Effect of Lubricants On Warm Compaction Process of Cu-Based Composite
Effect of Lubricants On Warm Compaction Process of Cu-Based Composite
Composites: Part B
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/compositesb
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: The use of lubricant is the key of warm compaction technology. Because of admixed different lubricants,
Received 22 July 2011 the optimal parameters of warm compaction process were also different. This paper investigated the
Received in revised form 6 September 2011 effect of two kind of lubricants (zinc stearate and polystyrene) on the parameters of warm compaction
Accepted 16 September 2011
process by compared properties of Cu-based composite. It was shown that with the rise of compacting
Available online 29 September 2011
pressure, the density and hardness of the Cu-based composite increased, but the resistivity and gaining
weight reduced. With increasing compacting temperature, the density and hardness first increased and
Keywords:
then decreased, but the trend of resistivity and gaining weight just reversed. For the samples admixed
A. Metal-matrix composites (MMCs)
B. Electrical properties
zinc stearate (ZS), the optimal admixed concentration was 0.4 wt%, and the sample prepared at 120 °C
E. Powder processing and 650 MPa had the highest density and hardness, the lowest resistivity and gaining weight. For the
samples admixed polystyrene (PS), these parameters were 0.7 wt%, 140 °C and 650 MPa, respectively.
The properties of samples admixed PS were superior to that of admixed ZS.
Ó 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1359-8368/$ - see front matter Ó 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.09.004
934 S.-S. Feng et al. / Composites: Part B 43 (2012) 933–939
Table 1 120 °C with a density as high as 8.38 g/cm3, and the smallest den-
Composition of materials tested (wt%). sity is gained at 160 °C with 6.71 g/cm3. For the samples admixed
Bi B4C Lubricant Cu–Re Cu PS, at 650 MPa, the maximum density of samples is obtained at
2 2 0.4–0.7 0.2 Balance 140 °C with a density as high as 8.52 g/cm3, and the minimum den-
sity is gained at 100 °C with 7.00 g/cm3. Compared to Figs. 1 and 2,
it is also found that the densities of samples admixed PS are higher
than that of samples admixed ZS. And the maximum density of
rometer. The microstructure morphology was characterized by the
samples admixed PS is 0.14 g/cm3 higher than that of samples ad-
EVOMA 10 scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
mixed ZS.
For electrical contact materials, electrical property, which is
3. Results and discussion resistivity in the experiment, is one of the most important perfor-
mance. Figs. 3 and 4 indicate that the resistivity reduces with
3.1. Effects of compacting temperature and pressure on properties of increasing compacting pressure. However, at the same compacting
samples pressure, resistivity first increases and then reduces with the rise
of temperature. For the samples admixed ZS, at 650 MPa, the mini-
The degree of effect of warm compaction conditions on the den- mum and maximum resistivity are obtained at 120 °C and 160 °C
sity is in turn from big to small followed as the increase of the com- compacting temperature, the values of resistivity are 2.12
pacting pressure, lubrication, compacting temperature and 10 8 X m and 3.52 10 8 X m. The values of minimum and maxi-
lubricant concentration. Figs. 1 and 2 are the density vs. compact- mum resistivity of samples admixed PS are gained at 140 °C with
ing pressure for the samples admixed ZS and PS, at the different 1.79 10 8 X m and 100 °C with 2.00 10 8 X m, respectively. It
compacting temperatures (100, 120, 140 and 160 °C). The results can be seen that the resistivities of samples admixed PS are smaller
show that the density increases with increasing pressure. And at than that of admixed ZS.
the same compacting pressure, the density first increases and then In the application of Cu-based electrical contact materials, the
decreases as the temperature rises. For the samples admixed ZS, at main obstacle is that Cu-based material is easily oxidized, which
650 MPa, the maximum density is obtained at approximately would lead to higher contact resistance. The smaller the weight of
Fig. 1. Relation between density and pressure for samples admixed ZS. Fig. 3. Relation between resistivity and pressure for samples admixed ZS.
Fig. 2. Relation between density and pressure for samples admixed PS. Fig. 4. Relation between resistivity and pressure for samples admixed PS.
