Job No:

Tann Designs & Engineers

149B, Selegie Road, Selegie Court Sheet No: 1 of 7

Singapore 188314
Designed by: KAM Checked by: KH TANN Date: 3/11/2018
Title:

2.8 m Depth EERS for Excavation

1 Drawings

Total Depth of Excavation = 3.45 m

Design Depth of Excavation = 3.45 m
Depth of Driving = 4.3 m
 Job No:
Tann Designs & Engineers

149B, Selegie Road, Selegie Court Sheet No: 2 of 7

Singapore 188314
Designed by: KAM Checked by: KH TANN Date: 3/11/2018
Title: 0
2 - DESIGN INFORMATION
2.1 Relevant Design Codes and Reference
a) SS EN 1997-1 b) BCA advisory Notes 1/09 on ERSS
2.2 Intended Used of Structure
Temporary works
2.3 Structural System
Simple structure
2.4 Material Properties
a) Kingpost
100X100X20 kg/m I Beams
Allowable flexure stress = 275.00 N/mm2
Allowable shear stress = 165.00 N/mm2
b) Steel Plate
Steel plate 25 mm thk
Allowable flexure stress = 275.00 N/mm 2

Allowable shear stress = 165.00 N/mm2

Modulus of Elasticity = 210000.0 N/mm2
c) Strut- 100X100X20 kg/m I Beams
Allowable flexure stress = 275.00 N/mm2
Allowable shear stress = 165.00 N/mm2
2 - DESIGN INFORMATION

2.1 Relevant Design Codes and Reference

a) Euro code -7

Combinations -1
Partial factor of safety on actions
Considered partial safety factors
γG = 1.35 Partial safety factor for permanent action
γQ = 1.50 Partial safety factor for variable action
γr = 1.00 Partial safety factor for variable action

Partial factor of safety on material

γφ' = 1 Angle of shearing resistance
γc' = 1 Effective cohesion

d) Soil Properties
γs = 18.5 kN/m3 Unit weight of soil based on Borehole 29
ɸ = 0° Friction Angle
C = 20 kN/m2 Cohesion of soil

Applying factor of safety on materials

C' = 20 °
ɸ'd = 0 °
e) Surcharge = 10 kPa
gw = 9.81 kN/m3 Unit weight of water

gd = 18.49 kN/m3 Dry unit weight of soli

g' = 9.17 kN/m3 Submerged Unit weight of soil
 Job No:
Tann Designs & Engineers

149B, Selegie Road, Selegie Court Sheet No: 3 of 7

Singapore 188314
Designed by: KAM Checked by: KH TANN Date: 3/11/2018
Title: ###

EN 1997 -1, Annex c

Figure C.11
Ka = 1.00 Active Pressure Coefficient
Kp = 1.00 Passive Pressure Coefficient

In case of this braced cut excavation method the maximum displacement occur in the bottom of the excavation,
Hence Ranking's Active Pressure Theory is no longer applicable. (above the excavation). Hence the following
Design os based on peck's observation (1967) of active pressure. (Note: EN 1997-1 Section 2.7 Allows to use
the observation based design when geotechnical behaviour is difficult to interpret)

Consider pressure distribution above the excavation as proposed by Peck (1967)- Method of Braced cut

Consider gH = 3.19 < 4

C
STIFF CLAY

Active Pressure Coefficient above the excavation

Ka = 1 - m*4C
gH
= -0.25
Ka = 0.40

0.8
1.5 m
0.75

2.25
1.6

2.25

0.8
3.45

1.0

3.75

Passive Pressure Active Pressure Surcharge Pressure

1.1 Depth of First support

The Active pressure Acting on the tiber Plank Given By

 Pa = ka* γ*z -2* C*(ka)^(0.5)
When active pressure = 0
z = 2.16

Job No: 2015-00053

Tann Designs & Engineers

149B, Selegie Road, Selegie Court Sheet No: 5 of 6

Singapore 188314
Designed by: KAM Checked by: KH TANN Date: 3/11/2018
Title:

