Personal Statement Assignment 1b
Personal Statement Assignment 1b
My Teaching Philosophy
I believe that there is no ‘one size fits all’ approach to teaching. Therefore, there is no single
pedagogy or practice that will suit all students. I feel that all educational theories have value in an
educational system. However, it is my responsibility to understand how and when to implement
these strategies. The main theories that I gravitate toward in developing my own pedagogy, is a
combination of behaviourism, cognitivism, and humanism. Utilising classical and operant
conditioning, I can assist my students in understanding what is expected of them in my classroom by
introducing and removing stimulus to promote a positive learning experience. (Van Deur, 2018;
Duchesne & McMaugh, 2016). I strive to build a social culture of learning where students have a
collaboration of thoughts and positive interactions with their peers, and where information is
continuously received. This promotes short term memory transitioning into long term memory for
the students’ growth and development (Duchesne & McMaugh, 2016). I use varied activities to
accomplish this. I use a combination of self-directed and teacher-directed learning in an ever-
changing environment to promote increased engagement in students (Duchesne & McMaugh, 2016;
AITSL, 2014; Anderson, Krathwohl, et al., 2001). This supports a higher order of thinking through
concepts such as, Bloom’s Taxonomy (Duchesne & McMaugh, 2016; AITSL, 2014; Anderson,
Krathwohl, et al., 2001). By using multiple pedagogies in a constantly evolving classroom
environment, I am in a much better position to assist my students’ critical and creative thinking by
keeping learning fun, appropriate, and engaging (Australian Curriculum, n.d.).
I also recognise that a student’s environment, in and out of school, play a major role in that
student’s ability to learn and excel. While the students’ environments outside of my classroom are
largely out of my control, their environment within my classroom needs to be one of inclusion.
Inclusion is not only for students with disabilities, but also for those from different socioeconomic
and cultural backgrounds. Another group that are often left out of this conversation are gifted
2
students who may find daily activities to be less engaging or effortless. As an educator I must ensure
that my use of multiple pedagogies cater for the inclusion of my diverse range of students in the way
that I direct learning in my classroom (Van Deur, 2018; Duchesne & McMaugh, 2016).
By building a classroom culture around positive social inclusion and catering for diversity
among my students, I have a solid platform to promote positive affective development. It is
important to note that not all children develop at the same rate as their peers and go through
different stages at different times. My use of positive affirmation and inclusion assists my students in
developing emotional intelligence. By developing emotional intelligence, students have a solid
platform for acknowledging their individual strengths, teach themselves to self-regulate their
impulses, and use emotion to aid in their reasoning and decision making as they strive to identify
their place in the world (Van Deur, 2018). This culture of positive and effective learning will help in
fostering positive relationships with other students by helping them to better understand
themselves, work better in teams, and build leadership qualities (ACARA, n.d.). By promoting a
positive environment in my classroom, a positive affirmation is created. Students establish can a
positive self-concept and self-efficacy about who they are and what they can achieve (Duchesne &
McMaugh, 2016; Graham, Schwartz, & MacArthur, 1993).
A1b.Butler.S.2184262
3
I love helping others to grow and develop. It is for this purpose that I chose to be a teacher. I
strive every day to be a great teacher. I agree with William Arthur Ward when he said, “The
mediocre teacher tells. The good teacher explains. The superior teacher demonstrates. The great
teacher inspires.” (Brainy Quote, n.d.).
A1b.Butler.S.2184262
4
References
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P., Cruikshank, K., Mayer, R., Pintrich, P., & Wittrock, M.
(2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy. New York.
Longman Publishing. Artz, AF, & Armour-Thomas, E. (1992). Development of a cognitive-
metacognitive framework for protocol analysis of mathematical problem solving in small groups.
Cognition and Instruction, 9(2), 137-175.
Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority. (n.d.). Retrieved from
https://www.acara.edu.au/curriculum/student-diversity
Van Deur, P. (2018). Introduction and Theories of Learning, lecture 1 presented at Flinders University,
05 March 2018.
Van Deur, P. (2018). Affective Development, lecture 5 presented at Flinders University, 26 March 2018.
A1b.Butler.S.2184262