factor of 1.109:
In other words, the meter movement will be calibrated to indicate approximately 1.11 times
higher than it would ordinarily (naturally) indicate with no special accommodations. It must be
stressed that this “cheat” only works well when the meter is used to measure pure sine wave
sources. Note that for triangle waves, the ratio between RMS and Average is not the same as for
sine waves:
With square waves, the RMS and Average values are identical! An AC meter calibrated to
accurately read RMS voltage or current on a pure sine wave will not give the proper value while
indicating the magnitude of anything other than a perfect sine wave. This includes triangle
waves, square waves, or any kind of distorted sine wave. With harmonics becoming an ever-
present phenomenon in large AC power systems, this matter of accurate RMS measurement is no
small matter.
The astute reader will note that I have omitted the CRT “movement” from the RMS/Average
discussion. This is because a CRT with its practically weightless electron beam “movement”
displays the Peak (or Peak-to-Peak if you wish) of an AC waveform rather than Average or
RMS. Still, a similar problem arises: how do you determine the RMS value of a waveform from
it? Conversion factors between Peak and RMS only hold so long as the waveform falls neatly
into a known category of shape (sine, triangle, and square are the only examples with
Peak/RMS/Average conversion factors given here!).
One answer is to design the meter movement around the very definition of RMS: the effective
heating value of an AC voltage/current as it powers a resistive load. Suppose that the AC source
to be measured is connected across a resistor of known value, and the heat output of that resistor
is measured with a device like a thermocouple. This would provide a far more direct
measurement means of RMS than any conversion factor could, for it will work with ANY
waveform shape whatsoever: (Figure below)
Direct reading thermal RMS voltmeter accommodates any wave shape.
While the device shown above is somewhat crude and would suffer from unique engineering
problems of its own, the concept illustrated is very sound. The resistor converts the AC voltage
or current quantity into a thermal (heat) quantity, effectively squaring the values in real-time.
The system’s mass works to average these values by the principle of thermal inertia, and then the
meter scale itself is calibrated to give an indication based on the square-root of the thermal
measurement: perfect Root-Mean-Square indication all in one device! In fact, one major
instrument manufacturer has implemented this technique into its high-end line of handheld
electronic multimeters for “true-RMS” capability.
Calibrating AC voltmeters and ammeters for different full-scale ranges of operation is much the
same as with DC instruments: series “multiplier” resistors are used to give voltmeter movements
higher range, and parallel “shunt” resistors are used to allow ammeter movements to measure
currents beyond their natural range. However, we are not limited to these techniques as we were
with DC: because we can use transformers with AC, meter ranges can be electromagnetically
rather than resistively “stepped up” or “stepped down,” sometimes far beyond what resistors
would have practically allowed for. Potential Transformers (PT’s) and Current Transformers
(CT’s) are precision instrument devices manufactured to produce very precise ratios of
transformation between primary and secondary windings. They can allow small, simple AC
meter movements to indicate extremely high voltages and currents in power systems with
accuracy and complete electrical isolation (something multiplier and shunt resistors could never
do): (Figurebelow)
(CT) Current transformer scales current down. (PT) Potential transformer scales voltage down.
Shown here is a voltage and current meter panel from a three-phase AC system. The three
“donut” current transformers (CT’s) can be seen in the rear of the panel. Three AC ammeters
(rated 5 amps full-scale deflection each) on the front of the panel indicate current through each
conductor going through a CT. As this panel has been removed from service, there are no
current-carrying conductors threaded through the center of the CT “donuts” anymore:
(Figure below)
Toroidal current transformers scale high current levels down for application to 5 A full-scale AC
ammeters.
Because of the expense (and often large size) of instrument transformers, they are not used to
scale AC meters for any applications other than high voltage and high current. For scaling a
milliamp or microamp movement to a range of 120 volts or 5 amps, normal precision resistors
(multipliers and shunts) are used, just as with DC.
REVIEW:
Polarized (DC) meter movements must use devices called diodes to be able to indicate AC
quantities.
Electromechanical meter movements, whether electromagnetic or electrostatic, naturally
provide the average value of a measured AC quantity. These instruments may be ranged to
indicate RMS value, but only if the shape of the AC waveform is precisely known
beforehand!
So-called true RMS meters use different technology to provide indications representing the
actual RMS (rather than skewed average or peak) of an AC waveform.
← Previous Page
Textbook Index
Next Page →
Share
Share
Share
Share
Share
This article shows you two ways to use a Raspberry Pi Zero Wireless to...
Mark Hughes
Programmable thermostats can save a lot of energy and money. But you...
Robert Keim
Robert Keim
Load More
Published under the terms and conditions of the Design Science License
Pages in Chapter 12
Power Measurement
AC Bridge Circuits
AC Instrumentation Transducers
PDF Version
← Volume Index
WHO WE ARE
More about us
CONTENT
BOM Tool
Calculators
Datasheets
Electronic Components
Forum
Giveaways
Industry Articles
Industry Webinars
News
Projects
Technical Articles
Test Equipment
Textbook
Video Lectures
Worksheets
CATEGORIES
Latest
Analog
Arduino Projects
Automotive
Connectors
Digital ICs
EDA Tools
Electromechanical
Embedded
IoT
PCB
Power
Sensors
Test & Measurement
Wearables
Wireless RF
CONNECT WITH US
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
LinkedIn
Contact Us
Write For Us
Advertise
Newsletters
SIGN UP
Register