0% found this document useful (0 votes)
88 views

HR Analytics 101, An Introduction

This document provides an introduction to HR analytics, including what HR analytics is, the four levels of HR analytics in organizations, and important data sources. HR analytics involves analyzing people data to understand connections and inform organizational changes. The four levels are: 1) data collection, 2) reporting, 3) trend tracking, and 4) predictive analytics using multiple linked data sources to predict outcomes. Key data sources include organizational data, employee surveys, performance assessments, and business metrics.

Uploaded by

Firas Chaabene
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
88 views

HR Analytics 101, An Introduction

This document provides an introduction to HR analytics, including what HR analytics is, the four levels of HR analytics in organizations, and important data sources. HR analytics involves analyzing people data to understand connections and inform organizational changes. The four levels are: 1) data collection, 2) reporting, 3) trend tracking, and 4) predictive analytics using multiple linked data sources to predict outcomes. Key data sources include organizational data, employee surveys, performance assessments, and business metrics.

Uploaded by

Firas Chaabene
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

HR ANALYTICS 101, AN INTRODUCTION

OVERVIEW
As you are probably well aware, human resources (HR) is in a state of
transition – moving from concentrating on meeting internal metrics
(such as hiring to meet headcounts, limiting turnover) to connecting the
dots between metrics (e.g., identifying and understanding how hiring
By:
and turnover are connected). Lauren Wegman, Ph.D.
Consultant
This new focus on linking people variables together presents an interesting op-
portunity for HR, in terms of analytics, with a great deal of upside for you as an
HR practitioner including:

• A greater understanding of the employee knowledge, skills, and abilities


that drive business outcomes specific to your organization
• The ability to make people investments that truly deliver results
• A way to calculate the ROI of investing in your people
• The opportunity to take the lead in making HR process business-focused,
making HR a strategic business partner for the core business
This white paper is designed to provide an overview of HR analytics including what it is (and
what it is not), introduce you to the four levels of HR Analytics in organizations, and discuss
data and data sources. A recent case study example is also presented in which SMD connect-
ed two different sources of data together to perform a predictive analysis in order to answer
an important HR analytics question for the client. Finally, practical tips for conducting your
own HR analytics research in your organization are included.

HR ANALYTICS – WHAT IT IS AND WHY IT IS DIFFERENT

Data in and of itself is not all that interesting – it is through the combination of data and
analysis that better talent decisions are uncovered. A great example is an organization that
is looking to reduce turnover. The leading assumption at the organization is that people are
leaving due to treatment by the immediate supervisor. Analytics can be used to test this
assumption and determine the true cause of high turnover – whether it be the immediate
supervisor or something else entirely.

Ok, so what exactly is HR Analytics? Simply, HR analytics is the analysis of people data. The
goal of any people analytics project is to gather and understand the connections between
people data in order to inform organizational and HR changes that support leadership’s
vision and company initiatives. Many times, the analysis requires multiple data sources,
involving the actual collection of data (such as the distribution of a survey) as well as use of
previously collected data (e.g., attrition data accumulated over the last year, selection data of
all successful job applicants). The implications of HR analytics can be far reaching – across HR
as well as the organization, and can include projects like:

• The development of predictive talent profiles to aid in succession planning and inform
the selection and development of employees.
• Survey development and the continuous assessment of employee attitudes across the
life cycle of employee tenure.
• The utilization of targeted organizational assessments in times of organizational change
(e.g., change readiness, climate assessment, wellness assessments).
• The prioritization of survey categories or behavioral competencies based on their impact
on business outcomes.

When you start to talk to people about HR analytics, one thing immediately becomes appar-
ent – there are often more questions than answers. When SMD goes into a new organization,
it keys in on their analytics questions because this tells much about the organization’s current
level of thinking in terms of people analytics as well as their potential readiness for more
advanced data analysis projects.

FOUR LEVELS OF HR ANALYTICS IN ORGANIZATIONS

SMD believes in the four levels of HR Analytics, all of which stem from the complexity of
people analytics questions.
4 LEVELS OF HR ANALYTICS

Level 1. The first being the lowest level – that of data collection and management. Here, clients
are collecting and storing people data but not doing much (if anything with it). Questions in this
phase tend to be around what kinds of data should be collected, and how it should best be orga-
nized/stored.

