Ibm Millipede: Neethu Kuttan
Ibm Millipede: Neethu Kuttan
SEMINAR REPORT
Submitted by
NEETHU KUTTAN
Of
BACHELOR OF TECHNOLOGY
In
COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING
COCHIN-682 022
JULY 2008
DIVISION OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING
COCHIN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY,
COCHIN-682 022
Certificate
Date:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
At the outset, I thank the Lord Almighty for the grace, strength and hope
to make my endeavor a success.
Last but not the least, I thank all others, and especially my classmates and
my family members who in one way or another helped me in the successful
completion of this work.
NEETHU KUTTAN
ABSTRACT
times higher than the densest magnetic storage available today. Rather than
bits into a thin plastic film. The result is akin to a nanotech version of the
venerable data processing punch card developed more than 110 years ago,
(meaning it can be used over and over again), and may be able to store more
than 3 billion bits of data in the space occupied by just hole in a standard
punch card. While flash memory is not expected to surpass 1-2 gigabytes of
of data into the same tiny format, without requiring more power for device
1. INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Motivation and objectives 2
1.2 Millipede Memory 4
1.3 The name Millipede 5
1.4 Basic Concept 5
2. DATA STORAGE 10
2.1 AFM Probes 10
2.2 Reading Data 11
2.3 Writing Data 13
2.4 Array design, technology and fabrication 16
2.5 Array Characterization 18
3. FEATURES 19
3.1 Areal density 19
4. APPLICATIONS 20
4.1 Nanodrive 20
4.2 Terabit Drive 21
4.3 High Capacity Hard Drives 21
i
5. CURRENT STATE OF THE ART 22
6. ONGOING DEVELOPMENTS 23
7. CONCLUSION 26
8. REFERENCES 27
ii
LIST OF TABLES
LIST OF FIGURES
1. Millipede Memory 7
2. AFM Probes 11
3. Sensing Mechanism 12
4. Writing Data 14
5. Storage medium of Millipede 15
iii
IBM Millipede
1. INTRODUCTION
The only available tool known today that is simple and yet offer these
long-term perspectives is a nanometer-sharp tip like in atomic force microscope (AFM)
and scanning tunneling microscope (STM). The simple tip is a very reliable tool that
concentrates on one functionality: the ultimate local confinement of interaction. In local
probe based data storage we have a cantilever that has a very small tip at its end. Small
indentations are made in a polymer medium laid over a silicon substrate. These
indentations serve as data storage locations. A single AFM operates best on the
microsecond time scale. Conventional magnetic storage, however, operates at best on the
nanosecond time scale, making it clear that AFM data rates have to be improved by at
least three orders of magnitude to be competitive with current and future magnetic
recording. The "millipede" concept is a new approach for storing data at high speed and
with an ultrahigh density.
In the 21st century, the nanometer will very likely play a role similar to the
one played by the micrometer in the 20th century. The nanometer scale will presumably
pervade the field of data storage. In magnetic storage today, there is no clear-cut way to
achieve the nanometer scale in all three dimensions. The basis for storage in the 21st
century might still be magnetism. Within a few years, however, magnetic storage
technology will arrive at a stage of its exciting and successful evolution at which
fundamental changes are likely to occur when current storage technology hits the well-
known superparamagnetic limit. Several ideas have been proposed on how to overcome
this limit. One such proposal involves the use of patterned magnetic media, for which the
ideal write/read concept must still be demonstrated, but the biggest challenge remains the
patterning of the magnetic disk in a cost-effective way. Other proposals call for totally
different media and techniques such as local probes or holographic methods. In general,
if an existing technology reaches its limits in the course of its evolution and new
alternatives are emerging in parallel, two things usually happen: First, the existing and
well-established technology will be explored further and everything possible done to
push its limits to take maximum advantage of the considerable investments made. Then,
when the possibilities for improvements have been exhausted, the technology may still
survive for certain niche applications, but the emerging technology will take over,
opening up new perspectives and new directions.