S.-S. Feng et al. / Composites: Part B 43 (2012) 933–939 935
Fig. 5. Relation between gaining weight and pressure for samples admixed ZS. Fig. 7. Relation between hardness and pressure for the samples admixed ZS.
Fig. 6. Relation between gaining weight and pressure for samples admixed PS.
Fig. 8. Relation between hardness and pressure for the samples admixed PS.
material increases, the better the oxidation resistance is. Figs. 5 and
6 show that, with increasing the pressure and temperature, the polymer would show itself three states successively: vitreous, plas-
gaining weight was similar to the trend of resistivity. For the sam- tic and viscous. In warm compaction process, the lubricant is in a
ples admixed ZS and PS, at 650 MPa, the minimum gaining weight viscous state in a certain temperature range which is at about
of samples are obtained at 120 °C and 140 °C, which is 2.16 10 2 g 120 °C and 140 °C for ZS and PS. Under pressure, the viscous lubri-
and 1.13 10 2 g, respectively. It is found that the gaining weight cation can flow among powder particles and between die wall and
of samples admixed PS is less than that of admixed ZS. particles, which can improve lubricate effect. Therefore, the value
Figs. 7 and 8 show that, with increasing the pressure and tem- of the frictional coefficient became smaller, the frictional resistance
perature, the hardness is similar to the trend of density. For the in powder compaction was reduced, that is to say that valid pres-
samples admixed ZS and PS, the maximum hardness are obtained sure was increased, which is advantageous to the remove, rear-
at 120 °C, 140 °C and 650 MPa, which is 55.8 HB and 60 HB. rangement and deform of powder particles, so the green density
Fig. 9a and b are the SEM image of samples admixed ZS, the was increased. In addition, lubricant could slower the premature
samples are prepared at 140 °C, 120 °C and 650 MPa, respectively. mechanical combination and microcold-weld, which reduces the
The irregular black blocks are B4C, it is uniformly distributed with- pressure loss and increases valid compacting stress. Consequently,
in the copper matrix. The main role of B4C is to improve wear resis- the green density was enhanced.
tance and resistance to arc erosion of Cu-based composite. It is The some properties of samples would be improved when the
found that the microstructure morphology of sample prepared at density increases. With increasing density, the gaps within the ma-
120 °C and 650 MPa, is smoother than that of sample prepared at trix would be reduced, which reduces the probability of electron
140 °C and 650 MPa. This result is exactly consistent with results scattering, and inhibits oxygen diffusion. Thence, for admixed ZS
of the above Figs. 1, 3, 5 and 7. and PS, the samples have lower resistivity, better oxidation resis-
On the one hand, the increase of the compacting pressure is tance and higher hardness at 120 °C, and 140 °C, respectively.
advantageous to the remove, rearrangement and deform of powder
particles. Therefore, the density of sample increases with increas- 3.2. Effects of lubricant concentrations on properties of samples
ing compacting pressure. On the other hand, the reason for the
above results is also closely related to the state of lubricant, which In the early experiments, the samples admixed 0.3% and 0.4% ZS
depends on temperature. Generally, with the rise of temperature, were prepared at 120 °C, 140 °C and 650 MPa. Then the densities of
936 S.-S. Feng et al. / Composites: Part B 43 (2012) 933–939
Fig. 9. SEM image of samples admixed ZS: (a) admixed 0.4 wt%, at 140 °C and 650 MPa; (b) admixed 0.7 wt%, at 120 °C and 650 MPa.
sintered samples were measured, the result showed that the den- Table 2 is the combination of factor level of orthogonal test. Table
sities of admixed 0.3% ZS were 8.27 g/cm3 and 8.20 g/cm3, and the 3 is the densities orthogonal array L16 (43) of admixed ZS and PS
densities of admixed 0.4% ZS were 8.35 g/cm3 and 8.30 g/cm3, samples which were prepared at the different temperatures, pres-
respectively. It is clear that the density of PM parts directly affects sure and lubricant concentrations, which is corresponding with Figs.
other properties of samples, so lubricant concentrations are 10 and 11. Figs. 10 and 11 indicate that the density increases with
0.4 wt%, 0.5 wt%, 0.6 wt% and 0.7 wt% in this study. the rise of the pressure, for the effect of lubricant concentrations
Table 2
Three-factor and four-level orthogonal array.
