Scribd
Upload
43 views

TCP in Mobilenetworks - Improvement in TCP Performance

This document discusses various modifications made to TCP (Transmission Control Protocol) to improve its performance over wireless networks. It describes protocols like I-TCP, Fast Retransmission, Snooping TCP, Mobile TCP, and Freeze TCP that address challenges like higher error rates, intermittent disconnections, and mobility in single-hop wireless networks. It also discusses TCP Feedback (TCP-F) for reliable communication in multi-hop mobile ad hoc networks.

Uploaded by

muki
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
43 views

TCP in Mobilenetworks - Improvement in TCP Performance

This document discusses various modifications made to TCP (Transmission Control Protocol) to improve its performance over wireless networks. It describes protocols like I-TCP, Fast Retransmission, Snooping TCP, Mobile TCP, and Freeze TCP that address challenges like higher error rates, intermittent disconnections, and mobility in single-hop wireless networks. It also discusses TCP Feedback (TCP-F) for reliable communication in multi-hop mobile ad hoc networks.

Uploaded by

muki
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 20

Mobile Transport Protocol

Unit - II
TCP in Mobile Networks
 Since scenarios for losses in wireless are different from
wireless (mostly due to congestion, rarely bit error), TCP
designed for wired cant be used
 Wireless Networks differs from wired such as:
 Lower bandwidth
 Bandwidth fluctuations with time
 Mobility
 Higher delay
 Intermittent disconnections
 High bit error
 Poor link reliability
Contd…
 To deal with the scenarios of wireless, many modifications to
transport protocol has been developed
 These modifications are different for single and multi-hop wireless
networks

 TCP for Single hop wireless networks:

 I – TCP (Indirect TCP)


 Fast Retransmission
 Snooping TCP (S-TCP)
 Mobile TCP (M-TCP)
 Freeze TCP
Indirect TCP (I-TCP)
Indirect TCP (I-TCP)
 The connection between Fixed Host (FH) and Mobile Host
(MH) is divided into 2 connections –
 FH and Base Station (BS) - wired part, BS to MH - wireless
part
 BS (usually FA) maintains 2 separate connections
 FH sends packet to BS, BS send ACK to FH
 BS forward the packet to MH, if packet lost it retransmits
(known from missing ACK or 3 dup ACKs)
 If MH moves out of range, BS has to transfer state of MH to
new BS
I - TCP
 Advantage:
 No modification to TCP required at FH or MH
 Wireless loss not propagated to wired part
 Latency less due to local retransmission in wireless part
 Disadvantage:
 TCP End to End Semantics is lost (as BS send ACK not the
MH to FH)
 BS or FA must be a trusted entity
Fast Retransmission
Fast Retransmission
 To overcome delay in transmissions due to intermittent
disconnection when MH moves to another FA
 Extremely short disruptions before Timer expires TCP does
not invoke Slow Start
 But for long disruptions like handover, invokes Slow Start
results in inefficiency
 To avoid this, when MH registers to new BS, it sends 3 dup
ACKs to FH via BS
 So FH retransmit immediately before timer expires and does
not invoke Slow Start
Contd…
 Advantage:
 Reduces time to get re-connected to new FA without wait
for RTO expires
 Disadvantage:
 Only applicable for packet loss due to handover, other
wireless errors not addressed
Snooping TCP
Snooping TCP
 Improves performance of TCP maintaining end to end
semantics
 Modified software at BS called Snoop
 Snoops packet flow in both directions (FH to BS and BS to
MH)
 Buffers all Segments close to MH, till successfully
transmitted
 When packet lost at MH, notified to BS via 3 dup ACKs, it
retransmit locally to MH
 To maintain end to end semantics, does not send ACK to FH
 So after timeout FH retransmit and BS filter duplicate packet
from reaching MH
Contd…
 For segments destined to FH, if FA detects holes in sequence no. ,
notify via NACK to MH and fill it locally
 FA forward it to FH, reordering is done at FH
 Advantage:
 TCP end to end semantics is maintained
 In case FA crashes, FH can retransmit
 Local retransmission at wireless part, so less latency
 Disadvantage:
 Wireless errors propagated to wired part
 NACK additional mechanism between FA and MH
 If encryption scheme used at Transport layer (SSL, TLS) applied
end to end, snooping and buffering useless
Mobile TCP (M-TCP)
Mobile TCP (M-TCP)
 Frequent disconnection in Wireless due to fading, handover,
lack of bandwidth causes delay is unacceptable to user
 M-TCP avoid this rather shrinking the window or invoking
Slow Start
 TCP connection is segmented into wired and wireless part
 FH and Supervisory Host (SH) – wired part
 SH to MH – wireless part
 SH controls many BS
 Wired part uses unmodified TCP and wireless part
modified TCP w.r.t. wireless
Contd…
 Packet acknowledged to FH only if MH receives, so end to
end semantics preserved
 If SH finds FH not received ACK, it decides MH is
disconnected and sets FH window to zero
 This prevent re-transmission, when SH notices MH
connected, sets window of FH to full size
 When MH moves from current SH to new SH, it transfers
the state of MH to new SH
 M-TCP requires bandwidth manager at wireless part for fair
sharing as it uses modified TCP
Freeze TCP
Freeze TCP
 Freezes TCP Sender before disconnection occurs
 MAC layer informs Transport layer before connection is actually
interrupted and receiver sends zero advertisement Window
to sender
 When re-connected, receiver notify sender to un-freeze window
 To avoid Slow Start during disconnection at sender, freezing info
should send quickly
 Does not need intermediate node, so can be used even if payload is
encrypted
 Used in Virtual Private Network (VPN)
 Lots of changes should be made in software at CH, MH, FA
TCP in Multi-hop Wireless Networks
 In Mobile Adhoc Network (MANET) all nodes are Mobile
Host (MH)
 No intermediatery to supervise communication
 Packets are transmitted in multi-hop fashion
 Nodes move freely and network topology changes
unpredictably
 Original TCP cannot be used to differentiate between packet
loss due to link failure and congestion
 Hence TCP extended for MANETs called TCP Feedback is
proposed
TCP – F (TCP – Feedback)
TCP – F (TCP Feedback)
 Source MH sending packet to destination MH, if
intermediate MH detects route failure due to mobility:
 It sends the Route Failure Notification (RFN) to source
 Invalidates the route to prevent further packet transfer to
Source MH via that route
 If intermediate MH, knows alternate path it uses that path
and discards RFN
 Receiving RFN, Source MH, stop sending packets, invalidates
timer and freeze send window
 Source MH remains in that state till it receives Route Re-
establishment Notification (RRN)

You might also like