Consider, for example, the vacuum electronic tube, which was replaced by
the transistor. The tube still exists for a very few applications, whereas the transistor
evolved into today's microelectronics with very large scale integration (VLSI) of
microprocessors and memories. Optical lithography may become another example:
Although still the predominant technology, it will soon reach its fundamental limits and
be replaced by a technology yet unknown. Today we are witnessing in many fields the
transition from structures of the micrometer scale to those of the nanometer scale, a
dimension at which nature has long been building the finest devices with a high degree of
local functionality. Many of the techniques we use today are not suitable for the coming
nanometer age; some will require minor or major modifications, and others will be
partially or entirely replaced. It is certainly difficult to predict which techniques will fall
into which category. For key areas in information technology hardware, it is not yet
obvious which technology and materials will be used for nanoelectronics and data
storage.
The only available tool known today that is simple and yet provides these
very long-term perspectives is a nanometer sharp tip. Such tips are now used in every
atomic force microscope (AFM) and scanning tunneling microscope (STM) for imaging
and structuring down to the atomic scale. The simple tip is a very reliable tool that
concentrates on one functionality: the ultimate local confinement of interaction.
In the early 1990’s, Mamin and Rugar at the IBM Almaden Research
Center pioneered the possibility of using an AFM tip for readback and writing of
topographic features for the purposes of data storage. In one scheme developed by them,
reading and writing were demonstrated with a single AFM tip in contact with a rotating
polycarbonate substrate. The data were written thermo mechanically via heating of the
tip. In this way, densities of up to 30 Gb/in.2 were achieved, representing a significant
advance compared to the densities of that day. Later refinements included increasing
readback speeds to a data rate of 10 Mb/s and implementation of track servoing.
In making use of single tips in AFM or STM operation for storage, one
must deal with their fundamental limits for high data rates. At present, the mechanical
resonant frequencies of the AFM cantilevers limit the data rates of a single cantilever to a
few Mb/s for AFM data storage, and the feedback speed and low tunneling currents limit
STM-based storage approaches to even lower data rates. Currently a single AFM operates
at best on the microsecond time scale. Conventional magnetic storage, however, operates
at best on the nanosecond time scale, making it clear that AFM data rates have to be
improved by at least three orders of magnitude to be competitive with current and future
magnetic recording. The objectives of our research activities within the Micro- and
Nanomechanics Project at the IBM Zurich Research Laboratory are to explore highly
parallel AFM data storage with areal storage densities far beyond the expected
superparamagnetic limit (60100 Gb/in.2) and data rates comparable to those of today's
magnetic recording.
The Millipede concept presented here is a new approach for storing data at
high speed and with an ultrahigh density. It is not a modification of an existing storage
technology, although the use of magnetic materials as storage media is not excluded. The
ultimate locality is given by a tip, and high data rates are a result of massive parallel
operation of such tips. Our current effort is focused on demonstrating the Millipede
concept with areal densities up to 500 Gb/in.2 and parallel operation of very large 2D (32
× 32) AFM cantilever arrays with integrated tips and write/read storage functionality.
The name Millipede came from the way the technology works. It consists
of a thin, organic polymer on which sit thousands of fine silicon tips that can punch
information into the polymer surface, leaving pits and creating a way of storing data.
Each tip is very small, with 4,000 fitting onto a 6.4 mm square.
The unveiling at the CeBIT event was not only to show off the tech but
also to try to get a manufacturing partner on board. IBM does not have the facilities to
manufacture MEMS systems, and needs another interested party to come on board that
has those facilities available. Big Blue also admits that the technology is nowhere near
ready for a release, as researchers still need to sort out the speed that data can be
transferred to and from the memory. IBM does hope, however, that Millipede will form a
future alternative to current flash memory technologies used in consumer digital
equipment.
which store data as the presence or absence of electrical charge. Each capacitor and its
associated control circuitry, referred to as a cell, holds one bit, and bits can be read or
written in large blocks at the same time.