Level Factor
A B C
Lubricant concentration (%) Compacting temperature (°C) Compacting pressure (MPa)
One-level 0.6 100 650
Two-level 0.4 140 450
Three-level 0.5 160 550
Four-level 0.7 120 350
Table 3
The orthogonal array L16 (43) of density of samples admixed ZS and PS.
Lubricant concentration (%) Compacting temperature (°C) Compacting pressure (MPa) Density (g/cm3)
Admixed ZS Admixed PS
0.6 100 650 8.23 8.23
140 450 7.54 7.82
160 550 7.89 8.13
120 350 6.86 7.11
0.4 100 450 7.43 7.57
140 650 8.32 8.52
160 350 6.71 7.04
120 550 8.16 8.26
0.5 100 550 7.97 8.05
140 350 6.80 7.16
160 650 8.17 8.30
120 450 7.62 7.74
0.7 100 350 6.75 7.00
140 550 8.08 8.31
160 450 7.35 7.65
120 650 8.38 8.45
Admixed ZS k1 7.630 7.595 8.275 The optimum parameters: 0.4%, 120 °C and 650 MPa
k2 7.655 7.685 7.485
k3 7.640 7.685 8.025
k4 7.640 7.755 6.780
Range 0.025 0.225 1.495
Optimal schema A2 B4 C1
Admixed PS k1 7.822 7.713 8.375 The optimum parameters: 0.7%, 140 °C and 650 MPa
k2 7.848 7.953 7.695
k3 7.813 7.780 8.188
k4 7.853 7.890 7.078
Range 0.04 0.240 1.297
Optimal schema A4 B2 C1
S.-S. Feng et al. / Composites: Part B 43 (2012) 933–939 937
Fig. 10. Relation between density and pressure of samples admixed ZS. Fig. 13. Relation between resistivity and pressure of samples admixed PS.
Fig. 11. Relation between density and pressure of samples admixed PS.
Fig. 14. Relation between gaining weight and pressure of samples admixed ZS.
Fig. 12. Relation between resistivity and pressure of samples admixed ZS.
Fig. 15. Relation between gaining weight and pressure of samples admixed PS.
Table 5
The properties of sintered samples prepared cold pressing and warm compaction.
the lubricant gradually evaporated, and then the gaps were left
within the Cu matrix. Therefore, the density of samples may be re-
duce with increasing lubricant concentration. At the same time, if lu-
bricant concentration is lower, the lubricant can’t be completely
filled to between particles of powder, then the valid compacting
stress would reduce. There is a suitable concentration so as to obtain
the optimum properties of the composite.
Fig. 16. Relation between hardness and pressure of samples admixed ZS. 3.3. The difference of properties of sample prepared cold pressing and
warm compaction
4. Conclusions
(1) For samples admixed ZS and PS, with the rise of compacting
pressure, the density and hardness of Cu-based composite in
warm compaction process increase. And the resistivity and
gaining weight reduce.
Fig. 17. Relation between hardness and pressure of samples admixed PS.
(2) For admixed ZS and PS of samples, with increasing compact-
ing temperature, the density and hardness first increase and
then decrease, but the trend of resistivity and gaining weight
Table 4 just reverse.
The green densities of samples prepared cold pressing and warm compaction.
