Practice Test Mba1
Practice Test Mba1
Telecommuting – substituting the computer for the trip to the job – has been hailed
as a solution to all kinds of problems related to office work. For workers it promises
freedom from the office, less time wasted in traffic, and help with child-care conflicts. For
management, telecommuting helps keep high performers on board, minimizes tardiness
and absenteeism by eliminating commutes, allows periods of solitude for high-
concentration task, and provides scheduling flexibility. In some areas, such as Southern
California and Seattle, Washington, local governments are encouraging companies to start
telecommuting programs in order to reduce rush - hour congestion and improve air quality.
But these benefits do not come easily. Making a telecommuting program work requires
careful planning and an understanding of the differences between telecommuting realities
and popular images.
These are powerful images, but they are a limited reflection of reality. Telecommuting
workers soon learn that it is almost impossible to concentrate on work and care for a young
child at the same time. Before a certain age, young children cannot recognize. much less
respect, the necessary boundaries between work and family. Additional child support is
necessary if the parent is to get any work done.
Management, too, must separate the myth from the reality. Although the media has
paid a great deal of attention to telecommuting. in most cases it is the employee's
situation, not the availability of technology, that precipitates a telecommuting
arrangement.
That is partly why, despite the widespread press coverage, the number of companies
with work-at-home programs or policy guidelines remains small.
4. Which of the following does the author mention as a possible disadvantage of telecommuting?
(A) Small children cannot understand the boundaries of work and play.
(B) Computer technology is not advanced enough to accommodate the needs of every situation.
(C) Electrical malfunctions can destroy a project.
(D) The worker often does not have all the needed resources at home.
PRACTICE TEST 2
There are two main hypotheses when it comes to explaining the emergence of
modern humans. The ‘Out of Africa’ theory holds that homo sapiens burst onto the scene
as a new species around 150,000 to 200,000 years ago in Africa and subsequently
replaced archaic humans such as the Neandertals. The other model, known as multi-
regional evolution or regional continuity, posits far more ancient and diverse roots for
our kind. Proponents of this view believe that homo sapiens arose in Africa some 2
million years ago and evolved as a single species spread across the Old World, with
populations in different regions linked through genetic and cultural exchange.
Of these two models, Out of Africa, which was originally developed based on fossil
evidence, and supported by much genetic research, has been favored by the majority of
evolution scholars. The vast majority of these genetic studies have focused on DNA from
living populations, and although some small progress has been made in recovering DNA
from Neandertal that appears to support multi-regionalism, the chance of recovering
nuclear DNA from early human fossils is quite slim at present. Fossils thus remain very
much a part of the human origins debate.