In contrast, hard drives store data on a metal disk that is covered with a
magnetic material; data is represented as local magnetization of this material. Reading
and writing are accomplished by a single "head", which waits for the requested memory
location to pass under the head while the disk spins. As a result, the drive's performance
is limited by the mechanical speed of the motor, and is generally hundreds of thousands
of times slower than DRAM. However, since the "cells" in a hard drive are much smaller,
the storage density is much higher than DRAM.
Millipede storage attempts to combine the best features of both. Like the
hard drive, Millipede stores data in a "dumb" medium that is simpler and smaller than
any cell used in an electronic medium. It accesses the data by moving the medium under
the "head" as well. However, Millipede uses many nanoscopic heads that can read and
write in parallel, thereby dramatically increasing the throughput to the point where it can
compete with some forms of electronic memory. Additionally, millipede's physical media
stores a bit in a very small area, leading to densities even higher than current hard drives.
Figure 1.1
The Millipede concept: for operation of the device, the storage medium - a
thin film of organic material deposited on a silicon "table" - is brought into contact with
the array of silicon tips and moved in x- and y-direction for reading and writing.
Multiplex drivers allow addressing of each tip individually.
During the storage operation, the chip is raster-scanned over an area called
the storage field by a magnetic x/y scanner. The scanning distance is equivalent to the
cantilever x/y pitch, which is currently 92 µm. Each cantilever/tip of the array writes and
reads data only in its own storage field. This eliminates the need for lateral positioning
adjustments of the tip to offset lateral position tolerances in tip fabrication. Consequently,
a 32 × 32 array chip will generate 32 × 32 (1024) storage fields on an area of less than 3
mm × 3 mm. Assuming an areal density of 500 Gb/in.2, one storage field of 92 µm × 92
µm has a capacity of about 10 Mb, and the entire 32 × 32 array with 1024 storage fields
has a capacity of about 10 Gb on 3 mm × 3 mm. As shown in Section 7, the storage
capacity scales with the number of elements in the array, cantilever pitch (storage-field
size) and areal density, and depends on the application requirements. Although not yet
investigated in detail, lateral tracking will also be performed for the entire chip, with
integrated tracking sensors at the chip periphery.
This assumes and requires very good temperature control of the array chip
and the medium substrate between write and read cycles. For this reason the array chip
and medium substrate should be held within about 1°C operating temperature for bit sizes
of 30 to 40 nm and array chip sizes of a few millimeters. This will be achieved by using
the same material (silicon) for both the array chip and the medium substrate in
conjunction with four integrated heat sensors that control four heaters on the chip to
maintain a constant array-chip temperature during operation. True parallel operation of
large 2D arrays results in very large chip sizes because of the space required for the
individual write/read wiring to each cantilever and the many I/O pads. The row and
column time-multiplexing addressing scheme implemented successfully in every DRAM
is a very elegant solution to this issue. In the case of Millipede, the time-multiplexed
addressing scheme is used to address the array row by row with full parallel write/read
operation within one row.
2. DATA STORAGE
Each probe in the cantilever array stores and reads data thermo-
mechanically, handling one bit at a time. In recent years, AFM thermo mechanical
recording in polymer storage media has undergone extensive modifications, primarily
with respect to the integration of sensors and heaters designed to enhance simplicity and
to increase data rate and storage density. Using cantilevers with heaters, thermo
mechanical recording at 30 Gb/in.2 storage density and data rates of a few Mb/s for
reading and 100 Kb/s for writing have been demonstrated.
The AFM consists of a microscale cantilever with a sharp tip (probe) at its
end that is used to scan the specimen surface. The cantilever is typically silicon or silicon
nitride with a tip radius of curvature on the order of nanometers. When the tip is brought
into proximity of a sample surface, forces between the tip and the sample lead to a
deflection of the cantilever according to Hooke's law. Depending on the situation, forces
that are measured in AFM include mechanical contact force, Van der Waals forces,
capillary forces, chemical bonding, electrostatic forces, magnetic forces (see Magnetic
force microscope (MFM)), Casimir forces, solvation forces etc. As well as force,
additional quantities may simultaneously be measured through the use of specialized
types of probe (see Scanning thermal microscopy, photothermal microspectroscopy, etc.).