1.2 Assume the effect of cohesion ignored

Active Maximum Pressure above the Excavation

Pa = 0.4*γ*H
= 25.52 kN/m2

Active Pressure Distribution Above the Excavation

h=1 P1.00 = 25.52 kN/m2 Support 1
h=2.25 P2.25 = 25.52 kN/m2 Support 2
h=3.25 P3.25 = 0 kN/m2 Bottom of excavation
h=4.0 P4.25 = 0 kN/m2

Active Pressure Distribution Below the Excavation

h=4 P4 = 23.80 kN/m2 Bottom of excavation
h=4 P4 = 29.35 kN/m2 Bottom of excavation

Passive pressure on support levels

h=4.0 = 40
h=4.3 P2 = 45.55 kN/m2

Surcharge Pressure Distribution Above the Excavation

h=0.95 P0.95 = 10.00 kN/m2 Support 1
h=2.25 P2.25 = 10.00 kN/m2 Support 2
h=3.55 P3.55 = 10.00 kN/m2 Support 3
h=4.0 P4.0 = 10.00 kN/m2 Bottom of excavation
h=4.3 P2 = 10.00 kN/m2
 Job No: 2015-00053
Tann Designs & Engineers

149B, Selegie Road, Selegie Court Sheet No: 5 of 6

Singapore 188314
Designed by: KAM Checked by: KH TANN Date: 3/11/2018
Title: 0

1.4 Analysis of Steel Plate

Consider Steel Plate with, 1.5 m Beam Spacing

Consider 1m above the solid level

Length = 1500 m
Width = 0.01 m
X

1.00

49.45 kN/m

1.465

49.45 kN/m

0.985 m

32.13 kN/m 54.00 kN/m

0.3 m

39.62 kN/m 61.49 kN/m

 1 Bending Diagrame 2 Shear Diagrame

Max Bending Moment = 11.886 kNm Max Shear force = 36.2 kN

Job No: 2015-00053

Tann Designs & Engineers

149B, Selegie Road, Selegie Court Sheet No: 5 of 6

Singapore 188314
Designed by: KAM Checked by: KH TANN Date: 3/11/2018
Title: 0

Maximum Moment = 11.89 kNm

Steel Plate
Thickness of Steel = 25.00 mm
Yeild Stress = 275.00 N/mm2

Section modules of timber = 104,166.67 mm3

Maximum Bending Stress  σt = M'a

Sx
= 114.11 N/mm2 < 275 N/mm2

Maximum Shear = 36.20 kN

Shear Area = 25000.0 mm2
Maximum Shear Stress = 1.45 < 275 N/mm2

Maximum Expected Deflection

Maximum deflection = 17.35 mm From the STAAD analysis

Maximum Allowable Deflection = 23.00 mm > 17.35 mm

Hence 25 mm THK Steel Plate Adequate

 Job No:
Tann Designs & Engineers

149B, Selegie Road, Selegie Court Sheet No: 6 of 7

Singapore 188314
Designed by: JK Checked by: KH TANN Date: 3/11/2018
Title:

1.5 Design of Intermediate Waller Beams RHS 100 x 100

Strut
King Post

Waller

0.5 m
25mm Steel Plate

1.75 m

Waler Beam
1 m

0.3 m

Maximum Force on 1m width o Waler Beam = 62.5 kN

Maximum Bending Moment = 7.81 kNm
Maximum Shear force = 31.3 kN
Structural Design of 100x100x6 SHS

1.5.2 Section Classification

B S275 steel grade

D = 100 mm
B = 100 mm
T = 8.1 mm
D t = 7.1 mm
A = 24.7 cm2
Z x,ela = 84.9 cm3
T Zx,pla = 103 cm3
fy = 275 N/mm2
E = 210000 N/mm2
 Job No:
Tann Designs & Engineers

149B, Selegie Road, Selegie Court Sheet No: 6 of 7

Singapore 188314
Designed by: KAM Checked by: KH TANN Date: 3/11/2018
Title: 0

1.5.3 ϵ = (235/fy)^0.5 I = 378 cm3

= 0.92

C = 45 mm
T = 7.1 mm

C/T = 6.3 < 67 (72ϵ)

(Hence section class - 1)

1.5.4 Bending capacity check

σ = My
Z
= 75.85 N/mm2 < Fy (275 N/mm2)
1.5.5 Shear Check
Av = A
= 2470 mm2
Vpl,rd = Av* (fy/(3)^0.5)
= 392.2 kN > 31.3 kN

