ED299 Study Trips: Overview of Critical Self-Reflection: A. Description of The Critical Incident or Practice
ED299 Study Trips: Overview of Critical Self-Reflection: A. Description of The Critical Incident or Practice
B. Feelings
The conversation that I had with these four girls made me so happy. On Tuesday, I had a very negative
interaction with one fifth grader. He wanted to cause stress and anxiety, and he accomplished that when he
spoke to me. In comparison, the interaction I had with four girls at an art table today filled my heart with joy and
peace.
C. Thoughts
Upon talking with these students, I appreciated nothing more than the fact that they seemed to happy,
intelligent ladies who were proud of their work. I loved that the girls accepted me and were willing to talk with
me. However, I also (momentarily) thought that these students were a little selfish for only talking about
themselves, until I remembered that they were fourth graders and that’s simply what fourth graders do.
As the conversation continued and the girls continued to chat—a little with me and a little with each
other—I realized that their conversation topics were so self-focused because the developmental stage they are at
is totally focused on learning about the self, one’s interests, one’s capabilities, etc. This realization made me so
much more invested in the conversation. I was thrilled to be a part of such an intricate developmental stage.
D. Deconstruction
D1) Underlying Assumptions
It appears as though I had an almost degrading view of children—I seemed to believe they weren’t
complex enough to speak intellectually about their interests.
D2) Multiple Perspectives
The simple fact that these students knew themselves so well was truly impressive. I certainly didn’t know
myself as well as these children did. What separates my younger self and these fourth graders was the
freedom they were given within the learner profile to discover their interests.
Erik Erikson would tell me that children aged six to eleven struggle in finding industry or experiencing
inferiority. This is the stage in life when children begin learning more complex ideas, so they must cope
with increasing social and academic demands. While Erikson’s theory is often more applicable to boys
than girls, the idea of children seeking out industry in this time of their life was palpable in the girls I
chatted with at the art table. Their entire focus was on figuring out what it meant to be “Halia,”
“Anastasia,” or “Shania.”
Lev Vygotsky would have explained to me not the developmental levels of these children, but rather the
importance a social influence has on these children. Just like the school as a whole, Vygotsky believes that
the college students who come into the classroom, modelling proper dialogue and curiosity, are
beneficial to the younger students. Even more wonderfully, IPS/ CFI 70 clearly believes, like Vygotsky,
IPS 70 / Center for Inquiry
“learning occurs when a child interacts with a skillful tutor.” However, the freedom of discussion in the
classroom—specifically Mr. Cole’s math lesson and the art classroom—proves that teachers believe
students can be skillful students to one another. By observing others’ social and academic interactions,
students can better understand how to be socially and academically successful.
Maria Montessori’s beliefs seem to connect Vygotsky and Erikson’s theories. Montessori sees ages 6-12
age the time period where children are “driven to understand the world around them, how things work,
and why.” Additionally, one of the greatest tools for development is social acceptance and the
development. The teachers working with this age group clearly understand and embrace this idea
because they do not yell at children to stop talking or stop doodling while the teacher was talking (unless
a very important instruction was given). The teachers understand that students in this age group cannot
staunch their curiosity or simply stop talking with others. Communication with others is the most
important thing at this moment in children’s lives.