Level 2. Level two dives into reporting and data visualization. Questions emerging in this stage
tend to focus on how to best present data, and what pieces of the data are most meaningful to
the data consumers (e.g., data splits – department, team, locations, etc.).

Level 3. At stage three, SMD sees clients tracking trends across time. In this level, the organiza-
tions are collecting and comparing data, and generally use the results for goal-setting purposes.
Questions in this phase are about the best ways to evidence increases (or decreases) on target
areas in order to meet goals or see an improvement from last year.

Level 4. Level four contains the most advanced companies – those that are using data to make
predictions (i.e., predictive analytics). These companies are not only using people data to inform
people decisions, but also linking people data sources to other data sources (e.g., business out-
comes, financials, customer satisfaction, etc.) to inform organizational decisions.

The method behind predictive analytics, structural equation modeling (SEM), is quite complicat-
ed, and unfortunately, many companies that think they are truly harnessing the power of predic-
tive analytics are only scratching the surface – looking at correlations. SEM is the method used
by SMD, to not only show prediction (above and beyond correlation), but also show cause and
effect. For more information on predictive analytics, including a ‘Predictive or Not Test,’ check out
SMD’s white paper – Big Data and Predictive Analytics, HR is Still Getting it Wrong.

In your own organization when you are thinking about crafting a predictive analytics question,
the following question can be helpful: How does X impact Y? X and Y are variables such as scores
on the employee survey, performance evaluations, turnover, or even hard business outcomes.
Next, you will need to define how X and Y will be assessed in this project. For example, if you are
interested in predicting turnover, how will turnover be measured? Will it be actual attrition data,
or will it be turnover intent from an opinion survey?

DATA, DATA, DATA – SOURCES AND INTEGRATION

A critical component of any analytics project are the data sources available. Access to and quality
of data can dictate which HR analytics questions can and cannot be answered as well as how X
and Y (the variables of interest) are measured and defined.

SMD organizes data sources into four broad categories: Organizational Data, Employee Survey
Data, People Performance Data, and Business Performance Data.

• HRIS – Employee, department, team descrip- • Employee Engagement


tives Survey
• HRIS – Organizational Hierarchy • Pulse Surveys
• HRIS - Turnover • New Hire Survey
• Compensation and Benefits • Exit Survey
• Applicant Tracking Organizational Employee • Culture Survey
Data Survey Data • Competency Models

• Selection Assessments –
People Business • Financial – Profitability,
Scores on behavioral interview,
Performance Performance EBITDA
cognitive ability test,
Data Data • Customer /
personality test, knowledge
assessment, role play, work sample Patient Satisfaction -
• Performance Appraisal – 360 Feedback HCHAPS
report • Sales - Profit, Number
• Training Assessments • Safety
• Salesforce – Win Rate, Average Win Size • Quality

• Organizational Data. Organizational Data houses all HRIS data. Variables of interest that fall
in here can include: turnover information, compensation, and applicant tracking. But, data
from this category is most commonly used to provide organizational hierarchy information.
That is to allow for splits based on departments, teams, leaders, etc. This area is also critical
in that employee IDs (a valuable linkage key for many types of analyses) originate here.

• Employee Survey Data. Many organizations have employee survey data -- whether from an
annual employee survey, pulse surveys, or more constant survey initiatives (e.g., continuous
listening, employee life cycle surveys). Surveys are a great way to pull data on employee at-
titudes and perceptions.
• People Performance Data. People performance data includes any type of selection, training,
or performance assessment/evaluation. This data is at the individual level, which allows for
performance comparisons between employees.

• Business Performance Data. Last is business performance data. The data in this category
can vary greatly by industry and organizational goals, but some common examples include
financial information, customer satisfaction, patient satisfaction, and measures of overall effi-
ciency and effectiveness. The data can be at the individual level (e.g., individual sales, profit),
but more commonly is found at higher levels (i.e., department, team, location levels).