Typically, the deflection is measured using a laser spot reflected from the top of the
cantilever into an array of photodiodes. Other methods that are used include optical
interferometry, capacitive sensing or piezoresistive AFM cantilevers. These cantilevers
are fabricated with piezoresistive elements that act as a strain gauge. Using a Wheatstone
bridge, strain in the AFM cantilever due to deflection can be measured, but this method is
not as sensitive as laser deflection or interferometry.
Figure 2.1
To accomplish a read, the probe tip is heated to around 300 °C and moved
in proximity to the data sled. If the probe is located over a pit the cantilever will push it
into the hole, increasing the surface area in contact with the sled, and in turn increasing
the cooling as heat leaks into the sled from the probe. In the case where there is no pit at
that location, only the very tip of the probe remains in contact with the sled, and the heat
leaks away more slowly. The electrical resistance of the probe is a function of its
temperature, rising with increasing temperature. Thus when the probe drops into a pit and
cools, this registers as a drop in resistance. A low resistance will be translated to a "1" bit,
or a "0" bit otherwise. While reading an entire storage field, the tip is dragged over the
entire surface and the resistance changes are constantly monitored.
Imaging and reading are done using a new thermo mechanical sensing
concept. The heater cantilever originally used only for writing was given the additional
function of a thermal readback sensor by exploiting its temperature-dependent resistance.
The resistance (R) increases nonlinearly with heating power/temperature from room
temperature to a peak value of 500-700°C. The peak temperature is determined by the
doping concentration of the heater platform, which ranges from 1 × 1017 to 2 × 1018.
Above the peak temperature, the resistance drops as the number of intrinsic carriers
increases because of thermal excitation.
Figure 2.2
To write a bit, the tip of the probe is heated to a temperature above the
glass transition temperature of the polymer used to manufacture the data sled, which is
generally acrylic glass. In this case the transition temperature is around 400 °C. To write
a "1", the polymer in proximity to the tip is softened, and then the tip is gently touched to
it, causing a dent. To erase the bit and return it to the zero state, the tip is instead pulled
up from the surface, allowing surface tension to pull the surface flat again. Older
experimental systems used a variety of erasure techniques that were generally more time
consuming and less successful. These older systems offered around 100,000 erases, but
the available references do not contain enough information to say if this has been
improved with the newer technique.
transfer from the tip to the polymer through the small contact area is very poor,
improving as the contact area increases. This means that the tip must be heated to a
relatively high temperature (about 400°C) to initiate the melting process.
Figure 2.3
Once melting has commenced, the tip is pressed into the polymer, which
increases the heat transfer to the polymer, increases the volume of melted polymer, and
hence increases the bit size. Our rough estimates indicate that at the beginning of the
writing process only about 0.2% of the heating power is used in the very small contact
zone (1040 nm2) to melt the polymer locally, whereas about 80% is lost through the
cantilever legs to the chip body and about 20% is radiated from the heater platform
through the air gap to the medium/substrate. After melting has started and the contact
area has increased, the heating power available for generating the indentations increases
by at least ten times to become 2% or more of the total heating power. With this highly
nonlinear heat-transfer mechanism, it is very difficult to achieve small tip penetration and
thus small bit sizes, as well as to control and reproduce the thermo mechanical writing
process.
This situation can be improved if the thermal conductivity of the substrate
is increased, and if the depth of tip penetration is limited. We have explored the use of
very thin polymer layers deposited on Si substrates to improve these characteristics.
The hard Si substrate prevents the tip from penetrating farther than the
film thickness allows, and it enables more rapid transport of heat away from the heated
region because Si is a much better conductor of heat than the polymer. We have coated Si
substrates with a 40-nm film of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) and achieved bit sizes
ranging between 10 and 50 nm. However, we noticed increased tip wear, probably caused
by the contact between Si tip and Si substrate during writing. We therefore introduced a
70-nm layer of cross-linked photoresist (SU-8) between the Si substrate and the PMMA
film to act as a softer penetration stop that avoids tip wear but remains thermally stable.
