IT Act Changes PDF
IT Act Changes PDF
To
All Addl. Central P.F Commissioners(Zones)
All Regional P.F Commissioners (Regions)
All Regional P.F Commissioner s-II/ Officer Incharge,SROs
Sir,
2. The CBT in its 176th meting has approved progressive changes in processing
the grant of exemption so as to facilitate the field offices to expeditiously dispose of
the applications seeking exemption under Section 17 of the Act. The major changes
approved are:
1 of 7
ix. Exemption from Employees’ Pension Scheme, 1995 to establishments
running pension schemes with benefits equal to or better than that available
under the Central/State Government.
Modalities on implementing the decision of 2(iv) (vi) and (vii) will be communicated
separately. Rest of the decisions shall be implemented strictly following the
guidelines below:
3. The Board has also approved the following changes in the procedure for
scrutinizing the applications.
ii. Three copies of PF Trust Rules duly signed by all the trustees
indicating their status in the Trust.
iii. Certificates of undertakings by the employer to abide by the Condition
No.22 and Condition No.23 of appendix ‘A’ to Para 27AA as per
prescribed proforma.
iv. Comparison of benefits under the PF Trust Rules vis-à-vis the benefits
available under the EPF Scheme, 1952 in the prescribed proforma.
2 of 7
v. Names and addresses of all the members of the Board of Trustees.
In addition, the following check points and mandatory requirements shall be verified
and certified by the RC recommending the grant of exemption. The RPFC shall also
forward alongwith all the proposal a certificate as reproduced below confirming these
mandatory requirements.
“Certified that the book of accounts of the establishment and the Trust Fund are
subjected to compliance audit and it is certified that:
3 of 7
g) The establishment has been enjoying relaxation/deemd
exemption for the period from to
and the investment by the trust during the period of
enjoyment of relaxation/deemed exemption is as per the pattern
of investment prescribed from time to time and the sanctions are
held strictly as per the guidelines issued.
4 of 7
5. Consequent on the approval of the above revised procedure by the Central
Board of Trustees henceforth all application received in the SROs headed by RPFC-
II shall be directly forwarded to Head Office with appropriate certification and
recommendation by the RPFC-II, incharge of the Office. The proposal received in
the offices headed by APFC and Reginal Office shall continue to be forwarded
through Regional Offices with the recommendation of RC-I, Incharge of the region.
6. It is also decided that the comparison of the benefits available under the
proposed rules vis-à-vis the statutory Schemes are done strictly by adhering to the
requirement of Section 17 of the Act which specifically state that the exemption is
permissible when the establishment proposed to provide benefits on the whole not
less favourable to the employees than the benefits available to them under the EPF
Scheme. Considering this position, it is sufficient that if the RPFC confirm that the
Trust rules satisfy the requirements of the parameters provided in the Act and
adoption model rules verbatim is not to be insisted. It is reiterated that:
It should also be made clear to the establishment that even after obtaining
exemption under Para 27A of the EPF Scheme the responsibility for compliance in
respect of employees employer indirectly, either through contractor or outsourcing,
lies squarely with the principal employer and even in respect of all default committed
5 of 7
by the contractors who are enrolled separately or independently the principal
employer is liable for all consequences.
8, Review of the proposal received in Head Office had revealed that there exist
substantial interval period between the date of coverage and the date from which
exemption is sought and recommended and the date on which rules are approved.
In majority of the cases right from the date of coverage the establishment is
maintaining the Trust and the contributions are transferred to Trust only. Even in
such cases without attempting regularization of the period for which the contributions
are not received in the respective field offices, proposal are recommended for
issuing notification granting exemption from a prospective date. It is needless to say
that in all cases wherein the establishment did not comply with as an unexempted
establishment we are required to either regularize the exemption status enjoyed or
impose the consequences of not complying with RPFC as an unexempted
establishment. It need to be appreciated that all cases wherein the Trust was being
administered and the compliance by the establishment in transferring the
contributions to the Trust and the management of the fund including investment of
the corpus was proper, treating such units as unexempted unit will have the
consequence of imposing the penal provisions of the EPF Act and the Schemes. No
doubt, the law requires that, an establishments until such time it is notified for
permitting exemption or until such time it is permitted to maintain the Trust by orders
issued under Para 79, is required to file compliance with the respective field offices.
It may also be recalled that vide circular letter No.E.III/Misc./2000 dated 24.5.2000,
we have permitted establishments to enjoy a deemed exemption status and this
facility was later withdrawn vide letter of even no. dated 3.8.2000. However, no
steps were taken by the RPFCs to take over the Trust funds and obtain compliance
as unexempted units from these units considering the fact that we are having large
number of establishment which were not complying as unexempted establishments
and continued to enjoy the status of deemed exemption and was maintaining the
Trust funds, steps shall immediately be taken to regularise such Trusts by
permitting exemption from the respective date from which the establishment has
managed the Trusts, either from the date of coverage or thereafter. The RPFC,
Incharge of the Region shall immediately review all such cases and confirm the
status of each of the pending cases and make specific recommendation for
regularizing such compliance from the date from which exemption is sought.
(a) The RPFC shall specifically state and certify as to whether he has verified
the accounts of the establishment during the period for which the
establishment has maintained the Trust funds before the date of
recommendation and the violations noticed was rectified. The cases
which failed to rectify the violations should be recommended for rejection
of request for grant of exemption and the funds should be taken over by
the RC. Logically liability for all the consequences of non compliance by
establishment as an unexempted unit will have to follow. This may
6 of 7
however be invoked only in cases wherein violation could not be rectified
and made good by the employers.
10. It is also reiterated that the possible surge of application expected from the
hitherto excluded trust to obtain exemption under Section 17/Para 27A provides an
opportunity to the Orgnaisation in regulating all the PF Trust in the country. The
Field office should therefore gear up their activities to meet this challenge and
demanding situation with total accountability and ensuring that the accountability
percolates down the line. The deadline for obtaining exemption notified being, is
31.3.2007, the Zonal ACCs and RC-I Incharge of the Regions shall draw action plan
for each of the office under their charge after assessing ground reality and estimated
number of establishment likely to apply for obtaining exemption. The zonal ACC
shall monitor the implementation of these instructions and ensure that all the cases
which are pending in the respective offices under their charge are forwarded to Head
Office within 15 days of the proposals are received in the field offices.
Yours faithfully,
Sd/-
( N.A. NAIR)
REGIOAL P.F. COMMISSIONER (EXEMPTION)
FOR CENTRAL P.F. COMMISSIONER
7 of 7