Although many HR analytics questions can be answered using one data source, more strategic
questions often require data from two or more sources. For example, when asking “how does X
impact Y?,” X and Y can fall in two different data sources. In order to perform the analytics, the
data sources need to be merged together. To do this, you need to have a unique identifier, which
is included in both data sources. Often this can be employee ID number (as long as it is unique).
If you do not have a unique identifier, one trick is to create your own. For smaller data sets, using
a combination of first name and last name works well.

CASE STUDY – LINKING PERFORMANCE DATA TO DOLLARS

To demonstrate some of the principles discussed above, this section introduces a recent case
study. The client in this HR analytics project is a large, global professional services firm. The proj-
ect centered around one job type: Executive Sales Professionals. The question SMD was charged
with answering: “What are high performing sales executives doing differently than low perform-
ers?”

To answer this question, data was needed from two sources – People Performance Data (360
Feedback scores for the professional sales team) and Business Performance Data (sales outcomes
– sales goal attainment, average win size, and average win rate for each executive sales employ-
ee). SMD then linked the 360 performance data for each sales executive to their sales outcome
data. This was a smaller data set that contained no duplicates in employee full name, so SMD
could use the last name and first name as the link variable.

Through this analysis, SMD was able to determine the specific behavioral competencies assessed
in the 360 that have the greatest impact on sales. In this case, eight of the 12 behavioral compe-
tencies from the 360 were identified as key drivers of sales outcomes.
SALES OUTCOMES

RELATIONSHIP BUILDING
Collaboration
BEHAVIORS

Communication
Drives for Results
Win Win
Follow Up Ratio Size

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SELLING


Industry Expertise Sales Goal
Demand Creation Attainment
Relationship Development
Consultative Conversations

To calculate the projected ROI of investing in these eight behavioral competencies, SMD looked
at high performing sales executives (in terms of scores on these eight critical competencies) and
compared them to their peers looking at differences in sales outcomes. SMD found that sales
executives who evidenced high levels of all eight of the critical behavioral competencies had an
average sales goal attainment of +78% higher than their peers, an average win rate of +10% more
often than their peers, and an average win size of $10,000 more than their peers.
This case study has many implications for this client. Through this analysis, SMD was able to set
target goals and proficiency levels for the current workforce on the behavioral competencies.
Additionally, using the proficiency cuts, it was able to map current workforce proficiency levels
across the critical eight behavioral competencies to identify areas where the workforce as a
whole could benefit from training. In an effort to align HR process, implications for training also
hold implications for selection. In other words, since SMD knows these eight behavioral compe-
tencies have the strongest impact on sales, and the current workforce can be trained on these
competencies, SMD should also be selecting new employees based on their proficiency level
with these same competencies. From this, a reengineering of the selection process is underway
where candidates will be selected based on hiring assessments designed to measure a candi-
date’s ability on each critical competency.

PRACTICAL TIPS

People analytics has far reaching implications from uncovering trends, solving current organiza-
tional problems, to providing support to HR functions. A few tips are provided below. For more
tips, check out the white papers at smdhr.com.

• Choose Wisely: When thinking about where to start in your organization, choose to solve a
problem that aligns with your organizational strategy.

• Start Small: If HR analytics is new to your organization, start small and choose something
manageable but applicable. For instance, if one organizational goal is to reduce turnover,
instead of choosing to intervene at the organizational level, choose a smaller department or
team that is critical to the core business of the company, but also one that has a high attri-
tion rate.

• Integrate & Share: When conducting HR analytics projects, work to integrate findings
together as well as share resources throughout. For example, the development of a compe-
tency model in which the discovered competencies are used in selection and development.

CONCLUSION

The HR function is evolving in its understanding and application of analytics; the benefits are nu-
merous. Ultimately, connecting people data to business outcomes through analytics will provide
the foundation for not only becoming better business partners and increasing HR’s credibility,
but it will also demonstrate the value and ROI that HR provides on a daily basis. To achieve these
goals, HR professionals don’t have to be data experts, but they must understand the basics of
analytics to effectively harness the power.

SMD is the leader in predictive analytics for employee assessments. SMD Link
is its patented technology that links employee data to business outcomes and
provides these key insights and actions in all manager reports. Learn more at
www.smdhr.com and contact them at [email protected].

13016 Eastfield Road, Suite 200-226, Huntersville, NC 28078 . 404.808.4730 . www.smdhr.com . [email protected]

You might also like