As a first step, a 5 × 5 array chip was designed and fabricated to test the
basic Millipede concept. All 25 cantilevers had integrated tip heating for thermo
mechanical writing and piezoresistive deflection sensing for read-back. No time-
multiplexing addressing scheme was used for this test vehicle; rather, each cantilever was
individually addressable for both thermo mechanical writing and piezoresistive deflection
sensing. A complete resistive bridge for integrated detection has also been incorporated
for each cantilever. The chip has been used to demonstrate x/y/z scanning and
approaching of the entire array, as well as parallel operation for imaging. This was the
first parallel imaging by a 2D AFM array chip with integrated piezoresistive deflection
sensing.
be avoided to eliminate electro migration and cantilever deflection due to bimorph effects
while heating.
The tip height should be as small as possible because the heater platform
sensitivity depends strongly on the distance between the platform and the medium. This
contradicts the requirement of a large gap between the chip surface and the storage
medium to ensure that only the tips, and not the chip surface, are making contact with the
medium. Instead of making the tips longer, we purposely bent the cantilevers a few
micrometers out of the chip plane by depositing a stress-controlled plasma-enhanced
chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) silicon-nitride layer at the base of the cantilever.
This bending as well as the tip height must be well controlled in order to maintain an
equal loading force for all cantilevers of an array.
The array's independent cantilevers, which are located in the four corners
of the array and used for approaching and leveling of chip and storage medium, are used
to initially characterize the interconnected array cantilevers. Additional cantilever test
structures are distributed over the wafer; they are equivalent to but independent of the
array cantilevers. In the low-power, low-temperature regime, silicon mobility is affected
by phonon scattering, which depends on temperature, whereas at higher power the
intrinsic temperature of the semiconductor is reached, resulting in a resistivity drop due to
the increasing number of carriers.
The cantilevers within the array are electrically isolated from one another
by integrated Schottky diodes. The tip-apex height uniformity within an array is very
important because it determines the force of each cantilever while in contact with the
medium and hence influences write/read performance as well as medium and tip wear.
Wear investigations suggest that a tip-apex height uniformity across the chip of less than
500 nm is required, with the exact number depending on the spring constant of the
cantilever. In the case of the Millipede, the tip-apex height is determined by the tip height
and the cantilever bending.
3. FEATURES
Table 3.1
4. APPLICATIONS
Millipede systems can be used for micro drives, which will feature very
small form factor, enabling use in small footprint devices like watches, mobile phones
and personal media systems, and at the same time provide high capacity. The very high
data density of Millipede systems makes them a very good candidate to be put to this use.
The array chip with integrated or hybrid electronics and the micro
magnetic scanner are key elements demonstrated for a Millipede -based device called
Nanodrive, which is of course also very interesting for audio and video consumer
applications. All-silicon, batch fabrication, low-cost polymer media, and low power
consumption make Millipede very attractive as a centimeter- or even millimeter-sized
gigabyte storage system.
The potential for very high areal density renders the Millipede also very
attractive for high-end terabit storage systems. As mentioned, terabit capacity can be
achieved with three Millipede-based approaches:
1) Very large arrays,
2) Many smaller arrays operating in parallel, and
3) Displacement of small/medium-sized arrays over large media.
Although the fabrication of considerably larger arrays (105 to 106
cantilevers) appears to be possible, control of the thermal linear expansion will pose a
considerable challenge as the array chip becomes significantly larger. The second
approach is appealing because the storage system can be upgraded to fulfill application
requirements in a modular fashion by operating many smaller Millipede units in parallel.
The operation of the third approach was described above with the example of a modified
hard disk. This approach combines the advantage of smaller arrays with the displacement
of the entire array chip, as well as repositioning of the polymer-coated disk to a new
storage location on the disk. A storage capacity of several terabits appears to be
achievable on 2.5- and 3.5-in. disks. In addition, this approach is an interesting synergy
of existing, reliable (hard-disk drive) and new (Millipede) technologies.
