This document discusses techniques for replacement analysis. It introduces the defender-challenger concept where the current asset is the defender and potential replacement options are challengers. Replacement analysis compares the equivalent uniform annual worth of the defender versus challengers. The document provides examples comparing a mobile crane defender to a potential challenger. It also discusses performing replacement analysis over additional time periods and calculating the economic service life as the period where total annual costs are minimized.
This document discusses techniques for replacement analysis. It introduces the defender-challenger concept where the current asset is the defender and potential replacement options are challengers. Replacement analysis compares the equivalent uniform annual worth of the defender versus challengers. The document provides examples comparing a mobile crane defender to a potential challenger. It also discusses performing replacement analysis over additional time periods and calculating the economic service life as the period where total annual costs are minimized.
Muhamad Abduh, Ph.D. Outline Module 9 Replacement Defender – Challenger Concept Replacement Analysis Replacement Analysis with Additional Period Minimum-Cost Life Analysis or Economic Service Life
9-2 SI-4251 Ekonomi Teknik Muhamad Abduh, Ph.D.
Questions Concerning Replacement Do we need (want) to replace the one we currently used (defender) with another (challengers)? What will we propose to replace the old one? When is the best time to do it?
9-3 SI-4251 Ekonomi Teknik Muhamad Abduh, Ph.D.
Reasons for Replacement Decision on the utilization of (productive) assets was set for a certain service life… In times, the performance (expected or unexpected) of asset will be reduced, and other alternatives are to be considered Replacement is commonly considered due to the following reasons: Reduce in performance due to friction, deterioration Increase requirements we want better / higher standard specifications (productivity, accuracy, ..) that the one we currently use Obsolescence new (alternative) makes the (still functioning) old ones look less valuable
9-4 SI-4251 Ekonomi Teknik Muhamad Abduh, Ph.D.
Changing Value in Time
cost Total Annual Cost
Annual O & M Cost
Annual Investment Cost
Time at minimum cost (Capital Recovery)
time
9-5 SI-4251 Ekonomi Teknik Muhamad Abduh, Ph.D.
Defender – Challenger Concept in Replacement Analysis In accounting, the value of an asset at any given time is estimated and recorded in a book book value However, things do not always proceed as we expected. The real value of an asset differs than the one we estimated. Sunk cost cost we have to pay for bad decision in the past; it is cost that we cannot recover
Sunk Cost = Book Value – Realizable Value
9-6 SI-4251 Ekonomi Teknik Muhamad Abduh, Ph.D.
Example A mobile crane was bought for Rp 1,125,000,000 two years ago and was estimated for having service life of 7 years before it can be sold for Rp 234,575,000. This piece of equipment requires an annual operation and maintenance of Rp 37,500,000. Today, the crane’s book value is Rp 821,570,000. However, the best offer for that piece of equipment is only Rp 695,000,000. A new crane worth Rp 1,110,000,000 is being considered for replacement. This crane will have a service life of 5 years and salvage value of Rp 360,000,000. The annual O&M cost is estimated at Rp 21,400,000.
9-7 SI-4251 Ekonomi Teknik Muhamad Abduh, Ph.D.
Example Sunk cost = Rp 821.575,000 – Rp 695,000,000 = Rp 126,575,000 Assuming the remaining service life and salvage value of the defender remain the same, Comparing the old (defender) with the new one (challenger): EUAW defender = 695,000,000 (A/P, i, 5) + 37,500,000 – 234,575,000 (A/F, i, 5) EUAW challenger = 1,110,000,000 (A/P, i, 5) + 21,400,000 – 360,000,000 (A/F, i, 5)
For i = 11% (A/P, 11, 5) = 0.2706 (A/F, 11, 5) = 0.1606
EUAW defender = 187,894,255 Retained old crane
EUAW challenger = 263,395,000
More realistic condition reduced salvage value for old
equipment
9-8 SI-4251 Ekonomi Teknik Muhamad Abduh, Ph.D.
Defender vs. More than One Challengers Initial Current Salvage Trade- Annual Remaining Cost Book Value in Value Cost Service Value life DEFENDER 850,000 435,000 221,500 - 45,000 6 CHALLENGER 1 590,000 220,120 328,750 11,000 6 CHALLENGER 2 410,000 289,400 330,000 9,750 6 CHALLENGER 3 395,700 250,000 295,000 7,300 6
Replacement Analysis with One Additional Period Timing for Replacement It is common practice to consider a replacement analysis not based on a particular point in time but in latter times as the decision might be changed. The analysis is done through comparing the value of defender with that of a challenger for additional period. Replacement is made whenever the cost for retaining the defender, CD is more than that of the challenger (EUAWC)
9-11 SI-4251 Ekonomi Teknik Muhamad Abduh, Ph.D.
Replacement Analysis with One Additional Period Timing for Replacement Calculate Defender Calculate EUAW start Challenger, EUAWC Cost for the next Year., CD
Calculate EUAWD EUAWC < CD
Compare for remaining life of defender, EUAWC : CD
EUAWC > CD
Compare EUAWC > EUAWD
EUAWC : Retain DEFENDER EUAWD
EUAWC < EUAWD
stop Select CHALLENGER replace DEFENDER
9-12 SI-4251 Ekonomi Teknik Muhamad Abduh, Ph.D.
Replacement Analysis with Additional Period
Initial Annual Add Annual Trade Salvage Service
Cost Cost Annual Reduction in Cost Value Life Cost in Book Value D 3,850,000 235,000 150,500 375,000 345,000 235.000 4 C-1 2.590,000 195,000 315.700 6
Replacement Analysis with Additional Period n Defender Challenger Book Value CD or EUAWD Book Value EUAWC 0 1 2 3 4 5
EUAWD = BVn (A/P, i, n) – SV(A/F, i, n) + BV1 (P/F, i, 1)(A/P, i, 1)
+BV2 (P/F, i, 2)(A/P, i, 2)+ ……. + BVn-1 (P/F, i, n-1)(A/P, i, n-1) + AOC + Additional AOC (A/G, i, n)
9-14 SI-4251 Ekonomi Teknik Muhamad Abduh, Ph.D.
Minimum-Cost Life Analysis Economic Service Life (ESL) is the number or year n at which the equivalent uniform annual worth of costs is the minimum. Due to reasons of weariness, in time the performance of asset is decreasing. The ever increasing O&M cost decreasing annual capital cost is accompanied by decreasing cost of capital (investment cost).
Cost Total Annual Cost
(TAC) Annual O & M Cost (AOC)
Annual Investment Cost
(AIC)
Time at Minimum Cost Time, j
9-15 SI-4251 Ekonomi Teknik Muhamad Abduh, Ph.D.
Minimum-Cost Life Analysis EUAWk = BV0 (A/P, i, k) – BVk (A/P, i, k) +[ΣAOCj (P/F, i, j)](A/P, i, k) where: BV 0 = P AIC = Annual Investment Cost BV k = SV TAC = Total Annual Cost k = life of service AOCj = annual cost at year j Year of BVj AOCj Equivalent AICj TACj service, k AOCj Or EUAWk (a) (b) (c) (d) = EUAW(c) (e) (f) = (d)+(e) 1 2 3 … k-1 k
9-16 SI-4251 Ekonomi Teknik Muhamad Abduh, Ph.D.
Homework #9 Redo the replacement analysis for the mobile crane problem in this module’s example using ESL.