(3) The optimal compacting temperatures are 120 °C and
Process Cold pressing Warm compaction 140 °C, for the samples admixed ZS and PS. Above or low
Admixed ZS Admixed PS the optimal compacting temperature, the density would
decrease slightly, which is mainly caused by the feature of
Density (g/cm3) 8.16 8.27 8.39
lubricant. And the optimal lubricant concentrations are
0.4 wt% and 0.7 wt%.
is 650 MPa. For admixed PS samples, the optimum process parame- (4) Compared to the density, resistivity, antioxidant and hardness
ters are 0.7%, 140 °C and 650 MPa, respectively. of Cu-based composite, the properties of samples admixed PS
Figs. 12–17 show that, the hardness increases with the rise of are superior to that of admixed ZS.
the pressure, the resistivity and gaining weight reduce. For the ef- (5) The properties of samples prepared warm compaction are
fects of lubricant concentrations on hardness, resistivity and gain- better than that of samples prepared cold pressing.
ing weight of samples, there is no obvious regularity. The reasons
of causing the phenomenons are similar to that of Figs. 10 and
11. However, as a whole, the optimal concentration is 0.4 wt% for
Acknowledgments
the samples admixed ZS, it is 0.7 wt% for the samples admixed PS.
For warm compaction process, one of the crucial factors is to seek
This work was supported by the project of the National Natural Sci-
the appropriate lubricant and lubricant concentration. At the opti-
ence Foundation of China (No. 50871047), the Natural Science Founda-
mal temperature, ZS and PS are fused due to the compaction pres-
tion of Shandong Province of China (ZR2010EM071) and Key Subject
sure, then penetrated between particles of the powder by capillary
(Laboratory) Research Foundation of Shandong Province.
force in order to decreasing the contact resistance between the par-
ticles, which is good for accelerating the rearrangement of the parti-
cles, and accelerating the increase on the density of samples. Higher References
weight percent of lubricant led to smaller amount of load that
[1] Fehim F, Uzun Huseyin. Microstructure, hardness and electrical properties of
needed to obtain the same green density, but in sintering progress, silver-based refractory contact materials. Mater Des 2003;24:489–92.
S.-S. Feng et al. / Composites: Part B 43 (2012) 933–939 939
[2] Chen JC, Sun JL, Zhang KH. Silver tin oxide electrical contact material prepared [9] Sation S, Lavakiri M, Kagaya T. Hitachi powdered metals technical report, no. 2;
by reactive synthesis. ICEC Zurich 2002:447–51. 2003. p. 36–43.
[3] Wu CP, Yi DQ, Li J, et al. Investigation on microstructure and performance of [10] Hoganas AB. Hoganas hand book for sintered compacts, no. 14, Warm
Ag/ZnO contact material. J Alloy Compd 2008;457:565–70. Compaction; 1998.
[4] Liu XM, Wu SL, Chu PK, et al. Effects of coating process on the characteristics of [11] Ozaki Y, Shigeru Unami, Uenosono S. Kawasaki steel technical report, no. 47;
Ag–SnO2 contact materials. Mater Chem Phys 2006;98:477–80. 2002. p. 48.
[5] Yang XH, Liang ShH, Wang XH, et al. Effect of WC and CeO2 on microstructure [12] Shokrollahi H, Janghorban K. Effect of warm compaction on the magnetic and
and properties of W–Cu electrical contact material. Int J Refract Metals Hard electrical properties of Fe-based soft magnetic composites. J Magn Magn Mater
Mater 2010;28:305–11. 2007;313:182–6.
[6] Abolfazl B, Ali H, Mohammad G. On the combined effect of lubrication and [13] Rutz HG, Hanejko FG. High density processing of high performance ferrous
compaction temperature on properties of iron-based P/M parts. Mater Sci Eng materials. Int J Powder Metall 1995;31(1):9–17.
2006;437:360–5. [14] Nor SSM, Rahman MM, Tarlochan F, et al. The effect of lubrication in reducing
[7] Tao SW, Tian JJ, Lu X, et al. Anisotropic bonded NdFeB magnets with radial net friction in warm powder compaction process. J Mater Process Technol
oriented magnetization by 2-step warm compaction process. J Alloy Compd 2008;207:118–24.
2009;477:510–4. [15] Xiao ZY, Ke MY, Fang L, et al. Die wall lubricated warm compacting and
[8] Ngai TL, Kuang YH, Li YY. In: Proceedings of Sino-Swedish structural materials sintering behaviors of pre-mixed Fe–Ni–Cu–Mo–C powders. J Mater Process
symposium. Warm compaction forming of a binder-treated Fe-base material; Technol 2009;209:4527–30.
2007. p. 77–81.