1.5 Analysis of Kingpost

31.3 31.3

50X100X6
102x102x19.4 kg/m
1.5.4 Bending capacity check
σ = My
 Z
= 3.13 N/mm2 < Fy (275 N/mm2)
1.5.5 Shear Check
Av = A
= 2470 mm2
Vpl,rd = Av* (fy/(3)^0.5)
= 392.2 kN > 62.5 kN

Job No:
Tann Designs & Engineers

149B, Selegie Road, Selegie Court Sheet No: 6 of 7

Singapore 188314
Designed by: KAM Checked by: KH TANN Date: 3/11/2018
Title: 0

1.6 Strut Analysis

Maximum Axial Load on the Strut = 62.5 kN (from STAAD)
length of Strut = 5 m

Structural Design of SHS 100 x 100 x 6

1.6.1 Section Classification

B S275 steel grade

D = 100 mm
B = 100 mm
T = 6 mm
D t = 6 mm
A = 21.6 cm2
Z x,ela = 62.3 cm3
Zx,pla = 75.1 cm3
fy = 275 N/mm2
E = 210000 N/mm2
I = 323 cm4

1.6.2 Axial Compression check

Nc,rd = A*fy
= 594 kN > VED 62.5 kN ok

1.6.3 Buckling resistance of the section

 = (Afy/Ncr)^0.5 Ncr = π2EI/L
= 267.78
= 1.49

Hot rolled finished member, Table 6

Suitable Curve = a

Job No:
Tann Designs & Engineers

149B, Selegie Road, Selegie Court Sheet No: 6 of 7

Singapore 188314
Designed by: KAM Checked by: KH TANN Date: 3/11/2018
Title: 0

The Reduction factor = 0.32

Buckling resistance Nb,Rd = 152.1 kN > 62.5 kN

Hence ok

1.6 Factor Of safety against the Basal Heave

Depth of excavation = 3.25 m

Width of Excavation = 5m

F.O.S against Basal Heave = 5.7 Su2

(Terzaghi 1943) He (γ+(qs/He)-(Su1/0.7B))

Input qs = 12 kN/m2
Su1 = 50 kN/m2
Su2 = 25 kN/m2

Fb = 2.46 > 1.5 Hence it's Safe

CHECK FOR DEFLECTION OF WALL DUE TO EXCAVATION
(Circular: Advisory note 1/09 on Earth retaining or stabilizing structures.)

Distance of excavation to structure/ building = 1.00 m

Height of excavation, H = 3.25 m

Taking into consideration the maximum possible wall deflection:

Zone number = 1 condition: distance of structure < 2

Allowable wall deflection limit = 0.7%* H = 0.023 m

Maximum deflection = 7.90 mm

23 > 7.90 mm
 Job No:
Tann Designs & Engineers

149B, Selegie Road, Selegie Court Sheet No: 1 of 7

Singapore 188314
Designed by: KAM Checked by: KH TANN Date: 3/11/2018
Title:

Piling Works
ECC Remedial Proposal ECC 1

Location - C-D/5 (From Grid Line C -6175)

39 65

6.25
200 150

72 64.75
19

62 17

The pile group ecc within tolerances hence no stretching work required. All Piles are still
within the Pile hence no pile cap enhancement works not Required. (the Available Maximum
Cove =111mm > 100mm Hence ok)
 Job No:
Tann Designs & Engineers

149B, Selegie Road, Selegie Court Sheet No: 1 of 7

Singapore 188314
Designed by: KAM Checked by: KH TANN Date: 3/11/2018
Title:

Piling Works
ECC Remedial Proposal ECC 2

Location - B/5 Grid B- 5

20 52
42 2.75

60 73.75

57 4
123 70

The pile group ecc within tolerances hence no stretching work required. One Number of Pile
has exceeds the allowable cover (the Available Maximum Cove =37mm < 100mm ) pile
Elements in necessary.
 Job No:
Tann Designs & Engineers

149B, Selegie Road, Selegie Court Sheet No: 1 of 7

Singapore 188314
Designed by: KAM Checked by: KH TANN Date: 3/11/2018
Title:

The Pile Cap Shall be Enlarged by 100mm on the side as indicated below.