The Millipede system provides high data density, low seek times, low
power consumption and, probably, high reliability. These features make them candidates
for building high capacity hard drives, with storage capacity in the range of terabytes.
Although the data density of a Millipede is high, the capacity of an individual device is
expected to be relatively low -- on the order of single gigabytes. Thus replacing hard a
drive probably requires economically collecting around 100 Millipede devices into a
single enclosure.
6. ONGOING DEVELOPMENTS
For the first time, it has fabricated and operated large 2D AFM arrays for
thermo mechanical data storage in thin polymer media. In doing so, it has demonstrated
key milestones of the Millipede storage concept. The 400 - 500-Gb/in.2 storage density
we have demonstrated with single cantilevers is among the highest reported so far. The
initial densities of 100 - 200 Gb/in.2 achieved with the 32 × 32 array are very
encouraging, with the potential of matching those of single cantilevers. Well-controlled
processing techniques have been developed to fabricate array chips with good yield and
uniformity. This VLSINEMS chip has the potential to open up new perspectives in many
other applications of scanning probe techniques as well. Millipede is not limited to
storage applications or polymer media. The concept is very general if the required
functionality can be integrated on the cantilever/tip. This of course applies also to any
other storage medium, including magnetic ones, making Millipede a possible universal
parallel write/read head for future storage systems. Besides storage, other Millipede
applications can be envisioned for large-area, high-speed imaging and high-throughput
nanoscalelithography, as well as for atomic and molecular manipulation and
modifications.
• Overall system reliability, including bit stability, tip and medium wear,
erasing/rewriting.
• Limits of data rate (S/N ratio), areal density, array and cantilever size.
• CMOS integration.
• Optimization of write/read multiplexing scheme.
• Array-chip tracking.
If the Millipede is used, for example, as an imaging device, let us say for
quality control in silicon chip fabrication, the amount of information it can generate is so
huge that it is difficult to transmit these data to a computer to store and process them.
Furthermore, most of the data are not of interest at all, so it would make sense if only the
pertinent parts were predigested by the specialized smart Millipede and then transmitted.
For this purpose, communication between the cantilevers is helpful because a certain
local pattern detected by a single tip can mean something in one context and something
else or even nothing in another context. The context might be derived from the patterns
observed by other tips. A similar philosophy could apply to the Millipede as a storage
device. A smart Millipede could possibly find useful pieces of information very quickly
by a built-in complex pattern recognition ability, e.g., by ignoring information when
certain bit patterns occur within the array. The bit patterns are recognized instantaneously
by logical interconnections of the cantilevers.
7. CONCLUSION
Millipede uses thousands of tiny sharp points (hence the name) to punch
holes into a thin plastic film. Each of the 10-nanometer holes represents a single bit. The
pattern of indentations is a digitized version of the data. According to IBM, Millipede can
be thought of as a nanotechnology version of the punch card data processing technology
developed in the late 19th century. However, there are significant differences: Millipede
is rewritable, and it may eventually enable storage of over 1.5 GB of data in a space no
larger than a single hole in the punch card. Storage devices based on IBM's technology
can be made with existing manufacturing techniques, so they will not be expensive to
make. According to Peter Vettiger, head of the Millipede project, "There is not a single
step in fabrication that needs to be invented." Vettiger predicts that a nano-storage device
based on IBM's technology could be available as early as 2009.
8. REFERENCES
1. www.research.ibm.com/journal/rd/443/vettiger.html
2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_Millipede
3. www.domino.research.ibm.com/comm/pr.nsf/pages/rsc.millipede.html
4. www.news.zdnet.co.uk/hardware/0,1000000091,39191254,00.htm
5. www.news.cnet.com/Photos-IBMs-Millipede-packs-
apunch/20091015_35615611.html
6. www.searchstorage.techtarget.com/sDefinition/0,,sid5_gci966197,00.html