Analysis of HT Cables and Joint Failures
Analysis of HT Cables and Joint Failures
6/11KV Joint
Our experiences failures
Now we will focus on our experiences The major areas of fault as observed in our
regarding cable faults. Our primary high system in a 6/11KV straight through joint
tension network comprises of 6 and11KV and terminations are discussed below:
and Sub transmission voltage of 33KV. We
are recently installing 3 core XLPE insulated
The continuity of the lead sleeve
cables in our primary distribution network
and single core XLPE cables for 33 KV with the PILC cable lead sheath:
networks. In our transition joint design we have a lead
sleeve prepared at site by beating up a
We have 3 types of 33KV Grade cables rectangular flat lead sheet to size, to
existing in our system: encapsulate the joint. The earth continuity
of the joint is ensured by a tinned copper
• PILC Cables (3 core H Cables braid of suitable size, connected to the
and Single core ‘HSL’ type cables armour wire of XLPE cable with jubilee clips
• XLPE CABLES (Single core and solder tacked on to lead sleeve of the
only) joint. The lead sleeve is plumbed on to the
• Gas Filled PILC Cables sheath of PILC cable and provides actually a
hermetic sealing on the PILC side of the
6/11KV Grade cables: joint which is most vulnerable to moisture
ingress(Fig : 3).
PILC belted cables (both
Aluminum and Copper
conductors)
XLPE cables (3 core
aluminum conductors)
(Fig : 6)
(Fig : 4)
Handling of the old PILC Cables during
aligning for jointing is therefore of an
extremely skillful task to avoid cracking of
paper insulation at the crutch region which
is most mechanically stressed. Bad cross in
PILC cores and damage to paper during core
handling can cause phase-to phase short at
the crutch region which is in turn most
electrically stressed also(Fig : 6).
(Fig : 10)
(Fig : 12 b)
Failure at termination:
The major fault prone areas of a XLPE and
PILC Termination are:
Failures in cable
run
Inference
Consequent to the above failures, we have
come to the conclusion that failure of our
Stage 1 high tension cables and joints are mainly
occurring for the following reasons:
Stage 4
Stage 5
inside the joint when the
Measures
end bonding with the other end
earthed through SVL for long circuits
lengths where the sheath circulating
current are considerably high. For
short circuit lengths where the
The root causes of failures that were
sheath induced voltage is within
detected from our analysis of cable and
limits we have gone for single end
joint failures guided us in making the
bonding.
following course corrections in our cable
and joint design:
We have identified the repetitive
spike prone cable routes and
We have phased out the taped type
replaced the same as far as
XLPE joint design and incorporated
practicable to minimize the number
heat shrink technology in all our
of cable breakdowns caused due to
high tension jointing system.
the presence of innumerable joints
in between a small cable length and
Crimping is to some extent
thereby reducing chances of failure.
dependent on manual skill where
equal spacing requires to be kept.
Our 11KV grade cables had
Therefore in order to arrest failures
previously PVC as outer sheath
at ferrule region due to bad
material which was subsequently
crimping, we have introduced
changed to HDPE owing to its tough
shearing bolt connector at 33KV
and rigid property in view to protect
level.
the cable components from spiking.
It is also stressed upon to adhere to
We have ceased to use Poly Al
the installation protocols of HT
sheathed cables in our 33KV system
cables regarding depth and
and proportionately increased the
protection by tiles to minimize
number and cross sectional area of
chance of direct spiking.
the armour wires to compensate
reduction in area of Poly Al. In our
modified joint design, the armour
continuity is being done using
aluminum connector which has not
only eliminated the bimetallic effect
of the spring band but also reduced
the number of junctions in the path
of the flow of the circulating current.
In the process we have done away
with Copper braid which was
responsible for ingress of moisture
However, a more futuristic method would