1700

123
77

1700 A
Plan of Pile cap 4P400

Additional Reinforcement not

Necessary, the existing Reinforcement
shall be extended to accommodate
the Pile cap enlargement of 77mm
1150

77

Section A-A
 Job No:
Tann Designs & Engineers

149B, Selegie Road, Selegie Court Sheet No: 1 of 7

Singapore 188314
Designed by: KAM Checked by: KH TANN Date: 3/11/2018
Title:

Piling Works
ECC Remedial Proposal ECC 3

Location - B/5 Grid B- 5

138 65 69
38 71.6667

64 7

18 66 13
64

32 60 31

The pile group ecc within tolerances hence no stretching work required. One Number of Pile
has exceeds the allowable cover (the Available Maximum Cove =22 mm < 100mm ) pile
Elements in necessary.
 Job No:
Tann Designs & Engineers

149B, Selegie Road, Selegie Court Sheet No: 1 of 7

Singapore 188314
Designed by: KAM Checked by: KH TANN Date: 3/11/2018
Title:

The Pile Cap Shall be Enlarged by 77mm on the side as indicated below.

138 A
64

1750

78
2700 A
Plan of Pile cap 4P400

Additional Reinforcement not

Necessary, the existing Reinforcement
shall be extended to accommodate
the Pile cap enlargement of 62mm
1850

78

Section A-A
 Job No:
Tann Designs & Engineers

149B, Selegie Road, Selegie Court Sheet No: 1 of 7

Singapore 188314
Designed by: KAM Checked by: KH TANN Date: 3/11/2018
Title:

Piling Works
ECC Remedial Proposal ECC 3

Location - B/5 Grid B- 5

22 60
67
63 60
73

19 37 -4
40

65 69 69 68.1

8 55 67
61
124 54

The pile group ecc within tolerances hence no stretching work required. One Number of Pile
has exceeds the allowable cover (the Available Maximum Cove =26 mm < 100mm ) pile
Elements in necessary.
 The pile group ecc within tolerances hence no stretching work required. One Number of Pile
has exceeds the allowable cover (the Available Maximum Cove =26 mm < 100mm ) pile
Elements in necessary.

Job No:
Tann Designs & Engineers

149B, Selegie Road, Selegie Court Sheet No: 1 of 7

Singapore 188314
Designed by: KAM Checked by: KH TANN Date: 3/11/2018
Title:

The Pile Cap Shall be Enlarged by 77mm on the side as indicated below.

2700

124
74

2700 A
Plan of Pile cap 4P400

Additional Reinforcement not

Necessary, the existing Reinforcement
shall be extended to accommodate
the Pile cap enlargement of 76mm
1750

78

Section A-A
 Job No:
Tann Designs & Engineers

149B, Selegie Road, Selegie Court Sheet No: 1 of 7

Singapore 188314
Designed by: KAM Checked by: KH TANN Date: 3/11/2018
Title:

Piling Works
ECC Remedial Proposal ECC 1

Location - C-D/5 (From Grid Line C -6175)

140

32

The pile group ecc within tolerances hence no stretching work required. All Piles are still within
the Pile hence no pile cap enhancement works not Required. (the Available Maximum Cove
=111mm > 100mm Hence ok)

Pile Size = 250 mm

Factored colu = 157 kN
Allowable ECC = 75 mm < 140 mm

Proposed strengthening of Floor Slab between 294 and 297

 140 = ex

P294 P297

3075

Job No:
Tann Designs & Engineers

149B, Selegie Road, Selegie Court Sheet No: 1 of 7

Singapore 188314
Designed by: KAM Checked by: KH TANN Date: 3/11/2018
Title:

Maximum Bending moment at averse ecc, M = 1.5*P*(ex-75)/1000

= 15.3075 kNm

Assume Beam Size = 150 X 250

b = 150 h = 250 d = 204

fu = 35 N/mm2
Fy = 460 N/mm2

K = M/(b.d2.fcu)
= 0.070062 < 0.156
Slightly Reinforced

As,req = M/(fy*Z)
= 161.1316 mm2

Provide 2 T16 = 402.1239 mm2

2T16

2T16
150X250 Beam

T10 - 150

Additional Cover of 140mm Shall be Added

Existing Rebar shall be enlarged to anchor the rebar